• Pages

  • CONTACT ED RIVERA
  • IMPEACHMENT OF GEORGE W. BUSH REQUIRED TO END HIS POLICIES
  • LETTER TO CAPTIVES
  • REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

• Recent Posts

  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LESSON: LEARNING CONSTITUTION LAW BY THE NUMBERS
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LESSON: CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT THAT DOOM THE CREATION OF A REPUBLIC
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LESSON: A CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND A CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES ALL IN “THIS CONSTITUTION”
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LESSON: THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IS A LEGISLATIVE NOT A JUDICIAL COURT, BECAUSE THE CHIEF JUSTICE IS A LEGISLATIVE OFFICER WITH CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATIVE DUTIES
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LESSON: THE ARTICLE 2 CLAUSE 5 OFFICE OF PRESIDENT HAS BEEN VACANT SINCE GEORGE WASHINGTON FAILED THE FOURTEEN YEARS RESIDENT WITHIN THE UNITED STATES ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT

• Categories

  • Adoption
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 5
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 8
  • Article III
  • Articles of Confederation
  • BAIL OUT
  • BANKRUPTCY
  • CENSUS
  • CIVIL CONTEMPT
  • COMMON LAW
  • CONGRESS
  • CONSTITUTION
  • CRIMINAL LAW
  • Declaration of Independence
  • Economic Stimulous
  • Electoral College
  • Foreclosure
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • FREEDOM
  • GAY MARRIAGE
  • GRAND JURY
  • IMMIGRATION
  • IMPEACHMENT
  • JURY DUTY
  • LAW OF THE LAND
  • LEARNING THE LAW
  • LIBERTARIAN
  • Martial Law
  • MAYAN 2012
  • Northwest Ordinance
  • Oath of Office
  • OBAMA
  • ORGANIC LAWS
  • PARDON
  • Presidential Elector
  • PRESIDENTS
  • ProperTea Tax Tea Party
  • Property Taxes
  • Second Amendment
  • State of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • TRIAL BY JURY
  • U.S. District Court
  • Uncategorized

• Archives

  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

September 24, 1789.
1 Stat. 73.

CHAP. XX.–An Act to establish the Judicial Courts of the United States.

SEC . 2. And be it further enacted, That the United States shall be, and they hereby are divided into thirteen districts, to be limited and called as follows, to wit: one to consist of that part of the State of Massachusetts which lies easterly of the State of New Hampshire, and to be called Maine District; one to consist of the State of New Hampshire, and to be called New Hampshire District; one to consist of the remaining part of the State of Massachusetts, and to be called Massachusetts district; one to consist of the State of Connecticut, and to be called Connecticut District; one to consist of the State of New York, and to be called New York District; one to consist of the State of New Jersey, and to be called New Jersey District; one to consist of the State of Pennsylvania, and to be called Pennsylvania District; one to consist of the State of Delaware, and to be called Delaware District; one to consist of the State of Maryland, and to be called Maryland District; one to consist of the State of Virginia, except that part called the District of Kentucky, and to be called Virginia District; one to consist of the remaining part of the State of Virginia, and to be called Kentucky District; one to consist of the State of South Carolina, and to be called South Carolina District; and one to consist of the State of Georgia, and to be called Georgia District.

 Section 2 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 is one of the early products of the Constitution of the United States, which proves the United States is the land in the United States of America owned by the Confederacy known as the United States of America.  Long before the Fourteenth Amendment claimed a person could be born in the United States and not just in one of the States of the United States, the Judiciary Act of 1789 had established two judicial districts in places that were not yet States of the United States of America.

 The judicial districts of Maine and Kentucky were on September 24, 1789 comprised of the same territory such districts are comprised of today—territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  By ratifying the Constitution of September 17, 1787, the States of Massachusetts and Virginia had decided to make Maine and Kentucky part of the United States.     

 Section 2 speaks with absolute clarity: “That the United States shall be, and they hereby are divided into thirteen districts, to be limited and called as follows.”  The “United States” as territory has always been limited to territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.

 If you have had it with being a citizen of the United States, try something better.   The Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 offers all the privileges and immunities of citizenship without the hardship.  To learn how you can be a free inhabitant under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

 Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera    

Eighteen months ago Rod Begojevich was arrested on political corruption charges and today his trial started by beginning the process that will pick a trial jury.  

On December 20, 2008 my Post was: BEGOJEVICH CAN BEAT ALL CRIMINAL CHARGES.  For a year and a half, I have explained without contradiction how all federal law is territorial.  Immigration law is territorial it only applies to entering the United States.  The law of eminent domain is territorial it only applies to property located within the United States.  The Democrat Health Care Reform Bill is  territorial it only applies within the United States.

All Rod Begojevich had to do to secure his freedom was file a motion to dismiss the grand jury indictment on the grounds that none of the grand jurors who brought the indictment were residents within the district. 

Maybe Rod Begojevich just wants to use the United States district court to prove his innocence.  What do you want?  If you want to learn the law, all the law, you won’t find it anywhere else.  Contact me to enroll in my Basic Course in Law and Government edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera         

Former federal judge and Attorney General Michael Mukasey in a November 14, 2009 interview on the Fox News Network claimed there was little the families of the 9-11 victims could do to stop the planned prosecutions in the Southern District of New York.

Mukasey is wrong.  The United States Department of Justice must obtain a true bill of indictment from a federal grand jury, before any case can be brought against Khalid Shaikh Mohammed.  To get a true bill of indictment, the federal grand jurors must be qualified.

New Yorkers do not qualify to be federal grand jurors because none of them reside within the district, which is the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America in the counties of Bronx, Dutchess, New York, Orange, Putnam, Rockland, and Suffolk.  Federal grand jurors must reside on federal territory and there are none that qualify in New York.  The United States Supreme Court case Test v. United States, 420 U.S. 28 (1975) establishes the absolute right of a federal criminal defendant to make a motion to dismiss the indictment because the grand jurors are not qualified.

The families of 9-11 victims must inform the United States Department of Justice that the military commissions are the only safe method of prosecuting Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and his co- conspirators. 

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

The administration of Barack Hussein Obama will prosecute Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the September 11 attacks, and four September 11 co-conspirators in the United States district court in Manhattan, New York rather than before a military commission.   The decision not to prosecute by military commission has ignited a sharp political debate.  The United States district courts are military trial courts for civilians (non-military) litigants. 

Title 28 of the United States Code, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure requires that district court judges reside within the district, which is the federal territory within the counties that comprise the district.  The judges of the federal district court in Manhattan have been exempted from the residence rule.  Grand and petit jurors cannot be excused from their one-year within the district residency requirement.  

The decision to use the United States district court was announced by Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who said he would instruct prosecutors to seek death sentences for Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and his co-conspirators.  Mr. Holder should have by now discovered why he is a General in charge of the Department of Justice.  One of the federal government’s biggest secrets is the military power basis of the United States district courts.   Justice is what is purportedly dispensed by an occupying military force or a ruling monarch.

Should the trial actually take place in Manhattan it would mean one of the highest-profile and highest-security terrorism trials in history would be set within blocks from where hijackers for Al Qaeda destroyed the World Trade Center, killing nearly 3,000 people.  Such a trial may take years to conclude and in those years, aggressive defense counsel will surely become aware of the problems the federal government will begin to have with the factors involved in territorial jurisdiction.

Deciding to prosecute the 9-11 terrorists in the United States district court in Manhattan was one of the dumbest things Barack Hussein Obama has done recently.  Bleeding heart liberal attorneys will do anything to save someone from a government execution.

To learn how Barack Hussein Obama is jeopardizing the successful prosecution of the 9-11 terrorists, enroll in my Basic Course in Law and Government by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

 

Roman Polanski was charged with a written law crime decades ago in California to which he pleaded guilty then he fled before he could be sentenced.  Now he is in custody in Switzerland awaiting extradition paperwork from the Los Angeles County District Attorney.

California like 48 of the other common law states substitutes California Codes for the common law.  The Los Angeles County District Attorney pretends that all so-called crimes that occur within the Los Angeles County lines fall within his federal district that include the Veteran’s Administration Hospital and Los Padres National forest.  The VA has its own Zip Code 90073, which is the most heavily populated federal enclave in an area of millions.  This is where federal jurors would have to come from and this is where the State of California juror, the “domiciliary” lives.  

If Roman Polanski had taken my Basic Course in Law and Government, he would be telling his high priced attorneys to drop the legal bomb on the State of California’s written law system. 

Polanski is a punk and a pervert.  You are probably a patriot and all around good guy.  Are you waiting for the gendarmes to knock on your door before you start preparing a legal defense.  The Congress of the United States is preparing legislation that will make it a federal offense not to have health insurance.  Prepare for the worse by enrolling as a Student.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera       

All the wonderful rights God gave you are called “unalienable Rights” in the Declaration of Independence, so whose idea was it to put them to a vote?  The assembly of lawyers and other scoundrels otherwise known as the Constitutional Convention knew the “unalienable Rights” of the Declaration of Independence stood in the way of a strong central government.  The so-called Founding Fathers dispensed with them by making them subject to the mob democracy.

The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the Constitution of September 17, 1787 were created within a span of a few weeks, so Article I of the Constitution and the Northwest Ordinance should considered as one document.  Representation in the House of Representatives and the payment of taxes to pay down the federal debt are both found first in the Northwest Ordinance.  That document creates a new Union of the States of the Northwest Territory and that Union is referred to as “this Union.”  The settlers and inhabitants of the States of the Northwest Territory, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota are the People of the United States, the new Union, and they are identical to the inhabitants of the states of the United States of America except they are without “unalienable Rights.”

Americans who do not inhabit territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America and who have not become citizens of the United States are not entitled to vote in federal elections.  In addition, they are not subject to direct taxation to pay the federal debt.   Americans of the first Union, the United States of America, are expressly entitled to “all the privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States,” according to Article IV of the Articles of Confederation. 

Representation of Article II and direct taxes of Article IV of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 are joined in Article I Section 2 Clause 3 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787:

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

The above sentence made permanent the temporary government created for the States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota by the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787.

As soon as the first nine States had ratified “this Constitution,” the race was on to complete the destruction of our “unalienable Rights” by making them the subject of litigation in federal courts.  On September 24, 1789, section 2 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 divided the United States into 13 judicial districts, when on that date only eleven States had ratified “this Constitution.”

More than two centuries of federalist propaganda have convinced Americans that they are free because they can fill the Congress with the crooks of their choice.  Americans also feel they are in control of government and the law because they can sit as grand and petit jurors in federal trial courts.  That ability now called a duty is only accorded those who are registered to vote, which brings us back to voting away our “unalienable Rights.”

You can start reclaiming your “unalienable Rights” only if you know how they were lost.  Get the knowledge of the law and government you need by enrolling immediately as one of my students.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera  

I very quickly exhausted all the usual sources of information in my quest for the truth in government and law, so I had to find students that would spur me in my search for something true to teach.  One of my first students, Doug Herich, was taken into custody on February 26, 2009 on the pretext that he was late for an appointment with Michael O’Gara, a person who claims to have authority over Mr. Herich, by virtue of his election to Los Angeles Office No. 94, on November 4, 2008.

I have been teaching Doug and several other students the law by correspondence using the Internet.  I teach, among other things, that all written laws must accurately describe their territorial limitations, so those limitations are hidden to falsely expand the authority of written law.  God is the creator of all that is good, as the first Organic Law of the United States of America, the Declaration of Independence so clearly demonstrates.  God creates unwritten laws by inscribing them on men’s hearts.  Unfortunately, as faith in God has diminished, the strength of written law has grown.

Written law systems have been so effective in obscuring the boundaries between written and the English common law that the common law has been pushed out of California.  Doug and my other students know that the limits of written law have not been lawfully expanded by the ignorant acceptance of written law outside its bounds.  As all men are created equal, no number of U.S. voters can saddle anyone with written laws.  Doug Herich has taken a principled stand against the unlawful extension of written law beyond its legitimate territory by demanding that Michael O’Gara contain himself to the territory within the Los Angeles County lines owned and ceded to the United States of America.   

When I first started teaching law, I used the movie that won the Oscar for Best Movie for 1966, “A Man for All Seasons,” to show the difference between written and unwritten law.  The unwritten law in the movie is, of course, the maxim, “Silence gives consent,” and the English common law.  The written law is the law the English Parliament has made.  The Act of Supremacy is the written law that is the law underlying the central theme of the movie.  The Act of Supremacy requires that Henry VIII be recognized as the supreme head of the Church in England.  The law requires certain people to take an oath acknowledging that the English monarch is the supreme head of the Church in England.

In the movie, “A Man for All Seasons,” Sir Thomas More is imprisoned for refusing to take the written oath that recognizes the authority of King Henry VIII over the former Catholic Church, the new Church of England.  After Sir Thomas More is found guilty of treason, he explains why government is separate from God and obedience to God is superior to allegiance to government.   

Amazingly, my student Doug Herich is taking up where Sir Thomas More left off, when in 1535 he was beheaded.  America has no monarch, but those persons appointed to positions distinguished by the wearing of the Black Robe believe themselves empowered to imprison those who will not swear allegiance to the State of the Black Robes.  Sir Thomas thought that he could keep his head, if he could keep his silence on the legitimacy of the king’s title as head of the Church in England.  Sir Thomas hoped that his silence would be interpreted as consent to the law.  Doug Herich by his refusal to enter a plea or accept legal representation consents to the law as it is written.  Since all written law describes a place where it applies, that place in California must be only the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.

Sir Thomas More could not contend with perjured testimony that would subject him to treason and capital punishment.  Treason and capital punishment is not an issue in any traffic case in the State of California or any other State.  Doug Herich has challenged the territorial jurisdiction of Michael O’Gara and the best O’Gara has offered is California Penal Code Section 27, which states that a person who commits a crime can be punished.  The crime, of course, must be committed on territory belonging to and ceded to the United States of America.  Such crimes are virtually non-existent as federal territory consists of military bases, veterans administration hospitals, national parks and forests.

The English monarchy still thrives in the United Kingdom, but in America the people have gotten rid of the king.  Student Herich has been imprisoned for questioning the authority of a State of California employee by a novice Black Robe, who claims the power to imprison anyone suspected of committing a crime in the State of California.  The Black Robe is claiming power that was eliminated in America when the authority of English King George III was terminated upon the defeat of the English in the American Revolution.

In More’s England, the King’s subjects could be imprisoned for disobedience, but they could not be executed for treason without testimony in court.  Perjured testimony was used against Sir Thomas More to provide the evidence upon which a jury convicts him.   Doug has no allegiance to the State of California and he has not committed a crime in the State of California.  He refuses to recognize that Michael O’Gara has any authority outside the federal territory within the County of Los Angeles.  In the movie, Sir Thomas More claimed that Parliament had no authority to make a Christian accept the English monarch as the head of the Church in England.  Doug Herich is taking a similar stand against tyranny as that taken by Sir Thomas More. 

After Americans got rid of the English monarchy, the power of the former king goes back to the people not to the government.  The people don’t have the authority to incarcerate those who have not been lawfully charged with the commission of a heinous crime by a common law grand jury, so where does that power come from?  It must come from somewhere.  Well it must be found in the Organic Law the fundamental law.

Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Ed. defines Organic Law as “The fundamental law, or constitution of a state or nation, written or unwritten; that law or system of laws or principles which defines and establishes the organization of its government.”

The Declaration of Independence states that no man has greater power over another and the rights of men are God given not granted by the government.  The Articles of Confederation is a delegation of certain specified state powers to the United States, in Congress assembled and there is no transfer of other state authority or state territory to the United States of America.  The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, as a matter of local law creates a “compact between the original States and the people and States in the said territory and forever remain unalterable, unless by common consent.”  That compact made the States of the Northwest Territory, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota and that they “forever remain a part of this Confederacy of the United States of America.”   The compact created the Union of the United States that was more formally organized in the Constitution for the United States of America.   The Constitution of the United States was an oblique reference to the States of the Northwest Territory that were to forever remain part of the United States of America.

The creation of the States of the Northwest Territory by the United States, in Congress assembled was analogous to the creation of the Church of England out of the existing Catholic Church.  The Act of Supremacy made the English government superior to God.  Having the States ratify “this Constitution” and then having George Washington take an oath to be President of the United States prevented the “Adoption” of “this Constitution,” which caused the Constitution of the United States to be substituted for the written one that was limited to the government.  The Constitution of the United States made George Washington, as President of the United States, supreme head of the Church of the Constitution in America, as the Act of Supremacy made Henry VIII head of the Church in England.      

Since the crucifixion of Jesus Christ there has only been one acceptable response to an accusation of an offense committed by a Christian against the State¾silence.  Silence gives consent, but only to that which is true.  Doug Herich and Sir Thomas More consented by their silence and refusal to cooperate only to what was actually true.   

Satan, the devil, and the power of the State have been officially isolated to territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.   Those who oppose the injustice of traffic tickets have failed to see that tickets are just one part of the total Department of Justice system.  Today, there is no part of the written law in use that is not based in Military Justice.  All Written Law enacted, since George Washington took an employment oath to be President of the United States, has been law to create and maintain a military government.

What proof do I have that all written law in America is military?  The written law itself has always described a system of military justice based on a determination of what the law is by military officers appointed by the President of the United States.  The United States was politically conquered by George Washington, when he became Employee/Dictator under the legislative authority of Congress.  The Black Robes are just another branch of the military Washington headed.  The United States Government has a Military Justice Officer called the United States Attorney General and each State has its State Attorney General.  Postal services are under a Postmaster General and medicine under a Surgeon General. 

Getting a driver’s license can be an inexpensive legal education, if you know where the license is necessary and where it is not.  Such a license might be required in wartime, because a lot of driving is upon the Interstate Highway system initiated under Commander in Chief General Eisenhower.  Of course, military government should only be in effect when there are credible hostilities.  In the event of an attack, the piece of plastic will replace “your papers” of World War II.

America, it is often claimed, has been under military occupation since the Civil War.  Martial law, actually, goes back to April 30, 1789, when George Washington took an oath to be President of the United States and incidentally became Commander in Chief of the United States when the Congress of the United States created an Army and Navy.

The military occupation must be limited to the territory owned and ceded to the United States of America, because “this Constitution” has not been adopted by a Congress and President, who have been bound by an oath “to support this Constitution.”   The military occupation of America extends beyond the territory owned and ceded to the United States of America, because the American people have been lied to by “I cannot tell a lie,” George Washington and a succession of 43 Presidents of the United States.   His actions have misled millions, don’t be one of them.

Doug Herich refuses to acknowledge their military authority, so they have none over him.  Like a true Christian, Doug is denying government his consent for it to exist outside its evil hole.  Doug remains in military custody.  The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department are scheduled to have him back in Department 113 on the 7^th floor of the Van Nuys superior court west at 8:30 am on March 26, 2009.  New students who attend will receive an 80% discount off tuition.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

            

 

If and when Rod Blagojevich is indicted, the plaintiff will be the United States of America.  Every federal criminal case is the same¾the victim is the United States of America. 

U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald is accusing Rod Blagojevich with a criminal injury to the Confederacy created by the Articles of Confederation.  All attorneys in America, with the exception of yours truly, have been taught to believe that the Articles of Confederation were repealed or replaced by Constitution of the United States.

There are, in fact two Unions, the perpetual Union of the Articles of Confederation and the more perfect, but temporary and territorially limited Union of the United States.

Illinois is a state of the perpetual Union of the United States of America under the Articles of Confederation, while the State of Illinois is part of the United States under the Constitution of the United States.

The State of Illinois requires its jurors to be citizens of the United States of America.  This requirement is equivalent to the State of California juror requirement to be a domiciliary of the State of California.

What will it take to establish a libertarian government in America?  It can be done in a few days just by knowing that all written laws must define the scene of the crime.

Rod Blagojevich was just fired from his day job as Governor of the State of Illinois.  To be indicted for a crime he must be placed at the scene by a grand jury from the same crime scene neighborhood.  Well, hardly anyone lives there.       

If you can’t understand what you have just read, it is because you haven’t read every post and you aren’t an enrolled student.  Once you learn the truth, you will know why the statement, “you are a free person because you have the right to vote,” is a lie.

To learn the truth about government, the law, become a student.  E-mail me at edrivera@edrivera.com.

 Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera 

Dear Mr. Blagojevich:

Now that you are officially out of government and you are facing federal criminal corruption charges, you will really feel how it is to be one of lonely expatriate inhabitants of formerly free America, which has not been free since George Washington became President of the United States.

I am a follower of the teachings of one Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera, who teaches law and government on the Internet at www.EDRIVERA.com  He has written extensively in your defense.

His research has proven that the federal grand and petit jurors that might serve in any federal criminal case must reside on territory that is subject to the exclusive legislative power of Congress.  As you know, jurors in State of Illinois criminal cases, must be citizens of the United States of America, which was established by the Articles of Confederation.  State of Illinois jurors and federal grand and petit jurors in Illinois are qualified to serve in both State and United States District courts because the territory where they are required to reside is the same¾federal territory.

The third Organic Law, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, made Illinois and the other fledgling States of the Northwest Territory part of the United States of America.  The States of the Northwest Territory became known as the United States and the States of the Articles of Confederation continued to be known as the United States of America, in accordance with the Articles of Confederation.   The State of Illinois, since the Northwest Ordinance, has been the territory in Illinois subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States Congress.

The Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois grand and petit jurors must reside in the federal territory within the counties that comprise the aforementioned Division and District.  I am sure that if there are any such persons in Illinois they will not be on any grand jury that U.S. Attorney will use to attempt to indict you.

Will you please check out Dr. Rivera’s website and let me know what you think of what he teaches.  I personally feel he is correct and that you could avoid further persecution by just reading the posts about your case.

Very truly yours,

A Student of the Law  

 

         

 

    

It’s official, if the government is obviously corrupt, it can and should be opposed.   

“Blagojevich obviously is a corrupt individual. I think that’s pretty clear. And the reason that he’s done what he’s done is to divert attention from the arrest that was just made of him and the indictments that will be coming in a few days according to the U.S. attorney in Illinois,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” 

As I have stated in other posts, Rod Blagojevich cannot be lawfully indicted because there are no qualified U.S. citizen grand and petit jurors in the Northern District of Illinois, but that won’t stop Harry Reid from trying to bust Rod Blagojevich to federal felon in the military system called the United States Government. 

There are two Senates: one under the Articles of Confederation and another called the “United States Senate.”  Rod Blagojevich just nominated Roland W. Burris to the Senate under the Articles of Confederation.  This nomination cannot be stopped by anyone because the Articles of Confederation makes no provision for it. 

When the House of Representatives and United States Senate make laws pursuant to Article I Section 7, they are called Bills and they do so for the United States, which is the territory and other property belonging to the United States of America. 

If the President of the United States approves, “he shall sign it.”  If he doesn’t approve the Bill, Article I Section 7 describes the rest of the process with respect to the Houses and President of the United States. 

Harry Reid is obviously stuck in the United States Senate and he is obviously corrupt for trying to hide that fact.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera    

Next Page →