• Pages

  • CONTACT ED RIVERA
  • LETTER TO CAPTIVES
  • REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

• Recent Posts

  • INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE CONSERVATIVE TARGETING SCANDAL
  • HOW SIMPLE CAN I MAKE THE STUDY OF LAW?
  • IF YOU DON’T VOLUNTARILY PAY A PROPERTY TAX BILL, WHICH GOVERNMENT OFFICER HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CALCULATE ANY AMOUNT ALLEGEDLY DUE AND DEMAND THAT AMOUNT BE PAID?
  • PROPOSED SALES TAX ON INTERNET PURCHASES IS JUST ANOTHER INCOME TAX ON RETAIL SELLERS
  • United States of America v. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, defendant

• Categories

  • Adoption
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 5
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 8
  • Article III
  • Articles of Confederation
  • BAIL OUT
  • BANKRUPTCY
  • CENSUS
  • CIVIL CONTEMPT
  • COMMON LAW
  • CONGRESS
  • CONSTITUTION
  • CRIMINAL LAW
  • Declaration of Independence
  • Economic Stimulous
  • Electoral College
  • Foreclosure
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • FREEDOM
  • GAY MARRIAGE
  • GRAND JURY
  • IMMIGRATION
  • IMPEACHMENT
  • JURY DUTY
  • LAW OF THE LAND
  • LEARNING THE LAW
  • LIBERTARIAN
  • Martial Law
  • MAYAN 2012
  • Northwest Ordinance
  • Oath of Office
  • OBAMA
  • ORGANIC LAWS
  • PARDON
  • Presidential Elector
  • PRESIDENTS
  • ProperTea Tax Tea Party
  • Property Taxes
  • PROPRIETARY POWER
  • Second Amendment
  • State of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • TRIAL BY JURY
  • U.S. District Court
  • Uncategorized

• Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Dear Representative or Candidate,

My law professor says no Representative has ever met the qualifications of Article I Section 2 Clause 2 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787: “No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.”

He teaches that this Constitution makes permanent a legal system in a place owned by the United States of America, where a person can be a Citizen of the United States at age eighteen contrary to the English common law.  However, in order to be a part of such a system a Person must make a claim to be a Citizen of the United States and an Inhabitant of the represented State under the authority of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.

Although there is no proof of repeal, everyone, with the exception of my law professor, believes the Constitution of September 17, 1787 replaced the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.  My professor says, without proof of repeal, the Articles of Confederation is still good Organic Law.

Upon what legal authority, do you claim to be a Citizen of the United States?

Your Name and Signature

To meet the qualifications set out in Article I Section 2 Clause 2: “No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen,” a Person aged 25 would have to be a citizen at 18 years.

The biggest secret of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 is that the federal age of majority of 18 years has been hidden in that Constitution for 223 years. 

This Constitution created a legal system where the age of majority was less than that of the common law, yet claimed to be superior.

Do any of the 435 members of the House of Representatives qualify for the office of Representative?  Now is the time to become a Student, so you can participate in the greatest learning experience in the history of the United States of America.  To enroll contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com  

 Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

The State of California is able to license the real estate brokerage profession because the federal Buck Act allows States of the second Union to impose income taxes on persons working in the United States within the outer borders of the State of California.  There are, however, no real estate sales transactions on federal territory.   

According to the Daily Breeze newspaper, the City of Manhattan Beach claims the power to impose an income tax on real estate professionals apart from the license fees charged by the State of California.

What is the law?  All municipalities in the State of California only have legislative power over that territory within the city limits owned by the United States of America.  The only persons brokering real estate sales, who are subject to licensing are those on federal territory.  Only readers of these Posts know this law.

Where does the power of a State come from?  The States that were the original thirteen colonies under the authority of the British monarch lost the power to tax and legislate when those colonies effectively became independent of Great Britain.  The only power that remains is the power of self defense, which can be delegated but not completely discharged.  

 Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

All government officials feed at the same government trough, but the Bell Eight were gorging themselves at the expense of the good though poor people of Bell.  From 1964 to 1970 I did my Army Reserve training at the George S. Patton Jr. Reserve Center that bounded the cities of Maywood and Bell, so I know how poor Bell was forty years ago.  I was stunned when the Bell Eight story broke nationally.  There was no possible circumstance by which the poor people of Bell could benefit from the outrageous sums paid to the Bell Eight.

All over America government officials are gorging themselves on property taxes fraudulently collected from Americans who trust the government.

All government power is derived from the Constitution of the United States and as any reader of these posts can prove the Constitution of September 17, 1787 remains un-adopted.  What happened in California to the Bell Eight can happen to any government official, who is acting beyond the territorial authority of the real property of the United States of America within governmental division of the State.

What government official or employee isn’t acting outside constitutional authority?  To learn how government power trickles down from Washington, D.C., become a Student by enrolling in my Basic Course in Law and Government.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com to learn more.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera             

Two hundred and twenty-three years ago the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was “laid before the United States in Congress assembled,” and ever since people have been trying to figure out what the heck it means.

Only one thing is certain it was never adopted as a Constitution George Washington saw to that by taking an oral oath to “preserve, protect and defend” another constitution.  You can start getting the truth about law, government and the Constitution of September 17, 1787 by reading all the Posts on my website and then enrolling as one of my Students, so you can get personal instruction from me. Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera   

There is no Constitution that restrains a government, because Article II Section 1 Clause 5 requires the person in the Office of President to be, “a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,” and no President has ever taken an Article VI oath “to support this Constitution.”   Being bound by oath “to support this Constitution” adopts “this Constitution.”      

This Constitution is a Constitution for the United States of America, because the Confederacy is able to use the employees of Article I to administer the lands and other property belonging to the United States of America, when according to plan there is no one “to support this Constitution.”

On April 30, 1789, George Washington took this oath: “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”   The Office of President of the United States is not identical to the Office of President no matter how many ignorant persons agree that it is.

The oral oath George Washington took, while a nice one, leaves no record that it was taken, therefore, it falls short of an Office and is merely at will employment.   The Constitution of September 17, 1787 provides no term of office for the President of the United States.  A term of four years is set for the Vice President and President of the United States of America.

There is a Constitution, but it is for the United States of America and not for you.  Don’t feel left out, because you can’t claim constitutional rights—unalienable rights are much better.  To claim yours and to become a Student, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera          

Dear Dr. Rivera:
 
   I have seen and read your periodic articles for some time now and I will admit I am somewhat intrigued by your views and opinions. Your words seem to be well chosen and very moving if nothing else.
   I will now get to the point: If things are as wrong as you say; and you do say things are wrong. It seems to me you could be a National hero by the end of the week if you would act upon your own convictions, take the bull by the horns so to speak and move to correct the wrongs. Trying to sell your beliefs to a few here and a few there will never effect the change needed.
   To quote a film line;  “If you build it they will come”  Dr. Rivera; if you start the ball rolling, the people who want the changes will join in with you. That is where the power comes from. One unified movement; one voice from millions of Americans. That voice could be yours.
   Perhaps this can serve as a test of your fortitude and your convictions. We will stand with you, but don’t ask us to pay you so we can stand by ourselves.
 
Thank you for your time
Tom Martin
 
George Washington
John Paul Jones
Abe Lincoln
Ed Rivera?

Spooner said, “The Constitution has no inherent authority or obligation. It has no authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between man and man. And it does not so much as even purport to be a contract between persons now existing. It purports, at most, to be only a contract between persons living eighty years ago.”

Spooner, like so many before him, failed to see that the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was a permanent version of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the ratification of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 by nine States was an accord between the two Unions to administer the lands and other property owned by the United States of America.

Spooner’s failure to see the Constitution of September 17, 1787, as an agreement between the two Unions of States, blinded future critics of the Constitution to its real purpose.  Hidden in the administration of the lands and other property belonging to the United States of America was the dictatorial power to manipulate and control all Americans either as virtual employees of government or as employees on the lands owned by the United States of America.

What Spooner and others failed to see in the Constitution of September 17, 1787 is brought out in my Basic Course in Law and Government, but you must enroll by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com  to see what is plainly there.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera  

       

The ratification of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 by the first nine States was timed so neither Congress nor the President of the United States of America would be eligible to take and be bound by the Article VI oath “to support this Constitution.”  Instead of signing the oath: “I swear to support this Constitution,” George Washington takes an oral oath to “preserve, protect and defend” the lands and other property belonging to the United States of America.  This was the step child constitution.

The first act of the First Congress was to create a legislative oath to support the Article II Section 1 Clause 8 Constitution, which includes the Constitution of September 17, 1787 ratified by nine States.  Thereafter, all other employee oaths are written by a Congress in support of the Article II Section 1 Clause 8 Constitution.

The Constitution of September 17, 1787, which was ratified by nine States on June 21, 1788, was not adopted by either a Congress or a President bound by an Article VI oath “to support this Constitution,” it is an orphan constitution binding only the States and limited to the lands owned by the United States of America in those States.     

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

The only constitutional duty imposed on the Vice President of the United States is to break tie votes in the Senate that makes that office legislative, according to the application of the separation of powers doctrine.

To get the only two Lessons you need to make sense of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com  to enroll in my Basic Course in Law and Government.  

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

Next Page →