Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, LEARNING THE LAW, Northwest Ordinance, ORGANIC LAWS, PRESIDENTS, Property Taxes, PROPRIETARY POWER, State of California, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
The Office of the Los Angeles County Tax Assessor makes this bold claim on its website: “State law mandates that all property is subject to taxation unless otherwise exempted. Your property taxes support necessary services provided to the residents of Los Angeles County. These include law enforcement, fire protection, education, parks and recreation, and other vital services.”
To what state law does the LA Tax Assessor refer?
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 13 TAXATION
SEC. 1. Unless otherwise provided by this Constitution or the laws of the United States:
(a) All property is taxable and shall be assessed at the same percentage of fair market value. When a value standard other than fair market value is prescribed by this Constitution or by statute authorized by this Constitution, the same percentage shall be applied to determine the assessed value. The value to which the percentage is applied, whether it be the fair market value or not, shall be known for property tax purposes as the full value.
(b) All property so assessed shall be taxed in proportion to its full value.
What doesn’t the Assessor tell you?
The Assessor doesn’t explain why only personal property located within the federal territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America might be subject to forced taxation. The government of the State of California within California is the only one which has been authorized by Congress to tax property within the State of California, however, because the State of California is the designation for the federal territory, within California, owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, only non-federal personal property can be taxed. Before admission into the second Union, a State must promise not to tax federal property, which leaves only the personal property not owned by the United States of America subject to property taxation.
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SEC. 1. The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
The above sentence means the State of California is the same kind of federal territory made a permanent part of the Confederacy by Article 4 of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, so only non-governmental personal property located on the federal territory within California is taxable.
Joining the Confederacy under the authority of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 did not require any transfer of territory within that State. Territory claimed by a State of the first Union, the United States of America, which had been ceded to the Confederacy became a permanent part of the Confederacy pursuant to Article 4 of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787. The Northwest Territory was comprised of what would be the States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota, so it can readily be seen how the term “United States” would come to mean the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. The territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America is also “the United States Constitution” George Washington swore to “preserve, protect and defend.”
Once the American people freed themselves from the British tyrant, King George III, only force could openly subject them to the same kind of blatant tyranny. The Confederation Congress, George Washington and the politicians of the time managed to re-install the same kind of government which had been expelled by a violent revolution, without firing a shot.
Using trickery and deceit, it only took a few Americans, who could keep a secret, led by George Washington to replace American freedom with one onerous central government. My “Basic Course in Law and Government” explains how George Washington created the American Presidential dictatorship and my “Advanced Course in Law and Government” helps Students achieve near total freedom. A $50 trial version of the $500 Basic Course in Law and Government along with the Organic Laws is still available by contacting me at firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
By now, this being very close to the 700th Post on this site, the reader should know the four Organic Laws of the United States of America: the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the Constitution of September 17, 1787. These four Organic Laws permit the “Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled” to enact all the laws in all the Titles of the United States Code. The Northwest Ordinance limits those laws and taxes to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. The Constitution of the United States limits those same laws to certain enumerated subjects
What Organic Laws do the States use when they want to license drivers and register motor vehicles? Here in California the State of California defines the “State of California” in Article 3 Section 1 of the Constitution: “The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.” What does that description mean?
“The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America,” means the government headquartered in Sacramento and that part of the land in California which is owned by the United States of America. The State of California fits the land described in Article IV of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787: “Article 4. The said territory, and the States which may be formed therein, shall forever remain a part of this Confederacy of the United States of America, subject to the Articles of Confederation, and to such alterations therein as shall be constitutionally made.”
“The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land,” means the State of California is subordinate to the commercialized version of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 ratified by the thirteen States to be the corporate charter which will guide the President of the United States in his administration of the United States.
The State of California and every other State of the United States including Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, America Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands consists of territory owned by or subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America. The men, women and children on such territory or who believe they are on such territory are United States persons. Such United States persons who can document birth within the boundaries of a State of the United States of America, in the United States or who have been naturalized in the United States may register as citizens of the United States by becoming voters. Californians who will represent California as Senators will register as electors rather than as voters in order to meet the eligibility of Article I Section 3 Clause 3.
The direct election of a State’s two Senators by the Seventeenth Amendment did not change the character of the Confederation Congress it was only intended to justify the expansion of government to include the regulation of every human activity, which explains the licensing of drivers and the registration of their vehicles.
I’m looking for Students in all 50 States to augment the Students I already have to join us on the last leg of a journey through the maze of law and government left to us by George Washington and shameless Founding Fathers. In the coming months we will be presenting the results of years of study and research to members of government and the educational establishment. There is still time for you to become a part of this educational effort and for as little as $50 to start. To begin your legal education, contact me at email@example.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Filed Under Adoption, Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, FREEDOM, LAW OF THE LAND, Martial Law, Northwest Ordinance, ORGANIC LAWS, PROPRIETARY POWER, State of California, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
I live in Torrance, California, which is in North America. When the State of California was a State of the Estados Unidos Mexicanos it was a republic called Alta California, but the state it represented was still in North America.
When Alta California ceased being a Mexican State, the government part of California, the State of California, joined two Unions, the United States of America under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and the United States under the Constitution of the United States. The Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 is the first of the four Organic Laws of the United States of America which will not be a part of this discussion.
The Google United States is essentially the territory owned by the Confederacy, the United States of America, in North America, which includes no part of Torrance.
The name, “United States” has been used to describe the territory owned by the United States of America since the enactment of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, which established a temporary government for the “United States,” until the Constitution of the United States made that “government” a more or less permanent “administration of the President of the United States.
So Google, if I live in Torrance, California, I can’t possibly live in the United States, why are you putting in a place subject to military rule?
I need more Students located in North America south of Canada and north of Mexico, who do not live in United States to take my “Basic Course in Law and Government.” Once these Students are properly schooled in the Organic Laws of the United States, they will be highly qualified to correct Google’s erroneous geography. To enroll for as little as $50 in a Course others have happily paid $500 to complete, contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Filed Under Adoption, Article II Section 1 Clause 8, Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, Electoral College, LAW OF THE LAND, Oath of Office, Presidential Elector, PRESIDENTS, PROPRIETARY POWER, State of California | 2 Comments
Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Ed. defines SOCIALISM this way, “Any theory or system of social organization which would abolish, entirely or in great part, the individual effort and competition on which modern society rests, and substitute for it co-operative action, would introduce a more perfect and equal distribution of the products of labor, and would make land and capital, as the instruments and means of production, the joint possession of the members of the community.”
In the Basic Course in Law and Government, the new Student learns how the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 created the United States of America out of the thirteen original States, which had declared their separation from Great Britain in the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776. Students also learn how George Washington took over all the governments in the America that operated between Canada and Mexico and began the first socialist state by the introduction of Freemasonry principles into those governments. The State of California will likely be the first State to collapse from the application of those principles in the country’s largest nanny State.
This is a much abbreviated version of how George Washington and the Freemason Founding Fathers did it. On April 6, 1789, the Electoral votes cast on February 4, 1789 were counted in Congress precisely as required by the Constitution and George Washington automatically became President of the United States of America without an oath and without any inauguration. Washington, as President of the United States of America, became the head of State for the Confederacy and the nation of the United States of America.
George Washington was not the first President of the United States of America there had been many before him. Washington was the first President of the United States of America after the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the Constitution of September 17, 1787. He would be the first one to take the oral oath to the Office of President of the United States, a special Office, whose occupant had the duty of signing a Bill passed by Congress, if he approved and making his objections on Bills, if he did not approve. Bills the President of the United States signed would become law. Bills not approved by the President of the United States would be returned to the Senate or House of Representatives with his objections. Congress could pass these Bills despite his objections or they could let his objections stand. The job of the President of the United States was to make Congress work and to work for Congress.
On April 30, 1789, Washington took this oral oath: “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.” On April 6, 1789, Washington became President of the United States of America when the Electoral votes were counted in Congress by the end of the day on April 30, 1789 George Washington would be both head of State of the United States of America and the head of the government, as President of the United States.
The next day, May Day, May 1, 1789, George Washington would begin his eight year reign as President of the first socialist nation in the world. What made George Washington government socialist? The government headed by George Washington as President of the United States acted as if the national government owned everything and the people had no right to keep all they produced, because they produced it on federal government property.
Taxation was the means by which George Washington’s administration extracted a portion of what the people produced. Congress first imposed taxes on imports of all kinds. Excises on carriages and reviled excise on distilled alcohol would follow. Throughout the history of the United States of America the basis of all lawmaking would be based on a taxable event or property within the United States which was always interpreted by federal court judges to be the geographical United States of America.
The actual taxable event was much more limited, but the federal government was not volunteering the truth. Instead, legislators carefully hid the situs of taxation in plain sight. As all legislation was tied or limited to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, so also was taxation. The phrase in Article VI of “this Constitution” that the “Laws of the United States” “shall be the supreme Law of the Land” referred to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States of America. That provision is binding on the States, so the State of California its taxes and laws are limited to that same federal territory. When that truth comes out the State of California will collapse.
I teach the law as it has never been taught, to become a Student of the law contact me at email@example.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
I got this e-mail from a Student. My response appears below his e-mail:
“These questions may be too simple. However, what meaning does the term BAR have in relation to an attorney or a lawyer? What does it mean when someone says they have their BAR card? There seems to be much confusion out there, and I have yet, to find the truth for this term. I was told years ago
that it stood for British Attorney Registry. Are US Attorneys registered with the Queen?”
I was a member of the California State Bar from June 2, 1972 until August 6, 2006, when I was disbarred from appearing before the State of California Supreme Court. I had never appeared before that court in the three decades I was licensed to be an Attorney and Counselor at Law #52737. I became a dues paying member of the State Bar of California by becoming a member of the bar of that Supreme Court, so to be disbarred I had to be thrown out of that court in order to be disbarred. If all this sounds like a bunch of lawyer’s tricks, you are catching on to the legal business in America.
Law in America is a fantasy. What institution determines what the law is in America? The United States Supreme Court is supposed to be the court of last resort, the court that is the last say in what the law is, however, the only constitutional duty of the Chief Justice is to preside at the impeachment of the President of the United States. Impeachment is defined in the Constitution as a non-judicial process in Article I Section 3 Clause 7: “Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to law.” Article I impeachment is a legislative process, where the party is charged by the House of Representatives and tried by the Senate.
The United States Supreme Court is a legislative court, which was created on September 24, 1789 in the Judiciary Act of 1789. The Offices of Chief Justice and Associate Justices were created a day before the Supreme Court making it truly a court of men and not laws.
When I got started in the legal business, there were no Bar Cards. Back in our offices we had Bar Admission Certificates framed for display. Much later we had paper Bar Cards and then plastic. I never registered with the Brits and I don’t think the Queen would want anything to do with American law or its lawyers.
The British have dealt with a bar in their own way. Alfred Lord Tennyson wrote:
CROSSING THE BAR
Sunset and evening star,
And one clear call for me!
And may there be no moaning of the bar,
When I put out to sea.
But such a tide as moving seems asleep,
Too full for sound and foam,
When that which drew from out the boundless deep
Turns again home!
Twilight and evening bell,
And after that the dark!
And may there be no sadness of farewell,
When I embark;
For though from out our bourn of Time and Place
The flood may bear me far,
I hope to see my Pilot face to face
When I have crost the bar.
I crossed the Bar when I started telling the truth about law and government in California. Telling the truth about law and government got me disbarred. Learning the truth about the law and government can get you free. It costs nothing to get the Organic Laws of the United States of America and information about becoming my Student. Contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Brian Davis stands accused of writing a letter to the Physical Therapy Board of California manifesting symptoms of a mental illness. The Accusation filed against Davis by Rebecca Marco alleges no other evidence of mental illness. The sole use my Student’s writing to claim he has a diseased mind is a despicable act and a violation of Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution of this State.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
SEC. 2. (a) “Every person may freely speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of this right. A law may not restrain or abridge liberty of speech or press.”
Student Brian is a serious student of the law which makes his letter to the Physical Therapy Board of California particularly interesting. Anyone interested in reading Brian’s letter to the Board and the Executive Director’s Accusation may request them by e-mail. Information about my Basic Course in Law and Government is also available by contacting me at email@example.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
One Rebecca Marco, Executive Officer of the Physical Therapy Board of California, Department of Consumer Affairs is accusing Advanced Student, Brian Davis, of being unfit to hold the Physical Therapy License he has held since 1989. Marco claims Brian is unfit because he has written that he does not live in the State of California. I am mentioned in the Accusation as the teacher of the “delusions” two psychiatrists claim are contained in a six page letter Brian wrote to explain why the statement, “the State of California is California” cannot be true.
While others outside California have no trouble seeing the State of California in a state of fiscal disaster, those same observers marvel at the physical beauty of California. The State of California has been definitively defined in Article 3 Section 1 of the State’s Constitution: “The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.”
My Students will be witnessing first-hand the initiation of the use of psychiatry by State of California government authorities to isolate political dissenters from the rest of society, discredit their ideas, and break them physically and mentally.
Beginning tomorrow, I will start releasing all the documents that prove the State of California has begun a full Soviet Union styled assault on the political freedoms of all free inhabitants in California.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Brian Davis, one of my Advanced Students, explained the meaning of Article III Section 1 of the State of California Constitution of 1879, to the State of California Physical Therapy Board, where he is licensed as a Physical Therapist. For those readers who have not read all my Posts, this is Article III Section 1: “The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.”
Article III Section 1 of the Constitution of the State of California of 1879 means that the State of California is the territory within California, which belongs to the Confederacy, the United States of America, under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777. The phrase,”and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land,” confirms the State of California is territory, land, subject to the Organic Laws of the United States of America.
In the six page letter Brian wrote to the State of California Physical Therapy Board, he explained the Organic Laws of the United States of America with such lucidity the Board was frightened out of its collective mind. Brian flat out explained why the State of California is all the federal territory in California and his Physical Therapy license is really only required there. The Loony Left has so infiltrated State of California government that no one can understand the “land” means only the territory owned by and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States of America, which explains why all so-called federal cases are brought in the name of the United States of America, as plaintiff.
The Board, fearing the ultimate consequences of our brand of “civil obedience,” which is strict adherence to written law particularly the Organic Laws, immediately made an order requiring Brian to be examined by Beverly Hills psychiatrist, Dr. Mohan Nair.
This will be the case to follow. Brian Davis has been a Physical Therapist for twenty-three years without a blemish on his work record. I met with Brian four days and he is as sane and physically fit as anyone I encountered in forty years of legal practice and instruction in law. The State of California, simply, does not have a response to “civil obedience,” the strict adherence to the letter of the Organic Laws of the United States of America that Brian eloquently presented in his letter to the Board.
The State of California is so desperate to avoid total collapse it has sunk to the tactics of the former Soviet Union.
To get a copy of Brian’s letter and the Board’s Order Compelling the Physical and Mental Examination of Brian Davis, PT, enroll as a Basic Student following the instructions on the July 9, 2011 Post.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
WHAT MUST YOU DO WHEN YOU ARE BEING INVESTIGATED BY FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OR DISTRICT ATTORNEY?
Filed Under Adoption, Articles of Confederation, COMMON LAW, CONSTITUTION, CRIMINAL LAW, LAW OF THE LAND, PROPRIETARY POWER, State of California, Territorial Jurisdiction, U.S. District Court | Leave a Comment
The odds are you are not being investigated for the commission of English common law crime. There are no common law courts in any of the 50 States, and there have never been any common law courts in the federal judiciary. There are no common law courts, because there are no common law judges or jurors.
The only law in America is the written law enacted by Congress and the State legislatures. The ability of the people of the States to make law, while sitting in common law juries, was slowly replaced by juries controlled by government judges. A hanging government jury is what awaits you unless you learn the lesson of the un-adopted constitution.
The Constitutional Convention of May 25, 1787 was charged with the task of revising the original federal constitution the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777. The best kept secret in America is the Constitutional Convention only revised the Articles of Confederation enough to create the Senate and President of the United States of America, so that George Washington could put himself in charge of the United States, the territory belonging to the United States of America. Sure the Constitution of September 17, 1787 has been ratified by the States, but it has never been adopted by government officers for use as a government charter.
The ratified Constitution of September 17, 1787 makes it possible for a Congress of the United States of America to make laws and taxes for the territory the United States of America owns and pretend those laws apply to everyone in America.
The governments of these nine States, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maryland, South Carolina, and New Hampshire became the United States on June 21, 1788, when New Hampshire became the ninth State to ratify the Constitution of September 17, 1787. Those nine States and two others New York and Virginia met in New York City on March 4, 1789 to make legislation based on the proprietary power of the United States of America over all the Northwest Territory and the territory formerly claimed by some of the States of the United States of America.
The easiest way to defend against a written law crime charge is to immediately start looking for the jury pool. Where do you look? They are everywhere, if you are looking for unqualified jurors.
Anyone who is not obviously an illegal alien can be a U.S. citizen. It is nearly impossible to be a resident within a judicial district because a district consists entirely of federal territory subject to the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of the United States of America.
Am I saying the local District Attorney is limited to crimes committed on federal territory within the county? That is exactly what I am saying. What better proof than the fact that trial jurors in California must be U.S. citizens and “domiciliaries of the State of California.” The State of California is both the name of the government and the federal territory in California.
What must you do? You must learn the law of what it takes to be a government juror in America by enrolling as one of my Students.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
In the State of California a statute must only have one subject, so a one sentence statute like Revenue & Taxation Code Section 19706 should be easily limited to its subject, but it is not.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION: ARTICLE 4 LEGISLATIVE
Section 9. “A statute shall embrace but one subject, which shall be expressed in its title. If a statute embraces a subject not expressed in its title, only the part not expressed is void. A statute may not be amended by reference to its title. A section of a statute may not be amended unless the section is re-enacted as amended.”
State of California Revenue & Taxation Code Section 19706.
“Any person or any officer or employee of any corporation who, within the time required by or under the provisions of this part, willfully fails to file any return or to supply any information with intent to evade any tax imposed by Part 10 (commencing with Section 17001) or Part 11 (commencing with Section 23001), or who, willfully and with like intent, makes, renders, signs, or verifies any false or fraudulent return or statement or supplies any false or fraudulent information, is punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed one year, or in the state prison, or by fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both the fine and imprisonment, at the discretion of the court, together with the costs of investigation and prosecution.”
My goal in creating the Basic Course in Law and Government was to empower ordinary people by providing them with the lifelong ability to learn the law and recognize good and lawful government. To become one of my Students, contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera