Jun
30
THE TWO CONGRESSES: THE UNITED STATES, IN CONGRESS ASSEMBLED & THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, Northwest Ordinance, Oath of Office, ORGANIC LAWS | Leave a Comment
Everyone, who follows American politics has special thoughts and cute pet names for the Congress that enacts laws that not one member has completely read. Has anyone given any thought to the strange history of the bizarre groups of men and women that have made up the various American Congresses? In this post, I discuss the transformation of the oldest, the United States, in Congress assembled, into “the Senate;” the newest Congress is now called the 111th, which unlike the Senate adjourns every two years, thus, revealing its inherently temporary nature.
The word “Congress” appears in each of the four documents that make up the Organic Law of the United States of America, but what was a “Congress” before there was a 4th of July, a Confederacy called United States of America, the Northwest Territory or the Constitution of the United States?
In international law, a congress is an assembly of envoys, commissioners or deputies from different sovereignties who meet to make plans and reach agreements. This definition certainly describes accurately the Congress of the Articles of Confederation, as the thirteen States considered themselves, to be, in the words and style of the Declaration of Independence, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES.
Article II of the Articles of Confederation makes certain that the Confederate States of the United States of America remain confederate and not federal:
Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.
The Articles of Confederation were proposed to the original thirteen States just after the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Virginia on December 16, 1777 became the first State to ratify the Articles and, when finally ratified by Maryland, the thirteenth State on March 1, 1781, all the States had agreed “that the articles thereof shall be inviolably observed by the states we respectively represent, and that the union shall be perpetual.”
Perpetuity lasted until the spring of 1787, when on May 25th George Washington convened the secret meeting of the Constitutional Convention that would initiate the false reports of the replacement of the Articles of Confederation by a new Constitution. By the summer of 1787, the Continental Congress had already ordained the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and repealed the Northwest Ordinance of April 23, 1784, thereby creating the Continental United States. By the fall of 1787, Mason George Washington could, “By the unanimous Order of the Convention,” of the twelve States participating present the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and resolve that it be laid before the United States in Congress assembled for later submission to the States for ratification.
The secrecy of the Constitutional Convention was so effective it permitted the claim to be made and accepted that the Articles of Confederation were to be superceded by the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and that ratification by just nine States would create, in the words of Mason Benjamin Franklin, “a Republic.” A Roman Republic was, indeed, created with George Washington as Dictator.
When the dust final settles, ratification by the ninth State, New Hampshire, on June 21, 1788 was sufficient to create a Committee of States pursuant to Article IX of the Articles of Confederation that will become “the Senate,” when it acts alone and “a Senate,” when together with the House of Representatives it becomes the Congress of the United States.
Because only one third of the Senate is elected every two years, the Senate is always in session and continues to act as the “United States, in Congress assembled,” pursuant to the authority of the Articles of Confederation.
The Constitution of September 17, 1787 creates in Article I Section 1 “a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives,” which can only mean that this Congress of the United States is a Congress in addition to the United States, in Congress assembled. This Congress, consisting of a Senate and House of Representatives has been vested with all the legislative powers herein granted, meaning the legislative powers ordained in the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 by the Continental Congress were now ratified by the States, as to any territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America in the ratifying State.
Compared to George Washington’s duplicity in the taking of the oath of Office of the President of the United States the scheming in setting up the Congress of the United States is many times more complicated. I have only touched on the highlights. I urge interested students to join me in the continued study of a disreputable institution that daily spins out of control. Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com to enroll in the only school that has exposed the Congress of the United States for what it is.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
29
WHAT MASONIC SECRET DID GEORGE WASHINGTON AND THE MASONS HIDE IN THE CONSTITUTION?
Filed Under CONSTITUTION, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, Oath of Office, OBAMA, PRESIDENTS | 2 Comments
The Masons are an occult society and like all secret societies they are parasitic to their larger host, which must be denied access to the society’s secrets. The public Masons claim to revere wisdom and enlightenment, but what they secretly worship is the secrecy of certain powerful knowledge. To a secret society, wisdom and enlightenment is of no value, if everyone has it and that is where the evil in the Masons can be found.
In America, the Masons have achieved their highest level of secrecy by hiding the ultimate in political power in the Constitution of September 17, 1787. Secret societies use stealth and subversion to hide their real motive, which is the acquisition and the manipulation of power for the personal benefit of their members. George Washington was a Mason and he used that secret society’s clandestine methods to take over the government in America for the personal benefit of his fellow Masons.
I won’t go into the details of the Masonic imprint on Washington, D. C. and the federal government; it is too obvious to dismiss. After George Washington takes power, the entire city is erected according to a Masonic building code. The dollar bill, which has not gotten a design makeover, pictures the world’s most famous Mason on one side and is full of Masonic symbols and mottos on the other. The Masonic trappings of the federal government are no secret how the Masons took power is revealed here.
The definitive proof of the Masonic takeover of government is found in the document called the Constitution of September 17, 1787. This is the document produced by the secret Constitutional Convention whose presiding officer was George Washington himself. Planted throughout the Constitution are countless clues to its real meaning. Washington and the other Mason concealed these clues in plain sight for any Mason of the highest degree to see, but which have remained invisible to non-Masons.
We start with the oral oath George Washington took at noon on April 30, 1789, because the oral oath is the key that has locked the clues within the Constitution, when he takes the oath the Masonic secrets of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 are locked up tight. Everyone should know that an oral oath is insufficient in law to support adherence and obedience to a written document such as the Constitution of September 17, 1787. The manner and means by which this was done was the prime Masonic secret that Washington carried to his grave. Washington took this oath in a whispered voice, while his left hand rested on a Masonic Bible borrowed from a nearby Masonic Lodge:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Washington added: “So help me God” to the oral oath to make it absolutely clear that he was marking the Office of President of the United States, as the beginning a new order of the ages, which is what it has turned out to be. Article VI Clause 3 of the Constitution prohibits test oaths, and here we have George Washington swearing an oath to a Masonic god and nobody gets it. April 30, 1789 was a day of celebration and apparently everyone but the Masons had turned their brains off for the inaugural. Americans had just lost their freedom and they were cheering.
By taking this oral oath rather than the written one required by Article VI, Mason George Washington was able take control of the federal government on behalf of the Masons. Washington’s taking of an oral oath left no profound memories that he had just stolen government for the price of a few whispers.
To this day, everyone believes that taking of an oral in front of witnesses is as binding as taking the oath and then subscribing a printed copy of the oath orally taken; an oral oath remains oral no matter how many witnesses there may be to its taking. That millions of people saw and heard Barack Hussein Obama take an oral oath does not change the oath in any way. The oral oath of Office of President of the United States remains a secret Masonic oath, because only I, a few of my students and some Masons of the highest degree know the secret. Masonic influence over government and the news media of that time and the present has been able to squelch any and all accounts of what George Washington and all his successors had done. Without this Masonic influence, George Washington, if caught, could have been hung for treason.
How else does the Constitution of September 17, 1787 prove that the oath of the Office of President of the United States creates in reality a secret Masonic Officer? Hidden throughout the Constitution are the clues that prove that the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 Office of President was to be a non-Masonic President, if the Masonic Architect God George Washington called on for help, did not favor the Masonic takeover of the federal government.
George Washington was able to fool the Americans that had assembled to witness his inaugural, so the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 Office of President has forever remained vacant. The hidden clues that prove the Office of President of the United States was created as Masonic Office for George Washington, also, prove that the Office of President is the legitimate Office of President under the authority of a yet to be adopted Constitution of September 17, 1787. Some, but not all the clues are listed below:
1. Article I Section 1 clearly establishes that “all legislative” powers granted are vested in “a” Congress of the United States meaning that there is to be more than one Congress and that there will be no sharing of legislative power; the President and Vice President of the United States are legislative Officers.
2. Article I Section 3 Clause 4 makes the Vice President of the United States a legislative Officer by imposing the duty of being President of the Senate and requiring him to break a tie vote.
3. Article I Section 3 Clause 5 confirms that the Vice President of the United States is a legislative Officer by making provision that a legislative Officer replace an absent Vice President.
4. Article I Section 3 Clause 6 subjects the President of the United States to impeachment for no reason or any reason, provided the Chief Justice presides; the imposition of a legislative function on the Chief Justice makes that office legislative and the oral oath of the President of the United States makes that Office at will employment subject to the termination by the Congress employer.
5. Article I Section 7 Clause 2 imposes on the President of the United States the legislative duties of approving, signing or returning Bills with his objections making him a legislative Officer to be consistent with Article I Section 1.
6. Article I Section 8 Clause 1 grants Congress the power to lay and collect taxes, so it needs the President of the United States to collect the taxes it lays.
7. Article I Section 8 Clause 17 grants Congress exclusive legislative power, however, it needs the usurped power of the President of the United States to extend this legislative power outside of territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
8. Article II Section 1 Clause 1 vests the executive power in “a President of the United States of America” not “the President of the United States;” who hold his Office for four years, while no term is specified for the President of the United States.
9. Article II Section 1 Clause 5 makes fourteen years residency within the United States a condition of eligibility to the Office of President, which cannot be met until after July 4, 1790, making George Washington ineligible to the Office of President.
10. Article II Section 1 Clause 7 provides compensation, which can’t be raised or reduced, for the person who holds the Office of President; George Washington refused pay in his inaugural address, so that receipt of compensation would not be interpreted as acceptance of the Office of President for which he was not qualified.
11. Article II Section 1 Clause 8 is an employment oath that can’t bind the President of the United States “to support this Constitution.”
12. Article II Section 2 Clause 1, 2 & 3 refer to the President of the United States of America not the President of the United States.
13. Article II Section 3 refers to the President of the United States of America not the President of the United States.
14. Article II Section 4 provides for the removal from Office by impeachment of the President, whose eligibility is described in Article II Section 1 Clause 5, the Vice President identified in Article II Section 1 Clause 1 and all civil Officers of the United States, for convictions of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
15. Article VI Clause 3 requires “all executive” Officers to be bound by Oath or Affirmation “to support this Constitution;” George Washington’s oral oath prevented the adoption of “this Constitution.”
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
27
WHY ARE THERE SO MANY CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATIONS?
Filed Under CONSTITUTION, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, Oath of Office, PRESIDENTS, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
The various interpretations of the Constitution can all be easily found on the Internet just by doing a word search on “constitutional interpretation.” Accepting that anyone of those many interpretations is a correct one would be a monunental mistake.
The U.S. Constitution can be so many things to as many people, because George Washington’s taking of the oral oath of Office of President of the United States acts as a rejection of the written Constitution of September 17, 1787. This failure to adopt the written Constitution permits the substitution of the indefinite Constitution of the United States in all subsequent oaths taken by everyone in all American governments.
The acceptance of George Washington as President of the United States without objection permitted the creation of a form of government that is made on the fly by the Congress of the United States, a President of the United States and a Supreme Court appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate of the United States.
The United States Constitution, as appropriate as it might be for the territory and other property belonging to the United States of America, is totally inappropriate for the inhabitants of free American states, as current events make clear. The ratification of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 by State convention was supposed to cause the people of the states to believe they were submitting to the newly stated authority of a federal government. The Amendments to the Constitution of the United States adopted by Washington’s oral oath undoubtedly caused many to believe the guarantees of the basic rights of the people meant the Constitution of the United States now was law for people.
The Constitution of September 17, 1787 is short and the Constitution of the United States is so short it is really no more than a title for what the Congress and President of the United States will create from whole cloth with the assistance of the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the legislative Supreme Court. The creation of a written Constitution from just the title: Constitution of the United States has resulted in what is now called the U.S. Constitution. To explain the wholesale reconstruction of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, the U.S. Constitution is termed a Living Constitution.
There is no Living Constitution. The U.S. Constitution, aka the “Constitution of the United States,” was born not as a blueprint for the structure of a government, but as an inventory of the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. Washington was elected to be President of the United States of America under the Articles of Confederation and to the Office of President, for which he was ineligible until after July 4, 1790. When no one noticed that George Washington had become a Roman Dictator of an imaginary republic, Congress and Washington proceeded with the creation of a new political State to be known as the United States. Governments use the Constitution of September 17, 1787 as a diversion. Government critics constantly scream the unconstitutionality of this or that government action never realizing that there is no Constitution.
The only right way to interpret a constitution is to credit each and every part and to account for each mandate contained in the document and when that is done to the Constitution of September 17, 1787, the written vanishes and a poser Constitution pops up. There are three oaths in the Constitution of September 17, 1787. When the Senate sits to try an Impeachment, they shall be “on Oath or Affirmation,” according to Article I Section 3 Clause 6. Article II Section 1 Clause 8 requires that the President of the United States “take the following Oath or Affirmation.” Finally, the third oath, Article VI Section 3, requires that the legislative, “and all executive and judicial Officers of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution.” No one has realized till now that an oral oath particularly the one taken by the President of the United States has anything to do with a written constitution like the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
The Constitution requires the President of the United States to take an “Oath or Affirmation,” that does not specifically bind him “to support this Constitution,” while in Article VI Clause 3 all legislative, executive and judicial Officers are to be bound “to support this Constitution.” The differences between these two Oaths and Affirmations make it clear that the Office of President of the United States is just an employment and not a public office. The President and Vice President of the United States along with the Chief Justice are employees of the legislative branch.
I contend that as the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was never adopted by the subscription of an “Oath or Affirmation” by the First Congress, therefore, it was impossible for someone like George Washington to adopt it by taking the Article VI Clause 3 oath, as George Washington was further disqualified from the Office of President, because he had not resided within the United States for fourteen years something that no one would be able to do until after July 4, 1790. After that date, Presidents Elect continued to take the oral oath of the Office of President of the United States.
The absolutely clear language of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 creates an employment in the description of and the acceptance of the Office of President of the United States by the taking of an oral oath. The equally clear language in Article VI Section 3 that all legislative, executive and judicial Officers shall be bound by “Oath or Affirmation” “to support this Constitution” makes the Constitution of September 17, 1787 a nullity outside the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
I need students who will help me explore the implications of a federal government and Constitution that is limited to territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. According to the Constitution of the United States, all the crazy spending and legislation coming out of the Congress of the United States can be easily limited to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. Don’t you think you should find out how to keep the federal government on its side of the fence? Contact me at: edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
26
WHY POLITICIANS CAN’T KEEP PROMISES
Filed Under CONSTITUTION, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Oath of Office, PRESIDENTS | Leave a Comment
During campaigns for election to public office politicians make promises they know they cannot keep. How is it that they keep getting away with this faithlessness?
George Washington set the precedent for dishonesty in American politics by lying about the office he was taking at noon on April 30, 1789. As Americans watched Washington take the oath and strained to hear him speak, everyone but the politicians believed in his honesty. When there were no shouts of Treason, at the conclusion of the first presidential inauguration, Washington and his cronies knew they could commence their plunder of the country.
When Washington took the oath of Office of President of the United States, he knew he was taking that oath in order to fool all the Americans who weren’t already in on the government takeover.
George Washington’s promise to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution of the United States created the illusion of a written document that will limit the government, when in truth it is only the initial step in the creation of a political State, where Washington and his cronies will rule everyone else.
From noon April 30, 1789, the Constitution of the United States has been a work in progress beginning with the territory needed for a new State, later adding the People of the United States and finally creating the mechanism to create law for the territory and People of the United States.
All of it, however, is built on the lie that George Washington took the right oath. He did not; an oral oath cannot support the performance of the terms of a written document that requires a substantial time. Article VI of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 requires a subscribed written oath.
Governor of the State of South Carolina, Mark Stanford, and every other holder of a public office in America takes a written oath to support the Constitution of the United States, a document that only begins to take some form when the Chief Justice John Marshall and the Associate Justices claim authority to interpret something that does not even exist.
Politicians can’t keep their promises because their very existence is founded on a lie. George Washington was a Mason, so when he added: “So help me God” to the oath of Office of President of the United States, it was because Washington believed that God gave him special occult powers. To learn how you can use the Constitution of September 17, 1787 to prove that George Washington was a very sneaky guy, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
25
MR. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, YOU’RE FIRED!
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, IMPEACHMENT, LEARNING THE LAW, Oath of Office, OBAMA, PRESIDENTS, Supreme Court, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
According to a former two-time President of the United States, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” The only credible argument that has been made against that statement is that “I’m” is a contraction of two words, so the statement should read: “The eleven most terrifying words in the English language are, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”
Well, it is common knowledge that the President of the United States is the executive branch of government, so logic would dictate that President must, also, be a terrifying person. This most serious condemnation of government employees came from someone who should know¾Ronald Wilson Reagan, the 40th President of the United States. Reagan is credited with “terrifying” the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics out of existence.
Ronald Reagan was, of course, not referring to himself as anyone, who terrified United States citizens, he was talking about an employee bureaucrat, someone from the government. Reagan thought, as almost all citizens of the United States do, that as the head of an entire branch of the government his good intentions made him a good guy.
We know today that the President of the United States is part of the Congress of the United States, because the Office of President of the United States is part of the legislative branch that administers territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. While Reagan was correct about the government being the problem, he was unaware of his place in it. Had he known what the first year Ed Rivera Law School student learns he might have had enough spunk to really change government for the better. The present government is not better it is much worse.
President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama is making government too big to manage, so it will be too big to fail. If you are a person who just wants to be free of the government, increased confrontations with someone from the government is in your future. The Barack Hussein Obama Administration is just the beginning of a long drawn out series of terrifying experiences, unless you learn how to put the President of the United States in his place, by firing him and presiding over your own life.
Ronald Reagan was a popular President because he told the truth, as he knew it. He knew government was the problem even if he didn’t know how to fix it. He didn’t know that the President of the United States of America made foreign policy under the Articles of Confederation and the Congress and President of the United States made laws only for the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. He didn’t know that the Constitution of the United States referred first to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America and later to a document created by the interpretation by the Congress and President of the United States and a non-judicial Supreme Court. You can learn all that Ronald Reagan didn’t know and fire the President of the United States by becoming my student.
The present President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama like every other first term President had to hire his own men and women into key positions in his administration of the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. These men and women appointed by the Presidents of the United States and confirmed by the Senate are directly responsible for the employment of the terrifying person from the government intent on helping you lose your freedom.
Firing the President of the United States is supposed to be as easy as firing any other employee who is not working out. The Constitution of September 17, 1787 calls firing top employees by the fancy name “impeachment,” of which there are two kinds: easy impeachment of high level employees for practically no reason and difficult impeachment of the President and Vice President under the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of September 17, 1787, “for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” The President of the United States is subject to easy impeachment because he, the Vice President of the United States and the Chief Justice are the only employees named in the Constitution of September 17, 1787. As employees, they should be easily replaced.
The President of the United States can be fired by an Article I Section 3 Clause 6 impeachment for any reason or no reason, as long as the Chief Justice, another employee of Congress, presides at the impeachment trial. The job of the President of the United States is to administer the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America or in the words of his official oral employee oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
You can easily fire the President of the United States, if you are being terrified by someone claiming: “I’m from the government and I’m here to help,” by enrolling as one of my students. To start your education, contact me at: edrivera@edrivera.com and then read every post and page on this site.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
18
YES, THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE SAYS: YOU CAN FIRE THE GOVERNMENT.
Filed Under CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, Oath of Office, Property Taxes | Leave a Comment
The Declaration of Independence is not the source of freedom in America that document merely expresses the inherent individual human right to deny consent to be governed by government or any group or person claiming to be a government. The Declaration of Independence served notice on the head of state of Great Britain that “these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES.” That piece of paper, a war and a peace treaty made it final, until George Washington became President of the United States.
George Washington fraudulently put himself at the head of a special kind of stealth Trojan Horse government intended from the beginning to administer property owned by a government that was a Confederacy of those free and independent states. Washington was the mastermind behind this maliciously brilliant idea of a permanent government for the States of the Northwest Territory temptingly described and palmed off as “ this Constitution for the United States of America.” Poor naïve Americans to this day believe the Constitution of September 17, 1787 turned the Confederacy, the United States of America, into some kind of representative democracy or democratic republic or similar scheme, where the people vote themselves rich. Votes were cast and Washington became a Roman Dictator, hence, the birth of the republic.
The plot was for Washington to be elected to an Office for which he was not eligible, the Office of President, he would then take an Office, not an Article VI “office or public Trust under the United States,” and without any eligibility requirements, the Office of President of the United States. The Washington Switch would, for 220 years, cause the false trust and belief that the President of the United States was bound “to support this Constitution.” He was not, because, he didn’t take and subscribe that oath.
In front of God and the world, George Washington took an oral oath that he would “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution of the United States and the biggest seizure of power occurred without notice. Washington knew, as any first year law student knows, when he took that oral oath that it was insufficient to support any written constitution, however, that was its intent¾to permit the President of the United States to wield power his Office did not possess, without constraint. Americans on April 30, 1789 thought they knew the Constitution, but they never saw the Trojan Horse Constitution of the United States hidden within the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
George Washington’s fraud and deception provides an unneeded reason to bail out of the government of the United States. I have prepared for students of my advanced law and government course a “ President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama you’re fired letter. To get a copy you must take the basic course, which you can begin by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
13
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS NOT THE REAL PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
Filed Under CONSTITUTION, Electoral College, LAW OF THE LAND, Oath of Office, OBAMA, Presidential Elector, PRESIDENTS | Leave a Comment
Even though Barack Obama took the oath of Office of the President of the United States twice, he is still not the real President of the United States. The real President of the United States is the one who qualifies for the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 Office of President by taking an oath “to support this Constitution” and subscribing his name to that oath. No American President has ever taken a written oath to be bound this Constitution, as required by Article VI of the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
George Washington’s clever trick to takeover the government, so he could help his rich friends has brought the country to the brink of ruin and Barack Obama is pushing the country into socialism.
The easiest way to put President of the United States of America Barack Hussein Obama back in Washington, D. C. and have him stay there is to have him confirm that he has never subscribed a written oath “to support this Constitution.” My students get help with letters that establish their freedom and independence by use of proofs found in the Constitution of September 17, 1787. My students do not make any of the dumb mistakes Rush Limbaugh often makes. Rush told Sean Hannity recently that Barack Hussein Obama was his President. Barack Hussein Obama is only your President if you are a government employee or a resident of territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
Barack Obama was duly elected by the Electoral College to be President of the United States of America and like every other President of the United States of America appointed himself to the Office of President of the United States.
President of the United States of America Barack Hussein Obama is not my President. Not one President since George Washington has told the truth about his oath and his office. Why would anyone accept a person as a leader, who refuses to be bound by a written oath?
Become a student and learn how you can prove that Barack Hussein Obama is not your President. Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
13
WHAT IS THE TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS LOCATED WITHIN THE 50 STATES?
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Northwest Ordinance, Oath of Office, Property Taxes, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment
This is an often asked question and the following admittedly short answer is the one I provided to a prospective student:
The territorial jurisdiction of all, local, State and federal trial courts is limited to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. This is so, because written law cannot be made for territory that does not belong to the only legitimate government in the land located between Canada and Mexico.
The United States of America was established as a legitimate Confederacy government of the United States of America by the Articles of Confederation. The so-called faults of the Articles of Confederation are factually correct, but any negative connotations are strictly opinion. The repeal or replacement of the Articles of Confederation by the Constitution of the United States is unsupported by any evidence, which, of course, means the Articles of Confederation are still valid and binding on the government of the United States of America. The government of the United States of America is, also, strictly limited to the delegated powers found in the Articles of Confederation themselves.
The Constitution of the United States has two meanings. The Constitution of the United States in the oral oath of the President of the United States cannot mean the written Constitution of September 17, 1787, because an oral oath cannot support a written Constitution. The written Constitution of the United States begins when the First Congress of the United States enacts, in the very first act of Congress, the written oath to be taken by all the new officers of the new government. The construction of the Constitution of the United States then proceeds piece by piece in accordance with the needs of the Senate of the United States of America, the Congress of the United States and the President of the United States. Gradually, what constitutes the Constitution of the United States falls to the Supreme Court of the United States.
The Government of the United States is an instrument of the government of the Confederacy, the United States of America, where the United States is the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. The Confederacy, the United States of America, is conceded not to have the power of taxation or legislation over its member States, however, that restriction cannot apply to its own property¾the United States of the Northwest Territory. All taxation and legislation is and must be limited to the government and territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
The government that is granted all the legislative power of Article I Section 1 the Constitution of September 17, 1787 is the government of the United States of America in the form of the Senate and the elected representatives of those Americans who have decided to be Citizens of the United States by registering to vote. This Constitution grants all legislative power to “a” Congress, of which there are two¾a Senate and House of Representatives and another that is just the Senate.
The House of Representatives is a rouse, a dodge, a gimmick to obtain the consent of those who would be governed, after all the Declaration of Independence requires that those who will not be governed by God must give consent to be ruled by government and to introduce the concept of direct taxation of property as a function of the Article I Section 2 Clause 3 direct taxation. The vote is the commonly accepted means by which men and women give up to government their right to govern themselves.
Prior to July 4, 1776, the source of all government power in British America was the English monarchy. The thirteen original States first existed as chartered British colonies. The Declaration of Independence elevated the status of all men to the status of monarchs first, as to authority over their own bodies and secondarily to the property they possessed.
The status of all men being equal and the numbers of the poor always exceeding those who are rich an oligarchy arose to protect the property of the rich in America. This propertied oligarchy devised in a secret Constitutional Convention a hybrid government that resembled both a Roman republic and a democracy. This pseudo government built around an illusory constitution and a territory owned exclusively by the United States of America is the only one known to the American hoi polloi.
The rich men of newly freed America used their concocted constitutional government to convince the lesser propertied rich that a Congress of the United States and a President of the United States could “preserve, protect and defend” their property as well as the territory and other property of the United States of America.
As with all unscrupulous property managers, Congress and the President of the United States have come to regard the territory and other property of the United States of America as their own and to add to that the property of the rest of Americans.
Congress and the President of the United States regularly consolidate their power by the redistribution of wealth back to those who actively support them. Who supplies the wealth to be redistributed to the richest of the rich? The shrinking middle class is losing the most and at the fastest pace.
The sale of your property for your failure to pay property taxes is analogous to what is known in landlord tenant law as “unlawful detainer,” the legal process used to dispossess a tenant in default of the conveyance by which the tenant gained possession. There is a significant difference between your situation and that of a defaulting tenant¾you are the owner.
The record of your title, however, will show that your property is not located in Nebraska. Within Nebraska will be found the State of Nebraska, which is the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
By literally placing your property in the State of Nebraska, you have subjected yourself to taxation and the jurisdiction of a foreign government. You have in a sense subjected yourself to a kind of mental slavery specific to a place that for most people only exists on paper.
To make the necessary corrections to the written record regarding you and your property ownership, you must have full and complete knowledge of how all the calamities you are now experiencing came to pass. This is the knowledge you will acquire when you take the basic law and government course, which you can begin by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com .
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
11
Jesus Christ changed the world by His incessant chiding of the Jew’s obsessive reliance on written law.
Christ began His ministry by rejecting Satan’s tempting offer of the power and authority of all governments. Neither the Jews nor the governments have modified their reliance on written laws since Jesus Christ’s crucifixion.
People like Von Brunn, who hate the Jews for a variety of bad reasons, have good reason to suspect governments given their past satanic association. Jews and governments are bound by a reliance on written law, however, Jews are only guilty by their association with governments.
The devil is, indeed, in the details that only written law can have. The so-called Founding Fathers gave in to Satan’s temptations and the results of their collaborations can be found in the posts and the curriculum of my law and government school.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Jun
10
DEAR SHEPARD SMITH: foxreport@foxnews.com
Filed Under CONSTITUTION, Oath of Office, OBAMA, PRESIDENTS | Leave a Comment
This explains why President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama doesn’t have to meet any of the qualifications set out in Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution to be eligible to the Office of President. George Washington, the first person elected President on February 4, 1789, wouldn’t qualify for 14 Years residency within the United States until July 5, 1790, so on April 30, 1789 he took the oral oath of Office of President of the United States, which has no stated qualifications. Article VI of the Constitution requires “all executive and judicial Officers” to “be bound by Oath or Affirmation,” which means that the oath or affirmation has to be signed by the person to be bound, according to the Statute of Frauds of 1677. No President of the United States has ever subscribed his oath of office.
Any good reporter can verify all the facts presented and allow Fox News viewers to decide what is true.
Signed: A Student of Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera