• Pages

  • CONTACT ED RIVERA
  • LETTER TO CAPTIVES
  • REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

• Recent Posts

  • IF YOU DON’T VOLUNTARILY PAY A PROPERTY TAX BILL, WHICH GOVERNMENT OFFICER HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CALCULATE ANY AMOUNT ALLEGEDLY DUE AND DEMAND THAT AMOUNT BE PAID?
  • PROPOSED SALES TAX ON INTERNET PURCHASES IS JUST ANOTHER INCOME TAX ON RETAIL SELLERS
  • United States of America v. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, defendant
  • THE LESSON OF THE ORGANIC LAWS
  • State of Connecticut Governor signs what is being described as the toughest gun laws in the U.S.

• Categories

  • Adoption
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 5
  • Article II Section 1 Clause 8
  • Article III
  • Articles of Confederation
  • BAIL OUT
  • BANKRUPTCY
  • CENSUS
  • CIVIL CONTEMPT
  • COMMON LAW
  • CONGRESS
  • CONSTITUTION
  • CRIMINAL LAW
  • Declaration of Independence
  • Economic Stimulous
  • Electoral College
  • Foreclosure
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • FREEDOM
  • GAY MARRIAGE
  • GRAND JURY
  • IMMIGRATION
  • IMPEACHMENT
  • JURY DUTY
  • LAW OF THE LAND
  • LEARNING THE LAW
  • LIBERTARIAN
  • Martial Law
  • MAYAN 2012
  • Northwest Ordinance
  • Oath of Office
  • OBAMA
  • ORGANIC LAWS
  • PARDON
  • Presidential Elector
  • PRESIDENTS
  • ProperTea Tax Tea Party
  • Property Taxes
  • PROPRIETARY POWER
  • Second Amendment
  • State of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • TRIAL BY JURY
  • U.S. District Court
  • Uncategorized

• Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Regular readers of these Posts can test them by using them to question the legal authority of any person who claims a power to enforce laws.

The following is an example of what an enrolled Student or student auditing my Basic Course in Law and Government might write:  Dear Law Enforcement Person, I am studying law using the materials provided on the Internet at www.edrivera.com , which divides law into written law and unwritten law.  Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera claims governments can only exist because of written law and that law is the Organic Laws of the United States of America, which expressly limits written law to a defined territory.  Do you agree or disagree that the written law is the only law you can enforce and that law is limited to a specific territory defined by written law?

If you do not fully understand the content of this letter to a person in law enforcement, you need to take advantage of the offer I have made in the Post dated July 7, 2011.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

 

Brian Davis, one of my Advanced Students, explained the meaning of Article III Section 1 of the State of California Constitution of 1879, to the State of California Physical Therapy Board, where he is licensed as a Physical Therapist.   For those readers who have not read all my Posts, this is Article III Section 1: “The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.”

Article III Section 1 of the Constitution of the State of California of 1879 means that the State of California is the territory within California, which belongs to the Confederacy, the United States of America, under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.  The phrase,”and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land,” confirms the State of California is territory, land, subject to   the Organic Laws of the United States of America.

In the six page letter Brian wrote to the State of California Physical Therapy Board, he explained the Organic Laws of the United States of America with such lucidity the Board was frightened out of its collective mind.  Brian flat out explained why the State of California is all the federal territory in California and his Physical Therapy  license is really only required there.   The Loony Left has so infiltrated State of California government that no one can understand the “land” means only the territory owned by and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States of America, which explains why all so-called federal cases are brought in the name of the United States of America, as plaintiff.

The Board, fearing the ultimate consequences of our brand of “civil obedience,” which is strict adherence to written law particularly the Organic Laws,  immediately made an order requiring Brian to be examined by Beverly Hills psychiatrist, Dr. Mohan Nair.

 This will be the case to follow.   Brian Davis has been a Physical Therapist for twenty-three years without a blemish on his work record.  I met with Brian four days and he is as sane and physically fit as anyone I encountered in forty years of legal practice and instruction in law. The State of California, simply, does not have a response to “civil obedience,” the strict adherence to the letter of the Organic Laws of the United States of America that Brian eloquently presented in his letter to the Board.

 The State of California is so desperate to avoid total collapse it has sunk to the tactics of the former Soviet Union.   

To get a copy of Brian’s letter and the Board’s Order Compelling the Physical and Mental Examination of  Brian Davis, PT, enroll as a Basic Student following the instructions on the July 9, 2011 Post.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

I teach law is either written or unwritten law and government is created and administered by written law.

I teach that contained within every written law system is an accurate description of its territorial jurisdiction.  The United States Code is such a written law system and true to form its territorial limitations are the territory and other property belonging to the United States of America.

The various manifestations of unwritten law know no bounds; however, written law is bound up tight with words.

To discover the limitations of the federal government, go to my July 7, 2011 Post.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

  

George Washington was the first President of the United States of America elected according to the procedure set out in Article II of the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  The fantasy election is the one citizens of the United States will participate in a little more than a year from now.

Ratification of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, on June 21, 1788, by New Hampshire the ninth State established, but did not adopt the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  The failure to adopt the Constitution of September 17, 1787 went according to the plan to have all thirteen States establish the Constitution of September 17, 1787, as a non-governmental commercial organization to be known as the “United States.”    The plan was to have George Washington occupy both Offices of President of the United States of America and President of the United States without public knowledge that two Offices even existed.  George Washington would be “The President” and all other titles were just variants of the Article II Section 1 Clause 5 “Office of President,” which has never been occupied.  

Establishment of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, as the Constitution of the United States, followed by the failure of a government to adopt it, permitted George Washington to found the new federal government as a military dictatorship.   Freemasons, George Washington, Ben Franklin and Alexander Hamilton used the military power of the United States in Congress assembled under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 to form a Roman Republic complete with dictator.

 The President of the United States of America has always been elected by the Presidential Electors and the person elected always becomes that President, when their votes are counted “in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives.”  The Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 requires no oaths, so the President of the United States of America has always been the one with the greatest number of votes.  George Washington was elected President of the United States of America on February 4, 1789 and when those votes were counted in Congress, George Washington immediately became President on April 6, 1789. 

On April 30, 1789, President of the United States of America George Washington took this Article I Section 1 Clause 8 oath to become President of the United States: “I, George Washington, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” “So help me God.”

Once you take me up on my July 7, 2011 Post Offer, your life will never be the same again.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

My enrolled Students know how the Officers named in the Constitution of September 17, 1787 got their power.  For readers who have not yet accepted my generous offer in my July 7, 2011 Post, I will summarize the transfer and substitution of power process, George Washington plotted in the Constitutional Convention of  May 25, 1787.   First the Office is created in a document which will later be submitted for ratification to entities, which can confer a duty that results in a grant of power to the person occupying that Office.    

 I will give two examples, which can be verified in the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  The President of the United States is thought to be the head of the executive branch, but in Article I Section 7, the President of the United States is given the duty to approve or object to Bills which have been passed by the House of Representatives and Senate.  As these are his only duties, the President of the United States is part of the legislative branch.

The language in Article I Section 3 Clause 6: “the Chief Justice shall preside,” “when the President of the United States is tried” for impeachment, imposes a legislative duty on the Office of Chief Justice. 

In both examples, the keyword is “shall.” If the President of the United States approves a Bill, “he shall sign it” and if he objects, “he shall return it.”  When the President of the United States is impeached the Chief Justice shall preside.  The President of the United States and Chief Justice have jobs fancy jobs, but jobs nonetheless.

Both the President of the United States and the Chief Justice are employees of Congress, as they have no little or no discretion as to how they will perform their duties.

So, if the highest federal law enforcement Officers, the President and Chief Justice of the United States are just employees, what more could your own local police and sheriff be?

My Students know the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was established, but was not adopted so proprietary power not government power would be the force behind Officer/Employees.  No one else knows the so-called government operates like a commercial enterprise, because no one in government has taken the Article VI oath to use the Constitution of September 17, 1787 to limit government.

Local law enforcement is limited to the territory owned by the federal government, the United States of America under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.  Ask your local law enforcement, where is your written authority?

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

         

The fastest way to learn the principles in my Basic Course in Law and Government is, of  course, to make the small initial down payment by following the instructions in my July 7, 2011 Post followed by the diligent reading of  all the Course Materials.

Once  the Student has learned a few good arguments that prove the Constitution of September 17, 1787 to be  an orphan document, which no President or member of  Congress is bound to support, solutions to problems caused by an out of control government will greatly multiply. 

The first problem to tackle is the claim of authority by those who claim the power to enforce the written laws.  We know who, supposedly, is the most powerful man in the world—the man in the Office of President of the United States.   My Students are knowledgeable enough not to claim the President of the United States as “my President,” but all local law enforcers do make the President of the United States “their President,” because they rightly sense he is the source of their power.

The President of the United States and the local law enforcer claim authority through the Constitution of the United States and we know that Constitution is limited to the territory owned by and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States of America.  Local law enforcement is limited to the territory owned by and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States of America, because that is the only landowner that has consented to be     governed by a local authority, provided those local laws do not impact the federal government.

 Take the first step to a limited government, by confirming with local law enforcement its acceptance of the Constitution of the United States as supreme written authority.  

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera   

The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 conferred the right “to elect a representative from their counties or townships to represent them in the general assembly” on every “free male inhabitant of full age in the district.”

What was “full age?”  The Constitution of September 17, 1787 tells us in Article I Section 2 Clause 2:  “No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen. “ 

For a twenty-five year old to meet the seven year citizenship requirement, the voting age had to be no more than eighteen years.  If the voting age in the United States owned by the United States of America was twenty-one, it would be impossible for any twenty-five year old to be a Representative.

There are no surplus words, figures or punctuation in a constitution.  In Article I Section 2 Clause 2 the Constitution of the United States expressly states that “full age” is eighteen years and the United States is a place where the Congress of the United States of America can change the English common law.

A true legal education awaits you, when you sample the Lessons other Students have paid hundreds of dollars to obtain.  Get the full details on my July 7, 2011 Post.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera     

   

The first sentence of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 is not this Preamble: “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”  The Preamble is not part of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, which is the document that was ratified, as required, by the ninth State on June 21, 1788 to become the Constitution of the United States.

The most important phrase in the Constitution, “United States,” is not defined in the Organic Laws of the United States of America.  Fortunately, my discovery of the eighteen year age of majority hidden in the  Article I Section 2 Clause 2 qualifications for Representative reveals the existence of two “United States.”

The minimum age of twenty-five years and seven years a Citizen of the United States makes it possible for an eighteen year old to be and act as an adult something not possible under the English common law in the several States that comprise the Confederacy, the United States of America, under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.  This possibility is further explained by reference to the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, where “free male inhabitants of full age” are made electors of representatives from the counties or townships within the district, the Northwest Territory. 

The Northwest Ordinance made provision for a temporary government of that district and a property law for the lands of that district, which acknowledged the rights of proprietors and their children specifically mentioning the right of transfer by written will, by those of “full age.”  There can be no doubt that “full age” meant eighteen years, which made that “United States” the territory belonging to the United States of America and subject to its exclusive legislative power.

The English common law is the unwritten law of English speaking people.  Any change to the common law is going to be slow and deliberate.   The legislative power of Congress to change the English common law is without limit in the United States, the territory owned by and subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.

This is the first and most important sentence in the Constitution of September 17, 1787: “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”   Using the insights we gained by ascertaining the correct “full age” of  the Representative to the House of Representatives, we can conclude that the “legislative Powers herein granted” are vested in a Congress of the United States of America.

As it is now proven that some or all of the Representatives in the House of Representatives, are representing districts within States, where the age of majority has been reduced to eighteen years.  Such proof establishes that the Congress of the United States of America is limited to making legislation for the United States, the territory owned by and subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.      

This time of great political and economic change presents the greatest opportunity in history to learn real law.  Do not miss this once in several life-times opportunity.  Refer to my July 7, 2011 Post and Trial Student offer.  

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

America has a debt problem because the Congress of the United States spends more than it takes in tax revenues the largest of  which is the federal income tax.

Scientific genius Albert Einstein said, “The hardest thing in the world to understand is the income tax.”  That great statesman and political genius Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has proclaimed the federal income tax voluntary, so we can conclude from the thinking of these two great minds that no matter what else Congress might do the federal income tax will continue to be voluntarily paid.

While anyone can volunteer to pay the federal income tax, only certain people can qualify to receive federal entitlements.  Generally, a person has to be a Citizen of the United States to receive federal benefits.  Most of  the persons who claim these federal benefits are the wrong kind of  Citizen.

The Constitution of September 17, 1787 at Article I Section 2 Clause 2 permits a Representative to be a Citizen of the United States at age eighteen because the English common law age of  majority does not apply on territory owned by the United States of America.   In fact, none of the English common law applies on territory owned by the United States of America.

The Congress of the United States has the power to govern the territory owned by the United States of America and to administer the inhabitants on that territory.

The solution to the debt and entitlements problems?  Federal entitlements will be  limited to those persons who reside in the United States, the territory owned by the United States of America.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

The Constitution of September 17, 1787 sets some revealing qualifications for the two Offices that constitute the Congress of the United States.  Representatives must be at least 25 years old and Citizens of the United States for at least seven years, which means a Representative can be a Citizen of the United States at age eighteen.

Citizenship is not for children and under the English common law age eighteen was the age of an infant, except in the territory owned by and subject to the jurisdiction of the Confederacy, the United States of America.  In the Northwest Territory and everywhere the United States of America owned territory subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America, the age of majority was eighteen years at the time of the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

The constitutional qualifications for Representative establish the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States of America in the territory it owned and a separate and unique category of United States Citizenship for that territory.

What does this mean to you?  There is another kind of United States Citizenship that does not subject you to the exclusive legislative power of the United States of America.

I am the first instructor in law and government to discover the two forms of United States Citizen in the Constitution of September 17, 1787.  My law and government instruction, the Basic Course in Law and Government, is the only authority in this important area of freedom.   To enroll in my Course of Instruction, refer to my July 7, 2011 Post.       

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera