• Pages

  • CONTACT ED RIVERA
  • IMPEACHMENT OF GEORGE W. BUSH REQUIRED TO END HIS POLICIES
  • LETTER TO CAPTIVES
  • REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

• Recent Posts

  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LESSON: LEARNING CONSTITUTION LAW BY THE NUMBERS
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LESSON: CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT THAT DOOM THE CREATION OF A REPUBLIC
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LESSON: A CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND A CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES ALL IN “THIS CONSTITUTION”
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LESSON: THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IS A LEGISLATIVE NOT A JUDICIAL COURT, BECAUSE THE CHIEF JUSTICE IS A LEGISLATIVE OFFICER WITH CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATIVE DUTIES
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LESSON: THE ARTICLE 2 CLAUSE 5 OFFICE OF PRESIDENT HAS BEEN VACANT SINCE GEORGE WASHINGTON FAILED THE FOURTEEN YEARS RESIDENT WITHIN THE UNITED STATES ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT

• Categories

  • Adoption
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 5
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 8
  • Article III
  • Articles of Confederation
  • BAIL OUT
  • BANKRUPTCY
  • CENSUS
  • CIVIL CONTEMPT
  • COMMON LAW
  • CONGRESS
  • CONSTITUTION
  • CRIMINAL LAW
  • Declaration of Independence
  • Economic Stimulous
  • Electoral College
  • Foreclosure
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • FREEDOM
  • GAY MARRIAGE
  • GRAND JURY
  • IMMIGRATION
  • IMPEACHMENT
  • JURY DUTY
  • LAW OF THE LAND
  • LEARNING THE LAW
  • LIBERTARIAN
  • Martial Law
  • MAYAN 2012
  • Northwest Ordinance
  • Oath of Office
  • OBAMA
  • ORGANIC LAWS
  • PARDON
  • Presidential Elector
  • PRESIDENTS
  • ProperTea Tax Tea Party
  • Property Taxes
  • Second Amendment
  • State of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • TRIAL BY JURY
  • U.S. District Court
  • Uncategorized

• Archives

  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Ask a sheriff to describe the origin of his territorial jurisdiction and he will tell you the entire county has always been his territory, but if you ask him about any federal property located within that county’s perimeter and he will deny any jurisdiction over that land.  The States of the second Union the United States identify the counties within a State by name and draw boundaries called county lines, by metes and bounds.   None of the States identify or describe the territory within the county lines as federal lands owned by the United States of America.  Where can the legal division of legislative power between State and federal government be found?

Title 1, Section 2 of the United States Code defines a county as, “The word ‘county’ includes a parish, or any other equivalent subdivision of a State or Territory of the United States.”  The phrase “of the United States” means belonging to the United States of America, the Confederacy.   States of the 50 State Union must accept the federal definition of a county as consisting of all the territory belonging to the United States of America, as the Constitution of the United States and the laws made pursuant to that Constitution is the supreme law of the land.  Upon close examination, all State and federal written  legislation will be found to be applicable only to government and to lands owned by the United States of America.       

 The Congress of the United States is recognized as having complete legislative power over lands owned by the United States of America and, as for the States, there is the popular belief that the State legislatures somehow get legislative power from the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

The  Posts on this site have explained in detail that the legislative power over the lands owned by the United States of America  is derived from the proprietary power every owner  possesses over property.  All that proprietary power is granted by the first nine ratifying States of the United States of America.  When all thirteen have ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787    

All government legislative power in America is derived from the proprietary power over lands owned by the “United States,” the Confederacy, the United States of America.  

Before the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was ratified by nine States of the Confederacy, the United States of America, English common law, without the procedural and administrative power of the English monarchy, was the law in America.   The sheriff was the elected common law officer, who was popularly recognized to have the power to assemble common law juries.

After the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was ratified by nine States of the United States of America, the States of the new Union, the United States, began the process of replacing the procedural and administrative power of the former English monarchy with legislated procedural law.

This is, in a very simplified form, how  the territorial jurisdiction of the sheriff is limited to the lands owned by the United States of America within the county lines.  Does the county sheriff know the territorial limitations of his or her office?  Can you explain to the sheriff, why your property is not within his territorial jurisdiction?  If you can’t, you need to enroll in my Basic Course in Law and Government.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com for enrollment information.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera       

The real purpose of the Miranda warning is to establish federal territorial jurisdiction where none exists.  

If you hear the following warning, a so-called law enforcement officer is trying to trick you into accepting the jurisdiction of the person arresting you and of the court where you will be tried if you submit:

You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?

The law in 49 of the 50 states is the English common law not federal law, which includes all written laws of all 50 States.  The court of law referred to in the warning is a legislative court not a judicial court.  The appointed attorney will be one only licensed to practice in legislative courts and will be incompetent to show the lack of territorial jurisdiction over you and any alleged crime.  Accepting these rights submits you to their jurisdiction.

Should you remain silent?  The promise that “anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law” should be exploited by you.   Become a Student in the Basic Course in Law and Government, learn everything there is to know about territorial jurisdiction and sing like a constitutional canary, if you are ever nabbed by government agents.  Better yet, become a Legal Genius and change the world. Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera  

The administration of Barack Hussein Obama will prosecute Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the September 11 attacks, and four September 11 co-conspirators in the United States district court in Manhattan, New York rather than before a military commission.   The decision not to prosecute by military commission has ignited a sharp political debate.  The United States district courts are military trial courts for civilians (non-military) litigants. 

Title 28 of the United States Code, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure requires that district court judges reside within the district, which is the federal territory within the counties that comprise the district.  The judges of the federal district court in Manhattan have been exempted from the residence rule.  Grand and petit jurors cannot be excused from their one-year within the district residency requirement.  

The decision to use the United States district court was announced by Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who said he would instruct prosecutors to seek death sentences for Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and his co-conspirators.  Mr. Holder should have by now discovered why he is a General in charge of the Department of Justice.  One of the federal government’s biggest secrets is the military power basis of the United States district courts.   Justice is what is purportedly dispensed by an occupying military force or a ruling monarch.

Should the trial actually take place in Manhattan it would mean one of the highest-profile and highest-security terrorism trials in history would be set within blocks from where hijackers for Al Qaeda destroyed the World Trade Center, killing nearly 3,000 people.  Such a trial may take years to conclude and in those years, aggressive defense counsel will surely become aware of the problems the federal government will begin to have with the factors involved in territorial jurisdiction.

Deciding to prosecute the 9-11 terrorists in the United States district court in Manhattan was one of the dumbest things Barack Hussein Obama has done recently.  Bleeding heart liberal attorneys will do anything to save someone from a government execution.

To learn how Barack Hussein Obama is jeopardizing the successful prosecution of the 9-11 terrorists, enroll in my Basic Course in Law and Government by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

 

Roman Polanski was charged with a written law crime decades ago in California to which he pleaded guilty then he fled before he could be sentenced.  Now he is in custody in Switzerland awaiting extradition paperwork from the Los Angeles County District Attorney.

California like 48 of the other common law states substitutes California Codes for the common law.  The Los Angeles County District Attorney pretends that all so-called crimes that occur within the Los Angeles County lines fall within his federal district that include the Veteran’s Administration Hospital and Los Padres National forest.  The VA has its own Zip Code 90073, which is the most heavily populated federal enclave in an area of millions.  This is where federal jurors would have to come from and this is where the State of California juror, the “domiciliary” lives.  

If Roman Polanski had taken my Basic Course in Law and Government, he would be telling his high priced attorneys to drop the legal bomb on the State of California’s written law system. 

Polanski is a punk and a pervert.  You are probably a patriot and all around good guy.  Are you waiting for the gendarmes to knock on your door before you start preparing a legal defense.  The Congress of the United States is preparing legislation that will make it a federal offense not to have health insurance.  Prepare for the worse by enrolling as a Student.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera       

Article III Section 1 Clause 3 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 reads as follows:

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.

Everyone knows that a crime is any act or omission to act for which the actor or non-actor can be punished by death or imprisonment, so how is it that millions have been imprisoned without a jury trial?  The “trial of all Crimes” is not by Jury, because George Washington took an oral oath that prevented the written Constitution of September 17, 1787, which would require jury trials in all crimes, from being adopted by foreclosing the formation of a government extending beyond territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  Such a government would be in the control of juries in full control of the law and the facts of any criminal case.  

Years of personal participation in Masonic ritual and secrecy had prepared George Washington and the other Freemasons in the secret Constitutional Convention to create in the Constitution of September 17, 1787 an intricate trap that would snare those who thought that consent to be governed meant they could say no to government.  Legislative power was to be limited to the rules for government and the territory owned by government by making provision for an executive under the Articles of Confederation, the President of the United States of America; an executive under the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and an employee/President of the United States to administer the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.

Washington set a precedent for all future Presidents Elect to reject the Constitution of September 17, 1787 by rejecting the Office of President in favor of becoming a secret employee of Congress.  The uninterrupted rejection of the Office of President by every man elected President has left the Constitution of September 17, 1787 un-adopted by any local, State or federal government.  The States ratified the written Constitution of September 17, 1787, but no State officer has ever taken the Article VI oath “to support this Constitution.”  George Washington took an oral oath to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution of the United States, but such an oath is insufficient in law to support a document that can only be binding if the oath is subscribed.

Blame the Freemasons.  When creating the secret Constitution, they saw to it that Freemason George Washington would be elected to two Offices: the Office of President of the United States of America and the Office of President, an Office that would not be open and available until after July 4, 1790.   The Office of President of the United States of America did not require an oath and the oath of Office of President of the United States wouldn’t bind Washington “to support this Constitution,” meaning the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

Sure, the Constitution of September 17, 1787 has been ratified by all the States.  The process of ratification merely recognized and affirmed, what State delegates to the secret Constitutional Convention had produced, which was the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  This Constitution provided in Article VI, a mechanism, an oath to bind government officials to the written rules embraced within that document.   Freemason George Washington has, since April 30, 1789, made certain that not one person has taken a valid oath to support it. 

 The Constitution of the United States is not a constitution and even if it was it could only be an unwritten one.  Become a student and learn the secrets of the Constitution that have been reserved to Masons of the 33^rd Degree.  Enroll in the only group intent in discovering the truth about the law and government; contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera