• Pages

  • CONTACT ED RIVERA
  • LETTER TO CAPTIVES
  • REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

• Recent Posts

  • IRS DIRECTOR LOIS LERNER PUT ON PAID ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE AFTER SHE REFUSES TO RESIGN
  • INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE CONSERVATIVE TARGETING SCANDAL
  • HOW SIMPLE CAN I MAKE THE STUDY OF LAW?
  • IF YOU DON’T VOLUNTARILY PAY A PROPERTY TAX BILL, WHICH GOVERNMENT OFFICER HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CALCULATE ANY AMOUNT ALLEGEDLY DUE AND DEMAND THAT AMOUNT BE PAID?
  • PROPOSED SALES TAX ON INTERNET PURCHASES IS JUST ANOTHER INCOME TAX ON RETAIL SELLERS

• Categories

  • Adoption
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 5
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 8
  • Article III
  • Articles of Confederation
  • BAIL OUT
  • BANKRUPTCY
  • CENSUS
  • CIVIL CONTEMPT
  • COMMON LAW
  • CONGRESS
  • CONSTITUTION
  • CRIMINAL LAW
  • Declaration of Independence
  • Economic Stimulous
  • Electoral College
  • Foreclosure
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • FREEDOM
  • GAY MARRIAGE
  • GRAND JURY
  • IMMIGRATION
  • IMPEACHMENT
  • JURY DUTY
  • LAW OF THE LAND
  • LEARNING THE LAW
  • LIBERTARIAN
  • Martial Law
  • MAYAN 2012
  • Northwest Ordinance
  • Oath of Office
  • OBAMA
  • ORGANIC LAWS
  • PARDON
  • Presidential Elector
  • PRESIDENTS
  • ProperTea Tax Tea Party
  • Property Taxes
  • PROPRIETARY POWER
  • Second Amendment
  • State of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • TRIAL BY JURY
  • U.S. District Court
  • Uncategorized

• Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Today I saw and heard, on Fox News, IRS exempt organizations director, Lois Lerner, say, after taking the testamentary oath at a House of Representatives Oversight Committee hearing, that  she had not done anything wrong.  ”I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws. I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations,” and then she took the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.  Lerner was in danger of criminal prosecution even though she was just a high level employee doing a job invented by Congress.  She is guilty of  not knowing the difference between a powerless employee and an officer of the United States of America.   Since 1952, the employee inmates have run the asylum at the Internal Revenue Taxpayer Service.  The customers are finally realizing they don’t have to buy what the IRS is selling.

The history of federal taxation from 1789 to 1948 is told in the United States Government Printing Office publication, “The Work and Jurisdiction of the Bureau of Internal Revenue,” which is available by doing an Internet search on that title.  That booklet documents the time in American history when federal taxes were collected by Collectors of Internal Revenue, who had been appointed by the President of the United States of America with the advice and consent of the Senate and who were bonded in an amount determined by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.    For an era of 163 years real federal taxes were collected by real federal Collectors of Internal Revenue although the collections were made outside the district where the taxes were owed.

The conservative targeting scandal is a direct result of the abolition of the Collectors of Internal Revenue by IRS Reorganization Plan No.1 of 1952, which took federal tax collection away from sixty-five Collectors of Internal Revenue and handed it to thousands of employees without any government power to collect federal taxes.  IRS employees could and did accept payments voluntarily made into the Treasury of the United States.  When payments were not volunteered, IRS employees pretended to be Collectors of Internal Revenue.

The employee run Internal Revenue Service evolved from the United States Treasury Department’s government Bureau of Internal Revenue, while Treasury pretended nothing had changed.  Thus, was born the longstanding practice, embraced by both Republican and Democratic administrations not to delve into the details of the IRS’s administration and enforcement of federal tax laws.

Mitt Romney vowed to repeal Obamacare when he was elected President, so IRS employees did everything in their power to re-elect Barack Hussein Obama by making difficulties for Obama’s political opponents.

Learning difficult tax law is easier when there are big rewards.  Congress wants to know what happened at the IRS.   You can teach anyone the law once you learn it.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com for the details.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

A complaint, not a presentment or indictment brought by a federal grand jury, alleges upon information and belief the commission of two criminal acts by this defendant.  The complaint alleges that these acts took place “on or about the date(s) of April 15. 2013 in the county of Suffolk in the District of Massachusetts.”

Readers familiar with Chapter 5 of Title 28 of the United States Code know that the District of Massachusetts is not the entirety of Massachusetts.  The District of Massachusetts is comprised of only the federal territory within the exterior borders of Massachusetts and the county of Suffolk is only the federal territory within the exterior borders of Suffolk County, according to Section 2 of Title 1 of the United States Code.

Neither the Fifth Amendment:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation,

nor the Sixth Amendment:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence,

apply, because only the States are bound by the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  The United States of America, the Confederacy established by the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 is the interested government party not the people of Massachusetts or the people of the United States of America.

The suspected Boston Marathon Bomber is doomed, but you can learn the written law by following his federal case in these Posts on this website.  You must have the Organic Laws of the United States of America, the basis of the written law in your computer in a searchable format.  To get the Organic Laws and free information about a $50 trial legal education contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

The simple answer is the Constitution of the United States is not the written Constitution dated September 17, 1787. Remember all American Presidents take an oral oath to attain the Office of President of the United States and none at all to be President of the United States of America.

We can be fairly certain George Washington took this oath, but there is no legal proof that he did: “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”      Similarly, the current President took the same oath: “I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God,” with the same result—the written Constitution can’t be enforced against a person who has not agreed in writing to be bound by it.  It can be proved with certainty President Barack Hussein Obama took the oral oath of Office of President of the United States prescribed by the Constitution of September 17, 1787, but taking that oral oath does not bind anyone to a written document such as the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

The power of the President of the United States is not derived from the Constitution of September 17, 1787 it is derived from the legislative power of the Congress of the United States.  The President of the United States’ source of power is a government secret, because, if discovered all government power would be limited to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. Disclosing such government secrets is routine at www.edrivera.com , however, to fully understand the depth of deceit Washington, D.C. is mired in requires a short course in elementary constitutional law, my “Basic Course in Law and Government,” which you can sample for $50.   To get the Organic Laws of the United States of America and to learn how to take the Course on a trial basis, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

Every time a politician claims he or she swore an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, he or she divulges his or her ignorance of the document believed to be the Constitution of September 17, 1787, which was established for the States on June 21, 1788.

These are the facts:

1. Article VII of the Constitution determines when that Constitution is established.
2. Article VI of the Constitution requires a subscribed oath “to support this Constitution,” thereby adopting this Constitution.
3. George Washington became President of the United States of America without taking any oath, when the Presidential Electoral votes were counted on April 6, 1789, before Congress.
4. On April 30, 1789, Washington became President of the United States upon taking the oral non-binding oath for that employment:  “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”
5. On April 30, 1789, George Washington was neither a natural born citizen nor had he been a resident within the United States for fourteen years.
6. Washington became President of the United States of America on April 6, 1789 and President of the United States on April 30, 1789, under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and Constitution of the United States respectively, because the Constitution of September 17, 1787 had not been adopted by a legally binding subscribed oath “to support this Constitution.”

The Constitution of the United States which George Washington orally swore an oath to “preserve, protect and defend” could have been the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, individually or any combination of them, but it certainly wasn’t the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

I have put together a course of legal instruction in the Constitution of September 17, 1787, my “Basic Course in Law and Government,” which I will share with you for a donation of $50.  To get the details of this offer and to receive the foundational Organic Laws of the United States of America, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

 My January 27, 2012 Post discussed an administrative accusation brought against my Advanced Student, Brian Davis for “unprofessional conduct,” resulting from his submission to the Physical Therapy Board of California, of a six page letter, which explained what is meant by the phrase: “State of California.”

 The Physical Therapy Board of California can’t disprove what Brian wrote, so it accused him of being mentally ill for expressing thoughts which diminish the territorial jurisdiction of the State of California to the territory in California owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.  The accusation can be found at: http://ptbc.ca.gov/consumers/enforcement/davis_brian_accusation.pdf

 The hearing date is set for Nov. 13, 2012 at 9:00 am at the office of administrative hearings, 320 West 4th Street, Los Angeles 6th floor.

 You can get a copy of Brian’s six page letter, all four Organic Laws and information about a $50 trial version of my $500 Basic Course in Law and Government just by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com   

 Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

Gerald Celente, according to his website, www.geraldcelente.com/, “has been forecasting trends worldwide since 1980, delivering concise, deployable success strategies and publishing the Trends Journal.”  This is one of Mr. Celente’s recent remarks: “State controlled capitalism is called fascism.”

What trend has Mr. Celente forecast by his state controlled capitalism definition?  Regular readers will recall that George Washington created a States elected Presidential dictatorship, when he took this oral oath on April 30, 1789: “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”

Washington’s oral swearing to carry out the faithful execution of the Office of President of the United States and preservation, protection and defense of the Constitution of the United States to the best of his ability, had nothing to do with the document nine States ratified and established between them on June 21, 1788.  George Washington, who had already been elected President of the United States of America on April 6, 1789 without taking any oath, was fully aware he was becoming the employee of the United States in Congress assembled upon the taking of that oath and that according to Article I of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 all that was necessary for the impeachment of the President of the United States was that the Chief Justice preside at the impeachment.  Washington, as President of the United States of America, would be the one to nominate any candidate for the Office of Chief Justice, which was just another high level employment for the Congress of the United States.

The federal government consists of the employees of the Congress of the United States which rules beyond its territorial limitations by actively and perpetually having Americans confuse the United States, the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, with the United States of America, the America not owned by the Confederacy.

Mr. Gerald Celente has not officially enrolled in “Basic Course in Law and Government” although like millions of others he may regularly visit www.edrivera.com .  Enrollment in my “Basic Course” will change your life, because by enrolling you will be making a commitment to learning and understanding the government’s written law.   Mr. Celente has only lately become aware of the government’s intrusion in American capitalism, which began when President of the United States of America George Washington took the oral oath of Office of President of the United States.   Following Mr. Celente’s trends will not take us off the path of  dictatorship George Washington put us on.  Only the best legal education ever devised will successfully remove a dictator.  That legal education begins, with the four Organic Laws, which I will send to you in a computer searchable format along with information about beginning your legal education for $50, when you contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera   

 

The power used in a taking of private property for public use is called eminent domain.  The concept is historically derived from both the war power and the law of necessity, which empowered the king to take whatever property was necessary to protect the people from invasion or other serious harm.    

 

 Eminent domain is found in the Bill of Rights, specifically in the last clause of the Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights.  The Constitution of September 17, 1787 was established on June 21, 1788, when New Hampshire became the ninth State to ratify “this Constitution.”  George Washington took an oral oath on April 30, 1789 to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” which was not a written constitution, as a consequence “this Constitution,”  the Constitution of September 17, 1787 ratified by the States of  the first Union was never adopted by any constitutional officers, who remained employees of  the Confederacy.

 

The true purpose of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and Bill of Rights was to have a large number of people believe their rights depended on that Constitution and those first ten amendments.  Both the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and the Bill of Rights brilliantly convinced vast numbers of people that constitutional rights were real and had value. 

 

The people of the United States, the people of   the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America immortalized in the Preamble as “We the People of the United States,” supposedly bound themselves and their descendents to the Constitution of September 17, 1787 by some kind of incantation to “ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”  These people left no evidence of an ordination or establishment of any Constitution.  

 

 Individual submission to the Constitution of September 17, 1787 is the only personal activity which submits a person not on federal territory to the commercial authority of the Constitution.  Ratification of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and the Bill of Rights by the States was binding only on those States.  The State elections which resulted from those ratifications did not produce all the qualified officers needed to form the government described in Article I Section 1 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  The institution of a Congress consisting of the Northwest Ordinance’s House of Representatives and a Senate, whose members were not qualified pursuant to Article I Section 3 Clause 3 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, resulted instead in the political body identified in Section 101 of Title 1 of the United States Code as “the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled.” 

 

Eminent domain pursuant to the war power and law of necessity remains in the United States in Congress assembled under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.  Eminent domain pursuant to the Fifth Amendment or any State Constitution which recognizes the Constitution of the United States as the supreme law of the land is limited to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.   

 

Members of Congress claim the Articles of Confederation were replaced by the Constitution of the United States, so that means an eminent domain taking can only take place in the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, which means only personal property could be taken, because the United States of America already owns all the territory in the United States.

 

The Constitution of September 17, 1787 even when ratified by all thirteen States of the Confederacy, the United States of America, had only one direct application to people—taxation.  The power of taxation like the power of eminent domain, in a time before a proliferation of corporations, would be arrayed against people.   The temporary government of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 meant temporary taxation.  Article I Section 8 of the Constitution extended taxation by two years indefinitely.  What the Constitution did for temporary taxation the Bill of Rights did for eminent domain. The Bill of Rights did more for government than the Bill of Rights did for ordinary people.             

 

The power of eminent domain is part of the power to make war and the law of necessity, which is why it is not specifically mentioned in either the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 or the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  The origin of the power of eminent domain provides for limitations on the power, however, because it is found in the Bill of Rights the Supreme Court thinks any taking is good and for a public purpose provided there is some compensation.

 

You can limit eminent domain to the taking of personal property on the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America by learning the four Organic Laws and how together they establish territorial limits on federal laws, which begin and end with government ownership and possession.   I will send you searchable copies of  all four Organic Laws plus information on my Basic Course in Law and Government , if you will contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com  

 Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

Any traffic court judge will tell you the Constitution of the United States isn’t part of the law in his court. If you know, where the government can tell you how fast you can drive, you know the traffic judge is telling the truth.  Where can the cop write his speeding ticket?  Traffic cops write speeding tickets within the traffic court’s territorial jurisdiction, which is subject to all the limitations of the Constitution, which was established to form a new Union between the first nine ratifying States on June 21, 1788 and a United States of America with its own territory and other property.  The rest of  the thirteen original States then ratified “this Constitution,” so by May 29, 1790, all States of  the first perpetual Union had established a second Union of  States, which lacked sovereignty, freedom and independence  these were, among others, the States of  the Northwest Territory, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota.    

The States of the Northwest Territory were promised real statehood, which meant sovereignty, freedom and independence, but not until each State attained a population of 60,000.  These States were also promised taxation in order to reduce the federal debt.  Taxation required legislation, which the Confederation Congress had no power to impose on the people of the States of the first and perpetual Union.   The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 allowed the Confederation Congress to create a House of Representatives in which the States without sovereignty, freedom and independence would have a voice but no vote.  The votes required to elect the Representatives, who would enact the legislation, which would impose the taxes on the settlers and inhabitants of States of the Northwest Territory would have to come from the States already admitted to the perpetual Union, the United States of America.  

The rest is history bad history, but history just the same.   George Washington became an American dictator by becoming both President of the United States of America and President of the United States.  The laws he signed as President of the United States, which should have been limited to  the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, were applied to the people living in the States thought to have retained their sovereignty, freedom and independence.

Did the American people rebel?  Of course, they did, however, they never had a chance against taxation imposed on the distillation of alcohol within the United States.  The media of the day called the patriots the whiskey rebels and their patriotism the Whiskey Rebellion.  In early October of 1794 George Washington led nearly 13,000 militia troops against the patriots and that was an end to freedom in America.

Speeding within the United States would be a federal offense were it not for the Constitution, which seems to allocate certain major enumerated powers to Congress and everything else to the States.  What is not explained is the difference between the two kinds of States.   Virtually all speeding occurs outside the United States, while all tickets for speeding are written as if the speeding occurred within the United States.

You can easily fight any speeding ticket, if you know how to place yourself outside the United States.  If you can’t, you should immediately enroll in my $50 “Basic Course in Law and Government” by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com       

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

 

The Constitution of September 17, 1787 was established on June 21, 1788, when New Hampshire became the ninth State to ratify that Constitution.   The Constitution of September 17, 1787 was transformed into the Constitution of the United States, when on April 30, 1789, George Washington took this oral oath: “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”

Washington’s oral oath was sufficient only to create a commercial administration of the territory and other property owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.  On April 6, 1789, Washington had been elected to the Office of President of the United States of America, an Office under the authority of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, which required no oral or subscribed oath or affirmation.

The oral oath Washington took, first, permitted the Freemasons to take over the corporate structure that was substituted for a legitimate government then a variety of special interests have succeeded the Freemasons as operators of the world’s oldest and largest Ponzi scheme.

How has such a fraud managed to survive this long?  Article I, Section 2, Clause 2 provides for the creation of a United States populated by callow eighteen year old Citizens.  A Representative who meets the minimum qualifications for that Office attained the status of Citizen of the United States at age eighteen.   A minimum age of twenty-five minus seven years citizenship makes for an eighteen year old Citizen of the United States.  The second militia act of May 5, 1792, 1Stat271, confirms eighteen year old Citizens of the United States.

Discover the rest of the citizens of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and Constitution of the United States take my “Basic Course in Law and Government,” by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

Eduardo Saverin the Los Angeles Times reports has given up his U.S. citizenship and as a result tax experts predict significant tax savings for him.  The Times reported that Saverin was “one of 1,780 former Americans who renounced citizenship last year.”

According to the Times Saverin was born in Brazil, came to the U.S. in 1992 and became a U.S. citizen in 1998.

What did Eduardo Saverin give up?  At the most he gave up his Fourteenth Amendment citizenship, which diminishes in value as more is discovered about the founding of the United States.

What is a Fourteenth Amendment citizen?  “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. “Saverin was naturalized according to legislation limited to the territory owed by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.  

What do we learn from this news report?  A Fourteenth Amendment natural born or naturalized citizen must be within the United States, the territory owed by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America to “be subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

You don’t have to formally renounce something you don’t have.  Find out what’s like to be free by taking my “Basic Course in Law and Government,” so you can later take my “Advanced Tax Course.”  To find out about both, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera                    

Next Page →