Oct
30
FEDERAL JUDGE DAVID O. CARTER DISMISSED OBAMA “BIRTHER” SUIT YESTERDAY
Filed Under Article II Section 1 Clause 5, LEARNING THE LAW, Oath of Office, OBAMA | 1 Comment
The suit brought by Mission Viejo, California attorney Orly Taitz that sought to prove Barack Hussein Obama was not a natural born Citizen and, therefore, not eligible to the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 Office of President was dismissed October 29th.
The news reports state the judge wrote a 30 page decision explaining why he ruled as he did. The judge’s reasoning is unimportant, because it fails to address what anyone of my students can easily prove: the Office of President has never been occupied.
Article II Section 1 Clause 5 sets out more than citizenship and a minimum age for the Office of President. George Washington, the first person to take the oral oath of the Office of President of the United States did so, because he could not meet the “fourteen Years a Resident within the United States” eligibility requirement.
If you become a Student, you will be taught the various secrets of “this Constitution.” One of those secrets is the date from which “fourteen Years a Resident within the United States” is counted. Here is a clue: no person can be eligible until after July 4, 1790. If you know the date, you have what it takes to be a legal genius.
George Washington was elected too early to fill the Office of President, but that was just one part of the plan to take over the government. To find out more, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Oct
28
PUTTING LEGAL GENIUS TO GOOD USE
Filed Under COMMON LAW, Foreclosure, LAW OF THE LAND, Martial Law, ORGANIC LAWS, Property Taxes, State of California, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
I teach ordinary people how to become legal geniuses by learning the origin of unwritten and written law. Being a legal genius is a lot like being a successful rocket scientist, you won’t succeed and you won’t get noticed, unless you put your payload into orbit. What would a Student, who has become a legal genius, do with his legal knowledge? One of several Students is interested in correcting the deed that makes him legal owner of his home. What’s wrong with his deed? His deed states that his home is located in the State of Wisconsin, which we know is territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. This Student wants a deed that puts his home, where the English common law is the law.
Glen Beck, the Fox News personality is claiming that the government will be securing a new series of currency with, you guessed it, territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
If you believe like Glen Beck that salvation is a matter of restoring the Constitution and revering George Washington and the Founding Fathers, you are going to need all the extra help you can get. Paying the $500 tuition for my Basic Course in Law and Government is cheap compared to $41,500 for one year’s tuition at Harvard Law School.
I teach what is not taught at Harvard and I show my Students how to get their “claim” that their property is not in the State of Wisconsin into orbit by putting it on top of the Organic Law. The county recorder of deeds has never read any of the Organic Law and won’t begin now. That officer does understand the written law and regulations that concern the administration of the officer he or she occupies. That statute law says what can be filed and what can be recorded by him or her. Somewhere in the law of the State of Wisconsin, or any other State, will be found the law that limits the county recorder to filing and recording documents that affect title to property located only within the State of Wisconsin and his or her specific county. I teach Students how to find that law.
If you become one of my Students, you will be learning the law in its proper order, but the bureaucrat only knows statute law and regulations instituted to administer statute law. To successfully present your case to the administrative bureaucrat, you must present this law to the bureaucrat in reverse order to the way you will be taught the law or the county recorder will not get to that part of the law that limits what he or she does to the State of Wisconsin.
State law in the State of Wisconsin requires the recorder to act in a specific way. Tap into that law and all you have to do is the factual work of proving your property is not territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Oct
18
REVEALED GOVERNMENT SECRETS: THE UNITED STATES SENATE AND THE SECRET START DATE FOR THE CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Filed Under Adoption, Article II Section 1 Clause 8, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, LEARNING THE LAW, Northwest Ordinance, Oath of Office, OBAMA, PRESIDENTS, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
It is a government secret that no member of Senate has ever taken and been bound by the oath of Office for “Senators and Representatives before mentioned” found in Clause 3 of Article VI of the Constitution for the United States of America. This Constitution makes possible the creation of two “governments,” a Government of the United States, which will manage and administer the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America and a government bound “to support this Constitution” that will manage and administer the first government. George Washington is elected to be President of the second government, but takes the oral oath of Office of President of the United States, the first government, which has prevented the formation of any second government.
The Constitution for the United States of America is the same as the Constitution of September 17, 1787. This Constitution is the one presented to the United States in Congress assembled by the secret Constitutional Convention, which had met in Philadelphia beginning May 25, 1787. The Framers of this Constitution have gone to great efforts to refer to the Constitution of September 17, 1787 as “this Constitution” eleven times in order to distinguish it from another contained within the same instrument. The secret Constitutional Convention was a conspiracy only if it could be proven that “this Constitution” was the same as “the Constitution of the United States” and it was not. The proof was to be found in the document itself.
The other Constitution contained within the Constitution of September 17, 1787 is the Constitution of the United States, which is the one George Washington takes, an oral oath to “preserve, protect and defend.” On the date of his inauguration, April 30, 1789, Washington was not eligible to any Office, which required the Article VI oath, so he took an oral oath to “preserve, protect and defend” the proprietary interests of the United States of America in the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
Once in the Office of President of the United States, George Washington, could perform the Article I Section 7 Clauses 2 & 3 duties of that Office and together, with “a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives,” to form a much less temporary government, for the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America, than the one ordained by the United States in Congress assembled in the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787.
Once Washington took the oral oath to the Office of President of the United States, the future territory of any federal government was limited to the kind represented by the Northwest Territory. Once the First Congress consisting of the eleven States was elected, that legislative body could enact a legislative oath of Office patterned after the oral oath taken by George Washington and that was, in fact, its very first act. Both the Congress and the President of the United States would be free to interpret the written Constitution of September 17, 1787 any way they wanted, because they were not bound by an Article VI oath “to support this Constitution.” The federal government was born fractured and has only become worse.
The rest of this report is only available to those who have become enrolled Students by paying the $500 tuition for the Basic Course in Law and Government. You are guaranteed, as a Student, to become a legal genius in a year or less or your tuition will be refunded. There is only one course of legal instruction guaranteed to make you smarter than Barack Hussein Obama, Barney Frank or anyone else in Washington, D. C. and that is my Basic Course in Law and Government. To become a Student contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Oct
15
ARE YOU GOING TO PAY FOR BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA ‘S NATIONAL DEBT?
Filed Under LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW | Leave a Comment
Did you know the Organic Law of the United States of America is your assurance that you can enjoy all the privileges and immunities of being a citizen without being burdened with any of the obligations? Well, you can if you follow the procedure pioneered by Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera.
The tuition for the Basic Course in Law and Government, which will make you a legal genius, is $500. If after 13 months of instruction, you are not a legal genius, your tuition will be refunded.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Oct
7
REAL PROPERTY ASSESSOR AND PROPERTY TAX COLLECTOR¾WIELDERS OF GOVERNMENT POWERS OR PAPER SHUFFLERS?
Filed Under Adoption, CONSTITUTION, Foreclosure, Fourteenth Amendment, Property Taxes, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
If you have a note and mortgage or trust deed and lien on your home, there is a 50% chance that you are “upside down” or “underwater” with respect to your equity in your home.
Half of you owe more than your house is worth, yet you will still be expected to pay property taxes. If the prospect of paying property taxes for steadily deteriorating public services, weren’t enough to cause you to give up completely there is the looming prospect of an increase in the interest rate you must pay on your home loan.
Do not despair. The end of this world approaches and a better new one is coming.
The literal world is coming to an end and a world that does not depend on the written word will replace it.
Long before the second section of the Fourteenth Amendment was claimed to have amended Article I Section 2 Clause 3, that section and clause of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was the fallback source of a State’s power to make laws and impose direct taxes on property located within each of the States that had ratified this Constitution. Your State imposes property taxes on the land you own and the home on that land which are the improvements to that land based on a statement in that State’s constitution that all property with certain exceptions is taxable. That statement in the constitution is based on the Constitution of the United States and nothing else.
Article I Section 2 Clause 3 is authority to impose direct taxes on property other than real property:
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound t to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.
The States of the second more perfect Union are comprised of territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. These States cannot, according to Article IV of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, impose taxes “on lands the property of the United States.”
You can confirm that your State has no authority to impose a property tax on your land and any improvements to that land by asking the property tax assessor and property tax collector in “your” county for proof of their authority to assess and to collect taxes.
When gold and silver was the coin of the realm, tax collectors had to be bonded, so that the government was protected from an absconding collector. Property tax collectors are not required to be bonded, because property taxes are paid voluntarily with fiat currency. Sure, a property tax bill is sent out, but that was done at your request. Somewhere on the deed to your property will appear the request to send the property tax bill to you.
To learn all the laws about direct taxes, real property taxes and government enroll as a student by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Oct
6
IF ROMAN POLANSKI HAD TAKEN THE BASIC COURSE IN LAW AND GOVERNMENT
Filed Under COMMON LAW, CONGRESS, CRIMINAL LAW, GRAND JURY, JURY DUTY, LAW OF THE LAND, State of California, Territorial Jurisdiction, TRIAL BY JURY | Leave a Comment
Roman Polanski was charged with a written law crime decades ago in California to which he pleaded guilty then he fled before he could be sentenced. Now he is in custody in Switzerland awaiting extradition paperwork from the Los Angeles County District Attorney.
California like 48 of the other common law states substitutes California Codes for the common law. The Los Angeles County District Attorney pretends that all so-called crimes that occur within the Los Angeles County lines fall within his federal district that include the Veteran’s Administration Hospital and Los Padres National forest. The VA has its own Zip Code 90073, which is the most heavily populated federal enclave in an area of millions. This is where federal jurors would have to come from and this is where the State of California juror, the “domiciliary” lives.
If Roman Polanski had taken my Basic Course in Law and Government, he would be telling his high priced attorneys to drop the legal bomb on the State of California’s written law system.
Polanski is a punk and a pervert. You are probably a patriot and all around good guy. Are you waiting for the gendarmes to knock on your door before you start preparing a legal defense. The Congress of the United States is preparing legislation that will make it a federal offense not to have health insurance. Prepare for the worse by enrolling as a Student. Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Oct
3
WHAT DOES THIS CONSTITUTION MEAN: LAW OF THE LAND?
Filed Under Adoption, Article II Section 1 Clause 5, Article II Section 1 Clause 8, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Oath of Office | Leave a Comment
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. Article VI Clause 2
This Constitution was established between the first nine States that ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787. On December 7, 1787, the State of Delaware became the first State to ratify this Constitution. The State of Pennsylvania, on December 12, 1787 became the second State to ratify this Constitution. On December 18, 1787, the State of New Jersey became the third State to ratify this Constitution. On January 2, 1788, the State of Georgia became the fourth State to ratify this Constitution. On January 9, 1788, the State of Connecticut became the fifth State to ratify this Constitution. On February 6, 1788, the State of Massachusetts became the sixth State to ratify this Constitution. On April 28, 1788, the State of Maryland became the seventh State to ratify this Constitution. On May 23, 1788, the State of South Carolina became the eighth State to ratify this Constitution. On June 21, 1788, the State of New Hampshire became the ninth State to ratify this Constitution. On June 25, 1788, the State of Virginia became the tenth State to ratify this Constitution. On July 26, 1788, the State of New York became the eleventh State to ratify this Constitution. On November 21, 1789, the State of North Carolina became the twelfth State to ratify this Constitution. The State of Rhode Island became the thirteenth State to ratify the Constitution on May 29, 1790.
There were, however, no “Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof.” This Constitution required binding oaths in support by all members of Congress and the person elected to the Office of President. George Washington abandoned that Office by becoming President of the United States on April 30, 1789.
This Constitution may have been eventually ratified and established by all thirteen States, but it was never adopted by a Congress or a President of the United States. All the laws, which have been made by the Congresses and Presidents of the United States have been made pursuant to “the Constitution of the United States,” a different kind of constitution supported by proprietary power not legislative power.
The remainder of this lesson on the meaning of the phrase, “Law of the Land” is available only to my enrolled Students. To see if you can qualify, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Oct
2
SENATOR: IS IT TRUE THAT THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION WERE NOT REPLACED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF SEPTEMBER 17, 1787?
Filed Under Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, LEARNING THE LAW, Northwest Ordinance, ORGANIC LAWS | Leave a Comment
Dear United States Senator:
I am an enrolled Student in Dr. Rivera’s Internet Law and Government School. He has prepared this letter, so his Students can confirm that contrary to what Wikipedia claims the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 has not been replaced by the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
Dr. Rivera teaches that the Organic Law of the United States of America consisting of the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the Constitution of September 17, 1787, which precedes the United States Code limits the 50 Titles of that Code to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
Dr. Rivera shows his Students that the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 repeals the earlier Northwest Ordinance of April 23, 1784 in the concluding sentence of that Organic Law and that no similar language appears anywhere in the Constitution of September 17, 1787. Dr. Rivera teaches that the absence of any language of repeal with reference to the Articles of Confederation means the Articles of Confederation are in full force and effect.
The remainder of this letter is available only to enrolled Students of Dr. Rivera. To become a Student of Dr. Rivera, contact him at edrivera@edrivera.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Oct
1
NOTICE TO COUNTY PROPERTY TAX ASSESSOR AND TAX COLLECTOR: PROVE YOUR AUTHORITY OR CEASE AND DESIST
Filed Under Adoption, Articles of Confederation, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, LEARNING THE LAW, Martial Law, ORGANIC LAWS, Territorial Jurisdiction | Leave a Comment
As an officially enrolled Student of the great legal scholar Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera, I have been shown how American history has been distorted so governments can claim the Articles of Confederation have been replaced by the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
The purpose of this pretended destruction of the second most important fundamental law was to allow the fraudulent replacement of that document with the un-adopted Constitution of September 17, 1787 for a government of territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
The Articles of Confederation created the United States of America as a Confederacy of free, independent and sovereign States and as such the thirteen original States were incapable of delegating to the United States in Congress assembled any power or authority over the American people, which those States did not possess.
When the Declaration of Independence was served on King George III, he responded by imposing military law on what he considered still to be British colonies. When King George III lost the American Revolution, that military defeat cost Britain government control and power over the American States.
The American victory over the British and the defeat of the British did not confer British power and authority to the thirteen American States. The British were defeated in America, when the American people refused to accept the British king as their ruler.
The British king had the power and authority to make law for the American people and to enforce it against them. He lost that power and authority in defeat to the American people.
The Articles of Confederation did not delegate the power to tax or the power to legislate to the United States of America, because the thirteen original States did not receive them by peace treaty with Britain or by any other means.
American historians claim the Articles of Confederation were replaced by the Constitution of September 17, 1787, because that deception is the only means by which any American government can claim authority to make laws and to tax Americans not on the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. Every American’s power to create wealth by his or her own self-government of personal and real property is an unalienable Right not subject to tax or legislation.
The balance of this letter to county officers who claim authority to impose direct taxes on the property of America is available only to my Students. Those who are willing to make a financial and personal investment of time to thought and study are invited to become Students by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com .
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera