• Pages

  • CONTACT ED RIVERA
  • LETTER TO CAPTIVES
  • REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

• Recent Posts

  • IF YOU DON’T VOLUNTARILY PAY A PROPERTY TAX BILL, WHICH GOVERNMENT OFFICER HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CALCULATE ANY AMOUNT ALLEGEDLY DUE AND DEMAND THAT AMOUNT BE PAID?
  • PROPOSED SALES TAX ON INTERNET PURCHASES IS JUST ANOTHER INCOME TAX ON RETAIL SELLERS
  • United States of America v. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, defendant
  • THE LESSON OF THE ORGANIC LAWS
  • State of Connecticut Governor signs what is being described as the toughest gun laws in the U.S.

• Categories

  • Adoption
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 5
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 8
  • Article III
  • Articles of Confederation
  • BAIL OUT
  • BANKRUPTCY
  • CENSUS
  • CIVIL CONTEMPT
  • COMMON LAW
  • CONGRESS
  • CONSTITUTION
  • CRIMINAL LAW
  • Declaration of Independence
  • Economic Stimulous
  • Electoral College
  • Foreclosure
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • FREEDOM
  • GAY MARRIAGE
  • GRAND JURY
  • IMMIGRATION
  • IMPEACHMENT
  • JURY DUTY
  • LAW OF THE LAND
  • LEARNING THE LAW
  • LIBERTARIAN
  • Martial Law
  • MAYAN 2012
  • Northwest Ordinance
  • Oath of Office
  • OBAMA
  • ORGANIC LAWS
  • PARDON
  • Presidential Elector
  • PRESIDENTS
  • ProperTea Tax Tea Party
  • Property Taxes
  • PROPRIETARY POWER
  • Second Amendment
  • State of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • TRIAL BY JURY
  • U.S. District Court
  • Uncategorized

• Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

If you can be forced to pay any amount of property taxes an assessor clams is due, you have no unalienable right to own property.   Fail to pay property taxes and government will initiate a process that will eventually result in the loss of your property for the alleged non-payment of property taxes.

How can you avoid the total loss of your property for non-payment of property taxes?  You must, of course, take your property out of the United States.  Placing yourself and your property within the United States is a voluntary act of  enfranchisement whereby you declare yourself to be a citizen of the United States.

The United States is the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, so, any property, real or personal, left on government land is subject to government regulation, taxation and even confiscation.

Even the most casual reader of  these Posts will be able to bring together from these Posts the events and the dates of  those events which allowed George Washington to establish, in America,  the first democratically elected  military dictatorship.   It doesn’t matter what local elective office is being contested the top office of  President of the United States will always go to a dictator.

By combining in a presumed Office of  the President the two Offices of  President of the United States of America and President of the United States, and causing the misconception that the Constitution of September 17, 1787 had been adopted and was binding on government, George Washington made that illusory Constitution the supreme law of  a mythical land ruled by subordinate State governors who were themselves democratically elected State dictators.  All State governors duplicate the power grab initiated by George Washington on April 30, 1789, when Washington took the oral oath to be President of the United States.    Since the ratification and establishment of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, governors have been democratically elected by the people who claim to be citizens of the United States.  These popularly elected governors operate just like the person in the federal Office of President of  the United States.  Governors are the heads of  those United States and the heads of  State government.

There is no source of civil government power for free people as their power of  self government is their freedom, which is unalienable.   Questioning the credentials of  all government officials who claim the sovereign powers of government will result in a proof such powers are limited to  the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.   The so-called Founding Fathers realized this truth soon after the defeat of  King George III, but kept that fact to themselves while they plotted to take power from the people.   My “Basic Course in Law and Government” is the only instruction in law and the structure of  government based in the Organic Laws of  the United States of America, which are yours for the asking along with information on my $50 trial instruction offer.  To get both, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

A complaint, not a presentment or indictment brought by a federal grand jury, alleges upon information and belief the commission of two criminal acts by this defendant.  The complaint alleges that these acts took place “on or about the date(s) of April 15. 2013 in the county of Suffolk in the District of Massachusetts.”

Readers familiar with Chapter 5 of Title 28 of the United States Code know that the District of Massachusetts is not the entirety of Massachusetts.  The District of Massachusetts is comprised of only the federal territory within the exterior borders of Massachusetts and the county of Suffolk is only the federal territory within the exterior borders of Suffolk County, according to Section 2 of Title 1 of the United States Code.

Neither the Fifth Amendment:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation,

nor the Sixth Amendment:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence,

apply, because only the States are bound by the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  The United States of America, the Confederacy established by the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 is the interested government party not the people of Massachusetts or the people of the United States of America.

The suspected Boston Marathon Bomber is doomed, but you can learn the written law by following his federal case in these Posts on this website.  You must have the Organic Laws of the United States of America, the basis of the written law in your computer in a searchable format.  To get the Organic Laws and free information about a $50 trial legal education contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

States incorporate cities as commercial enterprises with municipal purposes using the same power with which they charter purely commercial enterprises.  Where is this power to create commercial enterprises found?

We must look to the Organic Laws of the United States of America for the origin of all delegations of power from the American people, and when we look there we find the people of the States have delegated all they are capable of delegating in the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.

The free inhabitants of the United States of America are not only free to exercise their unalienable rights they must do so to remain free.  In short, the people of the United States of America have the unalienable right to govern themselves as individuals, but that right does not extend to others.  No majority of any size has the right to govern by force.

Majority rule has been imposed by the States in the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America acting as the Confederacy pursuant to the authority of the Articles of Confederation.   However, that majority rule is subject to the limitations imposed by the Constitution of the United States, the Constitution which resulted when nine States ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reserves to the States or to the people the power to incorporate cities, however, that power is limited to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, as expressed in the Constitution of the United States.

The key to putting any city in its federal place lies in learning the Organic Laws of the United States of America.  I offer the only Internet law course on that subject.  To learn how you can try out my $500 Basic Course in Law and Government for $50 contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

The Office of the Los Angeles County Tax Assessor makes this bold claim on its website: “State law mandates that all property is subject to taxation unless otherwise exempted. Your property taxes support necessary services provided to the residents of Los Angeles County. These include law enforcement, fire protection, education, parks and recreation, and other vital services.”

To what state law does the LA Tax Assessor refer?

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 13 TAXATION

SEC. 1.  Unless otherwise provided by this Constitution or the laws of the United States:

(a) All property is taxable and shall be assessed at the same percentage of fair market value. When a value standard other than fair market value is prescribed by this Constitution or by statute authorized by this Constitution, the same percentage shall be applied to determine the assessed value. The value to which the percentage is applied, whether it be the fair market value or not, shall be known for property tax purposes as the full value.

(b) All property so assessed shall be taxed in proportion to its full value.

What doesn’t the Assessor tell you?

The Assessor doesn’t explain why only personal property located within the federal territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America might be subject to forced taxation.  The government of the State of California within California is the only one which has been authorized by Congress to tax property within the State of California, however, because the State of California is the designation for the federal territory, within California, owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, only non-federal personal property can be taxed.  Before admission into the second Union, a State must promise not to tax federal property, which leaves only the personal property not owned by the United States of America subject to property taxation.

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SEC. 1.  The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

The above sentence means the State of California is the same kind of federal territory made a permanent part of the Confederacy by Article 4 of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, so only non-governmental personal property located on the federal territory within California is taxable.

Joining the Confederacy under the authority of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 did not require any transfer of territory within that State.  Territory claimed by a State of the first Union, the United States of America, which had been ceded to the Confederacy became a permanent part of the Confederacy pursuant to Article 4 of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787.  The Northwest Territory was comprised of what would be the States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota, so it can readily be seen how the term “United States” would come to mean the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. The territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America is also “the United States Constitution” George Washington swore to “preserve, protect and defend.”

Once the American people freed themselves from the British tyrant, King George III, only force could openly subject them to the same kind of blatant tyranny.   The Confederation Congress, George Washington and the politicians of the time managed to re-install the same kind of government which had been expelled by a violent revolution, without firing a shot.

Using trickery and deceit, it only took a few Americans, who could keep a secret, led by George Washington to replace American freedom with one onerous central government.   My “Basic Course in Law and Government” explains how George Washington created the American Presidential dictatorship and my “Advanced Course in Law and Government” helps Students achieve near total freedom.   A $50 trial version of the $500 Basic Course in Law and Government along with the Organic Laws is still available by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

The simple answer is the Constitution of the United States is not the written Constitution dated September 17, 1787. Remember all American Presidents take an oral oath to attain the Office of President of the United States and none at all to be President of the United States of America.

We can be fairly certain George Washington took this oath, but there is no legal proof that he did: “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”      Similarly, the current President took the same oath: “I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God,” with the same result—the written Constitution can’t be enforced against a person who has not agreed in writing to be bound by it.  It can be proved with certainty President Barack Hussein Obama took the oral oath of Office of President of the United States prescribed by the Constitution of September 17, 1787, but taking that oral oath does not bind anyone to a written document such as the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

The power of the President of the United States is not derived from the Constitution of September 17, 1787 it is derived from the legislative power of the Congress of the United States.  The President of the United States’ source of power is a government secret, because, if discovered all government power would be limited to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. Disclosing such government secrets is routine at www.edrivera.com , however, to fully understand the depth of deceit Washington, D.C. is mired in requires a short course in elementary constitutional law, my “Basic Course in Law and Government,” which you can sample for $50.   To get the Organic Laws of the United States of America and to learn how to take the Course on a trial basis, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

First, get a written Constitution and find within that document all the direct references to the written Constitution.  If you start at the beginning, you might think the first reference would be in the Preamble:  “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”  “This Constitution for the United States of America” is a reference to the written Constitution, but the Preamble is not part of the Constitution.

Now, see how many references to a written constitution you can find in the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

George Washington avoided being bound to the written Constitution by orally swearing this oath:  “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”

Before noon on April 30, 1789, George Washington had been President of the United States of America since April 6, 1789, without ever taking or subscribing any oath of office, because the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 was binding only on the member confederate States.  The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 created a temporary government for the United States of   Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota and the Constitution of September 17, 1787 made that government permanent for those States and future United States.  When George Washington, the Senators and Representatives failed to subscribe the Article VI oath to be bound “to support this Constitution,” what should have been a government continued as a corporate business enterprise.

To continue your education, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

Every time a politician claims he or she swore an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, he or she divulges his or her ignorance of the document believed to be the Constitution of September 17, 1787, which was established for the States on June 21, 1788.

These are the facts:

1. Article VII of the Constitution determines when that Constitution is established.
2. Article VI of the Constitution requires a subscribed oath “to support this Constitution,” thereby adopting this Constitution.
3. George Washington became President of the United States of America without taking any oath, when the Presidential Electoral votes were counted on April 6, 1789, before Congress.
4. On April 30, 1789, Washington became President of the United States upon taking the oral non-binding oath for that employment:  “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”
5. On April 30, 1789, George Washington was neither a natural born citizen nor had he been a resident within the United States for fourteen years.
6. Washington became President of the United States of America on April 6, 1789 and President of the United States on April 30, 1789, under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and Constitution of the United States respectively, because the Constitution of September 17, 1787 had not been adopted by a legally binding subscribed oath “to support this Constitution.”

The Constitution of the United States which George Washington orally swore an oath to “preserve, protect and defend” could have been the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, individually or any combination of them, but it certainly wasn’t the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

I have put together a course of legal instruction in the Constitution of September 17, 1787, my “Basic Course in Law and Government,” which I will share with you for a donation of $50.  To get the details of this offer and to receive the foundational Organic Laws of the United States of America, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

First, let’s review.   The four Organic Laws of the United States of America represent four different constitutions above the level of the States.  The Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 mentions an unwritten Constitution:  “He has combined with others to subject us to a Jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution, and unacknowledged by our Laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation.”    The Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 become the Constitution for the Confederacy, the United States of America, when Maryland becomes the thirteenth State, to ratify the Articles on March 1, 1781.  The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 is the Constitution for the temporary government for the Northwest Territory legislated by the United States in Congress assembled under the authority of  the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.   The Constitution of September 17, 1787 is a combination of the implementation of Article X of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and a finalization of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 into the Constitution of the United States.

Driver’s licenses had to await the invention of the automobile and marriage licenses wouldn’t be widely deployed by a majority of the States as their opposition to mixed race common law marriages until the 1920’s. It may safely be said that none of the framers of the four Organic Laws of the United States of America contemplated the future existence of the driver’s license or the government’s modern role in licensing marriages in America, so the constitutional law basis of these two modern institutions must be found in the lesser known Constitutions of the United States of America. 

Operators of automobiles and couples to marriage contracts were subjected to State licensing, taxation and regulation pursuant to an alleged exercise of the State’s police power.  The police power is a remnant of the English law under the monarchy which gave the monarchy the power to maintain the king’s peace in the kingdom.  Independence and separation from Great Britain should have eliminated the power of the newly liberated States to assert police power over the people of those states.

The monarchical police power of King George III over the Northwest Territory was conveyed to the United States of America via the Treaty of Paris of 1783 and from that document the United States in Congress assembled funneled the police power into the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787.  All the monarchical power over the Northwest Territory was now reposed in the oligarchy known as the United States in Congress assembled.      

 The Constitution of September 17, 1787 created the dictatorship of the American Presidency, the details of which can be found throughout these Posts.  In short, the constitutional law of marriage and driver’s licenses is found in the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  Learning the constitutional law of marriage and driver’s licenses requires more than just a quick reading of “the Constitution.”  

Knowing constitutional law requires full knowledge of all four Organic Laws of the United States of America and the only way to acquire that knowledge is to read and study those laws.  I will e-mail a full set of the Organic Laws in a searchable format to everyone who contacts me at edrivera@edrivera.com I will include full details of a trial offer of my $500 “Basic Course in Law and Government” for $50.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

George and Martha Washington had the kind of marriage Frank Sinatra would sing about many years later:

Love and marriage, love and marriage, 
Go together like a horse and carriage. 
This I tell ya, brother, you can’t have one without the other. 

While Sinatra crooned, the kind of common law marriage George and Martha Washington had enjoyed slowly became a relic of the past.  The State of California along with many other States no longer recognizes common law marriages.  In the recent presidential election, the voters of two States legalized same sex marriages by requiring county clerks to sell marriage licenses to same sex couples.  Once those couples complied with the same paperwork requirements as heterosexual couples, their marriages would be recorded just like any other in the State’s records.  

Government licensing can make gay marriage legal, but a common law marriage can’t be made illegal by a heterosexual couple’s refusal to buy a State marriage license.  Heterosexual marriage is the indisputable primary unalienable right of all people and the likely beginning of all governments. 

What makes it possible for government either by its citizens, its legislature or its judiciary to legalize same sex marriage by written law, while it is powerless to punish those heterosexual couples who marry without first obtaining a marriage license?  Obviously, the power of a heterosexual couple to produce new human life is not subject to government control, regulation or taxation.  Government created by written law is fundamentally limited by the language of its creation to a place and that place is the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. Within that territory every human endeavor may be regulated and taxed save one, the consensual marriage between a man and a woman.

You are invited to join me on this journey of enlightenment begun, when Barack Hussein Obama was elected to a first term as President of the United States of America, by becoming one of  my Students.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com for all the details.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

Every four years there is talk about doing away with the Presidential Electors and electing the President of the United States by popular vote.  That will never happen for two reasons.

1. The change would require alienation of natural rights secured by the “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God” propounded in the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776.
2. The formal change in government would result in the establishment of the same kind of administration Adolf Hitler employed to rule Nazi Germany.

Talk of abandoning the election of the President of the United States and President of the United States of America in favor of voting for those two Offices ceases once the truth about how George Washington took over the government emerges.   If you don’t know how George Washington combined the two Offices of President of the United States and President of the United States of America, you may not be aware of the four Organic Laws.  E-mail me your request for the Organic Laws and I will attach the particulars of acquiring a first-class legal education for $50.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

Next Page →