Feb
24
WHY ALL STATE OF CALIFORNIA JURORS MUST RESIDE IN A COUNTY OR DISTRICT AND BE DOMICILED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, COMMON LAW, CONSTITUTION, JURY DUTY, State of California, Territorial Jurisdiction, U.S. District Court | 2 Comments
A person, who is not homeless in California, may have many residences but only one domicile. It is also very likely that a person in California may have only one domicile and no other residences. Readers of these posts know that the territory of the State of California is that which belongs to the United States of America. This fact is confirmed in the Constitution of the State of California, which is the source of all law for the State of California.
The law in California is the English common law and in that law serving on a jury is not a duty it is a right upon which all other rights depend. You haven’t heard or seen the common law? That’s because it is unwritten law. The written government law is found in the various titles of the State of California Codes.
This post examines how the Legislature of the State of California has written such contradictory qualifications for civil and criminal trial jurors that it may be impossible to create a qualified jury anywhere in the State of California. Of course, this also creates the likely possibility for the uninformed to be wrongly imprisoned in the political State called the State of California.
The State of California Legislature has enacted the qualifications that every trial juror must meet and these have been codified and placed in the Code of Civil Procedure.
203. (a) All persons are eligible and qualified to be prospective
trial jurors, except the following:
(1) Persons who are not citizens of the United States.
(2) Persons who are less than 18 years of age.
(3) Persons who are not domiciliaries of the State of California,
as determined pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 2020) of
Chapter 1 of Division 2 of the Elections Code.
(4) Persons who are not residents of the jurisdiction wherein they
are summoned to serve.
(5) Persons who have been convicted of malfeasance in office or a
felony, and whose civil rights have not been restored.
(6) Persons who are not possessed of sufficient knowledge of the
English language, provided that no person shall be deemed incompetent
solely because of the loss of sight or hearing in any degree or
other disability which impedes the person’s ability to communicate or
which impairs or interferes with the person’s mobility.
(7) Persons who are serving as grand or trial jurors in any court
of this state.
(8) Persons who are the subject of conservatorship.
(b) No person shall be excluded from eligibility for jury service
in the State of California, for any reason other than those reasons
provided by this section.
Section 203 is a list of exclusions. “All persons are eligible and qualified to be prospective trial jurors, except” those who possess the exclusions. We need only discuss the first four exclusions, because “[a]ll persons” refers to all persons in the State of California and only one exclusion is required to disqualify.
(1) Persons who are citizens of the United States are qualified to be prospective jurors. The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution defines “citizens of the United States” as “all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” In the Constitution of September 17, 1787, only Citizens spelled with a capital “C” are eligible to be Representatives, Senators and the Article II Section 1 Clause 5, Office of President. These Citizens were citizens of the States of the United States of America. At the time of the first Congress, citizens of another United States elected Representatives to Congress who could debate, but not vote. Like 14th Amendment citizens, these citizens were statutory citizens of the United States of the Northwest Territory, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota. These States were created by the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and made a permanent part of the United States of America. The Constitution of September 17, 1787 created a new Union of the States of the Northwest Territory. The “more perfect Union” of the United States of the Northwest Territory created by the Constitution was immediately confused with the perpetual Union created by Articles of Confederation to such a degree it is commonly believed in the legal profession that the Constitution repealed the Articles. The substitution of the Constitution for the Articles of Confederation was accomplished by Congress even before all thirteen States had ratified the Constitution. A Congress of eleven States established the first United States federal courts by going outside the Northwest Territory to Kentucky and Maine for thirteen districts. There are still two Unions. The preeminent Union is still the Confederacy, the United States of America. The State of California is acknowledged to be an inseparable part of the perpetual Union United States of America, which would make it the equal of the States of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, Maine and Kentucky. The territory and the citizens of the State of California are exactly the same as the territory and citizens of the States of the Northwest Territory.
(2) A person 18 years of age qualifies to be a juror, while a person would have to be 21 years of age to be a juror under English common law. The State of California is not a common law State. Common law is made by common law jurors, so the 18 years of majority qualification is a clear sign that the State of California is comprised only of territory subject to the legislative power of the United States Congress, which would exclude the English common law as primary law.
(3) A domiciliary is a person with a domicile, which is similar to a residence, except that a domicile is unique and permanent. Any dwelling can be a domicile as long as it is unique from other dwellings or abodes, another name for a domicile. The State of California cannot be a domicile because it is neither unique nor permanent. A domicile is a personal abode that can be shared with a spouse or family members. The State of California cannot be both an abode or dwelling and an inseparable part of the United States of America.
(4) Prospective jurors must be “residents of the jurisdiction wherein they are summoned to serve.” Such a resident must also be a domiciliary of the State of California, because prospective jurors who are not are excluded. This qualification refers to the only jurisdiction below that of the State of California¾the county. Because the State of California is declared to be an inseparable part of the United States of America by Constitution of the State of California, the highest legal authority for the State, the jurisdiction known as the county is defined by the United States Code. Title 1 of the United States Code is General Provisions. Section 2 of that title defines county: “The word ‘county’ includes a parish, or any other equivalent subdivision of a State or Territory of the United States.” State of California legislators are trying to avoid the inevitable connection of the word “county” to the State of California. The State of California is conclusively an inseparable part of the United States of America as stated in the State of California Constitution and 58 counties of the State of California are subdivisions of a State of the United States. The conclusion is inescapable “residents of the jurisdiction” must reside on territory subject to the exclusive legislative power of Congress.
Article 3 Section 1 State of California Constitution:
The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
The purpose of Article 3 Section 1 of the State of California Constitution is clear, when legislation such as Section 203 is carefully examined. That article of the Constitution describes the territorial limitations in such cryptic terms that its meaning has gone undiscovered until now.
Code of Civil Procedure Part b. states:
(b) No person shall be excluded from eligibility for jury service
in the State of California, for any reason other than those reasons
provided by this section.
The recognition by the State of California Constitution that the State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America makes it practically impossible to establish a domicile in the State of California, because the only territory to be found within the State must belong to the United States of America.
Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Ed. defines a domicile as “that place where a man has his true, fixed, and permanent home and principal establishment, and to which when ever he is absent he has the intention of returning.” This definition explains why no man can have a domicile in this county or in any county of the State of California. Ordinary people cannot establish a permanent claim on what is owned by the United States of America, so it is impossible to have a domicile in the State of California.
This law is found many times throughout the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California: “In this State” or “in the State” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America. The State of California is not California. As the preceding definition for “in this State” and “in the State” explains, the State of California is “all territory within California owned or ceded to the United States of America” The explanation of what the “State” means merely restates Article 3 Section 1 of the Constitution.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Feb
24
WHICH PRESIDENT WILL ADDRESS WHICH CONGRESS ABOUT WHICH UNION?
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Electoral College, Oath of Office, OBAMA, Presidential Elector | 1 Comment
Article II CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES
Section 3. He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.
Barack Hussein Obama was elected to the Office of President by the Presidential Electors, who are now known as the Electoral College. Prior to his election to the Office of President, he received a majority of the votes cast for President of the United States by the registered voters of the United States.
Barack Hussein Obama has taken only one oath the oath of Office of President of the United States, twice:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Barack Hussein Obama’s election to the Office of President makes him President of the United States of America. The Constitution of September 17, 1787 vests the executive power in a President of the United States of America. The Articles of Confederation, which created the Confederacy known as the United States of America does not require an oath of Office of the President of the United States of America.
Barack Hussein Obama took an oral oath to become President of the United States this means the Office of President of the United States is an employment not an Office of government with discretionary power. The Constitution of September 17, 1787 does not vest the Office of President of the United States with any power. A careful reading of the Constitution will reveal that the President of the United States is given duties, but no powers and no specific term of Office in which to complete them.
Barack Hussein Obama is President of the United States, which is the Union created by the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787. An ordinance is local law and the Northwest Ordinance is local law for the territory that is, thereby, being made a permanent part of the United States of America. Joining the States of the Northwest Territory, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota creates United States. These States are United with each other and are United with the United States of America, so they are rightly called the United States. In the future all territory and property belonging to the United States of America will be known as the United States. These United States are the States of the Office of the United States and no others.
Barack Hussein Obama is legitimately President of the United States of America under the Articles of Confederation. His executive power is limited, by the Articles of Confederation and Senate, which is the new name for the Committee of States. He has no executive power under the Constitution of September 17, 1787, because no President Elect has ever been bound by an oath “to support this Constitution,” foreclosing adoption of the Constitution by any government. The States of the Union of United States do ratify this Constitution, but such ratification does not bind any federal or national government to support this Constitution.
Barack Hussein Obama will give a speech tonight that is not technically considered a State of the Union address. The annual State of the Union speech is delivered in the chamber of the House of Representatives before members of both the House and the Senate. The Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court, the president’s Cabinet and international dignitaries also attend the State of the Union Address. The Constitution of September 17, 1787 imposes the non-judicial duty of presiding at the impeachment of the President of the United States making them both employees.
Which President will deliver the speech tonight? Watch and listen and that will be announced when the President is introduced.
Which Congress will be present at the speech? They will both be there. Which Congress is present depends on which President speaks.
As for the Unions, we can be certain that those two will remain hidden.
If you find these answers less than satisfying, you need to become a student. Get enrolled by emailing me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Feb
21
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA’S INEVITABLE COLLAPSE AND THE RE-EMERGENCE OF THE CALIFORNIA REPUBLIC
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, COMMON LAW, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Northwest Ordinance, ORGANIC LAWS, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
The State of California legislature just insured that State government’s collapse by increasing vehicle license fees and the sales and income tax. These taxes and fees are imposed by legislation supposedly authorized by the State of California Constitution. The power to make laws in the State of California comes from the Constitution of the United States. Article 3 Section 1 of the Constitution of the State of California shows how this is so: “The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.”
The Articles of Confederation that created the United States of America did not involve the transfer of any territory to the jurisdiction of the United States of America. The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 did involve territory that would be subject to the legislative power of the United States of America. These present day States were carved out of the Northwest Territory: Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota. These States became the United States before there was a Constitution of the United States. These States of the Northwest Territory explain why the United States is synonymous with federal territory, federal enclaves and territory and other property subject to the exclusive legislative power of Congress. Today the State of Ohio, State of Indiana, State of Illinois, State of Michigan, State of Wisconsin and part of State of Minnesota identify the territory and other property owned and controlled by the United States of America. What is not federal is subject to the English common law.
The State of California legislature makes laws that impose taxation in the State of California, which is the territory in California belonging to the United States of America. The people of California have been lied to they don’t live in the State of California. The Constitution of the State of California is the Organic Law of the State of California. There are four more important Organic Laws of the United States of America. These Organic Laws are: the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the Constitution of September 17, 1787. This is the law of freedom, so don’t expect any attorneys who are admitted to practice law before State of California courts to know the importance of these laws.
I guarantee that if you read and understand everything that is posted here, you will become a legal genius in the time that your mind takes to flush all the lies placed there by the government and media. If you don’t fully understand what I have written or you think some explanation has been left out, you are correct on both counts. What you find posted here for free are practice drafts of material that will be polished for student lessons. Don’t complain you are saving money and the mental exercise might stave off Alzheimer’s.
The State of California legislature has been redundant since the U.S. Supreme Court decided the most prominent of the one-man one vote cases, Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962). Since that decision, both the Assembly and the Senate of the State of California have been apportioned according to population. Just for the sake of economy, one of the legislative houses should have been eliminated that one was not eliminated proves California’s government dysfunction.
How was it before Baker v. Carr? Forty Senators were divided among 58 counties. Los Angeles county had one Senator and what were called “cow counties” could have one too, though some with a small combined population shared one Senator. The end result was that California cities were under represented and agriculture was over represented.
Federal cases like Baker v. Carr finally drove home the point that the States are not set up like the United States of America, where the states have two Senators and the Union called the United States is represented by Representatives apportioned according to population. The term “United States” means the federal territory in the states of the United States of America. The other supposedly more perfect Union is called the United States and is presumably represented in the House of Representatives.
The third Organic Law of the United States of America, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, is critical to a proper understanding of the written Constitution, but it has been intentionally ignored and is now largely forgotten. This Organic Law was labeled an Ordinance, because it was local to the States of the Northwest Territory, which were to be known as the United States. The States of the Northwest Territory, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota, are United States because they are carved from one very large federal district. These United States, became on July 13, 1787, this Union, the United States.
“We the People of the United States,” in the Preamble, are the People of the Northwest Territory. The formation of a new “more perfect Union” for the purpose of establishing Justice, domestic Tranquility, common defense, general Welfare, and securing the Blessings of Liberty is necessary because the States of the United States in the Northwest Territory, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota, won’t become States of the United States of America for many years.
The reference, in the Preamble, to the People of the States of the Northwest Territory, “[t]he People of the United States,” ordaining and establishing “this Constitution for the United States of America” confirms that “this Constitution” needed to be “Adopted,” but was not, after ratification by the States of the United States of America. George Washington’s refusal to be bound “to support this Constitution,” by subscribing to a written oath left this Constitution un-adopted. This Constitution’s “Adoption” by the executive and legislative branches was to be absolutely necessary if this Constitution was to serve beyond the Northwest Territory and to the rest of America.
All the Presidents of the United States that succeed George Washington take the same oath of employment to be President of the United States, as a consequence the People of the Northwest Territory/United States are protected some what from unconstitutional acts of the States, but this Constitution does not apply to the Congress and the President of the United States. This is why George W. Bush acted as if the Constitution was just a piece of paper.
George Washington’s true status as an employee of Congress has not previously been revealed. Had that fact been known the vacancy in the Office of President might have been filled. Washington’s employment was not discovered, so knowingly or unknowingly every President of the United States since Washington has acted outside the authority of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the United States. Voters and taxpayers consent in the obvious ways.
By the time of the admission of the State of California into the Union, every State of the original union of the United States except Minnesota had been admitted into the United States of America. The California Republic had been a Mexican State, so it was not the property of the United States of America, as were the States of the Northwest Territory. California became a State of the United States of America when its Senators were accepted into the Senate. The government of the State of California together with any federal territory was what was admitted into the Union of the United States, when the State of California was admitted by Congress according to Article IV Section 3 Clause 1 of the Constitution.
From the date of its admission on September 9,1850, to the present time, the only territory of the State of California that could be said to have been represented in Congress has been the federal territory in California. Territory called the United States cannot be represented because it is the property belonging to the United States of America. The House of Representatives was created to give citizens of the United States something to do on election day. Voters vote for Congress. Congress makes laws for the States of the Northwest Territory: Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota and pretend that those laws apply in the states of the Articles of Confederation¾the United States of America. Voters voting for incompetent Representatives create the representative democracy and everything goes to hell.
One hundred and twelve years after its dual admissions, the State of California intentionally missed the real point of Baker v. Carr, by retaining the house of the State legislature known as the Assembly. It makes no sense to retain two houses of the legislature, especially, if both of them must be apportioned by population. Worse is the State of California making laws that increase taxes and fees that only pay for worthless government.
The Seventeenth Amendment had taken the selection of the Senators from the State of California legislature and made their selection by popular election. That made the United States Senate even more of a private club by conditioning the acceptance of new Senators on the prerogative of sitting Senators.
Before the ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment, the legislature of the State of California had the responsibility of electing Senators and ratifying Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Admission of the State of California into the Union of the United States confers authority of a kind to legislate for the federal enclaves in California, subject to the approval of Congress. Admission of the State of California into the United States of America conferred no legislative power over the people of California. The taxes and fees imposed by the State of California legislature can only be imposed by lawmakers over land owned by the United States of America. Take a look is that where you live?
The United States of the Northwest Territory, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota, elected Representatives who met and debated in the Congress of the United States, but who could not vote. The Representatives who could vote had to be inhabitants from the Confederacy of the original thirteen States. This meant that these Representatives who would legislate had to come from non-federal territory in the original thirteen States. This created an anomaly in that there was no such territory in the original thirteen States until a much later time and even then hardly anyone would live there. Representatives in the States of the United States of America were making laws for the States of the United States and fooling the people as to where the United States began and ended.
How does all this talk about Representatives, apportionment and taxes doom the State of California? The State of California is just the federal territory in California. People are planning to leave California because they think the State of California is the same as California and the two Californias are not one.
Let’s look at a simple tax that was increased one per cent, the sales tax. The sales tax is an income tax because it is a flat tax on the gross receipts of a group of business people, retailers. Federal law defines an income tax on net income, gross income or gross receipts. A flat tax is a tax that is not progressive.
State of California law imposes the sales tax on the gross receipts of the retailer making sales in this State of California or within the State of California. State of California law on the Sales Tax is found in the Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 6001-6095. This following Section defines the meaning of the terms used to locate the place of the Sale. Section 6017 of California Revenue and Taxation Code: “In this State” or “in the State” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.
The Declaration of Independence recounted many “Injuries and Usurpations” of George III, however one begat many others: “He has combined with others to subject us to a Jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution, and unacknowledged by our Laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:” “For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:”
The Constitution referred to in the Declaration of Independence must be an unwritten one, for no has seen it, but so must “our Laws” be unwritten. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land the Constitution of the State of California says so in Article 3 Section1: “The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.”
The term “United States” is not the result of sloppy writing by English law experts who just happened to be writing a constitution. The context that determines the different meanings of the term “United States” is the entire Organic Law of the United States of America. The so-called Framers of the Constitution intended the confusion we have with government today and that confusion can only be resolved by confronting those who are claiming power under that instrument.
The United States Barack Hussein Obama is President of the federal territory in California. The President of the United States is charged in Article I Section 7 of the Constitution with the duty of approving or objecting to the Bills presented to him. That is the extent of the authority of the President of the United States and it does not amount to the power to legislate, as that power is exclusive to “a Congress of the United States.”
I urge everyone contemplating leaving California, because the government of the State of California is worse than most, to begin studying these posts and to consider becoming students of the law.
The most I can do in this post is scratch the surface of difficult subject but not an incomprehensible one. A few students can make significant contributions to a subject that has been neglected for two centuries.
California, without the State of California and its taxes, can with your help be a paradise. E-mail me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Feb
21
NATIONALIZATION OF AMERICAN BANKS? IMPOSSIBLE THERE IS NO GOVERNMENT IN AMERICA
Filed Under BAIL OUT, BANKRUPTCY | 1 Comment
Talk that some banks might have to be taken over by the government neglects one fact: there is no government in America.
There is a business enterprise called the United States Government that began operation when George Washington became President of the United States by accepting at will employment by agreeing to do his best to “preserve, protect and defend” the assets belonging to the United States of America.
Dissection and examination of the business plan that is the Constitution of the United States does not reveal a government of three branches. At best there is a much despised lawmaking body of old men and some women, who claim to have been elected by persons who are not technically qualified to represent themselves.
If the United States Government is going to start taking over banks, it will first have to come up with a word to properly describe the process.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Feb
19
POLITICAL MALPRACTICE NOT TO SEEK ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION?
Filed Under LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
Dear California Legislator:
Dr. Rivera teaches law on the Internet and he has proven to my satisfaction that the State of California is the federal territory within California that is subject to the legislative power of the Congress of the United States.
I am asking you to confirm or deny that the State of California is territory owned and controlled by the United States of America.
If you do not know the answer to my question, would your failure to seek an opinion from the State of California Attorney General be some kind of political malpractice?
Very truly yours,
A Californian
Feb
18
CALIFORNIA STUDENTS: GET A LEGISLATOR TO ADMIT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IS FEDERAL TERRITORY AND EARN $500 IN TUITION
Filed Under COMMON LAW, CONSTITUTION, JURY DUTY, LEARNING THE LAW, U.S. District Court | Leave a Comment
Dear State of California Legislator:
I am a law student of Internet law professor, Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera. He teaches that the State of California, like all political states, is comprised of three basic elements: law, human population and territory. He teaches that the territory of the State of California is the land in California subject to the exclusive legislative power of the Congress of the United States. If I can get your agreement that what he teaches is correct or proof from you that he is wrong, I will earn one year paid tuition worth $500.
Dr. Rivera teaches that State of California law is created by the legislature from authority in the State of California Constitution and the Constitution of the United States.
The California voters who vote in general state and federal elections form the jury pools for all federal trials in the District of California. Voters in the State of California must be U.S. citizens who can reside anywhere in California, while State trial jurors must be domiciliaries in the State of California, according to Section 203 of the California Code of Civil Procedure.
Dr. Rivera teaches that law in California is English common law, while the law in the State of California is constitutional.
Mr. Legislator, doesn’t this mean, as Dr. Rivera teaches, that the territory of the State of California is the same place as the federal district where California federal jurors have to reside? Isn’t it true that jurors in California qualify for both State and federal trials?
Will you please respond, so I can learn more about the law.
Very truly yours,
Law Student
Feb
16
PRESIDENT’S DAY? APRIL 30, 1789 THE DAY GEORGE WASHINGTON AND CONGRESS SOLD OUT THE COUNTRY
Filed Under CONSTITUTION, Oath of Office | 1 Comment
George Washington was elected to the Office of President, but he sold the country out on April 30, 1789, so he and his friends who would sit in the First Congress could loot the country. Presidents Day should be a day of national shame for 44 men who have sold out the people by agreeing to work for Congress.
Washington took the oath that allowed him to become the first employee to an oligarchy called Congress. Americans have always distrusted Congress and for good reason. The 111th Congress just pulled off the biggest heist of national treasure in its 220 year history.
Senators used to be chosen by the State legislatures now Representatives and Senators are employees elected by U.S. citizens who are registered to vote.
Registering U.S. citizens who will vote for Congress is the ultimate voter fraud. When the First Congress was elected, representation was determined according to Article I Section 2 Clause 3:
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative; and until such enumerations shall be made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New-York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three.
The House of Representatives of the First Congress is rigged from the beginning to give the appearance of a representative body of all the people in all the thirteen states. The first clause of the first sentence in Section 3 tells us all be need to know to determine that the several States will be the same States in the Northwest Territory: Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota. These are the States of “this Union.”
The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 confirmed the power of the United States, in Congress assembled to tax and permit representatives from Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota to attend Congress and debate, but not vote.
The original thirteen States were to be represented in the House of Representatives, by voting Representatives, so that the proprietary interests of the people of states were represented when legislation was made for, and taxes imposed on, the States of Northwest Territory.
The Census was supposed to count only those persons in the several States, which are the States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota for the purpose of determining when their population was sufficient for Statehood.
Article 5 of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 provided for admission when the States reached a threshold population:
And, whenever any of the said States shall have sixty thousand free inhabitants therein, such State shall be admitted, by its delegates, into the Congress of the United States, on an equal footing with the original States in all respects whatever, and shall be at liberty to form a permanent constitution and State government: Provided, the constitution and government so to be formed, shall be republican, and in conformity to the principles contained in these articles; and, so far as it can be consistent with the general interest of the confederacy, such admission shall be allowed at an earlier period, and when there may be a less number of free inhabitants in the State than sixty thousand.
Extending the Census beyond the United States makes it appear that Congress can make laws anywhere voters are registered. U.S. voters cannot be domiciled in the United States that is why U.S. voters need a residence to register. Domicile requires permanence and there can be none where the government owns the land. Voters who do not reside within the United States are not qualified to vote, but only we know that.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Feb
14
MAKING SENSE OF “THIS CONSTITUTION” “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, THIS UNION, THE UNION, UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, LEARNING THE LAW, Northwest Ordinance, ORGANIC LAWS | Leave a Comment
“This Constitution” is distinguished from the “Constitution of the United States” in the Constitution of September 17, 1787. “This Constitution” is identical to the Constitution of September 17, 1787, in that both are identical written documents. The “Constitution of the United States” refers to the composition of the United States. The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 re-made the Northwest Territory, into the United States, a permanent part of the Confederacy known as the United States of America.
The States of the Northwest Territory are Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota. The first State of Northwest Territory to be admitted into the Union was admitted into the wrong Union. In 1803, President of the United States Thomas Jefferson signed the resolution that admitted the State of Ohio into “the Union,” styled the United States of America. One hundred and fifty years later, in 1953, the State of Ohio was admitted into the “more perfect Union,” the United States.
The 1953 resolution was unnecessary for admission into “this Union,” because the State of Ohio had been in the United States since the States of the Northwest Territory were made a permanent part of the United States of America. The Territory of Ohio or Ohio Territory had non-voting delegates in the House of Representatives and, of course no Senators, until it joined the United States of America and the United States.
In 1803, Ohio was admitted into “the Union,” the Confederacy of the United States of America, as a State on an equal footing with the original States of the Union under the Articles of Confederation, when its Senators were accepted and no members of the Senate objected to admission.
The 1953 resolution was necessary to continue the fraud that the “Constitution of the United States” had replaced the Articles of Confederation.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Feb
11
200 YEAR OLD FRAUD ABRAHAM LINCOLN BORN FEBRUARY 12, 1809
Filed Under CONSTITUTION, Electoral College, IMPEACHMENT, LEARNING THE LAW, Oath of Office, Presidential Elector, PRESIDENTS | Leave a Comment
On February 4, 1789 George Washington was elected to the Office of President. He took the oath of Office of President of the United States on April 30, 1789, because the Constitution was written so that one person would be eligible until after July 4, 1790. Taking the oath of Office of President of the United States made George Washington an employee and not an Official of a government.
When Washington was elected to a second term, he could have taken the oath of public Office provided in the third paragraph of Article VI of the Constitution, but he took the same employment oath he took on April 30, 1789. Every succeeding person elected to the Office of President has become an employee of the United States government by taking the employment oath found in Article II Section 1 Clause 8:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Being President of the United States must be kept a secret employment, for if the people were to find out there would be a revolution. The presidential Electors pick a person who will fill the Office of President under the Constitution and be a President of the United States of America under the Articles of Confederation. The Office of President can only be filled if the President Elect takes the Article VI oath and is bound to that Office. The secret has been kept for 220 years and had he lived Honest Abe would have kept it secure for all his 200 years.
The secret is out. There is no real United States Government. The written Constitution cannot be adopted because no person elected to the Office of President has ever taken an oath to be bound by the written Constitution. There is just the business of government trying to sell to the people the same freedom that was taken from them. There is no real President. Millions of people voting for an employee cannot make that employee an Official of government, if that person refuses to be bound by a written Constitution.
The federal courts are fake. Their Chief Justice is an employee who’s only constitutional duty is to watch the President of the United States be impeached. There is no term of Office for the President of the United States nor are there any qualifications.
There are two Congresses one under the Articles of Confederation and a second, the best money can buy, according to Will Rodgers.
The Constitution of the United States? That is just an employment agreement. The pay is good. The benefits are the best available and hardly anyone gets fired. If you are a taxpayer, you aren’t part of the Constitution. The taxpayer just works for those who work for the government under the employment agreement Constitution.
The people ask, “What good is the Constitution? It works for the President of the United States, Chief Justice and the other high placed employees, but it can’t work for the taxpayer. The Constitution takes the place of God and religion. “We the People of the United States,…do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” These words ordain the President of the United States as chief high priest and establish the Constitution of the United States as the government’s gospel.
The End is Near. Two hundred years is the life span of a really good lie. The Presidential lie has been spread all over the world. The global economic collapse will finally bring it down.
Readers have complained that these posts leave them with unanswered questions. I thank them for their comments, but that is all they get for free. Government schools provide the wrong answers for free. For all the correct answers enroll: edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Feb
10
WHAT IS MISSING UNDER ROMAN OR CIVIL LAW? ANSWER: UNALIENABLE RIGHTS
Filed Under CONSTITUTION, LEARNING THE LAW, OBAMA | Leave a Comment
Roman Law was made by and for the Roman government. Civil law is law for citizens who owe allegiance to the government. Roman Law and civil law are virtually the same. Pontius Pilate found that Jesus Christ had not violated Roman Law, but had Him scourged and crucified because He presented a danger to government stability. The federal government is a government based on the Roman model
It is no secret the Masons had a significant if not controlling interest in the founding of the United States Government and the buildings in Washington, D. C. Everything architectural that could be found in Rome can be found in Washington, D. C.
Our unalienable rights could not be found in Rome, because ancient Rome was a city of many gods none of which conferred freedom on the inhabitants of that city. Washington, D. C. has managed to achieve that unenviable distinction of having no unalienable rights by cleverly avoiding adoption of this Constitution.
Human unalienable rights are not recognized by government law, because that law is made by and for government. George Washington was able to achieve this kind of American government law by taking an oath to be the employee of government rather than a servant of the people. As an employee of government, George Washington was able to ignore the unalienable rights of the people every time he signed a Bill enacted by Congress.
Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Ed. defines unalienable this way: “Inalienable; incapable of being aliened, that is, sold and transferred.” The “People of the United States” are the people of the Northwest Territory, who are temporarily without unalienable rights until the State of the United States becomes a state of the United States of America and they decide to be inhabitants of that state. Ratification of this Constitution by the State bound the People of the United States in the States of that Union, while the lack of adoption of this Constitution left the United States Government free to treat citizens of the United States as if they have no unalienable rights.
George Washington’s ploy to feign the taking of the Article VI oath “to support this Constitution” by taking the oath of Office of President of the United States has worked 44 times. American believe they have constitutional rights (they don’t) and that those rights are the same or better than unalienable rights (they are not).
The poor state of the American economy and the disreputable condition of government are a direct result of the totally deficient legal education establishment. Poor legal education even in Ivy League law schools means the people have no unalienable rights. Traditionally Anglo-American law is taught in three year law schools. President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama attended and graduated from one of the most prestigious of these professional schools, yet he knows nothing of true character of the Office of President of the United States. Change will not come without knowledge
The purpose of these posts is to provide an idea of the kind of legal education that is available even for all those of limited means, if the authority of government is really questioned. Reading and believing U.S. Supreme Court opinions written by justices who have been appointed by another government employee is sheer folly.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Roman Law was made by and for the Roman government. Civil law is law for citizens who owe allegiance to the government. Roman Law and civil law are virtually the same. Pontius Pilate found that Jesus Christ had not violated Roman Law, but had Him scourged and crucified because He presented a danger to government stability. The federal government is a government based on the Roman model
It is no secret the Masons had a significant if not controlling interest in the founding of the United States Government and the buildings in Washington, D. C. Everything architectural that could be found in Rome can be found in Washington, D. C.
Our unalienable rights could not be found in Rome, because ancient Rome was a city of many gods none of which conferred freedom on the inhabitants of that city. Washington, D. C. has managed to achieve that unenviable distinction of having no unalienable rights by cleverly avoiding adoption of this Constitution.
Human unalienable rights are not recognized by government law, because that law is made by and for government. George Washington was able to achieve this kind of American government law by taking an oath to be the employee of government rather than a servant of the people. As an employee of government, George Washington was able to ignore the unalienable rights of the people every time he signed a Bill enacted by Congress.
Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Ed. defines unalienable this way: “Inalienable; incapable of being aliened, that is, sold and transferred.” The “People of the United States” are the people of the Northwest Territory, who are temporarily without unalienable rights until the State of the United States becomes a state of the United States of America and they decide to be inhabitants of that state. Ratification of this Constitution by the State bound the People of the United States in the States of that Union, while the lack of adoption of this Constitution left the United States Government free to treat citizens of the United States as if they have no unalienable rights.
George Washington’s ploy to feign the taking of the Article VI oath “to support this Constitution” by taking the oath of Office of President of the United States has worked 44 times. American believe they have constitutional rights (they don’t) and that those rights are the same or better than unalienable rights (they are not).
The poor state of the American economy and the disreputable condition of government are a direct result of the totally deficient legal education establishment. Poor legal education even in Ivy League law schools means the people have no unalienable rights. Traditionally Anglo-American law is taught in three year law schools. President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama attended and graduated from one of the most prestigious of these professional schools, yet he knows nothing of true character of the Office of President of the United States. Change will not come without knowledge
The purpose of these posts is to provide an idea of the kind of legal education that is available even for all those of limited means, if the authority of government is really questioned. Reading and believing U.S. Supreme Court opinions written by justices who have been appointed by another government employee is sheer folly.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera