Why should Barack Obama have to be “a natural born Citizen, or Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,” if the qualification has never been a requirement of the Office of President of the United States. The Office of President has been vacant since George Washington decided he did not meet the fourteen Years residency requirement for the Office of President.
Fourteen Years from July 4, 1776 is July 4, 1790. George Washington was elected to the Office of President February 4, 1789 and he took the oath of Office of President of the United States on April 30, 1789. I have examined all four of the Organic Laws of the United States of American and I have found no qualifications for President of the United States or President of the United States of America. Washington was even better informed since he had intimate working knowledge of these documents.
The States of the so-called “more perfect Union” ratify “this Constitution” they do not “Adopt” it. Adoption requires the level of support that would be promised in an oath. No President and no member of Congress has ever taken the Article VI oath, “to support this Constitution,” so as a consequence this Constitution has never been ”Adopted.”
Being “a natural born Citizen” is a requirement for a person to be eligible to the Office of President only “at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution.” The Preamble to the Constitution clearly foretells that the People of the United States will “ordain and establish” a Cult of the Constitution, but that is not “Adoption.” Ratification by all the States is not “Adoption.”
This Constitution has not been “Adopted,” so being “a natural born Citizen” is not a qualification for the Office of President and has never been a qualification for the Office of President of the United States or President of the United States of America.
President Elect Barack Obama should be treated exactly like the 43 White Presidents that preceded him in the Office of President of the United States. Presidential precedent demands that he be allowed to take the oath of Office of President of the United States just like every President before him.
In one way or another, Barack Obama will change history. Millions of people will see him either take the same oath every President has taken or he will ”support this Constitution.” By the year 2012, the truth will be out, the old world will end and nothing will ever be the same.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
It is said that a good lie can travel half way around the world before the truth has its pants on. Well, at least the truth is getting ready to go out in public.
The truth is the world is ending a 5,000 year cycle of the written word and graven image and entering a new cycle of spirituality. The old cycle has been dominated by a militarism characterized by rigid laws and domineering governments.
As the year 2012 comes nearer, larger signs of real change will appear. These are not times to be a bystander. Everything on this website is intended to draw the reader to the truth can be verified against the truth reported on the Internet. For all of us here on Earth right now, the beginning of a new 5,000 year cycle is the end of the old world and the beginning of a new one.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
The year 2012 marks the end of a cycle of thousands of years in the Mayan calendar. 2012 will mark the end of Barack Obama’s first term as President of the United States. Most Presidents serve two terms, but what will be known by December 21, 2012? Will Obama be as fearful of being found out, as George Washington showed in his Second Inaugural address?
The Russians are not waiting till 2012 to pronounce the United States of America dead. The world will be surprised, when the United States finally frees itself and the world from military occupation, but we have to make sure we tell the world what we know right now.
I graduated from the University of California at Los Angeles Law School in 1971, but I’m the self-taught World’s Greatest Legal Mind. I admit I made up the title to call attention to what I write in this blog. I only have a diploma awarding me a Juris Doctor degree and a certificate acknowledging my admission in the State Bar of the State of California. The purpose of this website is to prove that I am the world’s greatest legal mind.
What I teach no law school anywhere teaches and what I teach I didn’t learn in any law school. What I teach can be found by reading these posts. Barack Obama will always be tenatative about what he knows, because he actually knows very little.
So, what did Barack Obama learn at Harvard Law School? What did he learn there that will help him do what he will promise to do, when he takes the oath of Office of President of the United States?
We know one thing he didn’t learn–the President of the United States does not serve for a definite term of office. All living Presidents of the United States are still Presidents of the United States. Their terms as Presidents of the United States of America are set at four Years. Those terms have an expiration date, a shelf life a President of the United States just goes on and on and on. That is the trouble with all schooling you are only taught what they want you to know.
I think President Elect Obama is worse off for having gone to law school, because he now thinks he knows the law. Now that he has been elected President in a popular election he thinks he can make laws that everyone in America will have to obey. The laws Congress makes are very limited that is the truth that Barack Obama does not want you to know. Members of the Libertarian Party are not aware that the government is already severely limited.
Barack Obama doesn’t want you to know the truth about the two kinds of law–written and unwritten. He and Congress can write law for the government and the territory and other property belonging to the United States of America. Unwritten English Common Law is the law in 49 of the 50 states, but hardly any attorney licensed by the States of the Union created by the Constitution knows that law.
Barack Obama doesn’t really understand the Constitution sufficiently to be bound by it. Anyone with the ability to read and think who diligently studies this blog will know more about the written Constitution than Barack Obama.
No doubt Barack Obama took what he learned at Harvard Law School and taught that at the University of Chicago Law School. What does Harvard Law School teach about the Constitution? Harvard Law teaches what every other accredited law school teaches: the Constitution is the “supreme Law of the Land.” The “Law of the Land” is alliterative and poetic but untrue except for what the government owns.
Law and Land are capitalized to emphasize that law is a special law and land is a special land. The astute reader will have learned that written law is always limited to a territory described in the written law. The Land is the land owned by the United States of America Ownership confers proprietary law making power in the Congress of the United States with law making power.
Which Congress is which? Article I Section: “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives. That Congress can only make laws for government and government property. That is what President Elect Barack Obama is being taught in briefings today.
He is learning to lie by sound bite. Every time he speaks, before January 20, 2009, he carefully conditions every thing he says with the lie: “There is only one President at a time.”
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Today is Thanksgiving Day. Something we should all be thankful for is being alive and while we are alive we should prepare for the day when we stop being alive and start the afterlife. We prepare for life after death by following the unwritten law of life on Earth. Government law has always been intended for those who could not or would not follow the unwritten law.
We should all start thinking of living under the English common law in the 49 states where it is the law. The bad economic times that are being experienced all over the world are acknowledged to be caused by government laws.
Thanksgiving is the one special meal of all the countless critically important daily meals we must all have to sustain life on Earth. We celebrate this day because everything we will consume today was provided by people just like us who want us to thrive.
Thank you for reading these posts and thinking about what I have written.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
I have been told that there are a few folks in the system who can’t wait for the truth to make them free. They are marked with the sign of the Beast and they say they have been forced to sign the dreaded W-4. They want their freedom and they want it now.
The English common law is their salvation.
The written law is the law of the system. The English common law and government law are mutually exclusive except in the District of Columbia, where the common law was the law before the ratification of “this Constitution” permitted the Congress to make written law for the United States Government.
Both the English common law and government law require jurors to determine the facts in every civil and criminal case. Just as common law and government law are mutually exclusive, so should the respective jurors be mutually exclusive. They are not, because there are no genuine common law jurors. In the State of California State jurors are qualified to be jurors in the United States district courts within the state.
The districts of the United States district courts are made up of the government land within the counties that comprise those districts. A State of California juror must be a domiciliary of the State of California, which means that each and every trial juror in any case trying a matter involving the written law must reside on government land.
This is your Thanksgiving present. You may remove yourself from the jury wheel from any county of any of the 50 States or district of the United States by claiming and showing that you do not reside on government land within the county boundary lines. Once you establish that you are not qualified to be a State of _____juror or a juror for the local United States district court, you can make it your duty to inform everyone else of the true qualifications for a juror in the state and the State.
Every litigant including any criminal defendant has a right to object to the lack of qualifications of any prospective juror. Because most jury trials are managed by incompetent attorneys, none of them have discovered that the two law systems the English common law and written government law occupy two different territories.
What you do with your gift is up to you. The more people you share it with the faster you will get the ultimate reward–your freedom.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
English colonists brought the English common law with them, when they came to America. The common law remained the law after July 4, 1776 and even after the 1783 Treaty of Paris recognized the thirteen states as free and independent of Great Britain, the English common law was still the law of the people.
Only in Louisiana is the law not the common law. Readers new to my research and writing are wondering about all the written law they know to exist. What is the place of written law? In America, all written law is law for government. The President of the United States really does run the country, if you want to believe that. The truth is the President’s country is defined in the written law and you are not in it.
The New Year’s resolutions you wrote down and promised to follow are laws for government. They are self-imposed rules, but they were made to govern you. The English common law allows you to rule yourself, provided you know the law that rules the king. The English King, according to the Declaration of Independence violated his rules.
The purpose of the English common law is to, also, govern behavior by making rules that are enforced by the people themselves sitting in grand and petit juries. Questions of a common law marriage have to be determined by common law jurors, when the married partners can’t resolve them without resort to legal process.
Traditionally, the sheriff facilitated the operation of the common law by assembling the jurors for a common law trial. Today, sheriffs operate the county jail and perform written law enforcement. The people are not taught the law or its history, so they are doomed to repeat all the mistakes. I am trying to teach them so they can qualify as common law jurors.
Shortly, after the people defeated the British and removed the King of England from power here, government began to encroach on the rights of the people just as had been described in the Declaration of Independence.
George Washington led the forces that began the destruction of the common law with the substitution of written government law. That process is a frequent topic here, so it will not be discussed in detail. The so-called Founding Fathers created a law making system and law enforcement system called the United States Government that begins to systematically create written law system for the people of the United States as soon as nine States ratify the Constitution.
George Washington was trusted and thought to be honest by most people, so he was able to publically take an oath that would require him to “preserve, protect and defend” the property of the government without regard to the “unalienable Rights” of the people. The oath taken by the President of the United States is the model for the United States Government, as well as, all the other oaths in States and local governments.
Because every President of the United States of America has appointed himself to be President of the United States, every President performs the only oath he has taken as if he is an occupying military commanding officer. As a military occupation is incompatible with the English common law, the common law has been ignored, as written government law has been extended beyond government property.
Codes written by State governments have sought to replace the common law for the people within the state. State Constitutions are subordinated to “this Constitution” by the language in Article VI: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all the Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”
“This Constitution” and the State constitutions which are established pursuant to Article VI are the exclusive sources of authority for all the law written for government. Close examination of all State constitutions will reveal that they only apply to government, to government property and on government land.
The gay marriage controversey makes the licensing of the right to marry the perfect example of the difference between written government law and the English common law. Obtaining a license to marry under written law requires the marriage licensing clerk to qualify the applicants and procure from them the tax or license fee. The application for the State issued marriage license will require the applicants to make themselves subject to State law.
Common law marriage does not involve written government law and is not recognized by the Government of the United States and most State governments. Common law marriage is not subject to licensing, recordation or registration.
Civil marriage is a relationship subject to direct government regulation by taxation, licensing and registration, because government is an acknowledged party to every civil marriage. Marriage is the coupling or joining into one. The forces of attraction cannot be overcome, but after the honeymoon is over where will the couple live?
The State of California is government and government land in California. California is the place where the people really do try to get along.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
I have been asked if the Amendments to the Constitution are also invalid? Written constitutions are the source of more written law. Written law is always limited and hardly ever invalid. I have called belief in the Constitution a cult and cults can be very powerful.
“A Constitution,” “this Constitution,” or “the Constitution,” are thoughts that can be believed to varying degrees.
The thought that is “this Constitution” requires that it be “Adopted” and it is clear that it has not. “The Constitution” has been adopted by the persons who have taken the oath of Office of President of the United States. “The Constitution” that the President of the United States has sworn to “preserve, protect and defend” are the assets belonging to the United States of America. All the Amendments must amend the same Constitution.
“A constitution is defined in a dictionary. “This Constitution” is the one that contains the phrase “this Constitution” eleven times.
“The Constitution” is the same as “the United States Constitution,” “the U.S. Constitution,” “the Constitution of the United States” and every other possible variation, except “this Constitution.”
This answer is my version of free public education, if you need a tutorial put some federal reserve notes in a letter with your question and email address. I will provide you with a worthy reply.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
In the movie, “Who Framed Roger Rabbit,” the sad tale of the loss of the Pacific Electric Railway is told Hollywood style. Politicians and big business got rid of mass transit in Los Angeles, just so they could sell more cars. As a kid growing up in Compton, I would take the Red Car to the Long Beach Nu Pike to spend the day and night gambling at the Penny Arcade.
General Motors deserves to go bankrupt just for what it did to mass transit in California, but that’s not all it did. GM created smog so bad I couldn’t take a deep breath and, of course, it was hard to play with tears in my eyes.
There should be no bailout for any company with a history like General Motors. I have no tears for GM.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
The State of California was officially admitted to the so-called “more perfect” Union of government territory created by “this Constitution” on September 9, 1850. The first “perpetual union” and “firm league of friendship” formed by the ratification by the first thirteen states of the Articles of Confederation is, of course, still operating. California was admitted to the Confederacy known as, the United States of America, when its two Senators were accepted by the rest of the Senate of the United States.
The thirteen states that declared their independence on July 4, 1776 were not immediately accepted as nation states by the established countries of the world. The states of the United States had to be recognized by another free and independent state under the Law of Nations, before they could call themselves nation states.
Benjamin Franklin first became commissioner to France then Minister Plenipotentiary. He would become one of the ministers who would sign the Treaty of Paris. Franklin is largely responsible for the myth that “this Constitution” created a republic that credit should go to George Washington.
On March 1, 1781 Maryland completed the Confederacy of the United States of America by ratifying the Articles of Confederation. Article I of the Treaty with Great Britain of 1783 acknowledged the thirteen states as “free, sovereign and independent States.”
New Hampshire became the ninth State to ratify “this Constitution” on June 21, 1788 according to Article VII. Note that Article VII of ”this Constitution” states that nine States ”shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.” “Establishment is, thus, fundamentally different from “Adoption.”
Although the People of the United States have Established this Constitution and the ratification of nine States shall be sufficient for the Establishment, 221 years after ratification and Establishment “this Constitution” is yet to be adopted by any branch of the United States Government. The Constitution is “the Constitution” found in the oath of Office of President of the United States.
California is one of the 37 states that became part of the United States of America, which is the Confederacy under the Articles of Confederation, after May 29, 1790, the date Rhode Island became the thirteenth state to ratify “this Constitution.” The urban legend that the Articles of Confederation were repealed by “this Constitution” is completely baseless, because “this Constitution” was to be established when only nine States ratified. The Articles require a unanimous vote of all thirteen states.
The original thirteen states organized into the United States of America, when Maryland became the final state to ratify the Articles of Confederation, contained no territory owned by the United States of America. The ratification of “this Constitution” by nine States permitted a Congress to purchase land, pursuant to a provision in “this Constitution.”
The District of Columbia, Places purchased by Congress in the original thirteen states and all the new territory in America owned by the United States of America would become the United States. The President of the United States is dictator of this government land and he administers it as if were under military occupation.
Proponents of gay marriage in California are relying on the State Constitution and the State Supreme Court. Even if the Constitution for the State of California guaranteed everyone in the State of California the right to marry the partner of his or her choice that right would have to be limited to the State of California, which has to be government territory. The United States Code of the United States Government defines marriage as between a man and woman, so it will not permit the Supreme Court of the State of California to make law for its territory.
The Constitution of the State of California should have the last word and here it is: “Article 3 State of California. Section 1. The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.”
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera