• Pages

  • CONTACT ED RIVERA
  • IMPEACHMENT OF GEORGE W. BUSH REQUIRED TO END HIS POLICIES
  • LETTER TO CAPTIVES
  • REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

• Recent Posts

  • FREEMASONRY’S BLOODLESS COUP THAT PUT AMERICA UNDER MILITARY LAW
  • PROPER TEA TAX TEA PARTY: YOUR CHOICE NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION OR UNLIMITED TAXATION WITH REPRESENTATION
  • WHY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DO NOT READ BILLS BEFORE THEY VOTE
  • THE TWO CONGRESSES: THE UNITED STATES, IN CONGRESS ASSEMBLED & THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES
  • WHAT MASONIC SECRET DID GEORGE WASHINGTON AND THE MASONS HIDE IN THE CONSTITUTION?

• Categories

  • Articles of Confederation
  • BAIL OUT
  • BANKRUPTCY
  • CENSUS
  • CIVIL CONTEMPT
  • COMMON LAW
  • CONGRESS
  • CONSTITUTION
  • CRIMINAL LAW
  • Declaration of Independence
  • Economic Stimulous
  • Electoral College
  • Foreclosure
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • GAY MARRIAGE
  • GRAND JURY
  • IMMIGRATION
  • IMPEACHMENT
  • JURY DUTY
  • LAW OF THE LAND
  • LEARNING THE LAW
  • LIBERTARIAN
  • Martial Law
  • MAYAN 2012
  • Northwest Ordinance
  • Oath of Office
  • OBAMA
  • ORGANIC LAWS
  • PARDON
  • Presidential Elector
  • PRESIDENTS
  • ProperTea Tax Tea Party
  • Property Taxes
  • Second Amendment
  • State of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • U.S. District Court
  • Uncategorized

• Archives

  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008

• Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

On April 30, 1789, when the sun was at its zenith and all eyes and ears were focused on the President Elect, George Washington took an oral oath to become Masonic Dictator and Commander in Chief of the United States.  Secretly implanted in the Constitution of September 17, 1787, this oath, when whispered by Washington, right hand raised and his left hand resting on a Masonic Bible, bound the States to Masonic law, while leaving Washington and the Masons free to build a government based on their Masonic beliefs.

Article VII of the Constitution provided that ratification by nine States shall be “sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States that had ratifying the Same.”  Masonic military rule began on June 21, 1788, when the State of New Hampshire satisfied Article VII by becoming the ninth State to ratify the Constitution.  Within days the State of Virginia would also ratify and by the next month the State of New York would be part of the “more perfect Union.”  The first Union created by the Articles of Confederation allowed the Masons little power.  With eleven States bound to the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and to the written “Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof,” all that remained for the Masons was a switch from an oath “to support this Constitution” to one supporting Masonic beliefs.

That switch came on the day set for the inauguration of the President of the United States, George Washington delivered America to the Masons by taking the following oral oath:

“I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”  “So help me God.”

A tall man, Washington then lowered his large frame and kissed the Masonic Bible upon which he had taken the only oath he would take as President of the United States, President of the United States of America, Commander in Chief and the first Masonic Dictator in America.

George Washington had switched from the Article VI oath, which required the person who took it to also subscribe his name, so that there would be a written record of his promise “to support this Constitution.”   Washington took an oral oath and refused “to support this Constitution,” by having Masons in the States elect him to the Office of President before he or any other person could qualify for that Office.  The Office of President required 14 years residency within the United States, which could not be met until after July 4, 1790.  The Office of President of the United States has no qualifications and no definite term and the Articles of Confederation requires no oath for the President of the United States of America.

The holders of legislative power, Congress of the United States and President of the United States, conspired to complete the bloodless coup by having all participants in American government swear an oath to the Masonic Constitution enacted as the first act of the First Congress.  The Constitution of September 17, 1787, had by then, been ratified by eleven of the original thirteen States, no President then and no President since has taken and subscribed the Article VI oath “to support this Constitution.” 

The Constitution of the United States is not a written document, so Washington’s spoken promise to “preserve, protect and defend” was only intended to enable the switch in oaths.  Washington’s oral oath is insufficient to bind him to the Constitution of September 17, 1787, which is a written document requiring a subscribed oath in order for it to be supported.  The written Constitution, so revered by the uninformed, remains an orphan for lack of any true support by the so-called government.  The States have ratified it in writing, but any subscribed oaths taken in the States will only support the Constitution of the United States, which will be written by George Washington and the Masons in Congress.

George Washington was a more likely God Father of his country, the Masons the wise guys and Freemasonry their code of conduct.   I need students to research and investigate further the secret role the Masons have played in American law, history and government.  To become a student, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera          

If there are two Congresses, it must follow that you have your choice of two Unions: perpetual or more perfect.  If you pick the perpetual “firm league of friendship” of the Articles of Confederation and the United States of America, you get no representation, because the style of the United States of America is a Confederacy, which is an organization of States not people.  The Articles of Confederation operates on States, but only to the degree that leaves them with their: sovereignty, freedom and independence, which means no taxation.  If you pick the more perfect Union of the United States, you can vote for an Elector pledged to a certain President of the United States, a Representative and two Senators, but you may have to pay taxes.

The Constitution of the United States makes the case for a Union more perfect than the one created by the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, by integrating the Articles of Confederation and Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 into a new Organic Law called “this Constitution for the United States of America.”  The Confederacy of the United States of America then uses “this Constitution” to create a Constitution of the United States for the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America and Washington, D. C.

The basis for federal taxation is found in the second half of Article I Section 2 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787:

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative; and until such enumerations shall be made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New-York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three.

When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies.

 

    The House of Representatives shall chuse their speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.       

 

The Representatives and direct taxes which shall be apportioned by “a Congress of the United States” are limited to the several States, which were originally created by the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787.  The States of the Northwest Territory, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota are the several States of “this Union.”  The Congress of the United States has legislative power only over the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. 

Ratification of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 by the original thirteen States is the authorization needed to create a State within a State.  The nine State ratification required by Article VII of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 satisfies Article IX of the Articles of Confederation with respect to the creation of a Committee of the States, henceforward to be called the Senate. 

What happened to the original thirteen States and the perpetual Union?  It, of course, still exists that’s what perpetual means.  The Union of the United States of America can be revived any time any of the 50 States of the perpetual Union decide against secession and return to the Organic Law.

If you are reading this post and wondering, “what is this guy talking about,” you haven’t read all the posts and you haven’t enrolled as a student.  You cannot become the second World’s Greatest Legal Mind without a teacher.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera         

By now it is widely known that not one member in Congress knows exactly what is contained in the Bills that are put to a vote and that is just the way they all want it.  The media reports that not one member has read and understands any of the Bills that have passed the Senate and House of Representatives.  No member claims full knowledge of what is contained in Bills because every member of Congress wants to avoid the responsibility of knowledge of the system that created these Bills. 

Before there were law schools, lawyers and attorneys learned the law by reading about it.  Today, law is taught by having law students read opinions of judges and justices who have decided certain cases.   As the truth about the origin of written law is revealed, members of legislatures are beginning to realize how vulnerable they are to increasing public scrutiny.

As legislation continues to become more complex and downright harmful, legislators will become increasingly defensive about their responsibility for the consequences of the legislative process.  They are denying responsibility now because legislation is complex.  It cannot get simpler and transparent, because that would reveal its limited territorial application.

Members of Congress can only know less about how and why they vote as they do.  Those who read and understand these posts will be in a superior position to discount federal legislation as limited to territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  Those who become my students now will avoid the hardships involved in going down with the doomed ship of State.  Enroll now by contacting me a edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera   

Everyone, who follows American politics has special thoughts and cute pet names for the Congress that enacts laws that not one member has completely read.  Has anyone given any thought to the strange history of the bizarre groups of men and women that have made up the various American Congresses?  In this post, I discuss the transformation of the oldest, the United States, in Congress assembled, into “the Senate;” the newest Congress is now called the 111^th, which unlike the Senate adjourns every two years, thus, revealing its inherently temporary nature. 

The word “Congress” appears in each of the four documents that make up the Organic Law of the United States of America, but what was a “Congress” before there was a 4^th of July, a Confederacy called United States of America, the Northwest Territory or the Constitution of the United States?

In international law, a congress is an assembly of envoys, commissioners or deputies from different sovereignties who meet to make plans and reach agreements.  This definition certainly describes accurately the Congress of the Articles of Confederation, as the thirteen States considered themselves, to be, in the words and style of the Declaration of Independence, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES.

Article II of the Articles of Confederation makes certain that the Confederate States of the United States of America remain confederate and not federal:

Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled. 

The Articles of Confederation were proposed to the original thirteen States just after the signing of the Declaration of Independence.  Virginia on December 16, 1777 became the first State to ratify the Articles and, when finally ratified by Maryland, the thirteenth State on March 1, 1781, all the States had agreed “that the articles thereof shall be inviolably observed by the states we respectively represent, and that the union shall be perpetual.”

Perpetuity lasted until the spring of 1787, when on May 25^th George Washington convened the secret meeting of the Constitutional Convention that would initiate the false reports of the replacement of the Articles of Confederation by a new Constitution.  By the summer of 1787, the Continental Congress had already ordained the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and repealed the Northwest Ordinance of April 23, 1784, thereby creating the Continental United States.  By the fall of 1787, Mason George Washington could, “By the unanimous Order of the Convention,” of the twelve States participating present the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and resolve that it be laid before the United States in Congress assembled for later submission to the States for ratification.

The secrecy of the Constitutional Convention was so effective it permitted the claim to be made and accepted that the Articles of Confederation were to be superceded by the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and that ratification by just nine States would create, in the words of Mason Benjamin Franklin, “a Republic.”  A Roman Republic was, indeed, created with George Washington as Dictator.

When the dust final settles, ratification by the ninth State, New Hampshire, on June 21, 1788 was sufficient to create a Committee of States pursuant to Article IX of the Articles of Confederation that will become “the Senate,” when it acts alone and “a Senate,” when together with the House of Representatives it becomes the Congress of the United States.   

Because only one third of the Senate is elected every two years, the Senate is always in session and continues to act as the “United States, in Congress assembled,” pursuant to the authority of the Articles of Confederation.

The Constitution of September 17, 1787 creates in Article I Section 1 “a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives,” which can only mean that this Congress of the United States is a Congress in addition to the United States, in Congress assembled.  This Congress, consisting of a Senate and House of Representatives has been vested with all the legislative powers herein granted, meaning the legislative powers ordained in the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 by the Continental Congress were now ratified by the States, as to any territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America in the ratifying State.

Compared to George Washington’s duplicity in the taking of the oath of Office of the President of the United States the scheming in setting up the Congress of the United States is many times more complicated.  I have only touched on the highlights.  I urge interested students to join me in the continued study of a disreputable institution that daily spins out of control.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com to enroll in the only school that has exposed the Congress of the United States for what it is.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera   

The Masons are an occult society and like all secret societies they are parasitic to their  larger host, which must be denied access to the society’s secrets.  The public Masons claim to revere wisdom and enlightenment, but what they secretly worship is the secrecy of certain powerful knowledge.  To a secret society, wisdom and enlightenment is of no value, if everyone has it and that is where the evil in the Masons can be found.

In America, the Masons have achieved their highest level of secrecy by hiding the ultimate in political power in the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  Secret societies use stealth and subversion to hide their real motive, which is the acquisition and the manipulation of power for the personal benefit of their members.  George Washington was a Mason and he used that secret society’s clandestine methods to take over the government in America for the personal benefit of his fellow Masons.

I won’t go into the details of the Masonic imprint on Washington, D. C.  and the federal government; it is too obvious to dismiss.  After George Washington takes power, the entire city is erected according to a Masonic building code.  The dollar bill, which has not gotten a design makeover, pictures the world’s most famous Mason on one side and is full of Masonic symbols and mottos on the other.  The Masonic trappings of the federal government are no secret how the Masons took power is revealed here. 

The definitive proof of the Masonic takeover of government is found in the document called the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  This is the document produced by the secret Constitutional Convention whose presiding officer was George Washington himself.  Planted throughout the Constitution are countless clues to its real meaning.  Washington and the other Mason concealed these clues in plain sight for any Mason of the highest degree to see, but which have remained invisible to non-Masons.

We start with the oral oath George Washington took at noon on April 30, 1789, because the oral oath is the key that has locked the clues within the Constitution, when he takes the oath the Masonic secrets of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 are locked up tight.  Everyone should know that an oral oath is insufficient in law to support adherence and obedience to a written document such as the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  The manner and means by which this was done was the prime Masonic secret that Washington carried to his grave.  Washington took this oath in a whispered voice, while his left hand rested on a Masonic Bible borrowed from a nearby Masonic Lodge:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Washington added: “So help me God” to the oral oath to make it absolutely clear that he was marking the Office of President of the United States, as the beginning a new order of the ages, which is what it has turned out to be.  Article VI Clause 3 of the Constitution prohibits test oaths, and here we have George Washington swearing an oath to a Masonic god and nobody gets it.  April 30, 1789 was a day of celebration and apparently everyone but the Masons had turned their brains off for the inaugural.  Americans had just lost their freedom and they were cheering. 

By taking this oral oath rather than the written one required by Article VI, Mason George Washington was able take control of the federal government on behalf of the Masons.  Washington’s taking of an oral oath left no profound memories that he had just stolen government for the price of a few whispers.  

 

To this day, everyone believes that taking of an oral in front of witnesses is as binding as taking the oath and then subscribing a printed copy of the oath orally taken; an oral oath remains oral no matter how many witnesses there may be to its taking.  That millions of people saw and heard Barack Hussein Obama take an oral oath does not change the oath in any way.  The oral oath of Office of President of the United States remains a secret Masonic oath, because only I, a few of my students and some Masons of the highest degree know the secret.  Masonic influence over government and the news media of that time and the present has been able to squelch any and all accounts of what George Washington and all his successors had done.  Without this Masonic influence, George Washington, if caught, could have been hung for treason.

How else does the Constitution of September 17, 1787 prove that the oath of the Office of President of the United States creates in reality a secret Masonic Officer?  Hidden throughout the Constitution are the clues that prove that the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 Office of President was to be a non-Masonic President, if the Masonic Architect God George Washington called on for help, did not favor the Masonic takeover of the federal government.

George Washington was able to fool the Americans that had assembled to witness his inaugural, so the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 Office of President has forever remained vacant.  The hidden clues that prove the Office of President of the United States was created as Masonic Office for George Washington, also, prove that the Office of President is the legitimate Office of President under the authority of a yet to be adopted Constitution of September 17, 1787.  Some, but not all the clues are listed below:

1.      Article I Section 1 clearly establishes that “all legislative” powers granted are vested in “a” Congress of the United States meaning that there is to be more than one Congress and that there will be no sharing of legislative power; the President and Vice President of the United States are legislative Officers.

2.      Article I Section 3 Clause 4 makes the Vice President of the United States a legislative Officer by imposing the duty of being President of the Senate and requiring him to break a tie vote.

3.      Article I Section 3 Clause 5 confirms that the Vice President of the United States is a legislative Officer by making provision that a legislative Officer replace an absent Vice President.

4.      Article I Section 3 Clause 6 subjects the President of the United States to impeachment for no reason or any reason, provided the Chief Justice presides; the imposition of a legislative function on the Chief Justice makes that office legislative and the oral oath of the President of the United States makes that Office at will employment subject to the termination by the Congress employer.

5.      Article I Section 7 Clause 2 imposes on the President of the United States the legislative duties of approving, signing or returning Bills with his objections making him a legislative Officer to be consistent with Article I Section 1.    

6.      Article I Section 8 Clause 1 grants Congress the power to lay and collect taxes, so it needs the President of the United States to collect the taxes it lays.

7.      Article I Section 8 Clause 17 grants Congress exclusive legislative power, however, it needs the usurped power of the President of the United States to extend this legislative power outside of territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.

8.      Article II Section 1 Clause 1 vests the executive power in “a President of the United States of America” not “the President of the United States;” who hold his Office for four years, while no term is specified for the President of the United States.

9.      Article II Section 1 Clause 5 makes fourteen years residency within the United States a condition of eligibility to the Office of President, which cannot be met until after July 4, 1790, making George Washington ineligible to the Office of President.

10.  Article II Section 1 Clause 7 provides compensation, which can’t be raised or reduced, for the person who holds the Office of President; George Washington refused pay in his inaugural address, so that receipt of compensation would not be interpreted as acceptance of the Office of President for which he was not qualified.

11.  Article II Section 1 Clause 8 is an employment oath that can’t bind the President of the United States “to support this Constitution.”    

12.  Article II Section 2 Clause 1, 2 & 3 refer to the President of the United States of America not the President of the United States.

13.  Article II Section 3 refers to the President of the United States of America not the President of the United States.

14.  Article II Section 4 provides for the removal from Office by impeachment of the President, whose eligibility is described in Article II Section 1 Clause 5, the Vice President identified in Article II Section 1 Clause 1 and all civil Officers of the United States, for convictions of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

15.  Article VI Clause 3 requires “all executive” Officers to be bound by Oath or Affirmation “to support this Constitution;” George Washington’s oral oath prevented the adoption of “this Constitution.”

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera           

   

The various interpretations of the Constitution can all be easily found on the Internet just by doing a word search on “constitutional interpretation.”  Accepting that anyone of those many interpretations is a correct one would be a monunental mistake. 

The U.S. Constitution can be so many things to as many people, because George Washington’s taking of the oral oath of Office of President of the United States acts as a rejection of the written Constitution of September 17, 1787.  This failure to adopt the written Constitution permits the substitution of the indefinite Constitution of the United States in all subsequent oaths taken by everyone in all American governments.    

The acceptance of George Washington as President of the United States without objection permitted the creation of a form of government that is made on the fly by the Congress of the United States, a President of the United States and a Supreme Court appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate of the United States.

The United States Constitution, as appropriate as it might be for the territory and other property belonging to the United States of America, is totally inappropriate for the inhabitants of free American states, as current events make clear.  The ratification of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 by State convention was supposed to cause the people of the states to believe they were submitting to the newly stated authority of a federal government.  The Amendments to the Constitution of the United States adopted by Washington’s oral oath undoubtedly caused many to believe the guarantees of the basic rights of the people meant the Constitution of the United States now was law for people.

The Constitution of September 17, 1787 is short and the Constitution of the United States is so short it is really no more than a title for what the Congress and President of the United States will create from whole cloth with the assistance of the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the legislative Supreme Court.  The creation of a written Constitution from just the title: Constitution of the United States has resulted in what is now called the U.S. Constitution.  To explain the wholesale reconstruction of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, the U.S. Constitution is termed a Living Constitution. 

There is no Living Constitution.  The U.S. Constitution, aka the “Constitution of the United States,” was born not as a blueprint for the structure of a government, but as an inventory of the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  Washington was elected to be President of the United States of America under the Articles of Confederation and to the Office of President, for which he was ineligible until after July 4, 1790.  When no one noticed that George Washington had become a Roman Dictator of an imaginary republic, Congress and Washington proceeded with the creation of a new political State to be known as the United States.   Governments use the Constitution of September 17, 1787 as a diversion.  Government critics constantly scream the unconstitutionality of this or that government action never realizing that there is no Constitution.

The only right way to interpret a constitution is to credit each and every part and to account for each mandate contained in the document and when that is done to the Constitution of September 17, 1787, the written vanishes and a poser Constitution pops up.  There are three oaths in the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  When the Senate sits to try an Impeachment, they shall be “on Oath or Affirmation,” according to Article I Section 3 Clause 6.  Article II Section 1 Clause 8 requires that the President of the United States “take the following Oath or Affirmation.”  Finally, the third oath, Article VI Section 3, requires that the legislative, “and all executive and judicial Officers of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution.”   No one has realized till now that an oral oath particularly the one taken by the President of the United States has anything to do with a written constitution like the Constitution of September 17, 1787.    

The Constitution requires the President of the United States to take an “Oath or Affirmation,” that does not specifically bind him “to support this Constitution,” while in Article VI Clause 3 all legislative, executive and judicial Officers are to be bound “to support this Constitution.”  The differences between these two Oaths and Affirmations make it clear that the Office of President of the United States is just an employment and not a public office.   The President and Vice President of the United States along with the Chief Justice are employees of the legislative branch.

I contend that as the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was never adopted by the subscription of an “Oath or Affirmation” by the First Congress, therefore, it was impossible for someone like George Washington to adopt it by taking the Article VI Clause 3 oath, as George Washington was further disqualified from the Office of President, because he had not resided within the United States for fourteen years something that no one would be able to do until after July 4, 1790.   After that date, Presidents Elect continued to take the oral oath of the Office of President of the United States.  

The absolutely clear language of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 creates an employment in the description of and the acceptance of the Office of President of the United States by the taking of an oral oath.  The equally clear language in Article VI Section 3 that all legislative, executive and judicial Officers shall be bound by “Oath or Affirmation” “to support this Constitution” makes the Constitution of September 17, 1787 a nullity outside the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.   

 I need students who will help me explore the implications of a federal government and Constitution that is limited to territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  According to the Constitution of the United States, all the crazy spending and legislation coming out of the Congress of the United States can be easily limited to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  Don’t you think you should find out how to keep the federal government on its side of the fence?  Contact me at: edrivera@edrivera.com     

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera 

During campaigns for election to public office politicians make promises they know they cannot keep.  How is it that they keep getting away with this faithlessness?

George Washington set the precedent for dishonesty in American politics by lying about the office he was taking at noon on April 30, 1789.  As Americans watched Washington take the oath and strained to hear him speak, everyone but the politicians believed in his honesty.  When there were no shouts of Treason, at the conclusion of the first presidential inauguration, Washington and his cronies knew they could commence their plunder of the country.

When Washington took the oath of Office of President of the United States, he knew he was taking that oath in order to fool all the Americans who weren’t already in on the government takeover.

George Washington’s promise to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution of the United States created the illusion of a written document that will limit the government, when in truth it is only the initial step in the creation of a political State, where Washington and his cronies will rule everyone else. 

From noon April 30, 1789, the Constitution of the United States has been a work in progress beginning with the territory needed for a new State, later adding the People of the United States and finally creating the mechanism to create law for the territory and People of the United States.

All of it, however, is built on the lie that George Washington took the right oath.  He did not; an oral oath cannot support the performance of the terms of a written document that requires a substantial time.  Article VI of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 requires a subscribed written oath.

Governor of the State of South Carolina, Mark Stanford, and every other holder of a public office in America takes a written oath to support the Constitution of the United States, a document that only begins to take some form when the Chief Justice John Marshall and the Associate Justices claim authority to interpret something that does not even exist.

Politicians can’t keep their promises because their very existence is founded on a lie.  George Washington was a Mason, so when he added: “So help me God” to the oath of Office of President of the United States, it was because Washington believed that God gave him special occult powers.  To learn how you can use the Constitution of September 17, 1787 to prove that George Washington was a very sneaky guy, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera      

According to a former two-time President of the United States, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”  The only credible argument that has been made against that statement is that “I’m” is a contraction of two words, so the statement should read: “The eleven most terrifying words in the English language are, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”    

Well, it is common knowledge that the President of the United States is the executive branch of government, so logic would dictate that President must, also, be a terrifying person.  This most serious condemnation of government employees came from someone who should know¾Ronald Wilson Reagan, the 40^th President of the United States.  Reagan is credited with “terrifying” the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics out of existence.

Ronald Reagan was, of course, not referring to himself as anyone, who terrified United States citizens, he was talking about an employee bureaucrat, someone from the government.  Reagan thought, as almost all citizens of the United States do, that as the head of an entire branch of the government his good intentions made him a good guy. 

We know today that the President of the United States is part of the Congress of the United States, because the Office of President of the United States is part of the legislative branch that administers territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  While Reagan was correct about the government being the problem, he was unaware of his place in it.  Had he known what the first year Ed Rivera Law School student learns he might have had enough spunk to really change government for the better.  The present government is not better it is much worse.

President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama is making government too big to manage, so it will be too big to fail.  If you are a person who just wants to be free of the government, increased confrontations with someone from the government is in your future.  The Barack Hussein Obama Administration is just the beginning of a long drawn out series of terrifying experiences, unless you learn how to put the President of the United States in his place, by firing him and presiding over your own life.

Ronald Reagan was a popular President because he told the truth, as he knew it.  He knew government was the problem even if he didn’t know how to fix it.  He didn’t know that the President of the United States of America made foreign policy under the Articles of Confederation and the Congress and President of the United States made laws only for the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  He didn’t know that the Constitution of the United States referred first to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America and later to a document created by the interpretation by the Congress and President of the United States and a non-judicial Supreme Court.  You can learn all that Ronald Reagan didn’t know and fire the President of the United States by becoming my student.

The present President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama like every other first term President had to hire his own men and women into key positions in his administration of the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  These men and women appointed by the Presidents of the United States and confirmed by the Senate are directly responsible for the employment of the terrifying person from the government intent on helping you lose your freedom. 

 

Firing the President of the United States is supposed to be as easy as firing any other employee who is not working out.  The Constitution of September 17, 1787 calls firing top employees by the fancy name “impeachment,” of which there are two kinds:  easy impeachment of high level employees for practically no reason and difficult impeachment of the President and Vice President under the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of September 17, 1787, “for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”    The President of the United States is subject to easy impeachment because he, the Vice President of the United States and the Chief Justice are the only employees named in the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  As employees, they should be easily replaced. 

The President of the United States can be fired by an Article I Section 3 Clause 6 impeachment for any reason or no reason, as long as the Chief Justice, another employee of Congress, presides at the impeachment trial.  The job of the President of the United States is to administer the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America or in the words of his official oral employee oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

You can easily fire the President of the United States, if you are being terrified by someone claiming: “I’m from the government and I’m here to help,” by enrolling as one of my students.  To start your education, contact me at: edrivera@edrivera.com and then read every post and page on this site.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera      

The Declaration of Independence is not the source of freedom in America that document merely expresses the inherent individual human right to deny consent to be governed by government or any group or person claiming to be a government.  The Declaration of Independence served notice on the head of state of Great Britain that “these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES.”  That piece of paper, a war and a peace treaty made it final, until George Washington became President of the United States.

 George Washington fraudulently put himself at the head of a special kind of stealth Trojan Horse government intended from the beginning to administer property owned by a government that was a Confederacy of those free and independent states.  Washington was the mastermind behind this maliciously brilliant idea of a permanent government for the States of the Northwest Territory temptingly described and palmed off as “ this Constitution for the United States of America.”  Poor naïve Americans to this day believe the Constitution of September 17, 1787 turned the Confederacy, the United States of America, into some kind of representative democracy or democratic republic or similar scheme, where the people vote themselves rich.  Votes were cast and Washington became a Roman Dictator, hence, the birth of the republic. 

 The plot was for Washington to be elected to an Office for which he was not eligible, the Office of President, he would then take an Office, not an Article VI “office or public Trust under the United States,” and without any eligibility requirements, the Office of President of the United States.  The Washington Switch would, for 220 years, cause the false trust and belief that the President of the United States was bound “to support this Constitution.”  He was not, because, he didn’t take and subscribe that oath.   

 In front of God and the world, George Washington took an oral oath that he would “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution of the United States and the biggest seizure of power occurred without notice.  Washington knew, as any first year law student knows, when he took that oral oath that it was insufficient to support any written constitution, however, that was its intent¾to permit the President of the United States to wield power his Office did not possess, without constraint.  Americans on April 30, 1789 thought they knew the Constitution, but they never saw the Trojan Horse Constitution of the United States hidden within the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

 George Washington’s fraud and deception provides an unneeded reason to bail out of the government of the United States.  I have prepared for students of my advanced law and government course a “ President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama you’re fired letter.  To get a copy you must take the basic course, which you can begin by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com

 Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera    

Even though Barack Obama took the oath of Office of the President of the United States twice, he is still not the real President of the United States.  The real President of the United States is the one who qualifies for the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 Office of President by taking an oath “to support this Constitution” and subscribing his name to that oath.  No American President has ever taken a written oath to be bound this Constitution, as required by Article VI of the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

George Washington’s clever trick to takeover the government, so he could help his rich friends has brought the country to the brink of ruin and Barack Obama is pushing the country into socialism.

The easiest way to put President of the United States of America Barack Hussein Obama back in Washington, D. C. and have him stay there is to have him confirm that he has never subscribed a written oath “to support this Constitution.”  My students get help with letters that establish their freedom and independence by use of proofs found in the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  My students do not make any of the dumb mistakes Rush Limbaugh often makes.  Rush told Sean Hannity recently that Barack Hussein Obama was his President.  Barack Hussein Obama is only your President if you are a government employee or a resident of territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.

Barack Obama was duly elected by the Electoral College to be President of the United States of America and like every other President of the United States of America appointed himself to the Office of President of the United States.

President of the United States of America Barack Hussein Obama is not my President.  Not one President since George Washington has told the truth about his oath and his office.   Why would anyone accept a person as a leader, who refuses to be bound by a written oath?

Become a student and learn how you can prove that Barack Hussein Obama is not your President.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera    

Next Page →