Jan
16
USING THE CONSTITUTION OF SEPTEMBER 17, 1787 AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW TO LEARN LEGAL THINKING
Filed Under Article III, CONSTITUTION, IMPEACHMENT, LEARNING THE LAW, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
If you believe Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, you will never understand the Constitution of September 17, 1787. The Chief Justice said, “We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is, and the judiciary is the safeguard of our liberty and of our property under the Constitution.”
The Chief Justice is not a judge he is not even a judicial officer. Judges and judicial power are located in Article III of the Constitution of September 17, 1787. The Chief Justice is found in Article I which imposes his only duty—to preside at the impeachment of the President of the United States for which no grounds need be stated. Article II Section 4 requires more to impeach an elected President: “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
Recognition of the differences between an Article I President of the United States and an Article II President of the United States of America with the executive power is an important attribute of the constitutional law thinker. The common constitutional scholar gets his ideas from the judiciary who combine the President of the United States of America and President of the United States into one Twelfth Amendment President. The judiciary and every dictator, since George Washington successfully combined the head of state with the head of the government, have done more to retard creative thinking than all television programs.
The Constitution of September 17, 1787 is a Noah’s Ark of government creatures in twos and threes. Sorting out the Citizens of the United States, the Presidents, the Chief Justice and the judges will sharpen the mind, so it can think about law and government without confusion.
Reading United States Supreme Court opinions won’t teach you how to think like a legal genius, but my Basic Course in Law and Government will. You can test your legal mind for as little as $50 by taking the same Course others paid $500 to complete. To get a free set of the Organic Laws of the United States of America and free information on my course, contact me at: edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Oct
31
WHAT IS A DISTRICT ATTORNEY?
Filed Under GRAND JURY, JURY DUTY, LEARNING THE LAW, Supreme Court, Territorial Jurisdiction, TRIAL BY JURY, U.S. District Court | Leave a Comment
You may know the District Attorney, or the DA, as the county’s elected chief criminal prosecuting attorney. If you do, you only know how the story of the District Attorney ends and not how it begins.
The first office of District Attorney was created by Section 35 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which according to Article I Section 8 Clause 9, initiated the constitution of the “Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court.” All the significant federal courts, which we know do the great majority of federal judicial work, were created by legislative act and not by the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
Not only were the District Courts created by Judiciary Act of 1789 inferior to the supreme Court, so was the Supreme Court, whose members were finally determined in Section 1 of the Judiciary Act of 1789. The yearly compensation for the Chief Justice and Justices had been established the day before in federal legislation enacted on September 23, 1789. The Chief Justice, associate justices and the District Attorney were all conceived in different ways as government employees, so the federal judiciary would be a system of government men not laws.
As an employee, the federal DA would represent the Confederacy, the United States of America in all cases in the United States district courts, where the United States of America was the plaintiff. The federal DA plied this employment under the Judiciary Act of 1789 in all original States, which had ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and in the United States Districts of Maine and Kentucky until those Districts were admitted as States equal to the original thirteen.
Federal District Attorneys co-existed with State criminal prosecutors until there was significant growth of written law in general and federal law in particular. As written federal criminal laws grew, so did State laws and fine distinctions had to be made by federal and State courts and legislators between what were State and what were federal crimes. Ultimately, that issue was resolved by designating local State criminal prosecutors “District Attorneys,” and making the State’s counties “Districts.”
Today federal district attorneys are called United States Attorneys and elected county prosecutors, who once took common law crimes to the grand jury, now bring informations on their own authority, as District Attorneys.
The untold history and evolution of the United States District Attorney helps explain the meaning of the “District” as the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. To get the rest of the story, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com and I will tell you how you can become one of my Students for trial tuition of $50 plus you will get the four Organic Laws in a searchable format, so you can begin your study of written law.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Sep
24
GERALD CELENTE: “STATE CONTROLLED CAPITALISM IS CALLED FASCISM.”
Filed Under Article II Section 1 Clause 8, CONSTITUTION, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, Oath of Office, ORGANIC LAWS, PRESIDENTS, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
Gerald Celente, according to his website, www.geraldcelente.com/, “has been forecasting trends worldwide since 1980, delivering concise, deployable success strategies and publishing the Trends Journal.” This is one of Mr. Celente’s recent remarks: “State controlled capitalism is called fascism.”
What trend has Mr. Celente forecast by his state controlled capitalism definition? Regular readers will recall that George Washington created a States elected Presidential dictatorship, when he took this oral oath on April 30, 1789: “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”
Washington’s oral swearing to carry out the faithful execution of the Office of President of the United States and preservation, protection and defense of the Constitution of the United States to the best of his ability, had nothing to do with the document nine States ratified and established between them on June 21, 1788. George Washington, who had already been elected President of the United States of America on April 6, 1789 without taking any oath, was fully aware he was becoming the employee of the United States in Congress assembled upon the taking of that oath and that according to Article I of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 all that was necessary for the impeachment of the President of the United States was that the Chief Justice preside at the impeachment. Washington, as President of the United States of America, would be the one to nominate any candidate for the Office of Chief Justice, which was just another high level employment for the Congress of the United States.
The federal government consists of the employees of the Congress of the United States which rules beyond its territorial limitations by actively and perpetually having Americans confuse the United States, the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, with the United States of America, the America not owned by the Confederacy.
Mr. Gerald Celente has not officially enrolled in “Basic Course in Law and Government” although like millions of others he may regularly visit www.edrivera.com . Enrollment in my “Basic Course” will change your life, because by enrolling you will be making a commitment to learning and understanding the government’s written law. Mr. Celente has only lately become aware of the government’s intrusion in American capitalism, which began when President of the United States of America George Washington took the oral oath of Office of President of the United States. Following Mr. Celente’s trends will not take us off the path of dictatorship George Washington put us on. Only the best legal education ever devised will successfully remove a dictator. That legal education begins, with the four Organic Laws, which I will send to you in a computer searchable format along with information about beginning your legal education for $50, when you contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jul
24
USING THE ORGANIC LAWS TO QUESTION THE AUTHORITY OF ANYONE CLAIMING TO REPRESENT THE GOVERNMENT
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, COMMON LAW, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, FREEDOM, Northwest Ordinance, ORGANIC LAWS, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
The Organic Laws of the United States of America are presented in Volume 1 of the United States Code as the foundation of “the general and permanent laws of the United States.” This presentation of the four Organic Laws and all the Titles of the United States Code tells us unequivocally that the United States of America and the United States are separate and distinct entities connected almost exclusively to the two pairs of Organic Laws written about the same time.
The first two Organic Laws, the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 and Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 are the first pair of Organic Laws which are connected to the United States of America, the Confederacy and the first and perpetual Union.
The last two Organic Laws are the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the Constitution of September 17, 1787, the second pair of Organic Laws which are connected to the United States, “this Union,” the United States, which include the governments of the 50 States, the federal territory within those States and Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, America Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands.
The Declaration of Independence describes an America where men and women are free to be governed exclusively by their Creator and the English common law. Article IV of the Articles of Confederation secures individual freedoms by restraining the assertion of power by the States of the first Union.
The United States Supreme Court requires proof of authority in assertions of power by anyone dealing with a person claiming government authority. See Federal Crop Insurance Corporation v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380 (1947)
In every situation where there is a claim of government authority, that authority will be limited to the territory described in Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
Knowledge of the limitations of government requires a complete comprehension of the Organic Laws of the United States of America. To receive a complete set of searchable Organic Laws, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jul
16
AMERICA’S MOST FAMOUS COUPLES: THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THE CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.
Filed Under Article II Section 1 Clause 8, CONSTITUTION, LEARNING THE LAW, Oath of Office, ORGANIC LAWS, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
This famous first Presidential couple has been one man in two Offices every four years for over 223 years. The President of the United States is nothing more than an employee of the Confederacy, while the President of the United States of America is vested with the executive power. Together these two offices form the combination that makes a tyrant, despot or dictator and it’s the President of the United States that gets to be dictator.
The Constitution for the United States of America came into existence on June 21, 1788, when the ninth State of the United States of America ratified “this Constitution,” the Constitution of September 17, 1787, which was drafted by the Constitutional Convention of May 25, 1787. That Constitutional Convention produced a Constitution dated September 17, 1787, and signed by 39 of the delegates, which included one, George Washington.
The Constitution of the United States was made possible when George Washington took this famous oral oath: “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.” George Washington didn’t add his signature as President of the United States to the one he had already affixed to the Constitution of September 17, 1787 as President and deputy from Virginia. Washington couldn’t sign the Constitution of the United States because that Constitution wasn’t a piece of paper or vellum parchment—the Constitution of the United States was all the land owned by the United States of America.
The States of the United States of America used the Constitution that never was to contrive the power to make laws and impose taxes outside the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. Once George Washington was safely both President of the United States of America and President of the United States, Washington, the States in the Senate, the Representatives in the House of Representatives, the Supreme Court and all the other federal employees could pretend the Constitution of September 17, 1787 which had been ratified by all thirteen States was the Constitution of the United States.
When George Washington took the oral Article II Section 1 Clause 8 oath of office of President of the United States, he knew the Constitution of the United States wasn’t the Constitution of September 17, 1787 he signed on September 17,1787 and you should too. For those who can take the truth, my “Basic Course in Law and Government” is the final authority on what the Constitution of September 17, 1787 really isn’t. You can get the Course my Advanced Students gladly paid $500 to start their legal educations, but you will only have to pay $50. To get a full set of searchable Organic Laws and information about enrolling, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
May
8
“IF ONLY THE GOVERNMENT WOULD FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION…”
Filed Under Adoption, CONSTITUTION, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, Oath of Office, PROPRIETARY POWER, Supreme Court | 1 Comment
How many times have you heard that remark? So few have questioned the authority of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 that to do so would be considered sacrilege. If the purpose of the Constitution was to bring us together as a nation, it certainly has done that, but at a terrible cost.
The Constitution of September 17, 1787 was written to confuse and confound the reader. The Constitution has succeeded so well hardly anyone knows the law and the government is irreparably broken.
There is only one way to understand the Constitution and that is to take my”Basic Course in Law and Government.” For as little as $50, anyone can learn secrets which have remained hidden in the Constitution for 225 years. Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com to get started.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Feb
9
WHY DO LAWYERS, ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW HAVE TO BE MEMBERS OF A BAR?
Filed Under Article III, CONSTITUTION, LEARNING THE LAW, ORGANIC LAWS, State of California, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
I got this e-mail from a Student. My response appears below his e-mail:
“These questions may be too simple. However, what meaning does the term BAR have in relation to an attorney or a lawyer? What does it mean when someone says they have their BAR card? There seems to be much confusion out there, and I have yet, to find the truth for this term. I was told years ago
that it stood for British Attorney Registry. Are US Attorneys registered with the Queen?”
I was a member of the California State Bar from June 2, 1972 until August 6, 2006, when I was disbarred from appearing before the State of California Supreme Court. I had never appeared before that court in the three decades I was licensed to be an Attorney and Counselor at Law #52737. I became a dues paying member of the State Bar of California by becoming a member of the bar of that Supreme Court, so to be disbarred I had to be thrown out of that court in order to be disbarred. If all this sounds like a bunch of lawyer’s tricks, you are catching on to the legal business in America.
Law in America is a fantasy. What institution determines what the law is in America? The United States Supreme Court is supposed to be the court of last resort, the court that is the last say in what the law is, however, the only constitutional duty of the Chief Justice is to preside at the impeachment of the President of the United States. Impeachment is defined in the Constitution as a non-judicial process in Article I Section 3 Clause 7: “Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to law.” Article I impeachment is a legislative process, where the party is charged by the House of Representatives and tried by the Senate.
The United States Supreme Court is a legislative court, which was created on September 24, 1789 in the Judiciary Act of 1789. The Offices of Chief Justice and Associate Justices were created a day before the Supreme Court making it truly a court of men and not laws.
When I got started in the legal business, there were no Bar Cards. Back in our offices we had Bar Admission Certificates framed for display. Much later we had paper Bar Cards and then plastic. I never registered with the Brits and I don’t think the Queen would want anything to do with American law or its lawyers.
The British have dealt with a bar in their own way. Alfred Lord Tennyson wrote:
CROSSING THE BAR
Sunset and evening star,
And one clear call for me!
And may there be no moaning of the bar,
When I put out to sea.
But such a tide as moving seems asleep,
Too full for sound and foam,
When that which drew from out the boundless deep
Turns again home!
Twilight and evening bell,
And after that the dark!
And may there be no sadness of farewell,
When I embark;
For though from out our bourn of Time and Place
The flood may bear me far,
I hope to see my Pilot face to face
When I have crost the bar.
I crossed the Bar when I started telling the truth about law and government in California. Telling the truth about law and government got me disbarred. Learning the truth about the law and government can get you free. It costs nothing to get the Organic Laws of the United States of America and information about becoming my Student. Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Nov
4
“THE POWER TO TAX INVOLVES THE POWER TO DESTROY”
Filed Under CONSTITUTION, LAW OF THE LAND, Property Taxes, PROPRIETARY POWER, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
The power to tax is not just involved with the power to destroy it is the power to destroy. Both the power to tax and the lawmaking power can be traced back to the despotic power of monarchical rulers. Ancient tyrants ruled the nations they conquered, as if they owned them, because they did own them. Monarchs taxed and laid down the law, because no one dared to oppose the royal ruler.
The Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 changed ancient history. Taxation and lawmaking, now, had to be consensual, but on an individual basis. That spelled trouble for American politicians, because the people, once they were freed from royal tyranny, were unwilling to bind themselves to a democratic version of what they had under King George III. The Framers of the Constitution concocted the Representative and House of Representatives to con Americans to consent to taxation and to being ruled by Congress.
My Basic Course in Law and Government shows how George Washington and his Freemason cronies subdued and subjugated the American people. The Whiskey Rebellion was put down with the military might of the United States of America, and soon after the tax on spirits a tax on carriages was imposed. Subjugation by unwarranted taxation didn’t end with George Washington’s two terms as President of the United States and President of the United States of America.
Some twenty years after Washington’s death, Chief Justice John Marshall of the Supreme Court ruled erroneously, in McCulloch v. Maryland, that the Constitution exempts the Federal Government from state taxation. In that case the Chief Justice set forth his renowned dictum that “the power to tax involves the power to destroy.”
Government power in America vanished along with King George III. George Washington brought it back with a vengeance.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Sep
24
SEPTEMBER 24, 1789: 222 YEARS OF JUDICIAL CORRUPTION BEGINS
Filed Under Adoption, Article III, Articles of Confederation, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, Electoral College, LAW OF THE LAND, Oath of Office, Presidential Elector, PRESIDENTS, PROPRIETARY POWER, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
Two hundred and twenty-two years ago, today the Judiciary Act of 1789, was signed by George Washington, as President of the United States to show he approved it in accordance with Article I Section 7 Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution of the United States imposes only two duties on the President of the United States: to sign, if the President of the United States approves a Bill, or to make his objections on a Bill, if he does not approve. As the Congress of the United States of the United States of America cannot make laws for the States of the Confederacy, the United States of America, Congress established the Supreme Court of the United States for the federal territory owned by and subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.
Immediately after the President of the United States signed the Judiciary Act of 1789, George Washington, as President of the United States of America beginning on April 6, 1789, appointed the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court. Thus, began the corruption of the entire American judiciary. The corruption of the American judiciary was necessary to keep secret the joining of the two Offices, which create a tyrannical dictatorship.
Washington was the first President of the United States of America to be elected by the Presidential Electors described in Article II Section 1 Clause 2, but he would never take an Article VI oath “to support this Constitution” meaning the Constitution, which could establish an independent federal judiciary, if it were ever adopted by binding oaths. Washington took a non-binding oral oath to obtain employment as the Article I Section 7 President of the United States.
Today, there is no possibility of obtaining justice in any court in America. Students who have enrolled in my Basic Course in Law and Government learn how George Washington turned the American presidency into a dictatorship. The truth about law and government is only available through my Course of Instruction. Go to my July 7, 2011 Post to take advantage of a special offer.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Aug
13
HOW LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS GOT THEIR POWER
Filed Under Adoption, Articles of Confederation, COMMON LAW, CONSTITUTION, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
My enrolled Students know how the Officers named in the Constitution of September 17, 1787 got their power. For readers who have not yet accepted my generous offer in my July 7, 2011 Post, I will summarize the transfer and substitution of power process, George Washington plotted in the Constitutional Convention of May 25, 1787. First the Office is created in a document which will later be submitted for ratification to entities, which can confer a duty that results in a grant of power to the person occupying that Office.
I will give two examples, which can be verified in the Constitution of September 17, 1787. The President of the United States is thought to be the head of the executive branch, but in Article I Section 7, the President of the United States is given the duty to approve or object to Bills which have been passed by the House of Representatives and Senate. As these are his only duties, the President of the United States is part of the legislative branch.
The language in Article I Section 3 Clause 6: “the Chief Justice shall preside,” “when the President of the United States is tried” for impeachment, imposes a legislative duty on the Office of Chief Justice.
In both examples, the keyword is “shall.” If the President of the United States approves a Bill, “he shall sign it” and if he objects, “he shall return it.” When the President of the United States is impeached the Chief Justice shall preside. The President of the United States and Chief Justice have jobs fancy jobs, but jobs nonetheless.
Both the President of the United States and the Chief Justice are employees of Congress, as they have no little or no discretion as to how they will perform their duties.
So, if the highest federal law enforcement Officers, the President and Chief Justice of the United States are just employees, what more could your own local police and sheriff be?
My Students know the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was established, but was not adopted so proprietary power not government power would be the force behind Officer/Employees. No one else knows the so-called government operates like a commercial enterprise, because no one in government has taken the Article VI oath to use the Constitution of September 17, 1787 to limit government.
Local law enforcement is limited to the territory owned by the federal government, the United States of America under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777. Ask your local law enforcement, where is your written authority?
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera