<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for EDRIVERA.COM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrivera.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrivera.com</link>
	<description>Professor of Law &#38; Government</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on DEMANDING THAT THE STATE RECOGNIZE COMMON LAW MARRIAGE, SO YOU CAN RESCIND YOUR OLD CIVIL MARRIAGE AND START OVER IN COMMON LAW by Is Saving The Marriage Even A Priority These Days? : Get Your Ex Back Forever</title>
		<link>http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1065#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Saving The Marriage Even A Priority These Days? : Get Your Ex Back Forever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1065#comment-199</guid>
		<description>[...] DEMANDING THAT THE STATE RECOGNIZE COMMON LAW MARRIAGE, SO YOU CAN &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DEMANDING THAT THE STATE RECOGNIZE COMMON LAW MARRIAGE, SO YOU CAN &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GAY MARRIAGE, PROPOSITION 8, MARRIAGE LICENSES, COMMON LAW AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA by Comparison of British and American Legal Systems &#124; No Win No Fee</title>
		<link>http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1063#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Comparison of British and American Legal Systems &#124; No Win No Fee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1063#comment-198</guid>
		<description>[...] GAY MARRIAGE, PROPOSITION 8, MARRIAGE LICENSES, COMMON LAW AND THE &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GAY MARRIAGE, PROPOSITION 8, MARRIAGE LICENSES, COMMON LAW AND THE &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VAUGHN R. WALKER OPENLY GAY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAYS PROPOSITION 8 IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL—SAME SEX MARRIAGES ARE LEGAL IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA by Aniston, Cher &#8212; Alleged Victims in Credit Card Scheme &#124; Garden Rock Lights</title>
		<link>http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1059#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Aniston, Cher &#8212; Alleged Victims in Credit Card Scheme &#124; Garden Rock Lights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1059#comment-197</guid>
		<description>[...] VAUGHN R. WALKER OPENLY GAY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VAUGHN R. WALKER OPENLY GAY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VAUGHN R. WALKER OPENLY GAY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAYS PROPOSITION 8 IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL—SAME SEX MARRIAGES ARE LEGAL IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA by What do U think illegal day Laborers say ban on seeking work on the street violates their civil rights? &#124; angeles attorney los tax</title>
		<link>http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1059#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>What do U think illegal day Laborers say ban on seeking work on the street violates their civil rights? &#124; angeles attorney los tax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 04:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1059#comment-196</guid>
		<description>[...] VAUGHN R. WALKER OPENLY GAY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VAUGHN R. WALKER OPENLY GAY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ENROLLED STUDENT IN BASIC COURSE IN LAW AND GOVERNMENT REPORTS ON STATE OF INDIANA by Taxation in the International Marketplace-auto</title>
		<link>http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1008#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Taxation in the International Marketplace-auto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1008#comment-195</guid>
		<description>[...] ENROLLED STUDENT IN BASIC COURSE IN LAW AND GOVERNMENT REPORTS ON &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ENROLLED STUDENT IN BASIC COURSE IN LAW AND GOVERNMENT REPORTS ON &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LESSON: THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IS A LEGISLATIVE NOT A JUDICIAL COURT, BECAUSE THE CHIEF JUSTICE IS A LEGISLATIVE OFFICER WITH CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATIVE DUTIES by The Paradox of a Legislative P&#8230; &#124; america1first.com</title>
		<link>http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1073#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>The Paradox of a Legislative P&#8230; &#124; america1first.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1073#comment-194</guid>
		<description>[...] MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LESSON: THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IS A &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MINI CONSTITUTIONAL LESSON: THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IS A &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VAUGHN R. WALKER OPENLY GAY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAYS PROPOSITION 8 IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL—SAME SEX MARRIAGES ARE LEGAL IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA by Oracle for any occasion</title>
		<link>http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1059#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Oracle for any occasion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1059#comment-193</guid>
		<description>[...] VAUGHN R. WALKER OPENLY GAY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VAUGHN R. WALKER OPENLY GAY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WHAT IS SO COMMON ABOUT THE ENGLISH COMMON LAW? by A Comparison of British and American Legal Systems &#8211; Solicitors Uk &#124; Change the title here</title>
		<link>http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1033#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>A Comparison of British and American Legal Systems &#8211; Solicitors Uk &#124; Change the title here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1033#comment-192</guid>
		<description>[...] WHAT IS SO COMMON ABOUT THE ENGLISH COMMON LAW? : EDRIVERA.COM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WHAT IS SO COMMON ABOUT THE ENGLISH COMMON LAW? : EDRIVERA.COM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DEMANDING THAT THE STATE RECOGNIZE COMMON LAW MARRIAGE, SO YOU CAN RESCIND YOUR OLD CIVIL MARRIAGE AND START OVER IN COMMON LAW by NSNA Recognizes Leader of Leaders &#124; Autism pharmacy Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1065#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>NSNA Recognizes Leader of Leaders &#124; Autism pharmacy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrivera.com/?p=1065#comment-191</guid>
		<description>[...] DEMANDING THAT THE STATE RECOGNIZE COMMON LAW MARRIAGE, SO YOU CAN &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DEMANDING THAT THE STATE RECOGNIZE COMMON LAW MARRIAGE, SO YOU CAN &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on THE HISTORY CHANNEL GETS IT WRONG TWICE by It Ain&#8217;t Rocket Science &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The History Channel Gets it Wrong Twice : Edrivera.Com</title>
		<link>http://www.edrivera.com/?p=918#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>It Ain&#8217;t Rocket Science &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The History Channel Gets it Wrong Twice : Edrivera.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 03:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrivera.com/?p=918#comment-190</guid>
		<description>[...] The History Channel in its premier two-hour Story of Us managed to refer to the unalienable Rights of the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 as inalienable Rights and then concluded the episode by claiming that George &#8230; Washington was elected President of the United States of America on February 4, 1789 and took that office immediately, as neither the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, nor the Constitution of September 17, 1787 require the &#8230;This Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The History Channel in its premier two-hour Story of Us managed to refer to the unalienable Rights of the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 as inalienable Rights and then concluded the episode by claiming that George &#8230; Washington was elected President of the United States of America on February 4, 1789 and took that office immediately, as neither the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, nor the Constitution of September 17, 1787 require the &#8230;This Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
