• Pages

  • CONTACT ED RIVERA
  • LETTER TO CAPTIVES
  • REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

• Recent Posts

  • HOW SIMPLE CAN I MAKE THE STUDY OF LAW?
  • IF YOU DON’T VOLUNTARILY PAY A PROPERTY TAX BILL, WHICH GOVERNMENT OFFICER HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CALCULATE ANY AMOUNT ALLEGEDLY DUE AND DEMAND THAT AMOUNT BE PAID?
  • PROPOSED SALES TAX ON INTERNET PURCHASES IS JUST ANOTHER INCOME TAX ON RETAIL SELLERS
  • United States of America v. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, defendant
  • THE LESSON OF THE ORGANIC LAWS

• Categories

  • Adoption
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 5
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 8
  • Article III
  • Articles of Confederation
  • BAIL OUT
  • BANKRUPTCY
  • CENSUS
  • CIVIL CONTEMPT
  • COMMON LAW
  • CONGRESS
  • CONSTITUTION
  • CRIMINAL LAW
  • Declaration of Independence
  • Economic Stimulous
  • Electoral College
  • Foreclosure
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • FREEDOM
  • GAY MARRIAGE
  • GRAND JURY
  • IMMIGRATION
  • IMPEACHMENT
  • JURY DUTY
  • LAW OF THE LAND
  • LEARNING THE LAW
  • LIBERTARIAN
  • Martial Law
  • MAYAN 2012
  • Northwest Ordinance
  • Oath of Office
  • OBAMA
  • ORGANIC LAWS
  • PARDON
  • Presidential Elector
  • PRESIDENTS
  • ProperTea Tax Tea Party
  • Property Taxes
  • PROPRIETARY POWER
  • Second Amendment
  • State of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • TRIAL BY JURY
  • U.S. District Court
  • Uncategorized

• Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

How are such laws possible when there is this Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States:  “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

The State of Connecticut is not a ‘free State” and the Constitution which was ratified by the States has not been adopted by the officers thought to be of the three branches of government.  The State of Connecticut is one of the thirteen States expressly identified as “the several States which may be included within this Union” in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3.  That Union is the Union of States of the United States, which will include the States of the Northwest Territory, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota.   These States are comprised of a government devised by the Confederacy for the purposes of  the Confederacy  and the territory in those States is to be purchased pursuant to Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, or is already owned by or otherwise subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.

The above two paragraphs are part of a Post I submitted to all my Advanced, Basic and prospective Students in order to obtain their comments.  The responses I received were predictable—the Advanced Students understand the subject best and the Basic Students not as well. All the responses I got indicate there can be no doubt that the Organic Laws of  the United States of America are the basis of  all written laws in the United States of America.

The Advanced Students are experienced and motivated to learn a rather simple though relatively unknown truth—free people are not subject to written laws.  Free people are those folks with the unalienable rights mentioned in the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 and unalienable rights are unalienable because they are self-evident they need no proof.  Unwritten laws need no proof.

Written laws are the laws of governments which my Students are learning to decipher. We have broken the United States Code as written law limited to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. Once a Student successfully completes my, “Basic Course in Law and Government,” upon that Student’s assent he or she becomes an Advanced Student.  If you would like to get started on a lifetime of legal learning, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

Federal laws are limited to federal territory—everybody who has questioned government authority knows that, but how do you prove it?  The first two federal Organic Laws, the Declaration of Independence and Articles of Confederation worked to free the American  people from an unwanted  central government by ridding America of nobility and requiring the States of  the Union to honor the right of  the people to live free of  government within those states.

The first two Organic Laws insured freedom in America, but the so-called leaders wanted to control America, so they introduced, temporarily, legislation and taxation to the Northwest Territory, the States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota.   George Washington, the Congress of the Confederacy and the so-called Founding Fathers in the biggest propaganda ploy ever pulled, the drafting and ratification of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, would then convince Americans and the world the United States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota was now the entire country under the central control of George Washington and the Congress of the United States.  Congress would make laws for the Northwest Territory and other federal territory, pretend it applied countrywide and then President of the United States George Washington would enforce those laws, particularly taxation, everywhere.  When Americans rebelled against the whiskey tax, Commander in Chief and President of the United States of America used the State Militias to put down the Whiskey Rebellion and stifled further opposition to the extension of federal legislation and taxation.

Proposed federal gun control legislation is, of course, federal, so it applies to what the federal government, the United States of America Confederacy. still owns and controls.  The old United States in Congress assembled is now operating as the Senate, but still under the general direction of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777—the Articles of Confederation were not repealed and replaced by the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  In fact, it can be proven George Washington planned the failed adoption of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, so the Article II Section 1 Clause 8 Constitution of the United States could be substituted.

The Constitution of September 17, 1787 ratified by the States of  the Confederacy, the United States of America, would have been the supreme law of   the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America had that Constitution been adopted by George Washington and members of  Congress, however, when that Constitution was not adopted the administration of  federal territory by the President of the United States continued commercially under the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787.

The right of self defense, as a God given unalienable right, is far more important than any Second Amendment to any unadopted constitution.  The foregoing revelations about government and its constitutions should convince you that any reliance on Second Amendment rights is ill advised.

Your intentionally inadequate public school education has left you defenseless in the face of government tyranny.  My “Basic Course in Law and Government” was created especially for the student, who wants to avoid reliance on court decisions of dubious value.    Lessons are based on unassailable historical facts and the fundamental Organic Laws of the United States of America.  To get the Organic Laws in a computer searchable form and more information on the Basic Course in Law and Government   contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

George Washington, when it came time to take an oath of Office couldn’t meet the 14 Years residency requirement for the Office of President, so he appointed himself President of the United States and was inaugurated on April 30, 1789, as President of the United States, an employee of the Congress of the United States.  The Office of President became vacant and has remained vacant, as no President elect has ever taken the Article VI oath “to support this Constitution.”  Taking the Article VI oath prevents the President Elect from also becoming an employee/dictator of Congress.  

This Constitution can’t be adopted without a President in the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 Office of President and a Congress whose members have all taken an oath “to support this Constitution.”  A substantial number of Americans believe that President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama is not qualified to be President of the United States or President of the United States of America, because they believe he cannot prove that he is a natural born Citizen of the United States.  The Office of President is the only one with qualifications.  The Offices of President of the United States of America and President of the United States have no qualifications whatsoever.  The Obama bashers are missing the obvious deficiency.

These Americans have conflated the many Presidents of the Constitution into one person, when it is clear the Constitution has constructed two Offices to be held by one person.  That one person will be a President of the United States of America under the authority of the Articles of Confederation and hold the Office of President under the authority of “this Constitution,” provided the Article VI oath of Office “to support this Constitution” is taken.

The truth about the Founding Fathers is that they were real Mothers.  They have been screwing Americans for more than 220 years, while being hailed as heroes.  Washington was the worst of the lot.

George Washington sets the precedent of not taking the Office of President and not taking an Article VI oath “to support this Constitution.”  Without an incumbent in the Office of President “this Constitution” is never adopted.  The Congress of the United States does whatever it wants, while the President of the United States pretends to be an independent branch of government.

Ratification, first by nine States and then by all States is only effective to amend the Articles of Confederation in minor ways such as to create a Senate in place of the United States, in Congress assembled and a President of the United States of America.

Ratification of this Constitution is a necessary pre-condition to the adoption of this Constitution, but it is not adoption of this Constitution.  This Constitution remains un-adopted and will continue un-adopted as long as the Office of President is vacant and Congress is not bound “to support this Constitution.”

Ratification binds the States, but only to the extent of the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  So long as the Office of President remains vacant and the Congress refuses to be bound by oath “to support this Constitution” there is no restraint on the Congress of the United States.      

To put a personal face on the problem, imagine a Congress of the United States without restraints, because the people do not know such a Congress may only make laws for the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America and you have the group of no goods led by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.

Only the truth will make you free and the only place you can get the truth about Pelosi and Reid is right here, when you contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com to become a student of law and government.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera   

President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama wants to infringe your right to own and use firearms, because he is a liberal democrat and he can practically do anything he wants in the United States.   When the States ratified this Constitution, they granted the Congress of the United States unlimited legislative power to make any laws for all territory and property belonging to the United States of America.  Barack Obama has twice taken an oath to be President of the United States, an Office of employment not an Office of political power.  The Office of President is the Office of political power under this Constitution and the Office of President of the United States is an Office of employment under Article I of this Constitution.   The President of the United States is an employee of Congress.  

Barack Obama is not bound by this Constitution, because he never took the Article VI oath “to support this Constitution.”   Taking the Article VI oath binds, “[T]he Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation,  to support this Constitution;”

Strange as it might seem the Office of President of the United States is not an executive Officer of the United States.  The President of the United States is an employee.  No matter how hard one searches the Constitution no term of office and no qualifications can be found for the Office of President of the United States.

What the Constitution does provide in Article II Section 1 Clause 5 are the qualities required to be eligible to the Office of President under this Constitution: 

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.  

President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama can infringe your right to own a firearm in the United States, because no person would be eligible to the Office of President until July 4, 1790.  Because George Washington was elected prior to July 4^th 1790 and took the oath of Office of before that date, this Constitution was never adopted except in the States.  This Constitution is limited to the federal territory within the States of the United States.  Outside of federal territory people are just blindly consenting to be governed, as the Declaration of Independence permits.   

Article VII of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 confirms that this Constitution is law for the United States:

The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.

 

done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth In Witness whereof  We have hereunto subscribed our Names,

Article VII permits ratification by nine of the thirteen States of the Union of the United States of America, because a government is being provided for the new Union of the United States consisting of the States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota.  The original thirteen states already have a government in the form of the Confederacy created by the Articles of Confederation, the perpetual Union.  Article VII tells us, also, that the Constitution counts time from July 4, 1776.  The fourteen Years residency requirement of Article II Section 1 Clause 5 can’t be met until July 4, 1790.  George Washington was conveniently elected before he could qualify for the Office of President.   

George Washington was not qualified to the Office of President, when he was elected on February 4, 1789, so on April 30, 1789 he took the oath of Office of President of the United States, an Office without any requirements because it was at will employment.

Every President Elect including Barack Hussein Obama has followed the lead of George Washington by refusing to take the oath of Office of President.  No binding oath means no bothersome Constitution to keep the government in check.

The consequence of not taking the oath “to support this Constitution” and taking the oath to be an employee of Congress for the purpose of taking on the administration of territory and other property belonging to the United States of America is the eventual disintegration of government and the economy.  Those who know the value of firearms in the preservation of the truth should consider becoming students just to preserve the right to own and use firearms without restrictions.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

 

Anyone familiar with these posts understands that the federal government is only bound by the written Constitution to the extent that it has been adopted by the person elected to the Office of President.   Time and time again I have shown that no one elected by the Electoral College has ever taken an oath to be bound by “this Constitution.”  In case you missed it, Barack Hussein Obama has take the oath to be an employee of Congress at least twice, but not once was he bound to an oath, except to try to do a good job. 

The States that have ratified “this Constitution” certainly are bound by “this Constitution,” but only the territory owned by the United States of America is so bound.

The State ratification and new State admission process is just a dodge by which the people are convinced that a Constitution has been ordained and established as a secular religion in America.  Champions of the Second Amendment are hooked on Constitutional Kool-Aid.  They will die defending the “right to bear arms” and sacrifice us in the process.

Once a reader of these posts has read them and has tried to prove them wrong, the Constitution of the United States takes on its true colors.  The U.S. Constitution is nothing more than an employment contract for the Congress, the President of the United States and the Justices and judges of the faux federal court system.

Intellectual confusion is the only reason the United States Constitution appears to be working at all.  Some in government believe the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land outside the federal territory where it is law, while others have no concept of what the document means resulting in the exultation of a business plan for the federal bureaucracy. 

Without the United States Constitution and the Second Amendment, the gun owner would be in the enviable position of the well armed patriot defending himself, his family, his home and his property from the attempted confiscation of all that by some do-gooder, who promises to join the patriot in voting for law and order, if he will only give up his firearms.  The English common law doesn’t allow you to take a life that’s trying to take your property, but if you are also armed with a good knowledge of the law, you can easily scare them off without firing a shot.  

The critical reader of these posts will immediately see that the United States Constitution creates a debilitating dependency on government.  The agent, from the government, who has come to disarm you, claims that he is from the government only for the purpose of helping you.  He is lying.  Get rid of him and get rid of the United States Constitution.  Without the Constitution, you will gain the advantage in a fair fight.

It is impossible for a government employee to be an agent of a multi-branch government.  Any G-man packing heat is an agent of the President of the United States, who is just a glorified employee.  

“This Constitution” didn’t have to be the fraud the Founding Fathers framed, but it could be nothing else, after George Washington became President of the United States.  If you already have a shooting iron to defend yourself against the best Congress money can buy, have you invested in the best legal education $500 can buy?

 

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera