Aug
18
MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LESSON: THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IS A LEGISLATIVE NOT A JUDICIAL COURT, BECAUSE THE CHIEF JUSTICE IS A LEGISLATIVE OFFICER WITH CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATIVE DUTIES
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, IMPEACHMENT, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, Supreme Court, U.S. District Court | 1 Comment
An earlier mini lesson established the office of President of the United States as an employment of the United States of America. The Constitution reads: “When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside.” In Article I Section 3 Clause 7, both Article I and Article II Impeachment is made non-judicial.
The Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 declared American independence from the English monarchy, which embodied all government authority in one person, the monarch. By eliminating King George III, every American was declared equal to every other American, which, also, eliminated all judges.
The Constitution, in Article I, makes it clear that only those Americans who have been freed from a government may rule themselves. The Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 did not bring Americans under governmental legislative power.
The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 expressly created a temporary government for those Americans inhabiting the Northwest Territory, land belonging to the United States of America. Article I of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 made that temporary government permanent.
Legislation enacted by the Congress of the United States, the Judiciary Act of 1789, made the federal courts “judicial courts” for the thirteen districts created by that act. On the date of enactment, September 24, 1789 two States had not ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787, making the federal courts legislative and only for the land owned by the United States of America.
The only duty imposed on the Chief Justice by the Constitution of September 17, 1787 is legislative and all other duties imposed on the Chief Justice and United States Supreme Court are legislative.
This is not all the information you need to prove the Chief Justice, Associate Justices and federal court system is limited to government affairs and the lands owned by the United States of America, but it is a start. To get the rest of this story, enroll in my Basic Course in Law and Government, by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
28
WHY YOU HAVE TO LEARN THE LAW
Filed Under Adoption, Articles of Confederation, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, LIBERTARIAN, PRESIDENTS, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
The federal government isn’t the President and Congress of the United States and the Supreme Court of the United States that just happens to be “the type of a particular activity or the manner in which the Government conducts it.” The “it” is the administration of the United States and other property belonging to the United States of America. The federal government is the United States of America, the Confederacy established by the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777. The Constitution of September 17, 1787 spun the Articles of Confederation into the federal government and made possible the President’s administration. The Federal Crop Insurance case should be read by anyone interested in limited government here is a piece of it:
FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION v. MERRILL
It is too late in the day to urge that the Government is just another private litigant, for purposes of charging it with liability, whenever it takes over a business theretofore conducted by private enterprise or engages in competition with private ventures. Government is not partly public or partly private, depending upon the governmental pedigree of the type of a particular activity or the manner in which the Government conducts it. The Government may carry on its operations through conventional executive agencies or through corporate forms especially created for defined ends. (Citations Omitted) Whatever the form in which the Government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the Government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the Government stays within the bounds of his authority. The scope of this authority may be explicitly defined by Congress or be limited by delegated legislation, properly exercised through the rule-making power. And this is so even though, as here, the agent himself may have been unaware of the limitations upon his authority. 332 U.S. 380, 384 (1947)
The President of the United States, Congress of the United States and the Supreme Court of the United States are limited to the United States, its “government” and its citizens. You won’t be free until you learn how to read and understand the law. To get the information you need, you must enroll in my Basic Course in Law and Government, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
21
The Judiciary Act of 1789
Filed Under Adoption, Article III, CONSTITUTION, LAW OF THE LAND, Martial Law, Oath of Office, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
The Judiciary Act of 1789
September 24, 1789.
1 Stat. 73.
CHAP. XX.–An Act to establish the Judicial Courts of the United States.
SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the supreme court of the United States shall consist of a chief justice and five associate justices, any four of whom shall be a quorum, and shall hold annually at the seat of government two sessions, the one commencing the first Monday of February, and the other the first Monday of August. That the associate justices shall have precedence according to the date of their commissions, or when the commissions of two or more of them bear date on the same day, according to their respective ages.
The Constitution of September 17, 1787 stated where the judicial power of the United States of America was to be placed in the first sentence of Article III: “The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”
It should be very clear from the language in the Judiciary Act of 1789 that Congress was enacting a system of legislative territorial courts for the United States, the lands owned by the United States of America.
The judicial power of the United States of America had two sources: the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and its proprietary power over the lands owned by the United States of America.
The Supreme Court of the United States was the simple result of legislative sausage making. There was no reverent ordination or establishment of any high minded judicial institution just the ordinary chicanery that brought the federalists into power.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
8
ARE UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATORS TELLING THE TRUTH
Filed Under Adoption, Article II Section 1 Clause 8, Article III, Articles of Confederation, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, Electoral College, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, Oath of Office, PRESIDENTS, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
If a United States Representative or Senator is asked about the present status of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, that Representative or Senator will respond with the story the Library of Congress is putting out, instead of telling the whole truth. Here is the federal government’s official Internet story of what happened to the Articles of Confederation:
The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation, the first constitution of the United States, on November 15, 1777. However, ratification of the Articles of Confederation by all thirteen states did not occur until March 1, 1781. The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments. The need for a stronger Federal government soon became apparent and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The present United States Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation on March 4, 1789.
When my Students ask the local Representative or Senator about the Articles of Confederation, they get back the same story.
Its their story and they’re sticking to it.
What is the whole truth? What really happened on March 4, 1789?
The First Congress met on March 4, 1789 in New York City to do the only business it could do—make laws for the United States, the lands owned by the United States of America, which, also, was not replaced by the Constitution of the United States. After the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, the American people were set free from government that ruled by written law, however, governments had to let go of whatever power they exercised over people and their lands. Governments retained proprietary over whatever land was government owned. The First Congress made laws for the lands owned by the United States of America.
June 21, 1788 was the date the State of New Hampshire became the ninth State to ratify the Constitution of September 17, 1787. That ratification established the constitution of the United States as any land within those nine States owned by the United States of America. This Constitution of the United States consisted of all the land owned by the United States of America. The documentary Constitution of the United States would be written by the Congress of the United States with legislation presented by the President of the United States and would be amended by the States, but never adopted by officers, who have taken an Article VI oath “to support this Constitution.”
On February 4, 1789, George Washington was elected President of the United States of America, however, instead of taking that Office immediately, as that Office required no oath of Office, Washington scheduled an inauguration to the Office of President of the United States, an Office which only required an oral oath.
The Office of President of the United States was critical to the creation of a Constitution of the United States, because all Bills enacted by the House of Representatives and Senate must be presented to a President of the United States, who has taken an oral oath to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution of the United States.
At noon on April 30, 1789, the United States would have both a Congress and a President of the United States, but it would not have a judiciary without the legislation Congress and the President would produce. The Judiciary Act of 1789 would create a legislative United States Supreme Court.
The Library of Congress was correct; the Constitution of the United States would begin to replace the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 on March 4, 1789, but only on the land owned by the United States of America, the Confederacy created by those Articles of Confederation.
The summary of the law and government I have presented here will be understood by my Students, if you are not a Student and you want to get the whole story of the law and government in America, enroll in my Basic Course in Law and Government, by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Apr
9
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ASSOCIATE JUSTICE JOHN PAUL STEVENS TO RETIRE
Filed Under CONSTITUTION, IMPEACHMENT, LEARNING THE LAW, OBAMA, ORGANIC LAWS, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
Stevens is an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court not a Judge of the Article III Supreme Court of the United States. There is no Article III Supreme Court, because then everyone would know the United States Supreme Court is legislative and not judicial. The “United States” describes the kind of Supreme Court it is; it is a legislative court established by the proprietary power of the United States of America. An Article III Supreme Court of the United States is never established, because that would require the person elected President of the United States of America to take the Article VI oath of office “to support this Constitution,” meaning the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
My law Students are taught all the law not just the written law. All American law schools indoctrinate their students to believe in the law of the United States Supreme Court, which results in the elevation of legislative law above the English common law, the law of the American people.
Justice Stevens’ office of Associate Justice is not found in any constitution. His office is created the day before the enactment of the Judiciary Act of 1789, when the pay of the Chief Justice and justices is set by law. The office of Chief Justice is found in Article I of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, however, that Constitution makes it a legislative office by imposing the legislative duty of presiding over the impeachment of the President of the United States.
Barack Hussein Obama as President of the United States of America will nominate a replacement for Justice Stevens, because the United States Supreme Court reviews the laws enacted by Congress for the territory owned by the United States of America.
While practically everyone in the country will be concerned with the irrelevancies of selecting a replacement for Justice Stevens, my Students will be learning all the law necessary to retain their property and their freedom. To join them, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com Your written commitment to complete your enrollment obligations will immediately secure for you all class materials.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Apr
5
SIXTEEN STATES SUE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ALLEGING DEMOCRAT HEALTH CARE REFORM BILL IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, IMPEACHMENT, LEARNING THE LAW, Supreme Court | 1 Comment
These suits show that the States remain confused about which Constitution applies to the federal government. No one in the federal government is bound by the Constitution of September 17, 1787, because no in the federal government has taken an oath to be bound by it. The States, however, have ratified that Constitution and they are bound to recognize the Constitution of the United States, which means they have to allow the federal government to make laws for its own territory and anyone who might be found on it. This means Congress and the President of the United States can require those on federal land to pay for health insurance.
Who will resolve this problem of constitutional interpretation? This is a job for the federal courts, which turn out to be the legislative courts planted in Article I of the Constitution of September 17, 1787. The Chief Justice is the head of the legislative/judicial courts. The Chief Justice is legislative rather than judicial officer, because his only constitutional duty is to preside at the impeachment of the President of the United States. Impeachment is specifically defined in the constitution as a non-judicial process.
It is unlikely that the States will prevail in their lawsuits, because the federal courts are rigged in favor of the government. You can teach the State Attorney General the law by taking my Basic Course in Law and Government and asserting your privileges and immunities as an inhabitant under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777. Tuition may now be paid in installments by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Feb
24
WHAT PRESIDENT IS THE “HE,” THE SUBJECT, OF THE CONSTITUTION’S ARTICLE II, SECTION 2, CLAUSE 2: THE “APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE”?
Filed Under Article II Section 1 Clause 5, Articles of Confederation, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Oath of Office, PRESIDENTS, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
We know George Washington took the oral oath of Office of President of the United States, because Washington was elected too early to qualify for the Article II Section 1 Clause 5, Office of President and he didn’t need to take any oath to be President of the United States of America. The “fourteen Years a Resident within the United States” requirement for the person who would fill the Office of President kept Washington from filing that Office. George Washington was elected to the Office of President of the United States of America on February 4, 1789 and he became President of the United States on April 30, 1789 by taking the oath of office on that date.
George Washington lawfully held both the Office of President of the United States of America and the Office of President of the United States, because nine States under Article IX of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 had the power to create a Committee of States and appoint a President and they did so by ratifying “this Constitution.” The Senate was that Committee and George Washington was that President. The Constitution of September 17, 1787 set forth the oath of Office of President of the United States, however, the Congress of the United States had to establish that Office by Law, which it did beginning March 4, 1789. The Office of President was never “established by Law by the Congress of the United States, so it has always remained vacant.
So who can nominate and make appointments?
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law; but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments. Article II Section 2 Clause 2 Constitution of September 17, 1787
It is now obvious that only the President of the United States of America has the power to make Treaties, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoint “Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for.”
The first President of the United States is not elected, he is one of those “Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for,” George Washington appointed himself to that Office by taking the only oral oath in the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
Students learn this and much more. Become one by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Nov
14
KHALID SHAIKH MOHAMMED WILL EVENTUALLY GO FREE IF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ATTEMPTS TO PROSECUTE THE 9-11 TERRORIST IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Filed Under CRIMINAL LAW, GRAND JURY, JURY DUTY, LEARNING THE LAW, Supreme Court, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
Former federal judge and Attorney General Michael Mukasey in a November 14, 2009 interview on the Fox News Network claimed there was little the families of the 9-11 victims could do to stop the planned prosecutions in the Southern District of New York.
Mukasey is wrong. The United States Department of Justice must obtain a true bill of indictment from a federal grand jury, before any case can be brought against Khalid Shaikh Mohammed. To get a true bill of indictment, the federal grand jurors must be qualified.
New Yorkers do not qualify to be federal grand jurors because none of them reside within the district, which is the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America in the counties of Bronx, Dutchess, New York, Orange, Putnam, Rockland, and Suffolk. Federal grand jurors must reside on federal territory and there are none that qualify in New York. The United States Supreme Court case Test v. United States, 420 U.S. 28 (1975) establishes the absolute right of a federal criminal defendant to make a motion to dismiss the indictment because the grand jurors are not qualified.
The families of 9-11 victims must inform the United States Department of Justice that the military commissions are the only safe method of prosecuting Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and his co- conspirators.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Aug
22
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: WHAT WAS THE CONSTITUTION OF SEPTEMBER 17, 1787 SUPPOSED TO CREATE? WHAT DID THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES ACTUALLY CREATE?
Filed Under Adoption, Article II Section 1 Clause 5, Article II Section 1 Clause 8, Articles of Confederation, CENSUS, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, Electoral College, LAW OF THE LAND, Martial Law, Oath of Office, PRESIDENTS, Presidential Elector, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
The Constitution of September 17, 1787 was ratified by the thirteen States of the original and perpetual Union, the Confederacy styled the United States of America, but it was not adopted by a President and Congress bound by oath “to support this Constitution,” the Constitution of September 17, 1787. This Constitution is the one erroneously thought to be operating in America. The Constitutional Convention meeting in secret devised the clever scheme, whereby George Washington would be ineligible to fill the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 Office of President. The “fourteen Years a Resident within the United States” requirement could not be met until after July 4, 1790, by Washington or anyone else. The absence of a President aborted this Constitution and prevented its adoption.
Washington was elected by the Presidential Electors on February 4, 1789, months after New Hampshire, on June 21, 1788, became the ninth State to ratify the Constitution of September 17, 1787. From before May 25, 1787, when the Constitutional Convention first met through the State ratifications of the Constitution George Washington was engaged in an active conspiracy to take over the governments of America.
The balance of this post is available only to Students enrolled in the Advanced Course on Law and Government.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jul
14
UNDERSTANDING THE CONSTITUTION: WHY THERE ARE NO JUDICIAL FEDERAL COURTS
Filed Under Article III, Articles of Confederation, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, Electoral College, IMPEACHMENT, Northwest Ordinance, Oath of Office, PRESIDENTS, Presidential Elector, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
Article III of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 vests the judicial Power of the United States in “one supreme Court” “and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” The Congress of the United States, which, in Article III, is the United States in Congress assembled of the Articles of Confederation has the power to ordain and establish. The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 was a result of the exercise of that power to ordain and establish.
As Article I Section 1 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 clearly shows: “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” The Congress of the United States with the power to ordain and establish is the “United States in Congress assembled,” which survives as the Senate of the United States. The first nine States to ratify the Constitution of September 17, 1787 established the Senate as a Committee of States pursuant to Article IX of the Articles of Confederation.
The legislative U.S. Supreme Court created by the Judiciary Act of 1789 can exercise no judicial power, as the Congress of the United States, with the power to ordain and establish, is the United States in Congress assembled. The Chief Justice who heads the legislative U.S. Supreme Court, according to the Judiciary Act of 1789, is bound to perform legislative duties, because he is a the person who must preside, according to Article I Section 3 Clause 6, at the impeachment trial of the President of the United States, a non-judicial proceeding.
An Article III “one supreme Court,” once ordained and established would have to have Judges, not Justices, appointed to it by a President who had taken and subscribed an Article VI oath. As no President Elect has ever taken and subscribed such an oath and no Supreme Court has been ordained and established, there is no evidence that any Article III court exists anywhere.
All federal judges including the Chief Justice and Associate Justices are appointed, by the President of the United States, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to legislative courts. My enrolled students are supplied with all the written materials needed to fully comprehend how George Washington and the Freemasons managed to take over the federal government using a few common words and a lot of secrecy. To become a student, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera