Jan
31
WHAT CONGRESS IS THE ONE HUNDRED AND ELEVENTH?
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, LAW OF THE LAND, Northwest Ordinance, ORGANIC LAWS, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
Regular readers of these posts are familiar with the concept of a plural Presidency, having more than one President at a time, doing the business of government. Congress, however, is the entity in charge of the Presidents and there are multiple forms of Congress.
The first sentence of this Constitution is not the Preamble. The prayer of We the People that precedes this Constitution expresses the hope that a written document can restrain government from abusing its power¾it can’t. Two hundred and twenty years of constitutional government have proven politicians will find a way to oppress people, if it will keep them in power. The first sentence of this Constitution warns the reader that there is no insignificant word in the document. The smallest word can be a loophole.
The one-letter word “a” in the first sentence of this Constitution declares that the Congress vested with all legislative power is the one that consists of “a” Senate and House of Representatives: “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”
The “United States, in Congress assembled” is a “Congress” using the authority of Article II of the Articles of Confederation, which is universally recognized as having no legislative power. The Articles of Confederation formed a perpetual Union of States, so rumors of its repeal or replacement by the United States Constitution are false. Each Union of the United States lasts only two years.
When Rhode Island became the thirteenth State to ratify this Constitution, it effectively amended the Articles of Confederation to make its Committee of the States, a Senate, which would have no legislative power over the States of the United States of America.
The Senate of the Congress of the United States of the first sentence of this Constitution is vested with legislative power, so the “United States” must refer to the kind of States that compose the Northwest Territory, which are part of a more perfect Union. As perfect, as it might claim to be, it is still only two years in duration.
What Congress is the one that calls itself the 111th ? The Congress with the legislative power over Washington, D. C. and other territory and property belonging to the United States of America has a two-year life, because the subjects of its legislative power should be shrinking. It doesn’t shrink because it is confused with the Congress of the Articles of Confederation.
The Congress, formerly known as the “United States, in Congress assembled,” and now know as the Senate of the United States has been in continual session, as only one third of its members are replaced every two years.
If you have gotten your education in a government school, you need to contact me immediately at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jan
30
WHO NEEDS THE SECOND AMENDMENT?
Filed Under COMMON LAW, CONSTITUTION, Second Amendment, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
Anyone familiar with these posts understands that the federal government is only bound by the written Constitution to the extent that it has been adopted by the person elected to the Office of President. Time and time again I have shown that no one elected by the Electoral College has ever taken an oath to be bound by “this Constitution.” In case you missed it, Barack Hussein Obama has take the oath to be an employee of Congress at least twice, but not once was he bound to an oath, except to try to do a good job.
The States that have ratified “this Constitution” certainly are bound by “this Constitution,” but only the territory owned by the United States of America is so bound.
The State ratification and new State admission process is just a dodge by which the people are convinced that a Constitution has been ordained and established as a secular religion in America. Champions of the Second Amendment are hooked on Constitutional Kool-Aid. They will die defending the “right to bear arms” and sacrifice us in the process.
Once a reader of these posts has read them and has tried to prove them wrong, the Constitution of the United States takes on its true colors. The U.S. Constitution is nothing more than an employment contract for the Congress, the President of the United States and the Justices and judges of the faux federal court system.
Intellectual confusion is the only reason the United States Constitution appears to be working at all. Some in government believe the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land outside the federal territory where it is law, while others have no concept of what the document means resulting in the exultation of a business plan for the federal bureaucracy.
Without the United States Constitution and the Second Amendment, the gun owner would be in the enviable position of the well armed patriot defending himself, his family, his home and his property from the attempted confiscation of all that by some do-gooder, who promises to join the patriot in voting for law and order, if he will only give up his firearms. The English common law doesn’t allow you to take a life that’s trying to take your property, but if you are also armed with a good knowledge of the law, you can easily scare them off without firing a shot.
The critical reader of these posts will immediately see that the United States Constitution creates a debilitating dependency on government. The agent, from the government, who has come to disarm you, claims that he is from the government only for the purpose of helping you. He is lying. Get rid of him and get rid of the United States Constitution. Without the Constitution, you will gain the advantage in a fair fight.
It is impossible for a government employee to be an agent of a multi-branch government. Any G-man packing heat is an agent of the President of the United States, who is just a glorified employee.
“This Constitution” didn’t have to be the fraud the Founding Fathers framed, but it could be nothing else, after George Washington became President of the United States. If you already have a shooting iron to defend yourself against the best Congress money can buy, have you invested in the best legal education $500 can buy?
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jan
30
LIBERATE LIBERTARIAN GOVERNMENT BY DE-CRIMINALIZING DISSING THE GOVERNMENT
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, CRIMINAL LAW, GRAND JURY, JURY DUTY, LEARNING THE LAW, LIBERTARIAN, State of California, Territorial Jurisdiction, U.S. District Court | Leave a Comment
If and when Rod Blagojevich is indicted, the plaintiff will be the United States of America. Every federal criminal case is the same¾the victim is the United States of America.
U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald is accusing Rod Blagojevich with a criminal injury to the Confederacy created by the Articles of Confederation. All attorneys in America, with the exception of yours truly, have been taught to believe that the Articles of Confederation were repealed or replaced by Constitution of the United States.
There are, in fact two Unions, the perpetual Union of the Articles of Confederation and the more perfect, but temporary and territorially limited Union of the United States.
Illinois is a state of the perpetual Union of the United States of America under the Articles of Confederation, while the State of Illinois is part of the United States under the Constitution of the United States.
The State of Illinois requires its jurors to be citizens of the United States of America. This requirement is equivalent to the State of California juror requirement to be a domiciliary of the State of California.
What will it take to establish a libertarian government in America? It can be done in a few days just by knowing that all written laws must define the scene of the crime.
Rod Blagojevich was just fired from his day job as Governor of the State of Illinois. To be indicted for a crime he must be placed at the scene by a grand jury from the same crime scene neighborhood. Well, hardly anyone lives there.
If you can’t understand what you have just read, it is because you haven’t read every post and you aren’t an enrolled student. Once you learn the truth, you will know why the statement, “you are a free person because you have the right to vote,” is a lie.
To learn the truth about government, the law, become a student. E-mail me at edrivera@edrivera.com.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jan
29
THE ONLY WAY TO QUICKLY ESTABLISH LIBERTARIAN GOVERNMENT IN AMERICA
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, CRIMINAL LAW, GRAND JURY, IMPEACHMENT, JURY DUTY, Territorial Jurisdiction, U.S. District Court | Leave a Comment
Dear Mr. Blagojevich:
Now that you are officially out of government and you are facing federal criminal corruption charges, you will really feel how it is to be one of lonely expatriate inhabitants of formerly free America, which has not been free since George Washington became President of the United States.
I am a follower of the teachings of one Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera, who teaches law and government on the Internet at www.EDRIVERA.com He has written extensively in your defense.
His research has proven that the federal grand and petit jurors that might serve in any federal criminal case must reside on territory that is subject to the exclusive legislative power of Congress. As you know, jurors in State of Illinois criminal cases, must be citizens of the United States of America, which was established by the Articles of Confederation. State of Illinois jurors and federal grand and petit jurors in Illinois are qualified to serve in both State and United States District courts because the territory where they are required to reside is the same¾federal territory.
The third Organic Law, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, made Illinois and the other fledgling States of the Northwest Territory part of the United States of America. The States of the Northwest Territory became known as the United States and the States of the Articles of Confederation continued to be known as the United States of America, in accordance with the Articles of Confederation. The State of Illinois, since the Northwest Ordinance, has been the territory in Illinois subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States Congress.
The Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois grand and petit jurors must reside in the federal territory within the counties that comprise the aforementioned Division and District. I am sure that if there are any such persons in Illinois they will not be on any grand jury that U.S. Attorney will use to attempt to indict you.
Will you please check out Dr. Rivera’s website and let me know what you think of what he teaches. I personally feel he is correct and that you could avoid further persecution by just reading the posts about your case.
Very truly yours,
A Student of the Law
Jan
28
GLENN BECK SAYS HE WILL STAND SHOULDER TO SHOULDER WITH ROD BLAGOJEVICH AGAINST PATRICK FITZGERALD IF HE BEATS THE GOVERNMENT’S CHARGES
Filed Under CRIMINAL LAW, Territorial Jurisdiction, U.S. District Court | Leave a Comment
Democrats and Republicans could be forced to accept a libertarian government overnight if Rod Blagojevich could be taught to put on his own defense in his pending federal corruption case.
I have outlined the ideal federal defense in these posts. It consists of a challenge to the validity of the indictment that will have to be brought against Rod Blagojevich to charge him with the commission of a federal felony.
Rod Blagojevich was arrested upon a misdemeanor criminal complaint in December and the time in which an indictment could be brought was extended by 90 days.
All Rod Blagojevich has to do to defeat the indictment is show that the federal grand jurors are not residents within the Northern District of Illinois. This very easy to do because the Northern District is comprised only of the government owned land in that part of Illinois.
Federal grand and petit jurors must also be United States citizens, which is an easy thing to be, if you also happen to be an American citizen, or a citizen of the United States of America or a citizen of one of the 50 States or any one of the possessions of the United States. In short, just about anyone with a driver’s license who can register to vote is considered a United States citizen.
Being a resident of a District is nearly impossible outside of Washington, D. C. The Districts are found in Chapter 5 of Title 28 United States Code. These Districts are all defined as of the date, January 1, 1945, in order to satisfy the Sixth Amendment’s requirement for a District “previously ascertained by law.”
This is the Sixth Amendment:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
The ascertainment by law is hidden from immediate view by labeling the law a Historic and Revision Note:
Sections 81-131 of this chapter show the territorial composition of districts and divisions by counties as of January 1, 1945.
Found within Sections 81-131 are the 48 States, Alaska and Hawaii, Washington, D. C. and Puerto Rico. The territorial composition of the Districts are the government lands in the 48 States, Alaska and Hawaii, Washington, D. C. and Puerto Rico.
The federal law is found in the 50 Titles of the United States Code and in almost every case the special words used in this written law are precisely defined. The territorial composition is the only instance that I have found of the “showing” of the meaning of a word. A picture of the United States District Court in Puerto Rico tells all one needs to know about the territorial composition of a District.
Anyone can claim to be a United States citizen, however, hardly anyone outside of Washington, D. C. can show they reside within any federal District.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jan
28
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES A JOB OF NO RESPONSIBILITY
Filed Under BAIL OUT, CONSTITUTION, Economic Stimulous, LEARNING THE LAW | 3 Comments
Barack Hussein Obama wants us to be responsible, but he refuses to do the responsible thing by taking an oath that actually binds him to the duties of a real Office. He’s already taken the wrong oath twice, so calling the press together for a real oath read from the real Constitution won’t be much of a shock.
The real Constitution is the written one referred to in the Constitution as “this Constitution.” The pretend Constitution is the Constitution of the United States. His job is to “preserve, protect and defend” the assets of the United States of America, which for the moment include you.
George Washington, the first President of the United States, prevented the “Adoption” of this Constitution by eliminating the possibility of anyone filling the Office of President, while he was in office. Secretly, Washington became an employee of Congress. Congress makes the job of President of the United States so good no one in the position ever wants to disclose the truth about the job.
As an employee, Barack Hussein Obama, can have no responsibility. As long as an employee does lawful work, that employee is not responsible for the bad consequences of the work he does. Torture is not lawful that is why George W. Bush may be in trouble. Barack Obama will be careful to avoid George Bush’s sins but he will never be able to come clean about the job.
So far, all Barack Obama has done is ask to be able to spend a whole lot of money. That is lawful because Congress defines money as Federal Reserve Notes. Printed on each note is the statement: “THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE.” Producing debt is the only way the government can increase the supply of money, as it is defined by Congress.
Federal Reserve Notes make it impossible for anyone to be responsible, as long as the redemption value of these notes declines steadily and there is little truth or transparency in government.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jan
27
UNDERSTANDING THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AS AN EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
Filed Under CONSTITUTION, IMPEACHMENT, LEARNING THE LAW, Oath of Office, OBAMA, PRESIDENTS | Leave a Comment
If George Washington had taken the following oath of Office, it would have caused a momentary stir: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support this Constitution.” Someone might have raised a stink that Washington wasn’t qualified to the Office of President, because he hadn’t resided within the United States for 14 Years and no one would until July 4, 1790.
Clause 3 of Article VI of this Constitution requires an oath that binds the Officer taking the oath “to support this Constitution.”
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
Instead of taking the Article VI oath binding him “to support this Constitution,” George Washington took the employee oath that Barack Hussein Obama took a couple of times:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
George Washington became an employee, when he took the oath of Office of President of the United States, on April 30, 1789, before anyone would be eligible to the Office of President and four years later when he was qualified for that Office. By then Congress had created the entire government around the Constitution as an employment contract. The first act of the First Congress was to make “this Constitution” an employment agreement called the “Constitution of the United States.”
An employee takes an oath to do the best job he is capable of doing. An officer is bound by an oath to perform the duties of his Office. George Washington permitted 110 Congresses and 43 Presidents of the United States to turn the Presidency into a job larded with perks and devoid of any real responsibility.
A word search of the Constitution of 1787 will reveal three oaths. Two oaths have been discussed. The third is the one taken by the Senators when they try an impeachment:
“I solemnly swear that in all things appertaining to the trial of the impeachment of (Name of Defendant) now pending, I will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws. So help me God.”
I propose that George W. Bush be impeached just to show that the Office of President of the United States is an employment and that no reason is required to fire an incompetent.
It is never too late to learn the truth and we need to know the truth to set us free.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jan
26
IF TIMOTHY GEITHNER KNOWS SO MUCH ABOUT HOW TO FIX THE NATIONAL ECONOMY, HOW COME HE DOESN’T KNOW WHY HE DOESN’T OWE FEDERAL TAXES
Filed Under BAIL OUT, Economic Stimulous | Leave a Comment
Alexander Hamilton, the evil genius, was George Washington’s first Secretary of the Treasury. Over the years we have had evil geniuses who were almost the equal of the man who now graces the ten spot, but Timothy Geithner?
Roger B. Taney was Secretary of the Treasury under Andrew Jackson then he became Chief Justice. He opposed the imposition of the Civil War income tax on federal judges on an erroneous constitutional basis, but he was nonetheless a brilliant legal mind.
Salmon P. Chase was Secretary of the Treasury under Abraham Lincoln and later Chief Justice less the legal mind than Taney his Court credibly sustained the federal income tax against many legitimate attacks.
Genius Secretaries of the Treasury and brilliant legal frauds have kept the ship of state afloat with phony taxes for more than two centuries.
What a low point has been reached in our history when we need a genius and the best we can come up with is Timothy Geithner.
Geithner should, however, have the honor of the final grounding of the ignoble ship of state.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jan
26
THE BARACK OBAMA DOLL: PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND EMPLOYEE OF THE SENATE
Filed Under BAIL OUT, Economic Stimulous, Oath of Office, OBAMA | Leave a Comment
I have been asked to suggest a business opportunity that my students could start to stimulate their own economic recovery, which would also allow them to support this school.
The negative publicity the Malia and Sasha dolls have generated directed my entrepreneurial efforts to adult models for dolls of let’s pretend to be government figures. Pretending to be a real government is not for kids.
In the pretend United States government, anyone can be President of the United States because there are no set qualifications or even a term of office. The trick is to raise enough campaign contributions, so the candidate can be elected President of the United States by the U.S. Voters. After the candidate’s election to the Office of President by the Electoral College, the candidate can appoint himself to be President of the United States, just like every President has before.
Anyone can make dolls of Barack Hussein Obama anyway they want. The more diverse these dolls can be made the better. I can provide Certificates of Authenticity attesting to the status of the President of the United States as an employee of the U.S. Senate.
There are other possibilities: a Joe Biden doll that talks (he says Article I is the executive branch) and a Chief Justice that recites the oath of Office of President of the United States in several wrong ways.
Students can contact me with other pretend government money making scheme at edrivera@edrivera.com or be inspired to create new toys and games to play lets pretend to be a government at www.EDRIVERA.COM
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jan
25
LESSON IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES PAYS TAXES ON HIS INCOME BECAUSE HE IS A GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE
Filed Under COMMON LAW, CONSTITUTION, Oath of Office | 2 Comments
Article II Section 1 Clause 7:
“The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period and other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.”
We know the President of the United States pays federal income taxes using a form 1040, because every April the President of the United States shares his tax return with the media and the media shares that information with the public.
The question this April 2009 will be: In the spirit of transparency and the rule of law, will President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama admit that he owes taxes, because, as President of the United States, he is the employee of the Congress of the United States?
Former Vice President Richard Cheney admitted to CNN’s Larry King that his paychecks come from the U.S. Senate and he considers himself a part of the legislative branch. Though he didn’t say it in so many words he admitted to being an employee of the U.S. Senate. Joe Biden in the Vice Presidential Debates with Sarah Palin said that Cheney was wrong in claiming to be part of the legislative branch.
The current Vice President of the United States, Joe Biden, thinks Dick Cheney has been the worst Vice President in the history of the United States, but watch him follow Cheney’s lead and patriotically pay federal income taxes on the same kind of income Cheney got from the U.S. Senate. It will be nothing new. Joe Biden has worked for the Senate for over 30 years and has received the same kind of checks.
As Vice President, Joe Biden, took the same oath as he had been taking in the Senate:
Title 5 United States Code, Section 3331. Oath of office
An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.
Note well that like the oath of the President of the United States the Section 3331 Oath must be taken without a provision that it is binding. Everyone who takes the oath of Office of President of the United States or a Section 3331 oath becomes an official employee of the United States Government and the performance of the functions of a public comes within the definition or a “trade or business.”
George Washington set the precedent to be an employee of the Senate by taking the oath to be President of the United States. The Constitution for the United States of America vests the executive power in a President of the United States of America, who is the same person elected to the Office of President under this Constitution. Neither the President of the United States of America nor the person elected to the Office of President is an employee.
Employment off the territory subject to the exclusive legislative power of Congress is subject to the English common law. Anyone can apply to be a student of Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera by contacting him at edrivera@edrivera.com Anyone can learn the law at www.EDRIVERA.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera