The Constitution of the United States, which like a phoenix arose from the ashes of the un-adopted Constitution of September 17, 1787, is the source of legislation only for the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. The Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives is vested with all the legislative power and that power is limited to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
Wikipedia claims, but cannot prove the Constitution of the United States superceded the Articles of Confederation. The Wikipedia idea being that replacing the Articles of Confederation with no power to tax or make laws with a Constitution of the United States made it possible for the Congress of the United States to tax and make laws for the inhabitants of the states of the perpetual Union, the United States of America.
Citizens are people who are the subjects of government meaning they are the subjects of government laws. To overcome the problem of having a government among the newly freed people of America, the Articles of Confederation required the States to recognize political equality. The assurance of non-citizen equality is found in Article IV of the Articles of Confederation:
The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different states in this union, the free inhabitants of each of these states, paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from Justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several states; and the people of each state shall have free ingress and regress to and from any other state, and shall enjoy therein all the privileges of trade and commerce, subject to the same duties, impositions and restrictions as the inhabitants thereof respectively, provided that such restriction shall not extend so far as to prevent the removal of property imported into any state, to any other state of which the Owner is an inhabitant; provided also that no imposition, duties or restriction shall be laid by any state, on the property of the united states, or either of them.
There is no proof that the Articles of Confederation have been replaced, repealed or superceded by the Constitution of the United States, the Constitution of September 17, 1787 or any other law the Organic Law being superior to all others.
So-called illegal immigrants are “free inhabitants” of the states of the perpetual Union and not the illegal aliens of the United States. The law is the law not what Lou Dobbs and Bill O’Reilly think it is. If you want to know what the law really is, you must enroll in the only law school that can teach you to be a legal genius. Contact me at email@example.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Former federal judge and Attorney General Michael Mukasey in a November 14, 2009 interview on the Fox News Network claimed there was little the families of the 9-11 victims could do to stop the planned prosecutions in the Southern District of New York.
Mukasey is wrong. The United States Department of Justice must obtain a true bill of indictment from a federal grand jury, before any case can be brought against Khalid Shaikh Mohammed. To get a true bill of indictment, the federal grand jurors must be qualified.
New Yorkers do not qualify to be federal grand jurors because none of them reside within the district, which is the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America in the counties of Bronx, Dutchess, New York, Orange, Putnam, Rockland, and Suffolk. Federal grand jurors must reside on federal territory and there are none that qualify in New York. The United States Supreme Court case Test v. United States, 420 U.S. 28 (1975) establishes the absolute right of a federal criminal defendant to make a motion to dismiss the indictment because the grand jurors are not qualified.
The families of 9-11 victims must inform the United States Department of Justice that the military commissions are the only safe method of prosecuting Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and his co- conspirators.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
The administration of Barack Hussein Obama will prosecute Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the September 11 attacks, and four September 11 co-conspirators in the United States district court in Manhattan, New York rather than before a military commission. The decision not to prosecute by military commission has ignited a sharp political debate. The United States district courts are military trial courts for civilians (non-military) litigants.
Title 28 of the United States Code, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure requires that district court judges reside within the district, which is the federal territory within the counties that comprise the district. The judges of the federal district court in Manhattan have been exempted from the residence rule. Grand and petit jurors cannot be excused from their one-year within the district residency requirement.
The decision to use the United States district court was announced by Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who said he would instruct prosecutors to seek death sentences for Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and his co-conspirators. Mr. Holder should have by now discovered why he is a General in charge of the Department of Justice. One of the federal government’s biggest secrets is the military power basis of the United States district courts. Justice is what is purportedly dispensed by an occupying military force or a ruling monarch.
Should the trial actually take place in Manhattan it would mean one of the highest-profile and highest-security terrorism trials in history would be set within blocks from where hijackers for Al Qaeda destroyed the World Trade Center, killing nearly 3,000 people. Such a trial may take years to conclude and in those years, aggressive defense counsel will surely become aware of the problems the federal government will begin to have with the factors involved in territorial jurisdiction.
Deciding to prosecute the 9-11 terrorists in the United States district court in Manhattan was one of the dumbest things Barack Hussein Obama has done recently. Bleeding heart liberal attorneys will do anything to save someone from a government execution.
To learn how Barack Hussein Obama is jeopardizing the successful prosecution of the 9-11 terrorists, enroll in my Basic Course in Law and Government by contacting me at firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
United States Army officials intend to charge Major Nidal M. Hasan with premeditated murder in the November 5th killing of 12 soldiers and a civilian at Fort Hood’s Soldier Readiness Processing Center, which also left 38 people wounded.
The court that will try Major Hasan for murder will without question have the trappings of the United States military. The flag of the United States identified in Title 4 United States Code Section 1 will be a focal point of those trappings, however, that flag will be symbolic of the executive power of the United States Government, by the addition of gold braid or fringe.
All United States flags displayed in government courtrooms and offices will have the gold fringe emblematic of executive authority.
All government courts display the gold fringed United States flags as a visual notice that the proceedings that take place there are not based in law, but in military authority legislated by the Congress of the United States.
Written government law is supreme where that territory is owned by and ceded to the United States of America. I teach how George Washington brilliantly overthrew the civilian government under the Articles of Confederation and replaced it with the military model that is in place to this day.
You will not see the fringed flag displayed when the President is acting diplomatically as President of the United States of America. It is not sufficient just to notice the appropriate display of the fringe on the flag that will only make you part of the lunatic fringe.
To fully understand law and government, you must enroll in my Basic Course in Law and Government. The $500 tuition is a modest 1% of what a year at Harvard costs. Famous Harvard Law School graduate Barack Hussein Obama was taught government can make you buy health insurance and make it a federal crime if you don’t. Don’t waste your money at a traditional law school contact me at email@example.com.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
No law school in the world teaches that the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 is still valid Organic Law, because to do so would result in the rejection of its graduates by all the Bar Examiners of all the 50 States and the District of Columbia. If the Articles of Confederation is still good law, then the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and all variations of it are limited to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
Attorneys and Counselors at Law, who are members of a State Bar, have all taken written oaths to support a constitution written by government. These legal professionals are licensed just like plumbers and electricians, who might perform their trades in territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.
Licensed Attorneys and Counselors at Law, who dare to learn and apply unwritten law, will certainly lose their license to practice law, as I lost mine in the State of California after 34 years of being licensed. Freed of any restraint on what I can teach about the law I can, now, reveal the secrets of the written law.
Learning all the law, written and unwritten, is easy, when I personally show you how to read any written law to discover the territorial limitations written into it. My Basic Law Course will provide you with the knowledge you need to finally understand law and government. For you, the unwritten law will be your source of freedom. The government must follow written law and that truth means you can know its territorial limitations simply by taking my Basic Course in Law and Government. If you have one percent of the $50,000 annual cost of a Harvard Law School education, you can become a legal genius by contacting me at firstname.lastname@example.org to enroll today.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
Filed Under Adoption, Articles of Confederation, CONGRESS, CONSTITUTION, Declaration of Independence, LAW OF THE LAND, LEARNING THE LAW, Northwest Ordinance, Oath of Office, ORGANIC LAWS | Leave a Comment
The first hurdle to making it a crime not to have health insurance has been successfully cleared by the United States House of Representatives. Whether it becomes law is still unclear, but where it would be law is clearly set out in the Constitution of September 17, 1787, or is it? Article VI Clause 2 does not define what is meant by “Law of the Land:”
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
I teach that the Framers of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 were masters of deception and I teach my Students how not to be deceived by written law. Members of the Constitutional Convention were fully aware that laws made under the authority of “this Constitution” would always be limited to the Land owned by the United States of America. The “Law” is the legislation enacted pursuant to “[A]ll legislative Powers herein granted” and “vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” The “Land” is identified in Article IV of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787:
The said territory, and the States which may be formed therein, shall forever remain a part of this Confederacy of the United States of America, subject to the Articles of Confederation, and to such alterations therein as shall be constitutionally made; and to all the acts and ordinances of the United States in Congress assembled, conformable thereto.
The ratification process described in Article VII implicitly sought the complicity of the State governments in the Framers’ plot to confuse the “Law of the Land” with law for the people in the states. Ratification of this Constitution by the first nine States establishes “this Constitution” among the States not the people of those states: “The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.”
While “this Constitution” was first ratified by the nine States needed to establish “this Constitution” between those States, ratification by all thirteen States did not adopt “this Constitution.” Adoption of “this Constitution” required all three branches of the government to take the Article VI oath:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
“This Constitution” would not be adopted until all the officers mentioned in Article VI Clause 3 had been bound by a written oath “to support this Constitution.” George Washington had not been a resident within the United States for fourteen Years when he took the oral oath of Office of President of the United States, because that date would not be reached until fourteen Years after the birth date of the thirteen United States of America, the places where one could reside to satisfy that requirement. Fourteen years from July 4, 1776 would be July 4, 1790. The constitutional government that would oversee the government headed by the President of the United States could not possibly begin before July 4, 1790.
On April 30, 1789 George Washington would become President of the United States, the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. Had George Washington been elected to the Office of President after July 4, 1790 he would have been eligible for the Office of President under the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and he would properly take the Article VI oath to be bound “to support this Constitution.” Washington’s election on February 4, 1789 was according to a premeditated conspiracy to take over the governments in America.
I have detected no deception in the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, however, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the Constitution of September 17, 1787 require the entire Basic Course in Law and Government to decipher. No amateur lawyer has ever decoded the Constitution of September 17, 1787. Understanding that Constitution requires an expert teacher. To become a Student contact me at email@example.com
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera