Apr
24
PROPOSED SALES TAX ON INTERNET PURCHASES IS JUST ANOTHER INCOME TAX ON RETAIL SELLERS
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Northwest Ordinance, Oath of Office, ORGANIC LAWS | Leave a Comment
The idea behind the Marketplace Fairness Act is that it levels the competitive sales field between brick and mortar merchants and Internet sales operators. The truth is it just provides more illicit tax revenue to incompetent State governments. The American people freed themselves from the tyrant King George III and nothing short of a coronation of a new monarch can re-impose monarchical power upon them. This being a free country the people are free to enslave themselves individually or collectively. A sales tax is a government charge on the privilege of selling at retail. It is a tax on the retailer indirectly paid by the consumer in the cost of goods purchased.
The opportunity to engage in commerce is an unalienable right of every human being and the realization of that opportunity is a fundamental basis of civilization. So, why are there sales and income taxes on commerce? The American Revolution removed King George III from power over the American people living south of Canada, thereby, relieving them of all taxation upon their unalienable rights. Immediately, American politicians began plotting a return to the status quo ante bellum. By the time the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was ratified, tyrannical government was back and taxation was returning to what it had been under King George III.
Today, taxation is much worse than what it was under King George III thanks to George Washington and the Federalists. Founding Father George led in the creation of a federal government of federal States consisting of governments with law making power over 1. the lands still owned by the Confederacy, the United States of America and 2. everyone who believed they still lived and worked in such territory. The result was a country founded by George Washington in which Congress and the State legislatures can enact any government scheme labeled a tax. Section 101 of Title 4 of the United States Code is a direct result of the oral oath George Washington took and the written oath or affirmation he didn’t subscribe:
Every member of a State legislature, and every executive and judicial officer of a State, shall, before he proceeds to execute the duties of his office, take an oath in the following form, to wit: “I, A B, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States.”
The Constitution of September 17, 1787 related to and applied only to the territory still owned and subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. The original thirteen States of the first Union, the United States of America, confirmed by their ratification of that Constitution that the United States of America would exercise the same power to lands it acquired post ratification in the original thirteen States. And, as to all lands within and without the States of the United States of America, owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. those territories were also within the United States, the Union called the United States, hence, the “Constitution of the United States.”
The persons in the States and territories, the United States, of the United States of America were made indirectly subject to sales and income taxes defined in Section 110 of Title 4 of the United States Code:
Sec. 110. Same; definitions
As used in sections 105-109 of this title - (a) The term “person” shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 3797 of title 26.
(b) The term “sales or use tax” means any tax levied on, with respect to, or measured by, sales, receipts from sales, purchases, storage, or use of tangible personal property, except a tax with respect to which the provisions of section 104 of this title are applicable.
(c) The term “income tax” means any tax levied on, with respect to, or measured by, net income, gross income, or gross receipts.
(d) The term “State” includes any Territory or possession of the United States.
(e) The term “Federal area” means any lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department, establishment, or agency, of the United States; and any Federal area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such State.
A sales tax is simply an income tax imposed on the net income, gross income or gross receipts of a person retailing goods or services within the United States, the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. The United States of America can impose a sales tax within the United States, because the United States is the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. An income tax on all income earned or generated within the United States, if not within the legislative power of the United States of America it is certainly within the proprietary power of the Confederacy, the United States of America.
Written law in general and the law of taxation in particular have been made complex so government can control more and collect much more taxes. I have made both simpler by tracing these subjects back to their roots in the Organic Laws of the United States of America. To get a complete set of the four Organic Laws of the United States of America, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com . To find out how you can start a first class legal education for $50, tell me you want to become a law Student.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Apr
17
THE LESSON OF THE ORGANIC LAWS
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, LEARNING THE LAW, Northwest Ordinance, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
The lesson of the Organic Laws is that all written laws in America are limited to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, which is the Confederacy, the United States of America under the authority of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.
It is universally accepted that the “United States in Congress assembled,” the formal name for the member States of the Confederacy, had no legislative authority until the United States in Congress assembled gained proprietary power over territory ceded to the United States of America by the States.
The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 set up a temporary government for the Northwest Territorial States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota and made them part of the Confederacy, the United States of America, making them United States, but not yet United States of America. From the day of the enactment of the Northwest Ordinance, to the ratification and establishment of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 federal legislation and taxation has been territorially limited to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.
Article I Section 2 Clause 3 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 provided for property taxation in the States of the new Union established when New Hampshire became the ninth State to ratify and thereby establish the Constitution of September 17, 1787 among those States which have ratified. Direct taxation of property in the United States of America is, therefore, limited to taxable personal property located, according to federal law, within the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.
It will take persistence and perseverance, but any property not located on federal territory eventually may be removed from the county’s tax rolls.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Apr
9
State of Connecticut Governor signs what is being described as the toughest gun laws in the U.S.
Filed Under Adoption, Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, FREEDOM, IMPEACHMENT, LEARNING THE LAW, Northwest Ordinance, ORGANIC LAWS, Second Amendment | Leave a Comment
How are such laws possible when there is this Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
The State of Connecticut is not a ‘free State” and the Constitution which was ratified by the States has not been adopted by the officers thought to be of the three branches of government. The State of Connecticut is one of the thirteen States expressly identified as “the several States which may be included within this Union” in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3. That Union is the Union of States of the United States, which will include the States of the Northwest Territory, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota. These States are comprised of a government devised by the Confederacy for the purposes of the Confederacy and the territory in those States is to be purchased pursuant to Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, or is already owned by or otherwise subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.
The above two paragraphs are part of a Post I submitted to all my Advanced, Basic and prospective Students in order to obtain their comments. The responses I received were predictable—the Advanced Students understand the subject best and the Basic Students not as well. All the responses I got indicate there can be no doubt that the Organic Laws of the United States of America are the basis of all written laws in the United States of America.
The Advanced Students are experienced and motivated to learn a rather simple though relatively unknown truth—free people are not subject to written laws. Free people are those folks with the unalienable rights mentioned in the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 and unalienable rights are unalienable because they are self-evident they need no proof. Unwritten laws need no proof.
Written laws are the laws of governments which my Students are learning to decipher. We have broken the United States Code as written law limited to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. Once a Student successfully completes my, “Basic Course in Law and Government,” upon that Student’s assent he or she becomes an Advanced Student. If you would like to get started on a lifetime of legal learning, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Mar
8
Why is there no hope for justice in American courts? All so-called judicial courts are in fact legislative courts set up to validate and perpetuate government legislation and to facilitate the collection of taxes.
Filed Under Article II Section 1 Clause 8, Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, IMPEACHMENT, LEARNING THE LAW, Northwest Ordinance, Oath of Office, PRESIDENTS, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
There are three oaths in the Constitution of September 17, 1787: 1. Senators take an oath before they try a legislative impeachment and because impeachment is a legislative process the exact wording of the oath is left to Congress. 2. The person taking the Office of President of the United States must, before taking that Office, take by oath or affirmation the oath to that Office expressly required by the Constitution of September 17, 1787. Because the Constitution of September 17, 1787, also, imposes no qualifications for the Office of President of the United States, George Washington was able to be both the Article II President of the United States of America and President of the United States simply by orally taking the following oath: “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.” 3. Article VI, Clause 3 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 imposed this oath on everybody else in government with the exception of the President of the United States:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
What was the Article VI, Clause 3 oath? A simple signed “I swear (or affirm) to support this Constitution” on a copy or last page of “this Constitution” would have sufficed. No such written oath or affirmation exists. George Washington’s signature appears on the original Constitution of September 17, 1787, however, as he signed the document before this Constitution was ratified according to Article VII, his signature does not constitute an oath or affirmation “to support this Constitution.”
George Washington and the so-called Founding Fathers fooled the American people. The signatures on the Constitution of September 17, 1787 including George Washington’s didn’t mean anything other than it was their submission. The oral oath Washington took was only good enough to require Bills passed by Congress to be presented to him for his approval or his objections. The office of President of the United States of America was vested with the executive power not the President of the United States.
One of the Bills Washington signed proves the present federal court system has no real judicial powers. Section 8 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 requires federal Justices and judges to take an oath or affirmation which does not comply with the requirements of Article VI Clause 3:
SEC. 8. And be it further enacted, That the justices of the Supreme Court, and the district judges, before they proceed to execute the duties of their respective offices, shall take the following oath or affirmation, to wit: “I, A. B., do solemnly swear or affirm, that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent on me as, according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the constitution, and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
The Judiciary Act of 1789 was enacted on September 24, 1789. The first act of the First Congress was dated June 1, 1789 and its purpose was to create a new legislative oath of office pattered after the oral oath George Washington took to become President of the United States. The new legislative oath would replace the Article VI, Clause 3 oath or affirmation “to support this Constitution,” when the Constitution of September 17, 1787 failed to be adopted because no President or member of Congress would be bound by an Article VI, Clause 3 oath.
The Constitution of September 17, 1787 should be and is the textbook example of federal legal legerdemain in my law course, the “Basic Course in Law and Government.” The Constitution of September 17, 1787 refers to itself as “this Constitution” about a dozen times and only once in the oath of office of the President of the United States is there a reference to “the Constitution of the United States.” It is clear that the constitutional creation of an oral oath for a President of the United States was really to hide the inauguration of the new Union of dependent federal States, which was begun with the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787.
The legislative creation of an oath of office for “the justices of the Supreme Court and the district judges,” which ended with “So help me God” was the clearest statement possible that the “United States” would be an entity consisting of the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.
The United States Supreme Court and the lower federal courts no longer provide copies of the oaths of Office of Justices and judges after it was discovered that these oaths showed these offices to be territorial. The oaths of office of State, county and local will show that they too are federal territorial “judges.” You can and should demand copies of the oaths of “judges” who might someday try to assert judicial authority over you.
There is no education greater than the one you will get by enrolling in my “Basic Course in Law and Government.” Government and government schools will only teach what government wants you to know. For a limited time, you can learn before you enroll. For a non-refundable $50, you can get all the materials my first Students had to pay $500 to get. Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com for all the details and copies of the Organic Laws of the United States of America, the foundation for all written law in America.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Mar
6
If the United States of America was born on the Fourth of July 1776, when and where was the United States, the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, born?
Filed Under Adoption, Article II Section 1 Clause 8, Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Northwest Ordinance, Oath of Office, ORGANIC LAWS, PRESIDENTS | Leave a Comment
The thirteen American States declared their separation and independence from King George III in the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776.
The first Union of the newly declared free and independent States, the Confederacy, was created when Maryland on March 1, 1781 became the thirteenth State to ratify the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.
A temporary second Union of dependent States comprising the Northwest Territory was created by the United States in Congress assembled when it enacted the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787. That Union was made permanent by the Constitution of September 17, 1787 on June 21, 1788, when New Hampshire became the ninth State to ratify the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
According to Article VII of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, “The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.” The ratification by the ninth State occurred on June 21, 1788, so that is the date of the birth of the United States, the territory of the Union owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.
The current President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, took this oral oath on January 20, 2013: ““I, Barack Hussein Obama , do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.” That oath made President of the United States Obama the employee of the entity with the exclusive legislative power over and possessory interest in the United States.
Ratification of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 by the States bound those States to that Constitution, however, the failure of any President or member of Congress to be bound by an Article VI oath or affirmation “to support this Constitution” reduced the United States to a corporation wholly owned by the United States of America
I need Students who want to learn the incontrovertible facts disclosed in these Posts, so they can teach government employees limited government. Anyone with $50 can try the complete “Basic Course in Law and Government ,“ for which my first Students paid $500. Every new Student must have the Organic Laws of the United States of America, so you get these in a computer searchable just for the asking. To get the Organic Laws and enrollment information contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Feb
27
THE EASY IMPEACHMENT: THE IMPEACHMENT OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, IMPEACHMENT, Northwest Ordinance, ORGANIC LAWS, PRESIDENTS | 1 Comment
Only my Students know how easy it would be to impeach Barack Hussein Obama, if the impeachment is limited to the office of President of the United States. The only condition imposed by the Constitution of the United States on such an impeachment is found in Article I Section 3 Clause 6: “The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.”
Why are there no other constitutional conditions placed on the impeachment of the President of the United States? The office of President of the United States is the highest employee in the federal government, who like the chief executive officer of a corporation, must be fired according to certain written rules. The President of the United States of America, the head of State of the United States of America, according to the Constitution of the United States, may only be impeached pursuant to Article II Section 4: “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.” Not only does the Constitution provide for the easy impeachment of the President of the United States it is proof the two offices were intended to be separate.
My new Students, who successfully complete my “Basic Course in Law and Government” and who want to see an immediate improvement to all governments in the United States of America, may obtain my letter to members of Congress which explains the benefits of an impeachment of the President of the United States.
Becoming an immediately successful Student of the Law has never been easier or more affordable. You can sample the $500 “Basic Course in Law and Government” for a non-refundable $50. Do you have what it takes to successfully learn the law?
If you have read this far, you have the reading ability necessary to understand the documents which are the foundation for the written law in the United States of America. You can have the four Organic Laws of the United States of America for the asking. The Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the Constitution of September 17, 1787, in a computer searchable format, are yours, when you contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Feb
21
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAS NO GOVERNMENT POWER TO TAX YOUR PROPERTY
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, LEARNING THE LAW, Northwest Ordinance, ORGANIC LAWS, PRESIDENTS, Property Taxes, PROPRIETARY POWER, State of California, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
The Office of the Los Angeles County Tax Assessor makes this bold claim on its website: “State law mandates that all property is subject to taxation unless otherwise exempted. Your property taxes support necessary services provided to the residents of Los Angeles County. These include law enforcement, fire protection, education, parks and recreation, and other vital services.”
To what state law does the LA Tax Assessor refer?
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 13 TAXATION
SEC. 1. Unless otherwise provided by this Constitution or the laws of the United States:
(a) All property is taxable and shall be assessed at the same percentage of fair market value. When a value standard other than fair market value is prescribed by this Constitution or by statute authorized by this Constitution, the same percentage shall be applied to determine the assessed value. The value to which the percentage is applied, whether it be the fair market value or not, shall be known for property tax purposes as the full value.
(b) All property so assessed shall be taxed in proportion to its full value.
What doesn’t the Assessor tell you?
The Assessor doesn’t explain why only personal property located within the federal territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America might be subject to forced taxation. The government of the State of California within California is the only one which has been authorized by Congress to tax property within the State of California, however, because the State of California is the designation for the federal territory, within California, owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, only non-federal personal property can be taxed. Before admission into the second Union, a State must promise not to tax federal property, which leaves only the personal property not owned by the United States of America subject to property taxation.
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SEC. 1. The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
The above sentence means the State of California is the same kind of federal territory made a permanent part of the Confederacy by Article 4 of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, so only non-governmental personal property located on the federal territory within California is taxable.
Joining the Confederacy under the authority of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 did not require any transfer of territory within that State. Territory claimed by a State of the first Union, the United States of America, which had been ceded to the Confederacy became a permanent part of the Confederacy pursuant to Article 4 of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787. The Northwest Territory was comprised of what would be the States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota, so it can readily be seen how the term “United States” would come to mean the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. The territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America is also “the United States Constitution” George Washington swore to “preserve, protect and defend.”
Once the American people freed themselves from the British tyrant, King George III, only force could openly subject them to the same kind of blatant tyranny. The Confederation Congress, George Washington and the politicians of the time managed to re-install the same kind of government which had been expelled by a violent revolution, without firing a shot.
Using trickery and deceit, it only took a few Americans, who could keep a secret, led by George Washington to replace American freedom with one onerous central government. My “Basic Course in Law and Government” explains how George Washington created the American Presidential dictatorship and my “Advanced Course in Law and Government” helps Students achieve near total freedom. A $50 trial version of the $500 Basic Course in Law and Government along with the Organic Laws is still available by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Feb
11
FEDERAL GUN CONTROL LEGISLATION IS LIMITED TO FEDERAL TERRITORY
Filed Under Adoption, Article II Section 1 Clause 8, Articles of Confederation, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, FREEDOM, LEARNING THE LAW, Northwest Ordinance, ORGANIC LAWS, Second Amendment | Leave a Comment
Federal laws are limited to federal territory—everybody who has questioned government authority knows that, but how do you prove it? The first two federal Organic Laws, the Declaration of Independence and Articles of Confederation worked to free the American people from an unwanted central government by ridding America of nobility and requiring the States of the Union to honor the right of the people to live free of government within those states.
The first two Organic Laws insured freedom in America, but the so-called leaders wanted to control America, so they introduced, temporarily, legislation and taxation to the Northwest Territory, the States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota. George Washington, the Congress of the Confederacy and the so-called Founding Fathers in the biggest propaganda ploy ever pulled, the drafting and ratification of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, would then convince Americans and the world the United States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota was now the entire country under the central control of George Washington and the Congress of the United States. Congress would make laws for the Northwest Territory and other federal territory, pretend it applied countrywide and then President of the United States George Washington would enforce those laws, particularly taxation, everywhere. When Americans rebelled against the whiskey tax, Commander in Chief and President of the United States of America used the State Militias to put down the Whiskey Rebellion and stifled further opposition to the extension of federal legislation and taxation.
Proposed federal gun control legislation is, of course, federal, so it applies to what the federal government, the United States of America Confederacy. still owns and controls. The old United States in Congress assembled is now operating as the Senate, but still under the general direction of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777—the Articles of Confederation were not repealed and replaced by the Constitution of September 17, 1787. In fact, it can be proven George Washington planned the failed adoption of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, so the Article II Section 1 Clause 8 Constitution of the United States could be substituted.
The Constitution of September 17, 1787 ratified by the States of the Confederacy, the United States of America, would have been the supreme law of the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America had that Constitution been adopted by George Washington and members of Congress, however, when that Constitution was not adopted the administration of federal territory by the President of the United States continued commercially under the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787.
The right of self defense, as a God given unalienable right, is far more important than any Second Amendment to any unadopted constitution. The foregoing revelations about government and its constitutions should convince you that any reliance on Second Amendment rights is ill advised.
Your intentionally inadequate public school education has left you defenseless in the face of government tyranny. My “Basic Course in Law and Government” was created especially for the student, who wants to avoid reliance on court decisions of dubious value. Lessons are based on unassailable historical facts and the fundamental Organic Laws of the United States of America. To get the Organic Laws in a computer searchable form and more information on the Basic Course in Law and Government contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Feb
4
CONGRESS AND VOTER FRAUD
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, FREEDOM, LEARNING THE LAW, Northwest Ordinance, ORGANIC LAWS | 1 Comment
One man rule when you are king and all others are your subjects is tyranny, however, when one man or one woman rules himself or herself and no others that is freedom. Voter fraud results when individual freedom can be put to a majority vote. The blame for this voter fraud can be placed upon the Congress of the United States.
The Congress of the Confederate States under the authority of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 was created when Maryland became the thirteenth State to ratify the Articles of Confederation. Ratification of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 by all thirteen States on March 1, 1781 involved no transfer of territory from the Confederate States to the Confederacy now called the United States in Congress assembled, so calling the post Revolution territory ceded to the United States of America the “United States,” was appropriate and logical. Today, the “United States” means the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.
The fourth and last Organic Law of the United States of America brought more changes in nomenclature: after nine States ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787, that Congress became the Senate on June 21, 1788.
Before the United States in Congress assembled became the Senate by way of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, it enacted the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 using the proprietary power it had over the Northwest Territory and any other territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. The Northwest Ordinance provided a temporary government for much of the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, in which each territorial State would have a delegate to Congress. That delegate could debate but not vote on the Bills which would ultimately be enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives.
However, before a Bill could be sent to the President of the United States, that Bill had to be passed by both the Senate and House of Representatives, Article I Section 1 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787: “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives,” and Article I Section 7 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787. Article I Section 2 Clause 2: “No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen,” meant that a person who would be a Representative must declare himself to have the required qualifications for that office. The Representatives who could vote on Bills had to declare themselves Citizens of the United States, which in the case of Article I Section 2 Clause 2 meant Citizens of the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.
Every election voter fraud is perpetrated by the millions who register themselves “citizen of the United States.” You can stop voter fraud by taking my $500 “Basic Course in Law and Government,” at the trial price of $50. Don’t have $50? Start your education for free just ask me at edrivera@edrivera.com for the four Organic Laws of the United States of America.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jan
15
EVIDENCE THAT NO POLITICIAN KNOWS OR UNDERSTANDS THE CONSTITUTION
Filed Under Adoption, Article II Section 1 Clause 5, Article II Section 1 Clause 8, Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Electoral College, LAW OF THE LAND, Martial Law, Northwest Ordinance, Presidential Elector, PROPRIETARY POWER | Leave a Comment
Every time a politician claims he or she swore an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, he or she divulges his or her ignorance of the document believed to be the Constitution of September 17, 1787, which was established for the States on June 21, 1788.
These are the facts:
- Article VII of the Constitution determines when that Constitution is established.
- Article VI of the Constitution requires a subscribed oath “to support this Constitution,” thereby adopting this Constitution.
- George Washington became President of the United States of America without taking any oath, when the Presidential Electoral votes were counted on April 6, 1789, before Congress.
- On April 30, 1789, Washington became President of the United States upon taking the oral non-binding oath for that employment: “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”
- On April 30, 1789, George Washington was neither a natural born citizen nor had he been a resident within the United States for fourteen years.
- Washington became President of the United States of America on April 6, 1789 and President of the United States on April 30, 1789, under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and Constitution of the United States respectively, because the Constitution of September 17, 1787 had not been adopted by a legally binding subscribed oath “to support this Constitution.”
The Constitution of the United States which George Washington orally swore an oath to “preserve, protect and defend” could have been the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, individually or any combination of them, but it certainly wasn’t the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
I have put together a course of legal instruction in the Constitution of September 17, 1787, my “Basic Course in Law and Government,” which I will share with you for a donation of $50. To get the details of this offer and to receive the foundational Organic Laws of the United States of America, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera