• Pages

  • CONTACT ED RIVERA
  • IMPEACHMENT OF GEORGE W. BUSH REQUIRED TO END HIS POLICIES
  • LETTER TO CAPTIVES
  • REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

• Recent Posts

  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LESSON: LEARNING CONSTITUTION LAW BY THE NUMBERS
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LESSON: CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT THAT DOOM THE CREATION OF A REPUBLIC
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LESSON: A CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND A CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES ALL IN “THIS CONSTITUTION”
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LESSON: THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IS A LEGISLATIVE NOT A JUDICIAL COURT, BECAUSE THE CHIEF JUSTICE IS A LEGISLATIVE OFFICER WITH CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATIVE DUTIES
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LESSON: THE ARTICLE 2 CLAUSE 5 OFFICE OF PRESIDENT HAS BEEN VACANT SINCE GEORGE WASHINGTON FAILED THE FOURTEEN YEARS RESIDENT WITHIN THE UNITED STATES ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT

• Categories

  • Adoption
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 5
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 8
  • Article III
  • Articles of Confederation
  • BAIL OUT
  • BANKRUPTCY
  • CENSUS
  • CIVIL CONTEMPT
  • COMMON LAW
  • CONGRESS
  • CONSTITUTION
  • CRIMINAL LAW
  • Declaration of Independence
  • Economic Stimulous
  • Electoral College
  • Foreclosure
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • FREEDOM
  • GAY MARRIAGE
  • GRAND JURY
  • IMMIGRATION
  • IMPEACHMENT
  • JURY DUTY
  • LAW OF THE LAND
  • LEARNING THE LAW
  • LIBERTARIAN
  • Martial Law
  • MAYAN 2012
  • Northwest Ordinance
  • Oath of Office
  • OBAMA
  • ORGANIC LAWS
  • PARDON
  • Presidential Elector
  • PRESIDENTS
  • ProperTea Tax Tea Party
  • Property Taxes
  • Second Amendment
  • State of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • TRIAL BY JURY
  • U.S. District Court
  • Uncategorized

• Archives

  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

The common law is so named because it is so much a part of the community that is also part of the oral language.  Do not fall for the Wikipedia/government propaganda that the common law was made by judges.  English common law had a history heavily influenced by the English monarchy’s administration of all legal matters in England, which accounts for the misconception that judges royally appointed made the common law.  If an act is so detrimental to the wellbeing of a community, it will be designated a crime and it will be given a name.  The people made an act a crime by giving it a name.  Similarly, merchants created contract law by custom and usage of the English language to fashion valid agreements.

The common law crimes were named long before the first colonists brought the English language and English common law to America.  Common law has continued to be the unwritten law in America, even as the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 announced the dissolution of the Political Bands, which once connected America with Great Britain.

Modern legal education has bastardized the teaching of law into an examination of the quirks of the judge’s mind rather than the proper separation of law into what is written and unwritten law.  Any student of the law must decide at the onset of his or her education, if a full examination of written and unwritten law will be made or if the student will follow the herd and examine only the law made pursuant to the Constitution of the United States.

You can start your common law education by looking in the a’s of any dictionary to find “abduction,” “arson” and “assault.”  Exhausting the a’s  the student can go on to the b’s and then all the way to the end of the dictionary.  For the student in a hurry to learn the common law, I recommend the index to any book on the common law.

The dictionary approach to learning basic law teaches the student that law has a very sensible and universal basis and what it isn’t basic and sensible is written law.   I teach my Students how to confine written law to government and the land owned by the United States of America.  To become one of those Students, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

      

On April 20, 2010 the United States Supreme Court struck down a federal law that made it a crime to make or sell videos of dogfights or other depictions of animal cruelty.  The Court’s 8-to-1 decision was based on the protection afforded free speech by the First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The first ten amendments were ratified by the required number of States on December 15, 1791, as the Bill of Rights.  These amendments were necessary to placate those, who at that time felt there was little to control Congress.   Such feelings were well grounded in law, but, unfortunately, not well understood.

There are two legal systems operating in the United States of America freed from monarchical rule by the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776: written and unwritten law.  The English common law is the unwritten law in 49 of the 50 states.   All written law is thought to be derived from the Constitution of September 17, 1787, which was first established on June 21, 1788.  The First Congress began meeting in New York City on March 4, 1789 and by June 1, 1789 had produced a statutory oath for the Government of the United States.  The Constitution of September 17, 1787, in Article I Section 7 imposes on the Congress the duty of presenting to the President of the United States all Bills, which have been passed by the House of Representatives and Senate.  Most certainly that process was followed with the animal cruelty video law that was just struck down.

The federal legislative process is itself a dog and pony show.  While the States have ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787, none of the officers of the Government of the United States have taken an Article VI oath “to support this Constitution.”  Instead, the President of the United States takes an oral oath to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution of the United States, which is limited territorially to the land in each state owned by the United States of America.

Where does Congress get the power to make laws for practically anything it wants?  Where else would kingly powers come from, but George III, King of England, who relinquished all “Government, proprietary and territorial rights” collectively to the thirteen original States in the Treaty of Paris of 1783.  The King could only relinquish by treaty that which he possessed as the States were free of all law except the English common law. 

Those States lost all government power over Americans they had acquired through the English monarchy with the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776.  The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and Constitution of September 17, 1787 made it possible for both the States and a so-called national government to have a territory to which the “Government, proprietary and territorial rights” relinquished by the King of England could apply.

It would take a man with the personality of a king, but without a male heir to snatch hard won American freedom from the People.  The Constitution of the United States was the brilliant piece of work that has deceived millions, but it needed the People’s choice to get it started .  George Washington’s oral oath to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution of the United States didn’t include the dogs on the land owned by the United States of America, but, as government must grow or begin to die, it now covers pets and livestock.           

 The Supreme Court was a September 24, 1789 statutory creation of the First Congress to complete the three ring circus of a federal government.  This brief account of how America went to the dogs is intended to spark the interest of readers to discover how animals got to be more important than people.  If you want to find out in detail how the government got its power, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com  to become a Student.

 

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera     

Former federal judge and Attorney General Michael Mukasey in a November 14, 2009 interview on the Fox News Network claimed there was little the families of the 9-11 victims could do to stop the planned prosecutions in the Southern District of New York.

Mukasey is wrong.  The United States Department of Justice must obtain a true bill of indictment from a federal grand jury, before any case can be brought against Khalid Shaikh Mohammed.  To get a true bill of indictment, the federal grand jurors must be qualified.

New Yorkers do not qualify to be federal grand jurors because none of them reside within the district, which is the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America in the counties of Bronx, Dutchess, New York, Orange, Putnam, Rockland, and Suffolk.  Federal grand jurors must reside on federal territory and there are none that qualify in New York.  The United States Supreme Court case Test v. United States, 420 U.S. 28 (1975) establishes the absolute right of a federal criminal defendant to make a motion to dismiss the indictment because the grand jurors are not qualified.

The families of 9-11 victims must inform the United States Department of Justice that the military commissions are the only safe method of prosecuting Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and his co- conspirators. 

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

United States Army officials intend to charge Major Nidal M. Hasan with premeditated murder in the November 5th killing of 12 soldiers and a civilian at Fort Hood’s Soldier Readiness Processing Center, which also left 38 people wounded.

The court that will try Major Hasan for murder will without question have the trappings of the United States military.  The flag of the United States identified in Title 4 United States Code Section 1 will be a focal point of those trappings, however, that flag will be symbolic of the executive power of the United States Government, by the addition of gold braid or fringe.

All United States flags displayed in government courtrooms and offices will have the gold fringe emblematic of executive authority.

All government courts display the gold fringed United States flags as a visual notice that the proceedings that take place there are not based in law, but in military authority legislated by the Congress of the United States.

Written government law is supreme where that territory is owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  I teach how George Washington brilliantly overthrew the civilian government under the Articles of Confederation and replaced it with the military model that is in place to this day.

You will not see the fringed flag displayed when the President is acting diplomatically as President of the United States of America.  It is not sufficient just to notice the appropriate display of the fringe on the flag that will only make you part of the lunatic fringe.

To fully understand law and government, you must enroll in my Basic Course in Law and Government.  The $500 tuition is a modest 1% of what a year at Harvard costs.  Famous Harvard Law School graduate Barack Hussein Obama was taught government can make you buy health insurance and make it a federal crime if you don’t.  Don’t waste your money at a traditional law school contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera       

Roman Polanski was charged with a written law crime decades ago in California to which he pleaded guilty then he fled before he could be sentenced.  Now he is in custody in Switzerland awaiting extradition paperwork from the Los Angeles County District Attorney.

California like 48 of the other common law states substitutes California Codes for the common law.  The Los Angeles County District Attorney pretends that all so-called crimes that occur within the Los Angeles County lines fall within his federal district that include the Veteran’s Administration Hospital and Los Padres National forest.  The VA has its own Zip Code 90073, which is the most heavily populated federal enclave in an area of millions.  This is where federal jurors would have to come from and this is where the State of California juror, the “domiciliary” lives.  

If Roman Polanski had taken my Basic Course in Law and Government, he would be telling his high priced attorneys to drop the legal bomb on the State of California’s written law system. 

Polanski is a punk and a pervert.  You are probably a patriot and all around good guy.  Are you waiting for the gendarmes to knock on your door before you start preparing a legal defense.  The Congress of the United States is preparing legislation that will make it a federal offense not to have health insurance.  Prepare for the worse by enrolling as a Student.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera       

In an interview of Nevada Senator and United States Senate majority leader Harry Reid, all but admitted that the federal government is voluntary to everyone not a part of it or residing on the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  The video of the Reid interview on www.janhelfeld.com presents a very confused Senator Reid trying to convince Helfeld that taxation in the United States is voluntary.

Regular readers of my posts know that it is the federal government that is voluntary; taxation by definition is the mandatory imposition of a tax by government.  Helfeld’s interview of New Mexico Governor and former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Bill Richardson, demonstrates dramatically the real basis of federal government power: the proprietary power of the United States of America to defend the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera 

Transcription of Senator Harry Reid interview

Jan Helfeld: …if the government is in the business of forcefully taking money from some people in order to provide welfare benefits to others, how will the people whose money is being taken feel about the government?

Harry Reid: Well, I don’t accept your phraseology. I don’t think we “force” people…

Helfeld: Taxation is not forceful?

Reid: Well, no.

Helfeld: It’s voluntary?

Reid: In fact, quite to the contrary. Our system of government is a voluntary tax system.

Helfeld: Oh… if you don’t want to pay your taxes, you don’t have to?

Reid: Of course you have to pay your taxes, but…

Helfeld: The government will force you to pay, or they’ll fine you or imprison you. Won’t they?

Reid: We have a voluntary system. The fact of the matter is, that if when you pay your taxes — you see, in many other countries, it’s not voluntary.  For example, in many countries, the government makes sure that your employer takes out every penny. Many countries don’t file income tax returns. Why?

Helfeld: We have withholding here too, don’t we?

Reid: Pardon me?

Helfeld: Withholding.

Reid: With some program, yes. But I’m talking about in some countries, European countries as an example, there… you don’t file an income tax return. There is no need to, because your employer takes all the money out. That’s the difference between a voluntary and an involuntary system.

Helfeld: But can…? Can…?

Reid: You can choose to not pay your taxes, but I don’t accept your phraseology, that you forcibly take money from somebody else and give it to others. You know, that’s the way it is on any program. I mean…

Helfeld: Can the taxpayer…?

Reid: …highway program is the same. We…

Helfeld: Excuse me.

Reid: We take money, we “forcibly” take money in your phraseology, but…

Helfeld: But can…? Let me ask you something.

Reid: …build highways with it, put people in the Army.

Helfeld: Can the taxpayer decide not to pay his taxes if he wants?

Reid: He can… He can not pay his taxes if he wants.

Helfeld: What will be the…? What will happen?

Reid: He’ll be subject to civil and criminal penalties.

Helfeld: They’ll put him in jail — they’ll use force against him. He pays…everybody pays taxes under threat of jail or fines: on the threat of force. In other words, you are forced to pay your taxes. Whether you fill out your form voluntarily or whether its withheld by your employer, you 

don’t have a choice on whether you can pay taxes that are going to be used for welfare programs — you can’t make that choice.

 

Reid: Well, but the reason our system is called a voluntary tax system — and I recognize, you know, that ultimately you can’t cheat your taxes, but our… We have many provisions in the law they don’t have in most countries: we have deductibility for home interest on mortgage payment, they don’t have that in most countries, we have deductibility for certain excessive expenses as relates to health — doctors, hospitals — we have all kinds of tax — some people call them “loopholes” but others would call them “incentives for people to do business” — and that’s why… You know, you’re not “forced” to pay certain taxes. There are ways… if you decide to buy a home and…

Helfeld: You can decide not to pay taxes? In the United States?

Reid: I mean, I really don’t understand what you’re trying to get at. If you’re… What… the point of the matter is…

Helfeld: Because you objected to my phraseology. You said that… you say that the government isn’t forcefully taking money from some people to provide welfare benefits to others, and, in fact, that’s what it’s doing, because all taxation is forceful. It’s backed up by physical force. If you 

don’t pay your taxes, the government will intervene with you forcefully.  So you don’t have a choice. It’s not voluntary. You can’t decide not to pay and not suffer consequences. If you don’t pay, you’ll go to jail. So: you’re forced to pay.

Reid: You don’t… you don’t go to jail. Some people go to jail. There are all kind of civil penalties if you don’t pay your taxes: you pay interest and you pay penalties. The fact of the matter is, our system is a voluntary system.

Had George Washington been eligible to the Office of President and had he taken the Article VI oath of Office “to support this Constitution,” he would have appointed someone to be President of the United States.  

That President of the United States would have been limited to approving or objecting to Bills applicable only to the federal government and the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.   

Is Chief Justice John Roberts constitutionally ignorant or guilty of violating this federal law:

 Title 18 United States Code Sec. 1016. Acknowledgment of appearance or oath

    Whoever, being an officer authorized to administer oaths or to take and certify acknowledgments, knowingly makes any false acknowledgment, certificate, or statement concerning the appearance before him or the taking of an oath or affirmation by any person with respect to any proposal, contract, bond, undertaking, or other matter submitted to, made with, or taken on behalf of the United States or any department or agency thereof, concerning which an oath or affirmation is required by law or lawful regulation, or with respect to the financial standing of any principal, surety, or other party to any such proposal, contract, bond, undertaking, or other instrument, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

 

The Constitution of September 17, 1787 was created in secret, so that it would self destruct, as soon as George Washington was elected President of the United States of America.   Washington was entitled to occupy the Office of President by virtue of his unanimous election to President of the United States of America by the Presidential Electors on February 4, 1789, but he would have to take and subscribe his name to an oath.   The Constitution was written to give Washington a secret excuse for not taking the oath of Office for the Office of President: 

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.  Article II Section 1 Clause 5

George Washington was not eligible for the Office of President.  The Constitution of September 17, 1787 was written so that the Office of President under the Constitution could not be filled until after July 4, 1790 and nothing short of an amendment could change it.   Washington didn’t want to change it.  He just hoped no one would notice.

A correct interpretation of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 makes it a nullity outside federal territory.  President of the United States of America Barack Hussein Obama bought his election by the Electoral College fair and square.  George Washington turned the Office of President into a fraud and now Barack Hussein Obama is being excoriated for refusing to release his long form certificate of live birth all to prove he is eligible to an Office that has been vacant for 220 years.  He may eventually prove his native birth, however, depending on the way the political winds are blowing he might be facing criminal charges.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera  

The Declaration of Independence, 1777 Articles of Confederation, Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the Constitution of September 17, 1787 are the sources of all written laws made by the Congress of the United States.  When they are properly studied, these Organic Laws prove that the Congress of the United States can only make laws for the federal government and the administration of the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. 

The Organic Laws can also show how any American can decide to be an Inhabitant under the Articles of Confederation and still be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several states.  An American Inhabitant can collect earned Social Security benefits without admitting to United States residence.

The United States of America, where Inhabitants live, was made free by the Declaration of Independence and the American Revolution.  The Articles of Confederation were completed and ready to be adopted by November 15, 1777 and finally ratified by all thirteen States on March 1, 1781. Final ratification by the State of Maryland formed a Confederacy called the United States of America that was responsible for prosecuting the Revolutionary War against the British.  After the successful conclusion of that war, the United States in Congress assembled continued to represent the States of the United States of America in foreign affairs until the United States in Congress assembled officially became the Senate of the United States. 

The first Congress, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives according to the Constitution, convened on March 4, 1789 in New York City.  According to Article I Section 3 Clause 2, the Senators, newly selected by State legislatures, were divided into three Classes, which would serve staggered terms of two, four and six years.  These staggered terms would provide for a Senate that will be in continual session from March 4, 1789 to the present.  In that same period there have been 111 Congresses.  This is conclusive proof that the Senate of the United States is the equivalent of the Article X Committee of States provided for in the Articles of Confederation.

I am the only law professor in America that teaches how the Organic Law creates a Senate that functions as the United States in Congress assembled under the Articles of Confederation and as the United States Senate under the authority of the Constitution of the United States.  All education is now controlled by the government, so the government will only teach what the government wants you to know.  The government does not want you know why George Washington took an oral oath to be President of the United States and that the United States is the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.

Every law school in America teaches that the Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation, but they won’t teach that the replacement was limited to the Northwest Territory, which was the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America at the time.  This is why the Congress of the United States, which consists of the United States Senate and the House of Representatives and is vested with legislative power, may only make laws for federal territory, territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  Proof that the Articles of Confederation are still viable law can be found here: http://edstudents.angelfire.com/papers/ORGANIC_LAW.pdf

Congress is out of control.  Bureaucrats are writing legislation and Congress is enacting it into law without it being read.  The only solution is limiting Congress’s lawmaking to territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  Right now this is the only place this information may be found.  Copy as many of these posts as you can and share them with others, who don’t want to see themselves and other Americans saddled with trillions in debt.

To protect property from confiscatory taxation any owner of real property must place that property into a common law trust, however, that property must first be removed from the tax assessment rolls that make it appear to be territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com  to get the law lessons you will need to understand the process.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera  

  

I very quickly exhausted all the usual sources of information in my quest for the truth in government and law, so I had to find students that would spur me in my search for something true to teach.  One of my first students, Doug Herich, was taken into custody on February 26, 2009 on the pretext that he was late for an appointment with Michael O’Gara, a person who claims to have authority over Mr. Herich, by virtue of his election to Los Angeles Office No. 94, on November 4, 2008.

I have been teaching Doug and several other students the law by correspondence using the Internet.  I teach, among other things, that all written laws must accurately describe their territorial limitations, so those limitations are hidden to falsely expand the authority of written law.  God is the creator of all that is good, as the first Organic Law of the United States of America, the Declaration of Independence so clearly demonstrates.  God creates unwritten laws by inscribing them on men’s hearts.  Unfortunately, as faith in God has diminished, the strength of written law has grown.

Written law systems have been so effective in obscuring the boundaries between written and the English common law that the common law has been pushed out of California.  Doug and my other students know that the limits of written law have not been lawfully expanded by the ignorant acceptance of written law outside its bounds.  As all men are created equal, no number of U.S. voters can saddle anyone with written laws.  Doug Herich has taken a principled stand against the unlawful extension of written law beyond its legitimate territory by demanding that Michael O’Gara contain himself to the territory within the Los Angeles County lines owned and ceded to the United States of America.   

When I first started teaching law, I used the movie that won the Oscar for Best Movie for 1966, “A Man for All Seasons,” to show the difference between written and unwritten law.  The unwritten law in the movie is, of course, the maxim, “Silence gives consent,” and the English common law.  The written law is the law the English Parliament has made.  The Act of Supremacy is the written law that is the law underlying the central theme of the movie.  The Act of Supremacy requires that Henry VIII be recognized as the supreme head of the Church in England.  The law requires certain people to take an oath acknowledging that the English monarch is the supreme head of the Church in England.

In the movie, “A Man for All Seasons,” Sir Thomas More is imprisoned for refusing to take the written oath that recognizes the authority of King Henry VIII over the former Catholic Church, the new Church of England.  After Sir Thomas More is found guilty of treason, he explains why government is separate from God and obedience to God is superior to allegiance to government.   

Amazingly, my student Doug Herich is taking up where Sir Thomas More left off, when in 1535 he was beheaded.  America has no monarch, but those persons appointed to positions distinguished by the wearing of the Black Robe believe themselves empowered to imprison those who will not swear allegiance to the State of the Black Robes.  Sir Thomas thought that he could keep his head, if he could keep his silence on the legitimacy of the king’s title as head of the Church in England.  Sir Thomas hoped that his silence would be interpreted as consent to the law.  Doug Herich by his refusal to enter a plea or accept legal representation consents to the law as it is written.  Since all written law describes a place where it applies, that place in California must be only the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.

Sir Thomas More could not contend with perjured testimony that would subject him to treason and capital punishment.  Treason and capital punishment is not an issue in any traffic case in the State of California or any other State.  Doug Herich has challenged the territorial jurisdiction of Michael O’Gara and the best O’Gara has offered is California Penal Code Section 27, which states that a person who commits a crime can be punished.  The crime, of course, must be committed on territory belonging to and ceded to the United States of America.  Such crimes are virtually non-existent as federal territory consists of military bases, veterans administration hospitals, national parks and forests.

The English monarchy still thrives in the United Kingdom, but in America the people have gotten rid of the king.  Student Herich has been imprisoned for questioning the authority of a State of California employee by a novice Black Robe, who claims the power to imprison anyone suspected of committing a crime in the State of California.  The Black Robe is claiming power that was eliminated in America when the authority of English King George III was terminated upon the defeat of the English in the American Revolution.

In More’s England, the King’s subjects could be imprisoned for disobedience, but they could not be executed for treason without testimony in court.  Perjured testimony was used against Sir Thomas More to provide the evidence upon which a jury convicts him.   Doug has no allegiance to the State of California and he has not committed a crime in the State of California.  He refuses to recognize that Michael O’Gara has any authority outside the federal territory within the County of Los Angeles.  In the movie, Sir Thomas More claimed that Parliament had no authority to make a Christian accept the English monarch as the head of the Church in England.  Doug Herich is taking a similar stand against tyranny as that taken by Sir Thomas More. 

After Americans got rid of the English monarchy, the power of the former king goes back to the people not to the government.  The people don’t have the authority to incarcerate those who have not been lawfully charged with the commission of a heinous crime by a common law grand jury, so where does that power come from?  It must come from somewhere.  Well it must be found in the Organic Law the fundamental law.

Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Ed. defines Organic Law as “The fundamental law, or constitution of a state or nation, written or unwritten; that law or system of laws or principles which defines and establishes the organization of its government.”

The Declaration of Independence states that no man has greater power over another and the rights of men are God given not granted by the government.  The Articles of Confederation is a delegation of certain specified state powers to the United States, in Congress assembled and there is no transfer of other state authority or state territory to the United States of America.  The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, as a matter of local law creates a “compact between the original States and the people and States in the said territory and forever remain unalterable, unless by common consent.”  That compact made the States of the Northwest Territory, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota and that they “forever remain a part of this Confederacy of the United States of America.”   The compact created the Union of the United States that was more formally organized in the Constitution for the United States of America.   The Constitution of the United States was an oblique reference to the States of the Northwest Territory that were to forever remain part of the United States of America.

The creation of the States of the Northwest Territory by the United States, in Congress assembled was analogous to the creation of the Church of England out of the existing Catholic Church.  The Act of Supremacy made the English government superior to God.  Having the States ratify “this Constitution” and then having George Washington take an oath to be President of the United States prevented the “Adoption” of “this Constitution,” which caused the Constitution of the United States to be substituted for the written one that was limited to the government.  The Constitution of the United States made George Washington, as President of the United States, supreme head of the Church of the Constitution in America, as the Act of Supremacy made Henry VIII head of the Church in England.      

Since the crucifixion of Jesus Christ there has only been one acceptable response to an accusation of an offense committed by a Christian against the State¾silence.  Silence gives consent, but only to that which is true.  Doug Herich and Sir Thomas More consented by their silence and refusal to cooperate only to what was actually true.   

Satan, the devil, and the power of the State have been officially isolated to territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.   Those who oppose the injustice of traffic tickets have failed to see that tickets are just one part of the total Department of Justice system.  Today, there is no part of the written law in use that is not based in Military Justice.  All Written Law enacted, since George Washington took an employment oath to be President of the United States, has been law to create and maintain a military government.

What proof do I have that all written law in America is military?  The written law itself has always described a system of military justice based on a determination of what the law is by military officers appointed by the President of the United States.  The United States was politically conquered by George Washington, when he became Employee/Dictator under the legislative authority of Congress.  The Black Robes are just another branch of the military Washington headed.  The United States Government has a Military Justice Officer called the United States Attorney General and each State has its State Attorney General.  Postal services are under a Postmaster General and medicine under a Surgeon General. 

Getting a driver’s license can be an inexpensive legal education, if you know where the license is necessary and where it is not.  Such a license might be required in wartime, because a lot of driving is upon the Interstate Highway system initiated under Commander in Chief General Eisenhower.  Of course, military government should only be in effect when there are credible hostilities.  In the event of an attack, the piece of plastic will replace “your papers” of World War II.

America, it is often claimed, has been under military occupation since the Civil War.  Martial law, actually, goes back to April 30, 1789, when George Washington took an oath to be President of the United States and incidentally became Commander in Chief of the United States when the Congress of the United States created an Army and Navy.

The military occupation must be limited to the territory owned and ceded to the United States of America, because “this Constitution” has not been adopted by a Congress and President, who have been bound by an oath “to support this Constitution.”   The military occupation of America extends beyond the territory owned and ceded to the United States of America, because the American people have been lied to by “I cannot tell a lie,” George Washington and a succession of 43 Presidents of the United States.   His actions have misled millions, don’t be one of them.

Doug Herich refuses to acknowledge their military authority, so they have none over him.  Like a true Christian, Doug is denying government his consent for it to exist outside its evil hole.  Doug remains in military custody.  The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department are scheduled to have him back in Department 113 on the 7^th floor of the Van Nuys superior court west at 8:30 am on March 26, 2009.  New students who attend will receive an 80% discount off tuition.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

            

 

Next Page →