• Pages

  • CONTACT ED RIVERA
  • LETTER TO CAPTIVES
  • REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

• Recent Posts

  • IF YOU DON’T VOLUNTARILY PAY A PROPERTY TAX BILL, WHICH GOVERNMENT OFFICER HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CALCULATE ANY AMOUNT ALLEGEDLY DUE AND DEMAND THAT AMOUNT BE PAID?
  • PROPOSED SALES TAX ON INTERNET PURCHASES IS JUST ANOTHER INCOME TAX ON RETAIL SELLERS
  • United States of America v. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, defendant
  • THE LESSON OF THE ORGANIC LAWS
  • State of Connecticut Governor signs what is being described as the toughest gun laws in the U.S.

• Categories

  • Adoption
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 5
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 8
  • Article III
  • Articles of Confederation
  • BAIL OUT
  • BANKRUPTCY
  • CENSUS
  • CIVIL CONTEMPT
  • COMMON LAW
  • CONGRESS
  • CONSTITUTION
  • CRIMINAL LAW
  • Declaration of Independence
  • Economic Stimulous
  • Electoral College
  • Foreclosure
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • FREEDOM
  • GAY MARRIAGE
  • GRAND JURY
  • IMMIGRATION
  • IMPEACHMENT
  • JURY DUTY
  • LAW OF THE LAND
  • LEARNING THE LAW
  • LIBERTARIAN
  • Martial Law
  • MAYAN 2012
  • Northwest Ordinance
  • Oath of Office
  • OBAMA
  • ORGANIC LAWS
  • PARDON
  • Presidential Elector
  • PRESIDENTS
  • ProperTea Tax Tea Party
  • Property Taxes
  • PROPRIETARY POWER
  • Second Amendment
  • State of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • TRIAL BY JURY
  • U.S. District Court
  • Uncategorized

• Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

On May 29, two hundred and eleven years ago, Rhode Island became the thirteenth State to ratify the Constitution of September 17, 1787, thus, making that Constitution a unanimous Article XIII alteration of portions of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.    All thirteen States of the United States of America confirmed the alterations by later official State acceptances of the changes applicable to specific parts of the Articles of Confederation.

The delegates to the May 25, 1787 Constitutional Convention were charged with a revision of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, which was accomplished, when on June 21, 1788, New Hampshire became the ninth State to ratify the Constitution of September 17, 1787, according to Article VII of  that Constitution.  The nine State revision implemented the Article IX authority to appoint a committee denominated the “Senate of the United States and a presiding Officer to fill an Office of President.

The United States in Congress assembled ceased doing business pursuant to the unrevised Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, after calling for the elections of President of the United States of America, and Representatives of House of Representatives. Those elections took place; however, the State legislatures chose Senators, before any of their number could satisfy the “nine Years a Citizen of the United States” requirement of the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  As a consequence of the failure of Senators to qualify, according to the Constitution of September 17, 1787, that Constitution could not be adopted and has remained un-adopted to the present day.

The un-adopted Constitution of September 17, 1787 became the Constitution of the United States George Washington swore, as President of the United States, to “preserve, protect and defend.”  That Constitution became the administrative manual for the President of the United States in the administration of the United States.

The only difference between the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and Constitution of September 17, 1787 was the ratification of the Constitution by nine States to revise the Articles of Confederation and then full ratification by all thirteen States to alter the Articles of Confederation. 

What was the purpose of the Constitution of September 17, 1787?  The Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 freed the American people from government, but not the law.  The long standing false claim that the Constitution of the United States has replaced the Articles of Confederation has allowed the federal government to claim the power to tax and make laws for all the American people.  What I have discovered and what I teach limits federal lawmaking and taxation to what the United States of America owns.

To learn more, become my Student for as little as $50.  Find out how by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera  

George Washington was elected President of the United States of America by the same system that will be used to elect the President and Vice President in 2012.   The American people have never directly elected the President of the United States of America or President of the United States, instead Presidential Electors, now called the Electoral College, elect one person to the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 Office of President, which consists of the Office of President of the United States of America and President of the United States.

George Washington, in a great conspiracy with the Continental Congress, the Constitutional Convention and practically every State politician, was able to combine the Office of head of State and the head of government into a democratic imitation of the British monarchy that America had recently defeated.

The Constitutional Conspiracy was so successful, perhaps only George Washington and Alexander Hamilton were aware of every detail of the plot.

The Constitutional Conspirators successfully portrayed the plot as a replacement of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 with the Constitution of the United States.  There is a little bit of truth and much deception in the alleged Constitutional Switch.

Not only does the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 survive the Establishment of  “this Constitution” by and between the first nine States to ratify “the Same,” the Constitution of September 17, 1787 becomes an Article XIII Alteration of  the Articles of Confederation, when Rhode Island is the last of  the thirteen States to ratify “this Constitution.”  

George Washington and Alexander Hamilton never intended that the Constitution of September 17, 1787 be adopted.    The full story of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, George Washington and the Organic Laws of the United States of America can finally be told, but you can only get that story by becoming a Student in my, Basic Course in Law and Government. 

The May 25, 1787 Constitutional Convention created the Constitution of September 17, 1787 in secrecy to avoid the revelations of  the truth about government and the written law you will receive when you take the Course.  The truth has been delayed more than 200 years and a $50 down payment will put it in your hands.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera            

 

 According to the Constitution of September 17, 1787 Barack Obama would have become President of the United States of America immediately when the December 15, 2008 votes of the Presidential Electors were unsealed and counted before the members of Congress on January 8, 2009.  Instead, Barack Hussein Obama was declared President Elect and preparations would continue for his Inauguration as President of the United States at high noon January 20, 2009 in Washington, D.C.

What has happened to the Constitution of September 17, 1787, which was ratified by the nine States required for its Establishment, according the Article VII of that Constitution?  That Constitution was never “Adopted,” as required by Article II Section 1 Clause 5:  “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, the Constitutional Convention of  May 25, 1787 and the final draft of  the Constitution of September 17, 1787 were all the major elements of  a conspiracy, Masonic or otherwise, to place George Washington in a position equivalent to that of a Roman Dictator.

 George Washington took the oral oath of Office of President of the United States on April 30, 1789, because neither he nor anyone else in America could be “fourteen Years a Resident within the United States” until after July 4, 1790.  Taking this oath had its consequences: “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”   Taking that oath conveniently meant he could not take the Article VI written oath “to support this Constitution,” the Constitution of September 17, 1787.   Dictator Washington did not want to bound by any written oath, also, the oral oath provided Washington with the political cover of government employment and obedience to the States, in case the plot was discovered.

George Washington and the First Congress converted the written Constitution into a tentative business plan for managing the territory and other property belonging to the United States of America and turned the American Presidency into the new Dictator of American Roman Empire, which would endure only as long as Americans continued to believe they were domiciled in the United States.

My Basic Course in Law and Government teaches the novice Student of law and government how to gain access to the Founding Father’s secrets hidden in plain sight within the Four Organic Laws of the United States of America.  New Students can sample the Course for as little as $50 by contacting me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera                

Article II Section 1 Clause 3 has been criticized and was finally amended by the Twelfth Amendment, but ever since George Washington was the choice of the Presidential Electors on February 4, 1789 and declared to be President of the United States of America, when those votes were unsealed and counted before members of the Senate and House of Representatives on April 6, 1789, every American President has been elected the same way—by getting the most Electoral Votes.

The American voters do not elect the President of the United States of America.  They don’t even elect the President of the United States.  The States of the United States of America do the electing and it has never occurred to anyone that the Constitution of September 17, 1787 revised the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 just enough to make it appear that the Office of President of the United States of America was the same as the President of the United States.

George Washington claimed he didn’t want to be George I, but he managed to create the dual Office of President of the United States of America and President of the United States, when he took the oral oath of Office on April 30, 1789.  What is a king, but the joining of the head of State and the head of the government?

George Washington took this verbal oath:  “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”  

Why couldn’t George Washington take and subscribe the Article VI oath “to support this Constitution”?  My Students learn the Constitution has a start date that couldn’t be met on April 30, 1789.  Do you know that date?  If you know that date, you can start my Basic Course in Law and Government for $50.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com , if you know.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

   

Constitution of the United States Article II Section 1. “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows”

Very simply, the Electors chosen by the States vote for a President and Vice President and the one with the most votes “shall be the President” and the one with the most votes for Vice President shall be Vice President.

George Washington was voted President of the United States of America on February 4, 1789.  Those votes were unsealed and counted before members of Congress on April 6, 1789 and Washington was declared to be President of the United States of America.

Congress and George Washington conspired to combine the Office of President of the United States of America with the Office of President of the United States in an oral oath taking and inauguration on April 30, 1789.  Using the same consolidation of power, Adolf Hitler 150 years later would plunge the world into a global war.

Take your first Lesson as one of my Students and see if you have what it takes to become a legal genius.  The Office of President with the executive Power is found above in Article II Section 1.  If you can find the Office of President with the legislative Powers to either approve Bills or make his Objections to them, you can start your legal education with a $50 down payment.   Here is a clue: the duties of the Office of President of the United States are found in Article I Section 7of the Constitution of the United States.

Good luck.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera                 

The odds are you are not being investigated for the commission of English common law crime.  There are no common law courts in any of the 50 States, and there have never been any common law courts in the federal judiciary.  There are no common law courts, because there are no common law judges or jurors.

The only law in America is the written law enacted by Congress and the State legislatures.   The ability of the people of the States to make law, while sitting in common law juries, was slowly replaced by juries controlled by government judges.  A hanging government jury is what awaits you unless you learn the lesson of the un-adopted constitution.

The Constitutional Convention of May 25, 1787 was charged with the task of revising the original federal constitution the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.   The best kept secret in America is the Constitutional Convention only revised the Articles of Confederation enough to create the Senate and President of the United States of America, so that George Washington could put himself in charge of the United States, the territory belonging to the United States of America.  Sure the Constitution of September 17, 1787 has been ratified by the States, but it has never been adopted by government officers for use as a government charter.

The ratified Constitution of September 17, 1787 makes it possible for a Congress of the United States of America to make laws and taxes for  the territory the United States of America owns and pretend those laws apply to everyone in America.

The governments of  these nine States, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maryland, South Carolina, and New Hampshire became the United States on June 21, 1788, when New Hampshire became the ninth State to ratify the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  Those nine States and two others New York and Virginia met in New York City on March 4, 1789 to make legislation based on the proprietary power of  the United States of America over all the Northwest Territory and the territory formerly claimed by some of the States of  the United States of America.  

The easiest way to defend against a written law crime charge is to immediately start looking for the jury pool.  Where do you look?  They are everywhere, if you are looking for unqualified jurors. 

Anyone who is not obviously an illegal alien can be a U.S. citizen.  It is nearly impossible to be a resident within a judicial district because a district consists entirely of federal territory subject to the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of the United States of America.

Am I saying the local District Attorney is limited to crimes committed on federal territory within the county?   That is exactly what I am saying.   What better proof than the fact that trial jurors in California must be U.S. citizens and “domiciliaries of the State of California.”  The State of California is both the name of the government and the federal territory in California.

 What must you do?  You must learn the law of what it takes to be a government juror in America by enrolling as one of my Students.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera   

Containing Obamacare to Washington, D.C. and the federal enclaves is as simple as taking my Basic Course in Law and Government.  

After taking my Basic Law Course, you will be able to show anyone that the United States is the territory owned by the United States of America.  Yes, you will also learn what the United States of America is.

When you complete the Basic Course in Law and Government, you will have learned what few lawyers know.  You will know how to accurately read the Constitution.   

To get started all you need is $50 and you will learn how George Washington and the Freemasons took over all the governments in between Canada and Mexico.   To get all the details about enrollment and payment of tuition, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera    

The power to tax property in America is traditionally thought of as a local legislative power, for good reason, because a tax on property evokes the memory of tyrannical English taxation which was a major cause of the War of Independence.   The truth is the direct tax on property can only be justified as a right to tribute and fealty due nobility.

The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and Constitution of September 17, 1787 were creations of the Continental Congress, the United States in Congress assembled under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 for the purpose of validating a counterfeit government power that would be a substitute for the power the British monarch wielded in tax collection.   The new American democracy created a king for a term of years who ruled to benefit Congress and the States and who was subject to impeachment if he failed to serve those two masters.  

 The States were rewarded with the power to legislate in all matters not within the enumerated powers and the power to impose local property taxes through cities and counties.    The reference to “Taxes” in Article I Section 8 Clause 1 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 is to direct taxes on people, but not property within the United States.  According to Wikipedia, the federal income tax is a direct tax permitted by the 16^th Amendment.  Wikipedia is, of course, wrong in its determination that the federal income tax is an un-apportioned direct tax.  The subject of the sentence that is the 16^th Amendment is the “power to lay and collect taxes on incomes,” which refers to the proprietary power to tax all income producing activities on the territory belonging to the United States of America.  

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.” Article I Section 8 Clause 1

The Constitution of September 17, 1787 makes no reference to a direct tax on real property within the United States, because the real property in the United States is owned by the United States of America and any personal property brought in is negligible.

The States, counties and municipalities are unable to cite authority for property taxation for one simple reason—there is none.  It seems incredible, but the only legal basis for the property tax in America ended when King George III lost the American Revolution.  To get the complete story of direct taxation in America, contact me for enrollment information at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera        

PROVING VOTER FRAUD: DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT IS A MYTH

The seemingly conflicting principles found in the Four Organic Laws of the United States of America cannot be reconciled by propaganda suggesting the elimination of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.  The Organic Laws can and must be read as a harmonious whole.  

The following from the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 requires no proof:  “WE hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.”  The equality of men and the unalienable nature of their rights precludes, for example, the unlawful taking of the life of one man by all of the other men.  No unlawful act is made lawful by the complicity of the entire society.  The logic of a completely righteous society rests on a supernatural Creator, which is the premise of the First and Second Organic Laws, the Declaration of Independence and Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777. 

Article IV of the Articles of Confederation, actually requires the States of the United States of America to grant privileges and immunities without requiring allegiance from those within the state who will not submit to majority vote and rule. Unalienable rights are not subject to majority vote, so they are secured in the Articles of Confederation by imposing duties on government without a direct means of raising revenue.

The Third Organic Law establishes a temporary government for the Northwest Territory owned by the United States of America.  The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 establishes majority rule subject to the supervision of the United States in Congress assembled under the Articles of Confederation.

The Fourth Organic Law, the “Constitution United States of America—1787,” is the official title given, in volume one of the United States Code, for the Constitution of the United States, which results when nine States ratify the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and George Washington takes an oral oath to “preserve, protect and defend  the Constitution of the United States.”    This Constitution makes permanent the House of Representatives established by the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787.

Although the House of Representatives consists of Representatives elected by the majority vote of citizens of all the States, that vote can still have no effect on the unalienable rights of the free inhabitants of the states.  The legislative power of the House of Representatives is limited to the territory owned by or ceded to the United States of America, hence, the title “Constitution of  the United States of America—1787,” confirms it is a revision of  the Articles of Confederation.   That nomenclature alone should be sufficient to dispel the unfounded claim that the Constitution of the United States replaced or superseded the Articles of Confederation.  

It is voter fraud to suggest that any number of voters can elect a President of the United States or a President of the United States of America.  There is nothing democratic about a government that consists of legislators who are territorially limited to lands owned by the United States of America.

Only my” Basic Course in Law and Government” teaches how the Declaration of Independence frees the American people from government good or bad and forces the States to make it an option and not an obligation.  You must take the Course to learn the truth government doesn’t want you to know.  Contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera           

Ratification and Establishment of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, also, created a new Union in which Congress and the President of the United States together, with the State legislatures could tax God given rights and could create legislation regulating the exercise of unalienable rights.  The creation of this new Union made it possible to claim the Constitution of the United States had replaced the Articles of Confederation.          

What did that have to do with property taxes and traffic tickets?  The God given unalienable rights cited in the Declaration of Independence are subject to taxation and regulation only on the territory owned by and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States of America.   The United States of America could have imposed property taxes, but they would not have collected much because the Confederacy owned all the land.  Traffic tickets would be left to the States at some future time when there was traffic.

Ratification of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 transformed part of the States of the first and perpetual Union under the Articles of Confederation, which had ratified “this Constitution,” into some of the United States of “this Union.”  A State of “this Union” had a Tenth Amendment claim as to territory, within that State belonging to the United States of America, so long as this territory was subject to the Constitution of the United States. 

How are States able to tax property and issue traffic tickets?

States claim those powers are found in  State Constitutions  of  States that are an inseparable  part of the United States of America, and where the United States Constitution is the supreme law of that  State.   Electors or State Voters ratify State Constitutions into existence, however, such Electors or Voters have no authority over the unalienable rights of the free inhabitants of the state.  The unalienable right to own real and personal property does not extend in or upon the property of others especially that of the government.   The unalienable right to travel does not extend to the private property of others including property of the government.     

After the elimination of the king, American governments, so-called, had to invent a basis of property taxes and traffic tickets.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera  

Next Page →