Aug
10
DEMANDING THAT THE STATE RECOGNIZE COMMON LAW MARRIAGE, SO YOU CAN RESCIND YOUR OLD CIVIL MARRIAGE AND START OVER IN COMMON LAW
Filed Under COMMON LAW, FREEDOM, GAY MARRIAGE, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, Territorial Jurisdiction | 2 Comments
Ten States and the District of Columbia recognize common law marriage, so 80% of the States refuse to recognize that a mature man and woman can live together as husband and wife without purchasing a marriage license.
Only one of the six States that allows same sex marriage recognizes common law marriage.
Clearly, the over whelming majority of the States are into marriage for the money and the control the licensing of the most intimate of human relationships provides government.
Government marital money grubbing can be stopped dead in its tracks, if married people individually or as couples rescind the marriage license that was purchased from a State on the false representation that any marriage without the license would be invalid.
How much sense does it make to refuse government recognition to a husband and wife in a common law marriage, while such recognition is extended to a same sex couple? It doesn’t make any sense, but government will not change its spots any more than a leopard can.
Government is a commercial enterprise, so if it can coerce the people to pay government for the “privilege” of enjoying human society’s most fundamental, it has become a “public trust” that needs busting.
Trust busing is as easy as learning the ABC’s of law and government by enrolling in my Basic Course in Law and Government. Licensing requires written laws and many regulations, which have to apply to one place and to the exclusion of all others. Governments are limited to making laws for the lands owned by the United States of America. You will learn how, when you enroll. To enroll contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jul
28
BRIDGING THE LEGAL GAP WITH WRITS: COMMON LAW AND WRITTEN LAW COMBINED
Filed Under COMMON LAW, Declaration of Independence, FREEDOM, LEARNING THE LAW | Leave a Comment
The Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 did more than sever the political bands that had connected Americans with Great Britain, the mother country. Independence freed men and women in America from all government not just the British King George III.
The English common law was not something they could get rid of even if they wanted. The English common law is embedded in the language itself. The administration of the common law was not automatic, because all government power was exercised through the king.
The king controlled justice by controlling the various writs that enabled the county sheriffs to enforce common law judgments.
Today, county sheriffs enforce court orders by a writ system that causes everyone to believe the English common law is still part of the written law system. Use of the writs of possession and replevin, for example, is just a ploy to fool the legal profession that somehow English common law and written law are united.
English common law and written law are like oil and water immiscible. The government’s written law has just appropriated the common law writ nomenclature for a seamless transition from freedom to what we have today—complete government control.
Writs with funny names do not mean justice. Writs are no more than court orders to a sheriff limited to the territory owned by the United States of America. To get the whole story, enroll in the Basic Course in Law and Government, by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jul
23
THE AUDACITY OF HYPE: NOT MY FOUNDING FATHERS
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, FREEDOM, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, LIBERTARIAN, Martial Law, Northwest Ordinance | 1 Comment
According to Glenn Beck, he never met a Founding Father he didn’t like. Beck gushes over these men like school girls swoon over the latest music celebrity. Beck may never end his love affair with these bewigged silk stockinged part time citizen statesmen. We, however, can take them exactly for what they were savvy men of business.
As leaders of American commerce, the so-called Founding Fathers hitched or rigged what passed for government in America to the rising star of American business enterprise, by taking the United States of America public. The assets of the United States of America were incorporated in the United States Inc. All went well until government started to be the rising star and that proved to be quite a drag, since it is a dead or dying star going nowhere but down.
The Constitution of September 17, 1787 was hyped to Americans as a panacea for the kind of economic downturn we would call a recession. Such recessions are part of the business cycle, but now they are the basis for governmental intervention. Up to the time of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, the government of the United States of America was as close as any government has come to being libertarian then George Washington found himself leading the secret Constitutional Convention of May 25, 1787.
The official story of the historians who work at the Library built by Congress is that the Constitution of the United States replaced the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 on March 4, 1789, the date the Congress of the United States first convened. No other historian disagrees with the historians at the Library of Congress. No attorney I know has ever read the Articles of Confederation, so they would not know why the Articles of Confederation were replaced and not repealed.
The hype has always been that the Articles of Confederation were repealed, but that lie had to be modified because the Articles are still part of the four Organic Laws. The Articles formed a Confederacy of sovereign, free and independent States so the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 wouldn’t do for the United States, which were not sovereign, free or independent.
The Articles of Confederation were replaced by the Constitution of the United States, because the Union of United States is much less than the United States of America and that’s not hype.
Veneration of the Founding Fathers violates the principle of not elevating men above law. With the Founding Fathers out of the way of our research and investigation, we can reconstruct the crime scene, when the smartest men in the Constitutional Convention ended freedom in America. Glenn Beck can’t teach you what he doesn’t know. This is the only place in the world where you can learn the truth about law and government came to be what they are. To become a Student contact me, for a good laugh watch or listen to Glenn Beck.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jul
19
PROVING THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION OF NOVEMBER 15, 1777 WERE ONLY REPLACED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES WHERE THE LAND IS OWNED BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, FREEDOM, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, ORGANIC LAWS | Leave a Comment
If you, like me, are sick and tired of being treated just like another second class citizen of the United States, and you are going to use Article IV of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 to get out of the citizenship trap you will need to know how to prove the Articles of Confederation are still good law. You will want to give notice to the nearest member of the United States Congress or representative of State government, that you claim the status of an Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 Article IV free inhabitant. You must be prepared to explain why the following version of the official federal story of the alleged end of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 proves you are a free inhabitant and not a citizen of the United States.
The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation the first constitution of the United States, on November 15, 1777. However, ratification of the Articles of Confederation by all thirteen states did not occur until March 1, 1781. The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments. The need for a stronger Federal government soon became apparent and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The present United States Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation on March 4, 1789.
This story is from the Library of Congress Web Site and like all government information it is only superficially true. The Library of Congress version of what happened to the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 is the official explanation of why you have no other choice than to be a citizen of the United States. As the national library for the United States, the Library of Congress cannot claim the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 have been repealed, as there is simply be no documentary evidence of that or the “repealed “word would have been used. Why wouldn’t American governments want the Articles of Confederation replaced or repealed? Article IV of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 assured non-citizens the enjoyment of all privileges and immunities of citizens of the several States with three specific exceptions. Who would consent to be a citizen if all the privileges and immunities of one are there for the taking, so long as you aren’t a pauper, vagabond or fugitive from justice? Article IV is the reason government has such difficulty dealing with so-called “illegal aliens.”
Federal and State governments would like to see the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 permanently removed from the Organic Laws of the United States of America, but it cannot, as the Articles of Confederation is the only real source of government power, which is exercised by the enactment of written law. Unwritten law applies to everyone, but written law only applies to government and its citizens.
The Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 limited government in America, so much the politicians of the time had to use deceit to grow its power and the present government is the inevitable result of more than two centuries of unfettered deception. The unquestioned success of my Basic Course in Law and Government to instruct Students in the most complex legal and governmental systems ever constituted will now permit those Students and any others who may have self taught using the Posts on this site to claim their freedom using the Articles of Confederation. If you have mastered the principles in the Basic Course, you are ready to achieve complete freedom by teaching government the Organic Law, to begin contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jul
15
TITLE 1 UNITED STATES CODE SEC. 101. ENACTING CLAUSE
Filed Under Adoption, CONSTITUTION, FREEDOM, LEARNING THE LAW, Oath of Office | 1 Comment
The Senate of Section 101 of Title 1 General Provisions is one of the possible two Senates that could have been “a Senate” of “a Congress of the United States.” The Senate in Section 101 of Title 1 is not bound by a written oath “to support this Constitution,” meaning a written Constitution. He or she is bound to one consisting of all the lands owned by the United States of America in all the States.
The first Senators were elected after the State of New Hampshire, on June 21, 1788, became the ninth State to ratify the Constitution of September 17, 1787. Note well that the States ratify the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and not the Constitution of the United States. The difference between the Senators in the enacting clause and the Senators in Article I Section 1 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 is the kind of oath they take and that oath makes the difference between freedom and servitude.
The first Senators elected to the first Senate of the First Congress were not the first State delegates of the United States of America in Congress assembled. They were the first to take an oath to support a Constitution of the United States, because none of them would qualify to be Article I Section 1 Senators until after March 1, 1790.
The first Senators never qualified under the Constitution of September 17, 1787, so they followed George Washington’s lead and swore an oath to the Constitution of the United States. Together with Representatives these members of the newly created legislative branch make laws for the lands owned by the United States of America.
Every State of the 50 State Union has two Senators, who can confirm the limitation of federal lawmaking power to the lands owned by the United States of America, but you have to be prepared to present your case for your freedom. My Basic Course in Law and Government is the only one that trains the Student to teach the Congress its limitations. To enroll, so you can learn to be free, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
15
ORGANIC LAW SUMMARY
Filed Under Adoption, Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, FREEDOM, LEARNING THE LAW | Leave a Comment
Every person should reflect, from time to time, on what that person has learned to that point in life. If everyone went through that assessment, I think there would be a lot of unsatisfied people. I get a lot of requests for information on enrollment in my Basic Course in Law and Government, but few inquirers enroll. Unlike public schooling, the person who seeks private enlightenment must pay tuition. That tuition is small and may be paid in manageable payments, but it still keeps many from knowing more about law and government, which is the only knowledge that will make you free.
The Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 set all Americans free from the domination of others without consent. Just as there is consent to marriage, there is consent to citizenship. Voting, being a juror, paying taxes, obedience to written law are some of the ways consent to be governed is shown. George Washington’s way forced the people to consent by creating the illusion that the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 had been repealed and replaced by the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
Finding out what happened to freedom in America after the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 and the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 is not free. To find exactly what the cost of freedom is, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
10
YOU, TOO, CAN BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
Filed Under Adoption, Article II Section 1 Clause 5, Article II Section 1 Clause 8, Articles of Confederation, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, Electoral College, FREEDOM, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, LIBERTARIAN, Northwest Ordinance, Oath of Office, PRESIDENTS, Presidential Elector | Leave a Comment
Before George Washington could become the first President of the United States, there had to be a United States he could preside over.
The Declaration of Independence created a United States of America on July 4, 1776, but King George III was not sufficiently impressed to let the thirteen American colonies go free. Great Britain would not let go of the Americans until the Treaty of Paris of 1783. In the mean time, the thirteen States began organizing around the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and by March 1, 1781 all those States were perpetually bound into the Confederacy known to this day as the United States of America.
The Americans, of course, won the War of Independence and lands south of Canada once claimed by the British, the Northwest Territory. The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 made this former British territory permanently part of the United States of America Confederacy. These United States, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota were the first States of a new Union of States, which belonged to the United States of America and were, also, of the United States of America.
The Constitution of September 17, 1787 that comes out of a secret session of the Constitutional Convention of May 25, 1787 was part of the plan for there to be a “United States” for George Washington to be President of the United States of. Before Washington can become President of the United States he has to be first elected to the Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 office of President of the United States of America on February 4, 1789, so he can appoint himself to the office of President of the United States.
As President of the Constitutional Convention, Washington knows that he must first be elected President of the United States of America by the State’s Presidential Electors before he can take the oral oath of office of President of the United States. Those famous Framers of the Constitution have concocted an elaborate oral employment oath grander than the Article VI oath and almost poetic in its tone for the person, who is to fill the office of President of the United States.
Only Washington and his confederates know that neither he nor anyone else will be eligible to the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 Office of President until July 4, 1790. Anyone with any political influence is in on the conspiracy to take over the Confederacy and replace it with a Roman Republic.
Many of these confederates have been elected to the first Congress, which will meet for the first time on March 4, 1789 in New York City. It will be the responsibility of this Congress that all Americans know that this Congress is preparing the new oath of office for the new government and the oath will be the first Bill Congress passes and the first one George Washington signs as President of the United States.
George Washington has made it possible for anyone to be President of the United States. Thanks to George there are no age, citizenship or residency requirements for the office of President of the United States. To be a President of the United States all you have to have is a voice. You can even whisper the oath as George Washington did the first time he took the oath.
Don’t want to President of the United States? You just want your freedom? Then you have to become a Student. Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
9
LETTER OF INTENTION TO BECOME A FREE INHABITANT UNDER ARTICLE IV OF THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION OF NOVEMBER 15, 1777
Filed Under Adoption, Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, FREEDOM, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, ORGANIC LAWS, Oath of Office | 28 Comments
All a person has to do to become a free inhabitant under Article IV of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 is stop acting like a citizen of the United States. If you are one of my Students, you can send President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama your version of the following letter. If you aren’t a Student, you can contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com and you can enroll as one.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
YOUR NAME
YOUR ADDRESS
DATE
President of the United States
Barack Hussein Obama
The White House
Washington, D. C. 20502
Dear Mr. President:
I am one of the students of Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera, who claims to be the World’s Greatest Legal Mind. He has discovered that George Washington did not meet the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 residency requirement of 14 Years on February 4, 1789, when he was elected, so without explanation, Washington took the oath that every President Elect has since taken. Dr. Rivera teaches that the taking of that oath permits the establishment of a kind of property management system, which is appropriately called an “Administration,” in which you are now the chief administrator.
George Washington made an unauthorized amendment of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 by taking that oath without informing the people of the world. Taking the oath of Office of President of the United States without disclosing that he was doing so because he was not eligible to the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 Office of President was a fraud upon the American people.
There is no dispute that you took the same oath taken by George Washington on April 30, 1789, my request is that you acknowledge that you have taken no other oaths as President. All existing Presidential Libraries acknowledge only the taking of an oral oath by any President Elect in recent history.
George Washington’s unauthorized amendment of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 aborted that part of the government that would have complemented the administration that you now lead. Congress under the Articles of Confederation. That government would have a President under the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and the “one supreme Court” of Judges instead of the military Justices in the U.S. Supreme Court
I am being harassed by persons who claim to be your agents. These persons do not make direct assertions of having an agency relationship with you, but by elimination of Congress and the Supreme Court, you are the only person who could be their principal.
You, Mr. President, are limited by the oral oath you have taken to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. I neither reside nor am I domiciled on that territory, so I would like an explanation of why your agents are contacting me.
Intending no disrespect to you, your offices and those who hold you in very high esteem, I do not regard you as my President and I do not consider myself obligated to follow any of your Executive Orders, any Bills “which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate” and you or your predecessors have signed into law and any order or opinion made by the U.S. Supreme Court or any lower court. This is my attempt to avoid the application of martial law.
You are not my president, because you were elected by the Electoral College to be President of the United States of America pursuant to the authority of Articles of Confederation, a Confederacy of the 50 States and of no application to me, except to be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens of the several States.
You are not my president, because you have taken the oral oath to be President of the United States, which may bind you to an employment, but which does not bind you “to support this Constitution” as an executive officer of the United States, pursuant to Article VI of the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
It is my intention to live as a free inhabitant of one of the 50 states pursuant to Article IV of the Articles of Confederation, however, your fame and celebrity as the holder of the most powerful office in the world causes certain employees in the federal government to assert powers over me that they simply do not have, so I cannot live free. I have in the past been a victim of false assertions of power and I seek to avoid any future false claims of authority by federal government employees, by your acknowledgement that your only oath of office was the following oral oath:
“I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, So help me God.”
I will be extremely grateful if you will acknowledge that the only oath you have taken to be President of the United States is the one prescribed by the Constitution at Article II Section 1 Clause 8.
Very truly yours,
Your Name
May
17
ONE NATION UNDER GOD
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, FREEDOM | Leave a Comment
Everybody knows the birth date of the United States of America, but few know the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 did not create a government. The Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 created the Confederacy, the United States of America, which is still the government for all Americans, citizens and inhabitants of the United States of America. What is not well known is that the Constitution can only grant authority to Congress to make laws for the United States, which is now a much smaller part of the United States of America. If you become a Student, you will be taught in many different ways why and how the Congress uses proprietary power not government power to make laws in the United States.
Congress and the other State and local governments can only make written law for the lands owned by the Confederacy, because the Organic Laws of the United States of America limit written law to a specific place, where the English common law cannot apply. All governments, which claim authority through the Constitution, are limited to that place government calls the United States. Calling the lands owned by the United States of America “United States” is confusing, because it was intended to be confusing. The Founding Fathers of the Declaration of Independence and Articles of Confederation were Christian men, who created a Confederacy that allowed the people of America the option to remain inhabitants or to become citizens. The United States Founding Fathers were not Christian. They used law, as Satan the devil would, to put Christians under the authority of secular government.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Apr
29
ARIZONA’S IMMIGRATION LAW VIOLATES THE ORGANIC LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Filed Under Adoption, Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, FREEDOM, LAW OF THE LAND | Leave a Comment
Long thought to have been repealed, replaced and superseded by the Constitution of the United States, the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 is still a mighty force of law to be reckoned with, when States such as the State of Arizona claim government power over Americans, who just happen to be in a place in America called Arizona.
Article IV of the Articles of Confederation prohibits the States of the United States of America from denying privileges and immunities to Americans, who do not declare themselves to be citizens. In other words, a State cannot require a person to be a citizen, in order for that person to enjoy all the privileges and immunities of citizenship. This is exactly what Arizona’s new tough immigration law is trying to do. When this law is fully implemented, it will likely place many native Americans in government custody just for refusing to claim U.S. citizenship.
The Constitution of September 17, 1787 is the fourth Organic Law. The other three are the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787. All four laws constitute the foundational Organic Law of the United States of America. These four laws limit the State governments and the federal government in ways not thought possible, while these laws were believed to be subsumed by the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
My recent research has proven that even ratification by all thirteen States of the original thirteen States was insufficient to adopt the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and impose on any federal government any obligation to support that Constitution.
There are no Article III judicial courts and even if there were such courts only Citizens could be parties to law suits in such courts. To learn more about the law and government contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com to enroll as a Student.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera