• Pages

  • CONTACT ED RIVERA
  • LETTER TO CAPTIVES
  • REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

• Recent Posts

  • Collectors of Internal Revenue and Deputy Collectors of Internal Revenue were Officers of the United States of America before their Offices were abolished.
  • IRS DIRECTOR LOIS LERNER PUT ON PAID ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE AFTER SHE REFUSES TO RESIGN
  • INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE CONSERVATIVE TARGETING SCANDAL
  • HOW SIMPLE CAN I MAKE THE STUDY OF LAW?
  • IF YOU DON’T VOLUNTARILY PAY A PROPERTY TAX BILL, WHICH GOVERNMENT OFFICER HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CALCULATE ANY AMOUNT ALLEGEDLY DUE AND DEMAND THAT AMOUNT BE PAID?

• Categories

  • Adoption
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 5
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 8
  • Article III
  • Articles of Confederation
  • BAIL OUT
  • BANKRUPTCY
  • CENSUS
  • CIVIL CONTEMPT
  • COMMON LAW
  • CONGRESS
  • CONSTITUTION
  • CRIMINAL LAW
  • Declaration of Independence
  • Economic Stimulous
  • Electoral College
  • Foreclosure
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • FREEDOM
  • GAY MARRIAGE
  • GRAND JURY
  • IMMIGRATION
  • IMPEACHMENT
  • JURY DUTY
  • LAW OF THE LAND
  • LEARNING THE LAW
  • LIBERTARIAN
  • Martial Law
  • MAYAN 2012
  • Northwest Ordinance
  • Oath of Office
  • OBAMA
  • ORGANIC LAWS
  • PARDON
  • Presidential Elector
  • PRESIDENTS
  • ProperTea Tax Tea Party
  • Property Taxes
  • PROPRIETARY POWER
  • Second Amendment
  • State of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • TRIAL BY JURY
  • U.S. District Court
  • Uncategorized

• Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Most Americans dislike the Congress of the United States more than practically anything else in government.  The House of Representatives has always been elected by the voters in the States and since 1913 registered voters have elected the Senators of the Senate, as well.  Even though the voters of the States pick the members of Congress, Mark Twain’s remark that Congress is the best money can buy has always been true.  Members of Congress are not bound to real oaths¾they fake them.

Why does that make the Congresses so bad?   Congress has always been a corrupt conspiracy.  George Washington covered his tracks so well I have not been able to find any evidence of a conspiracy between George Washington and another person, but the “Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives” was always conspiratorial.  There is no acting alone in Congress, from September 17, 1787 to the present, Congress has conspired to create the illusion that it lawfully makes legislation outside territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.

George Washington took the oral employment oath of Office that was already in the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  The first act of Congress was to create an oath that looked like an oath, but did not bind the person to any high moral standard.  The Congress wasn’t under oath when the oath was first created and the oath created on June 1, 1789 didn’t bind anyone to much of anything.

The deviousness of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 is a direct result of its orphan status, because George Washington and the First Congress refused to adopt it by taking and being bound by the Article VI oath.  Ratification of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 by all the States creates a non-binding paper copy of a Constitution now called the Constitution of the United States.   Congress, the President of the United States and President of the United States of America are free to ignore it because they are not bound by oath to support it as a written document.  Their obligation is to the preservation, protection and defense of the territory and property belonging to the United States of America.

Right now there is a lot of rage and frustration being shown to members of Congress by many unhappy Americans.  Unhappiness with Congress is an American tradition.  If you want to make a clean break with that tradition and the corrupt American Congress contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com  for Student enrollment information.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera  

 

       

George Washington and the Founding Fathers used their knowledge of the written law to steal the country from the people and place them under martial law.  Washington and his crew in the Constitutional Convention met in secret in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787 to undo the Declaration of Independence and Articles of Confederation.  By the time the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was being delivered to the United States in Congress assembled for submission to the States, there were no Articles of Confederation and all that was left of the Declaration of Independence was an obligation to Consent to be Governed by half of the vote plus one.

All the major secrets of American government are revealed in the more than 200 posts on this website.  If you haven’t been able to figure out the law and government from what I have posted, it’s because you still believe in the Founding Fathers, Uncle Sam, Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.  Ordinary attorneys are no help.  They will only help themselves to your property. 

Government is growing at your expense, because government is like any organism that must grow or it will begin to die.  It’s eaten AIG, Chrysler, GM and it is poised to eat you out of your house and home, if you let it.  Don’t let it.  Learn the law and how government has always fed on the people contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com and I will help you stop socialism’s theft of your property.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera     

Yet another American historian has reported that the Articles of Confederation and Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 are not part of the founding documents that make up the Organic Law.  Author Joseph J. Ellis, writing in the Sunday August 9 Los Angeles Times, wrote:  “Our two founding documents embody the tension in its classical form.”  The tension he is referring to is that which exists between those “who regard government as ‘them’ and those who see it as ‘us.’”

There would be no tension if historians stuck to the facts and considered the other half of the Organic Law of the United States of America.  Ellis claims the founding documents to be the Declaration of Independence and Constitution.  He is wrong by two.  The Declaration of Independence is dated, significantly, July 4, 1776 its natural pair is the Articles of Confederation dated November 15, 1777.  Together these two founding documents were sufficient to defeat the English, the greatest military power in the world at the time.

The Constitution was created in the secret Constitutional Convention beginning May 25, 1787 and was submitted to the United States in Congress assembled on September 17, 1787.  The Constitution of September 17, 1787 is naturally paired with the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, because both the Northwest Ordinance and the Constitution have the same purpose: the creation of a government for the territory lost by Britain to the Americans.  The Northwest Ordinance created a temporary government and the Constitution created a permanent government, not just for the Northwest Territory, but for all future territory belonging to the United States of America.

Ellis, in his article, recognizes, as he must, that the Declaration of Independence frees American mankind from government within the thirteen states.  However, he concludes “[T]he Constitution enshrines ‘the people’ as the sovereign agent, with a Bill of Rights that defines a protected region where government cannot intrude, but otherwise identifies a collective interest best managed by a federal government empowered to make decisions for the society as a whole.”  Having freed the “one People,” of the Declaration of Independence, from the shackles of the English nobility, American history must eliminate half of the Organic Law of the United States of America to make them the subjects of government once again.  There are only two bases for government: tyranny by rule of man and the rule of God through kings.  The Declaration of Independence made all men equal and all men equal to those who would be kings.

Historians like Ellis have been doing the federal government’s dirty work by simply ignoring inconvenient truths.  How long they will continue to do so depends on you.  The Declaration of Independence is deservedly celebrated every July 4^th, because it does free the “one People” of the newly freed, sovereign and independent states from the English monarchy and any other government, if they refuse to consent.

A person consents to be governed by registering to vote in any election.  Once a person withdraws or cancels federal voter registration, the missing Organic Laws reemerge as founding documents and they can be used to explain why the federal government is limited to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.

Freedom is not free, but it is not expensive.  To become a Student of law and government contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com   To find the rest of the truth about author and historian Joseph J. Ellis, just do an Internet search.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera                

        

George Washington is the father of his country, because he actually defeated the adoption of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and replaced it with the abridged version the Constitution of the United States or U.S. Constitution, for short.  At noon on April 30, 1789, George Washington swore this oath to secure the assets of the Confederacy for the benefits of the Freemasons:

“I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. So help me God.”        

The Constitution of the United States and the U.S. Constitution are both phrases that identify the land that consists of the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America and the authority given the Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives, the President of the United States and the U.S. Supreme Court.

Article VI Clause 2 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, the written constitution, which has not been adopted, is clearly identified eleven times as “this Constitution.” 

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.     

Article VI Clause 2 drops out of the Constitution of the United States and U.S. Constitution, because “this Constitution” has not been adopted.  However, when the Constitution of the United States or the U.S. Constitution is being forced on the public those constitutions are the supreme law of the land.  A whole nation of people is being bullied by a constitution that isn’t even a piece of paper.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera 

  

A George shredded the Constitution way before George W. Bush got to it.  George Washington made sure the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was just for show by refusing to take an oath to support it, thus making it an orphan at less than two years.

Adoption of the Constitution is very important for freedom.  Without adoption, the branches and Officers of government can do just about anything they want.  Presidential candidates can be elected without having to be Citizens of any kind.

How is a Constitution kept an orphan?  First, you create it in secret; its parentage is unknown.  Then, you rig the christening so there is no one to support it.  Last, you confuse those who do support it, as to what they are supporting.

John Bouvier brought out the 6^th Edition of his Law Dictionary in 1856, “adapted to the Constitution and laws of the United States of America and of the several states of the American Union.”  The definition provided for “Adoption” has nothing to do with the Constitution.   To this day attorneys, judges and legal scholars believe the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was adopted when presented to the United States in Congress assembled for ratification by the States, upon the ratification by nine States or on the “Establishment” between the ratifying nine States.

Adoption, of course, required a government to take a binding oath “to support this Constitution,” something, which has never been done.

The good news is some of my students will be ready soon to teach you the law and government.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera    

   

Had George Washington been eligible to the Office of President and had he taken the Article VI oath of Office “to support this Constitution,” he would have appointed someone to be President of the United States.  

That President of the United States would have been limited to approving or objecting to Bills applicable only to the federal government and the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.   

Is Chief Justice John Roberts constitutionally ignorant or guilty of violating this federal law:

 Title 18 United States Code Sec. 1016. Acknowledgment of appearance or oath

    Whoever, being an officer authorized to administer oaths or to take and certify acknowledgments, knowingly makes any false acknowledgment, certificate, or statement concerning the appearance before him or the taking of an oath or affirmation by any person with respect to any proposal, contract, bond, undertaking, or other matter submitted to, made with, or taken on behalf of the United States or any department or agency thereof, concerning which an oath or affirmation is required by law or lawful regulation, or with respect to the financial standing of any principal, surety, or other party to any such proposal, contract, bond, undertaking, or other instrument, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

Both George Washington and Barack Obama were elected Presidents of the United States of America by Presidential Electors.  Washington was already a war hero.  Barack Hussein Obama won a very expensive popularity contest that didn’t decide anything. 

Nothing in the Constitution of September 17, 1787 requires the President of the United States of America to take any oath “before he enters on the execution of his Office.” 

The President of the United States, a different Office, is required to take an oral oath:

Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:¾“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”  

Apparently, neither George Washington nor Barack Obama qualified for the Office of President.  Washington was elected too early to meet the July 4, 1790 date for the fourteen years residency within the United States and Obama can’t qualify for an Office that has been vacant for 220 years.  This what the media has missed and what it could have discovered with a little research.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera 

The controversy over Barack Obama’s eligibility for the Office of President requires a re-examination of Article II Section 1 Clause 5:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.  

George Washington was not a natural born Citizen of one of the thirteen States and he could not become a Citizen of the United States until the “Adoption of this Constitution.”

Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Ed. defines “adopt” as, “[T]o accept, consent to, and put into effective operation; as in the case of a constitution, constitutional amendment, ordinance, or by-law.”    “Adoption of this Constitution,” thus, requires its constitutional Officers to take the Article VI oath “to support this Constitution.”

The “natural born Citizen or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution” qualification does not apply to George Washington, because neither he nor any member of Congress has taken the oath “to support this Constitution.”  “This Constitution” has not been adopted, so there is no “time of the Adoption of this Constitution.” The oaths of the person eligible to the Office of President and all the members of Congress “to support this Constitution” that are needed to “put into effective operation,” a government having as territory the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America and the populations residing there, have never been taken and subscribed.  “This Constitution” truly is just a piece of paper.  

George Washington does not take the Article VI oath “to support this Constitution,” because no American will be eligible to the Office of President until after July 4, 1790.  Instead of taking the oath that would act as “the Adoption of this Constitution,” Washington takes the oath of Office of President of the United States, which implies “adoption” of a “Constitution of the United States.”

Incompetent American historians mistakenly view Washington’s taking of the oath of Office of the President of the United States as meeting the constitutional requirements for “the Adoption of this Constitution.”  The Constitution of the United States begins as the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America and then begins to morph into a writing from parts cannibalized from “this Constitution,” by the Congress of the United States and the President of the United States.  The United States Supreme Court then takes any formal objections to this construction and gives a “final opinion.”

The Article II Section 1 Clause 5, Office of President, of “this Constitution” becomes the President of the United States under the Constitution of the United States making the original “Office of President” and any qualifications for the President of the United States vanish. 

Become a student and learn how the Founding Fathers, also, made your unalienable rights disappear.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera 

Article II Section 1 Clause 5 sets out clearly what it takes to be eligible to the Office of President:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. 

The language is clear as to whether a certain person can qualify to an Office and not a title.  The title of President can be as much a title of nobility as that of a duke or earl.  Article II Section 1 Clause 5, therefor, establishes qualifications for the Office of President and not for President.

Just as clearly as the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 establishes eligibility, nowhere in the Constitution is eligibility determined for the Offices of President of the United States of America or President of the United States.

Barack Obama must keep up the myth that the oath of Office for the Office of President is the same oath of Office for the Office of President of the United States.  Barack Obama cannot be caught claiming authority to the Office of President.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera   

← Previous Page