Aug
9
GAY MARRIAGE, PROPOSITION 8, MARRIAGE LICENSES, COMMON LAW AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Filed Under COMMON LAW, CONGRESS, GAY MARRIAGE, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, ORGANIC LAWS, Oath of Office, State of California, Territorial Jurisdiction | 1 Comment
California was named by Spanish explorers and claimed for the Spanish monarchy many centuries ago.
California and Texas were republics of the Mexican Union of States and Spanish property law currently applies in these and other American States. English is the common language in California and Texas and the English common law is the law in both places.
The original thirteen States formed the perpetual Union, the United States of America on March 1, 1781 when Maryland became the thirteenth State to ratify the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777. The State of California joined the perpetual Union when her two Senators were admitted to the Senate of the United States of America.
The State of California was admitted to the Union established by the Constitution of September 17, 1787 on September 9, 1850 and according to Article 3 Section 1of its Constitution of 1879, “is an inseparable part of the United States of America and the Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land.” The State of California, an inseparable part of the United States of America, is both a government and that part of California, which is owned by the United States of America.
The State of California does not recognize common law marriage, which is an unlicensed marriage between a man and woman, but does recognize the licensed marriages of the other 55 States of the Union established by the Constitution of September 17, 1787, which was ratified by the States, but not adopted by a government bound to support that Constitution.
The Supreme Court of the State of California issued an opinion in a case that marriages between persons of the same sex were lawful and, therefore, should be licensed by the State of California.
Proposition 8, which defined marriage as only between one man and one woman, was approved by a majority of State of California registered voters and conforms with Title 1 United States Code Section 7. Definition of “marriage” and “spouse:” “
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ‘marriage’ means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.”
Based upon these facts, the Congress of the United States of America recognizes the existence within the place called California two kinds of territory one owned by the United States of America and another owned by others not the United States of America.
The decision and opinion rendered by United States district judge Vaughn Walker in the matter of the constitutionality of Proposition 8 is inconsistent with the Organic Laws of the United States of America and an act of the Congress of the United States of America.
The recognition by Congress and the refusal of the State of California and many other States of the United States to recognize common law marriage illustrates the nature of the Article I Section 8 Clause 18 ”exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever.” The Congress of the United States has the power to recognize common law from outside the United States, but the States of the United States do not.
Because the officers of the federal government have never taken and subscribed a written Article VI oath “to support this Constitution,” the Constitution of September 17, 1787 has not been adopted for the United States of America. The “exclusive Legislation” afforded by proprietary power of Congress trumps the un-adopted Constitution of the United States every time.
Has your state withdrawn recognition of common law marriage and is there a gay marriage movement in your state or has same sex marriage become a reality there? Then you are in luck, if you want to claim your freedom. The right to pick your marriage partner is a fundamental human right, so the attempt by the State to outlaw common law marriage and to license civil marriage is a clear signal that the State has unlawfully extended its power beyond the lands owned by the United States of America.
To take advantage of all the possibilities common law and gay marriage present, you must know law and government. My Basic Course in Law and Government is the only one that will prepare you to take on the State government’s legal establishment. To enroll, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Aug
4
VAUGHN R. WALKER OPENLY GAY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAYS PROPOSITION 8 IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL—SAME SEX MARRIAGES ARE LEGAL IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Filed Under CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, GAY MARRIAGE, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, ORGANIC LAWS, State of California, U.S. District Court | 3 Comments
The territorial jurisdiction of Chief Judge Walker is the land owned by the United States of America within the counties that comprise the Northern District, so Judge Walker’s findings are limited to that territory.
The legal result of the ruling is that same sex couples may marry in a place under the exclusive legislative power of the United States Congress. Using that authority Congress has enacted Title 1 United States Code Section 7, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which recognizes only a marriage between one man and one woman.
Judge Walker’s opinion is in direct conflict with an act of Congress, when one knows how to interpret the first sentence that appears in Chapter 5—District Courts Title 28 United States Code: “Sections 81 - 131 of this chapter show the territorial composition of districts and divisions by counties as of January 1, 1945.”
Sections 81 through 131 of Chapter 5 of Title 28 describe the territorial composition of the 48 States, the two Territories, Alaska and Hawaii; the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. The only territory common to the 48 States, two territories, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico is land owned by the federal government, the United States of America, the Confederacy.
Knowing the proper legal territorial jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is the only sensible way to understand the consequences of Judge Walker’s opinion. My Students are the only law Students who are taught written law using all the Organic Laws and not just the Constitution of the United States. If you are looking for a simple solution to a federal problem or a problem with one or more of the States of the United States, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jul
7
SURVIVING THE COMING CRASH OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Filed Under BANKRUPTCY, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, LEARNING THE LAW, State of California, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
The State of California is an example of a modern political state, which was first devised by George Washington and the so-called Founding Fathers at the secret Constitutional Convention of 1787. After the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 and the success of the War for Independence, American politicians slowly realized that few Americans would only consent to be governed, if deceived or threatened by some form of coercion. Shays Rebellion supplied an imminent threat of anarchy and the result was the Constitution of the United States, which provides a State of a new Union completely controlled by a government of politicians.
A state consists of a large group of people who share a common territory, law and language. When California was part of the Estados Unidos Mexicanos, the law and language was different from what they are today, but the territory was much the same. The State of California went from a Mexican State to a State of the United States, while California remained unchanged except by its eternal earthquake activity.
In the coming crash of the government of the State of California there will be a tremendous opportunity for those who are prepared to replace old disreputable law with the more liberating English common law. Government law has slowly replaced common law, but it cannot be repealed as it is contained within the English language. With the collapse of the State of California comes the collapse of government law and the inevitable revival of English common law, unless unscrupulous politicians like George Washington intervene to take advantage of the crisis.
Only my Students know how George Washington engineered the overthrow of the free and independent States of America and plotted the substitution of the States of the United States. The commercial enterprise known as the State of California is about to liquidate, don’t invest in the newer model of that old lemon that will surely be offered. The Golden State will thrive under new management, if you arm yourself with the facts by enrolling in my Basic Course in Law and Government. Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
29
PREPARING FOR THE INEVITABLE COLLAPSE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Filed Under COMMON LAW, CONSTITUTION, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, LIBERTARIAN, Martial Law, PRESIDENTS, State of California | Leave a Comment
Everyone with an informed opinion knows government in California based on the Constitution of the State of California and the Constitution of the United States is headed toward total collapse. The only viable law outside of that for the land owned by the United States of America will be the English common law.
Fortunately, governments only seek to control productivity governments produce nothing. We can survive the end of this government, if we are prepared. The destruction of Government will not be complete, because the federal government will try to maintain control over the property in California owned by the United States of America. The State of California’s collapse will give us another chance to get it right.
The coming collapse of the State of California will herald the return to the legitimate government that existed during the American Revolution and after the defeat of the English monarchy and before the rise of George Washington and the Presidents. My Students are learning how all governments in America came to be and why the worse ones are teetering near collapse now.
Successful reconstruction of society depends on a total comprehension of the errors of the past and the knowledge necessary to avoid those errors in the future. By becoming a Student, you will learn how government was broken and what can be fixed.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Mar
10
USING THE BASIC COURSE IN LAW AND GOVERNMENT TO LIMIT LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES TO FEDERAL TERRITORY.
Filed Under Adoption, CONSTITUTION, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, ORGANIC LAWS, Oath of Office, State of California, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
The Constitution of the United States is the basis of all written law in America. If the law, as written, is not constitutional, it is not the law, upon this there is complete agreement.
All written law in America is limited to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America, because the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was never legally adopted by any government by having its President, as executive, and its Congress take and be bound by a subscribed Article VI oath, “to support this Constitution.”
The ratification of the written constitution, the Constitution of September 17, 1787, this Constitution, by the States is insufficient to personally bind “a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives” and the President of the United States “to support this Constitution.” The Article VI oath must be taken, so it binds the Officer taking the oath this means signing a name to a written oath “to support this Constitution” and not an oral oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
The oral oath taken, but which does not bind the President of the United States, to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” is sufficient to make laws for the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America using the proprietary power of the owner, the United States of America. All written laws are limited to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America, because the self-evident truth “that all Men are created equal” and “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights” limits legislative power to territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. Cops, lawyers and judges are limited to federal territory, because their laws are limited to federal territory.
Only the Basic Course in Law and Government teaches the Student how to read and understand the Organic Law of the United States of America, so that its territorial limitations can be easily found and understood. Learn how to put those who are pushing federal law in their place: federal territory, by becoming one of my Students. Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Feb
23
HOW CALIFORNIANS CAN SAVE CALIFORNIA
Filed Under LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, Northwest Ordinance, ORGANIC LAWS, Oath of Office, State of California, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
My Students learn how to prove State government in California is part of the Union of States first started by the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787. That law was one of the few laws the Congress of the United States, under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, could make. It is well known that the Congress under the Articles of Confederation had no law making power over the states of the first Union, the United States of America.
The United States of America, the Confederacy, under the authority of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, acquired through the 1783 Treaty of Paris, the peace treaty between Great Britain and the United States of America, power to govern the Northwest Territory and to exercise all proprietary and territorial power over that land, which would become the States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota. Through the exercise of those powers Congress under the Articles, the United States in Congress assembled, issued the Northwest Ordinance as a temporary law establishing a tentative government and a process for selling the land in that Territory. Any unsold land would forever remain territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America and would constitute the territory of the second “more perfect Union” under the terms of a permanent version of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
Citizens of the United States identified in the Constitution of September 17, 1787 were Americans who bound themselves to the law embraced within the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787. Most of the temporary provisions in the Ordinance appear to have been incorporated into the Constitution of September 17, 1787, and any that were not, were enacted into statutory law by the First Congress, on August 7, 1789, when the entire Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 was made federal law.
Each of the 50 States of the United States, the second “more perfect Union,” must have a patch of sovereign ground (territory) where its laws can attach that territory is the territory within the State owned by and ceded to the United States of America. Right now most Californians consent to be governed by erroneously believing they are citizens of the United States and residents of the State of California.
If you live within a state, but not on territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America, you can easily learn the law and how government is supposed to work by becoming one of my Students. Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Oct
28
PUTTING LEGAL GENIUS TO GOOD USE
Filed Under COMMON LAW, Foreclosure, LAW OF THE LAND, Martial Law, ORGANIC LAWS, Property Taxes, State of California, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
I teach ordinary people how to become legal geniuses by learning the origin of unwritten and written law. Being a legal genius is a lot like being a successful rocket scientist, you won’t succeed and you won’t get noticed, unless you put your payload into orbit. What would a Student, who has become a legal genius, do with his legal knowledge? One of several Students is interested in correcting the deed that makes him legal owner of his home. What’s wrong with his deed? His deed states that his home is located in the State of Wisconsin, which we know is territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. This Student wants a deed that puts his home, where the English common law is the law.
Glen Beck, the Fox News personality is claiming that the government will be securing a new series of currency with, you guessed it, territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
If you believe like Glen Beck that salvation is a matter of restoring the Constitution and revering George Washington and the Founding Fathers, you are going to need all the extra help you can get. Paying the $500 tuition for my Basic Course in Law and Government is cheap compared to $41,500 for one year’s tuition at Harvard Law School.
I teach what is not taught at Harvard and I show my Students how to get their “claim” that their property is not in the State of Wisconsin into orbit by putting it on top of the Organic Law. The county recorder of deeds has never read any of the Organic Law and won’t begin now. That officer does understand the written law and regulations that concern the administration of the officer he or she occupies. That statute law says what can be filed and what can be recorded by him or her. Somewhere in the law of the State of Wisconsin, or any other State, will be found the law that limits the county recorder to filing and recording documents that affect title to property located only within the State of Wisconsin and his or her specific county. I teach Students how to find that law.
If you become one of my Students, you will be learning the law in its proper order, but the bureaucrat only knows statute law and regulations instituted to administer statute law. To successfully present your case to the administrative bureaucrat, you must present this law to the bureaucrat in reverse order to the way you will be taught the law or the county recorder will not get to that part of the law that limits what he or she does to the State of Wisconsin.
State law in the State of Wisconsin requires the recorder to act in a specific way. Tap into that law and all you have to do is the factual work of proving your property is not territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Oct
6
IF ROMAN POLANSKI HAD TAKEN THE BASIC COURSE IN LAW AND GOVERNMENT
Filed Under COMMON LAW, CONGRESS, CRIMINAL LAW, GRAND JURY, JURY DUTY, LAW OF THE LAND, State of California, TRIAL BY JURY, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
Roman Polanski was charged with a written law crime decades ago in California to which he pleaded guilty then he fled before he could be sentenced. Now he is in custody in Switzerland awaiting extradition paperwork from the Los Angeles County District Attorney.
California like 48 of the other common law states substitutes California Codes for the common law. The Los Angeles County District Attorney pretends that all so-called crimes that occur within the Los Angeles County lines fall within his federal district that include the Veteran’s Administration Hospital and Los Padres National forest. The VA has its own Zip Code 90073, which is the most heavily populated federal enclave in an area of millions. This is where federal jurors would have to come from and this is where the State of California juror, the “domiciliary” lives.
If Roman Polanski had taken my Basic Course in Law and Government, he would be telling his high priced attorneys to drop the legal bomb on the State of California’s written law system.
Polanski is a punk and a pervert. You are probably a patriot and all around good guy. Are you waiting for the gendarmes to knock on your door before you start preparing a legal defense. The Congress of the United States is preparing legislation that will make it a federal offense not to have health insurance. Prepare for the worse by enrolling as a Student. Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Sep
22
UNDERSTANDING STATE CONSTITUTIONS AS MINI CONSTITUTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES
Filed Under CONSTITUTION, Fourteenth Amendment, State of California | Leave a Comment
The State of California was admitted into the second Union of the United States as the 31st State on September 9, 1850. As very State must have a constitution approved by Congress, the State of California had the Constitution of 1849, which is still law in the State of California to the extent it is not contrary to the Constitution of 1879. The second constitution was necessary in order for the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States to be adopted by the people of California.
State constitutions mimic the Constitution of the United States in that the territory the constitution applies to is the same¾territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. The State of California specifically states this in Article 3 Section 1: “The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.”
The first Constitution of the United States of America is unwritten and reference to it is found in the Declaration of Independence, which declares the American people to be free and endowed with unalienable Rights. The Constitution of the State of California In Article 1 Sections 1 and 2 repeats this message, so it too can confuse the reader. These free people are not those who are United States citizens residing in the State of California.
The balance of the 1879 Constitution of the State of California will have nothing to do with the people who have and properly claim their unalienable rights. The people of the State of California are going to become United States citizens subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and the State of California. People in California become United States citizens primarily by registering to vote, working for corporations incorporated in the United States and which claim to be located within the United States.
Every State Constitution will repeat the same theme. All people are free and have unalienable until they become United States citizens and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
6
SAVING CALIFORNIA FROM THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES
Filed Under GAY MARRIAGE, JURY DUTY, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, ORGANIC LAWS, Oath of Office, Property Taxes, State of California | Leave a Comment
I have been too busy saving California from the government of the State of California and the government of the United States to write new posts. I am sharing with regular readers a portion of what I have written to help Californians out of the hole government has dug for them.
The “Dear State of California Superior Court Judge Letter” is both a lesson for the students in my advanced class and a notice to the so-called judicial branch of State government. Only the first and last paragraphs of this six-page letter appear here. Only former law clients and students who have enrolled and paid for the basic course in law and government will be able to participate in the advanced course and receive this and other advanced lessons. For information on the basic and advanced course, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Dear State of California Superior Court Judge:
It is the intention of this notice to make you aware that your evident lack of basic knowledge of the structure of government and the difference between written and unwritten law have caused me and other Californians great financial harm in that you and judges like you are extending the written law of the State of California outside the territorial limitations of that law. There are no real judges in the State of California, as sovereignty is based on the authority of a written constitution that has not been adopted by government. The government of the United States is based on the popular election of a President of the United States, who has taken only an oral oath to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution of the United States.
***
Dr. Rivera’s research confirms that none of the presidential libraries contain any evidence of a subscription to a written oath. The complete absence of a written oath by any of the 44 Presidents of the United States provides such overwhelming evidence that a United States Constitution or Constitution of the United States, whether, by now, written or unwritten must be confined to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. In any event, the evidence I have provided is so compelling it requires a response from you. I will assume that your refusal or failure to respond as an acknowledgement that your territorial jurisdiction does not extend beyond the federal territory in California.
Very truly yours,
Your name