• Pages

  • CONTACT ED RIVERA
  • IMPEACHMENT OF GEORGE W. BUSH REQUIRED TO END HIS POLICIES
  • LETTER TO CAPTIVES
  • REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

• Recent Posts

  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LESSON: LEARNING CONSTITUTION LAW BY THE NUMBERS
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LESSON: CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT THAT DOOM THE CREATION OF A REPUBLIC
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LESSON: A CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND A CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES ALL IN “THIS CONSTITUTION”
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LESSON: THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IS A LEGISLATIVE NOT A JUDICIAL COURT, BECAUSE THE CHIEF JUSTICE IS A LEGISLATIVE OFFICER WITH CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATIVE DUTIES
  • MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LESSON: THE ARTICLE 2 CLAUSE 5 OFFICE OF PRESIDENT HAS BEEN VACANT SINCE GEORGE WASHINGTON FAILED THE FOURTEEN YEARS RESIDENT WITHIN THE UNITED STATES ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT

• Categories

  • Adoption
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 5
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 8
  • Article III
  • Articles of Confederation
  • BAIL OUT
  • BANKRUPTCY
  • CENSUS
  • CIVIL CONTEMPT
  • COMMON LAW
  • CONGRESS
  • CONSTITUTION
  • CRIMINAL LAW
  • Declaration of Independence
  • Economic Stimulous
  • Electoral College
  • Foreclosure
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • FREEDOM
  • GAY MARRIAGE
  • GRAND JURY
  • IMMIGRATION
  • IMPEACHMENT
  • JURY DUTY
  • LAW OF THE LAND
  • LEARNING THE LAW
  • LIBERTARIAN
  • Martial Law
  • MAYAN 2012
  • Northwest Ordinance
  • Oath of Office
  • OBAMA
  • ORGANIC LAWS
  • PARDON
  • Presidential Elector
  • PRESIDENTS
  • ProperTea Tax Tea Party
  • Property Taxes
  • Second Amendment
  • State of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • TRIAL BY JURY
  • U.S. District Court
  • Uncategorized

• Archives

  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

An earlier mini lesson established the office of President of the United States as an employment of the United States of America.  The Constitution reads: “When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside.”  In Article I Section 3 Clause 7, both Article I and Article II Impeachment is made non-judicial.

The Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 declared American independence from the English monarchy, which embodied all government authority in one person, the monarch.  By eliminating King George III, every American was declared equal to every other American, which, also, eliminated all judges.

The Constitution, in Article I, makes it clear that only those Americans who have been freed from a government may rule themselves.  The Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 did not bring Americans under governmental legislative power.

The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 expressly created a temporary government for those Americans inhabiting the Northwest Territory, land belonging to the United States of America.  Article I of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 made that temporary government permanent.

Legislation enacted by the Congress of the United States, the Judiciary Act of 1789, made the federal courts “judicial courts” for the thirteen districts created by that act.  On the date of enactment, September 24, 1789 two States had not ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787, making the federal courts legislative and only for the land owned by the United States of America.     

The only duty imposed on the Chief Justice by the Constitution of September 17, 1787 is legislative and all other duties imposed on the Chief Justice and United States Supreme Court are legislative.

 This is not all the information you need to prove the Chief Justice, Associate Justices and federal court system is limited to government affairs and the lands owned by the United States of America, but it is a start.   To get the rest of this story, enroll in my Basic Course in Law and Government, by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

    

Stevens is an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court not a Judge of the Article III Supreme Court of the United States.  There is no Article III Supreme Court, because then everyone would know the United States Supreme Court is legislative and not judicial.   The “United States” describes the kind of Supreme Court it is; it is a legislative court established by the proprietary power of the United States of America.  An Article III Supreme Court of  the United States is never established, because that would require the person elected President of the United States of America to take the Article VI oath of office “to support this Constitution,” meaning the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

My law Students are taught all the law not just the written law.  All American law schools indoctrinate their students to believe in the law of the United States Supreme Court, which results in the elevation of legislative law above the English common law, the law of the American people.

Justice Stevens’ office of Associate Justice is not found in any constitution.  His office is created the day before the enactment of the Judiciary Act of 1789, when the pay of the Chief Justice and justices is set by law.   The office of Chief Justice is found in Article I of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, however, that Constitution makes it a legislative office by imposing the legislative duty of presiding over the impeachment of the President of the United States.

Barack Hussein Obama as President of the United States of America will nominate a replacement for Justice Stevens, because the United States Supreme Court reviews the laws enacted by Congress for the territory owned by the United States of America.

While practically everyone in the country will be concerned with the irrelevancies of selecting a replacement for Justice Stevens, my Students will be learning all the law necessary to retain their property and their freedom.  To join them, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com  Your written commitment to complete your enrollment obligations will immediately secure for you  all class materials.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera                   

These suits show that the States remain confused about which Constitution applies to the federal government.  No one in the federal government is bound by the Constitution of September 17, 1787, because no in the federal government has taken an oath to be bound by it.  The States, however, have ratified that Constitution and they are bound to recognize the Constitution of the United States, which means they have to allow the federal government to make laws for its own territory and anyone who might be found on it.  This means Congress and the President of the United States can require those on federal land to pay for health insurance.

Who will resolve this problem of constitutional interpretation?  This is a job for the federal courts, which turn out to be the legislative courts planted in Article I of the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  The Chief Justice is the head of the legislative/judicial courts.  The Chief Justice is legislative rather than judicial officer, because his only constitutional duty is to preside at the impeachment of the President of the United States.  Impeachment is specifically defined in the constitution as a non-judicial process.

It is unlikely that the States will prevail in their lawsuits, because the federal courts are rigged in favor of the government.   You can teach the State Attorney General the law by taking my Basic Course in Law and Government and asserting your privileges and immunities as an inhabitant under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.    Tuition may now be paid in installments by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera           

Barack Hussein Obama has taken an oral oath of office for President of the United States, which is only good for government work.  President of the United States Obama is an at will employee of the United States of America subject to impeachment for no reason or any reason, so long as the Chief Justice presides.   Obama was also elected to the office of President of the United States of America, which requires no oath of office, thus, making it an employment and Obama, an employee.

How can President of the United States of America/President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama appoint new employees of the United States of America, if he is just an employee?  Obama is the equivalent of a corporate chief executive officer.   George Washington launched the “federal government” as a commercial enterprise of the United States of America, by refusing to take the Article VI oath “to support this Constitution.”  Without oaths to install and implement the Constitution of September 17, 1787, “this Constitution” becomes a business plan for the management of the territory and other property belonging to the United States of America, the Constitution of the United States.  Once nine States had ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787, that Constitution and any federal territory in those States was transformed into the Constitution of the United States. 

What else happened to the Constitution of September 17, 1787?  That Constitution was established between the States ratifying, when nine States had ratified, but not even ratification by all thirteen States could impose a duty to support the Constitution of September 17, 1787 on the individuals in the federal government without their taking of the proper Article VI oath.   When Washington takes the oral oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” he completes the legislative scheme for the territory and other property belonging to the United States of America.  Had his oath been placed at the end of Article I Section 7 there would be no question, but that the President of the United States was an employee.  Nothing is to be inferred from a law’s place in relation to other laws, but we can infer from the location of the oath of office of the President of the United States that the Framers intended the deception that makes Washington’s  oral oath a binding one.

What is the purpose of all this deception?  George Washington and his friends were men of power and they wanted to retain that power by creating a document that would rule lesser men long after they were dead and buried.  The Constitution is a devious device that rules by deception, if you let it.  Don’t allow yourself to be deceived any longer enroll in my Basic Course in Law and Government.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com 

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

  

The media missed the most important news in constitutional law history, when it focused on Vice President Joe Biden’s foul remark to President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, instead of realizing that for 221 years the President of the United States of America not the President of the United States has been signing all the Bills passed by the House of Representatives and Senate.

American historians are probably most responsible for the overgrown federal government, because of their unsupported claims that the Constitution of September 17, 1787 superseded and replaced the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.  This historic mistake has caused the equally erroneous and legally unsupportable belief that the President of the United States of America and the President of the United States is one office rather than two.

George Washington intentionally caused the conflation of the two offices by taking the oral oath of office of President of the United States, so that it would appear to have the binding effect of the Article VI oath “to support this Constitution.”  Becoming President of the United States by taking the oral oath for that office made Washington an at will employee of the United States of America, since he could be “fired,” impeached, for any reason or no reason, as long as, the Chief Justice presided at the impeachment.  Washington’s office of President of the United States of America was secure because he was elected for a four year term and could only be impeached “for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors,” and only if “this Constitution” was formally adopted by a legitimate President and Congress bound by an Article VI oath, which Washington prevented from ever happening.

The Framers of the constitution carefully drafted the Constitution of September 17, 1787, so that March 1, 1790 was the earliest start date for a legitimate Congress and no person could be eligible to the Office of President until fourteen Years after July 4, 1776—July 4, 1790.  Washington was elected February 4, 1789 and he took the oath of office of President of the United States on April 30, 1789.  Congress met for the first time in New York City on March 4, 1789, a year too early for Senators to qualify under “this Constitution” but certainly qualified under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.

The Democrat Health Care Reform Bill is unconstitutional in the sense that it does not conform to any written constitution.  It is the “Law of the Land” because it is law made for the land owned by the Confederacy, the United States of America.  The thirteen original States all ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787 by May 29, 1790 almost a year after Congress and George Washington began making laws.  The Health Care Bill is just the very latest in government administration of the subjects of government on government Land.

The oral oath of the President of the United States is the only oath of office any of the 44 Presidents of the United States and of the United States of America have ever taken.  The 1677 English Statute of Frauds and Perjuries and American law would make the relationship created by such an oral oath an unenforceable employment agreement.  The Article VI oath “to support this Constitution” could bind a President and a government, but such a government would have to include the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 President, who would have to be bound by an Article VI oath.  Washington could not take the Article VI oath until July 4, 1790, so the delay that waiting more than a year for government to start was his excuse for starting a government without a written Constitution.  The Constitution of September 17, 1787 is nonetheless binding on the States to the extent they can be bound.

The important question for most of you reading this is: How can you be bound to an unwritten constitution?  In the present federal government, the President of the United States of America takes an oral oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” which turns out to be all the Land owned by the United States of America.  The Congress and President of the United States can, using the proprietary and territorial powers of the United States of America, make Law for the Land owned by that Confederacy.  If you are on that Land, or if you think you are, you are very likely to be subject to that Law.   To be free of the “Law of the Land” get off their Land by becoming a Student of my Basic Course in Law and Government.  To enroll, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

 

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera                  

       

 

 

 

There is a real legal basis for the legislative actions of a Congress that are unrestrained by the demands of the American people.  “We the People of the United States” refers to the people on the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  The free inhabitants of the United States of America were “framed” by the Founding Fathers and Framers of the Constitution as subjects of a federal government.

Proof that the legislative power of Congress is limited to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America, which includes Washington, D. C., is found within the Constitution itself.  The true story of the formation of the Government of the United States can now be told to a select group of people brave enough to handle the truth. Here are some of the reasons all the legislative powers of Congress are limited to federal territory. 

The “legislative powers herein granted” arise when, according to Article VII, nine of the thirteen States ratify this Constitution.  However, because Washington, D. C. is to be made up of territorial contributions from Maryland and Virginia, both these States must ratify “this Constitution” before “[A]ll legislative powers” are vested “in a Congress of the United States,” with a seat of government in the District of Columbia.  The State of New Hampshire became the ninth State to ratify “this Constitution,” on June 21, 1788 and Virginia followed on June 25, 1788.   Ratification by Virginia made a federal government with a seat of government in Washington, D. C. possible two years before the Article II Section 1 Clause 5, Office of President could be filled.  To be eligible to the Office of President, a person must be “fourteen Years a Resident within the United States,” so that Office could not be filled until fourteen years after July 4, 1776, which would be July 4, 1790.  The legislative Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives must be matched with a President of the United States not with the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 Office of President, with its many eligibilities.

The Constitution of September 17, 1787 provided no similar limitations on the Office of President of the United States, in fact, there is no eligibility or term limitation on that Office except to require that the Chief Justice preside at any impeachment trial.  The Constitution clearly makes a distinction between the three Offices of President by providing an oral oath in place of the Article VI oath “to support this Constitution” for the President of the United States; no oath at all for the President of the United States of America and a binding written and subscribed oath, so simple it is not specifically set out in Article VI, for the Office of President.   Without any eligibility and no term of Office, the first person to take the Article II Section 1 Clause 8 oath would become President of the United States.  George Washington, by virtue of his February 4, 1789 election to the Office of President of the United States of America was able to combine all three Presidents in himself.  Of course, by doing so he prevented filling the Office of President, because Article VII required a binding oath to secure that Office and the only oath ever taken by Washington was the non-binding oral oath of the Office of President of the United States.

The oral oath of the Office of President of the United States has always been wrongly believed to be the binding oath of Article VI, which has caused the permanent vacancy of the Article II Section 1 Clause 5, Office of President.  Not having a constitutional President prevents the adoption of “this Constitution” by that President and prevents the Constitution of September 17, 1787 from being extended to a constitutional Congress and constitutional Office of President.  Ratification of “this Constitution” by nine States establishes that Constitution as the Constitution of the United States for the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America within those States.  The legislative power of Congress would be limited to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America within the states even if a constitutional President and Congress were installed.  The absence of that layer of additional government between the Confederacy of the United States of America made it appear as if the federal government was the missing and unfilled Constitutional version of government, but with legislative power.    

Article I Section 7 requires that “[E]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it becomes a Law, be presented to the President of the United States.”  The First Congress of the United States met in New York City on March 4, 1789 and by June 1, 1789 Bills had become Law after being presented to George Washington, who had taken the oral oath of Office of President of the United States on April 30, 1789.     

The Constitution of September 17, 1787, which was produced in a secret meeting, must be subjected to a rigorous scrutiny because of that occult origin.  The secrecy by which the Constitutional Convention of May 25, 1787 was conducted requires us even at this late date to treat the Constitution as a crime scene.  There is even evidence of an official cover up.  It is still claimed the ratification of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 by nine States replaced and superseded the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and this belief is widely held by American historians, legal professionals and judges although there is no written record of the repeal of the document that established the United States of America, as a Confederacy. 

I am the only person in America and perhaps the world teaching how the federal government of the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America came to be imposed on the free inhabitants of the United States of America.  To become a Student, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

William Jefferson Clinton like all Presidents, since George Washington, was elected to the Office of President of the United States of America under Article IX of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.  And, just like George Washington he only took one oath, the oral oath of Office of President of the United States.

The Articles of Confederation makes no provision for impeachment of the incumbent President of the United States of America.  The Constitution of September 17, 1787 makes provision for the impeachment of the President of the United States by requiring in Article I Section 3 Clause 6, only that: “When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside.”  So much, for the misbehavior of the President of the legislative branch, Congress can impeach for any reason or no reason.

The Constitution of September 17, 1787 sets out the eligibility for the President of the executive branch in Article II Section 1 Clause 5:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

 No one would be able to meet the “fourteen Years a Resident within the United States” until after July 4, 1790, so the executive branch Office of President has remained vacant since George Washington took this oral on April 30, 1789:

“I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. So help me God.”        

 Legal scholar and historian Ken Gromley was able to write an 800 page book on the Clinton impeachment without discovering the grounds for impeachment “for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” set out in Article II Section 4 do not apply to the legislative Office of President of the United States.  

Don’t waste your time reading “The Death of American Virtue: Clinton vs. Starr,” instead make an investment in yourself by learning the truth about the Constitution, government and the law by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com to become my Student.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera 

The statutory Supreme Court created by the Judiciary Act of 1789 has ruled that corporations may spend freely to support or oppose candidates for president and Congress.

The court created by Congress and the President of the United States of America on September 24, 1789, today, overturned a 20-year-old opinion asserting corporations can be prohibited from using their own money to pay for campaign ads.

The Chief Justice, whose only constitutional duty is to preside at the impeachment of the President of the United States, and four Associate Justices also struck down part of the landmark McCain-Feingold campaign finance bill.

The Supreme Court now sitting in Washington, D. C.  is not the “one supreme Court” ordained and established by Article III of “this Constitution.”  The Chief Justice and Associate Justices are not Article III Judges.   When the State of New Hampshire became the ninth State to ratify “this Constitution” on June 21, 1788, a written Constitution dated September 17, 1787 was immediately established between the nine States that had ratified “this Constitution.”  That ratification and the ratifications of the four remaining States was binding on the States as to the federal territory within the State, as it was done in writing.   The ratifying States elected members of Congress, who were to meet on March 4, 1789.  Presidential Electors were also selected and they elected George Washington President of the United States of America on February 4, 1789.  Instead of taking an Article VI binding oath, Washington took the oral oath of President of the United States on April 30, 1789, which cannot bind a person to a written document, such as a Constitution.  Without taking a binding oath, George Washington signed into law the Judiciary Act of 1789 creating the statutory U.S. Supreme Court.  I teach my Students how to use these facts about American History to prove the Constitution of September 17, 1787 binds the States, but not the people of states.  To become a Student, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera            

There is no justice in America, because there is one employee of the federal government occupying the position of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.  Putting an American Chief Justice at the head of the legal system, touted as “the supreme law of the Land,” had the same effect as making the presiding judge in the king’s bench division of the high court of justice Chief Justice in England.  The “Lord Chief Justice of England” exercises the judicial power of the monarch in England.  The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court exercises the “judicial power” of the Congress of the United States.  There is no separate judicial power just as there is no separate executive power.  All government power in America has been exercised, since 1789, by a few people making written laws enforced, by Justices and judges, without real judicial power.    

The title of Chief Justice is located in Article I, the legislative Article, and there the person with that title is charged with the solitary legislative duty of presiding over the impeachment of the President of the United States, which is a legislative function not a judicial one.  The statutory creation of the Office of Chief Justice was a two-step process.  Statute I, Chapter XVIII of September 23, 1789 set the annual compensation for “the judges of the Supreme and other courts of the United States.”  Statute I, Chapter XX, Section 1. of September 24,1789, the Judiciary Act of 1789 established by statute “the supreme court of the United States and the office of chief justice. 

The legislative creation of the Chief Justice and the Supreme Court of the United States was complete when the President of the United States, a legislative Officer, approved the federal judicial system, by signing the compensation and judiciary Bills.  This was all possible, because “this Constitution” required an adoption by the Congress of the United States and the person elected President of the United States of America.  The adoption of this Constitution could take place no sooner than July 4, 1790.  By the time that date was reached, George Washington had established a permanent federal government for the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America, but which was extended beyond those boundaries by the federal census and voting in federal elections.  The takeover of law and government in America had been accomplished without one shot being fired.

         The balance of this post is available only to Students enrolled in the Advanced Course on Law and Government.

Article III of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 vests the judicial Power of the United States in “one supreme Court” “and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”  The Congress of the United States, which, in Article III, is the United States in Congress assembled of the Articles of Confederation has the power to ordain and establish.  The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 was a result of the exercise of that  power to ordain and establish.   

As Article I Section 1 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 clearly shows:  “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”   The Congress of the United States with the power to ordain and establish is the “United States in Congress assembled,” which survives as the Senate of the United States.  The first nine States to ratify the Constitution of September 17, 1787 established the Senate as a Committee of States pursuant to Article IX of the Articles of Confederation.

The legislative U.S. Supreme Court created by the Judiciary Act of 1789 can exercise no judicial power, as the Congress of the United States, with the power to ordain and establish, is the United States in Congress assembled.  The Chief Justice who heads the legislative U.S. Supreme Court, according to the Judiciary Act of 1789, is bound to perform legislative duties, because he is a the person who must preside, according to Article I Section 3 Clause 6, at the impeachment trial of the President of the United States, a non-judicial proceeding.

An Article III “one supreme Court,” once ordained and established would have to have Judges, not Justices, appointed to it by a President who had taken and subscribed an Article VI oath.  As no President Elect has ever taken and subscribed such an oath and no Supreme Court has been ordained and established, there is no evidence that any Article III court exists anywhere.

All federal judges including the Chief Justice and Associate Justices are appointed, by the President of the United States, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to legislative courts.  My enrolled students are supplied with all the written materials needed to fully comprehend how George Washington and the Freemasons managed to take over the federal government using a few common words and a lot of secrecy.  To become a student, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera   

Next Page →